MotorGPA
Find My Match
Model year:2025+3 not yet gradedHistory & evolution ↓
Infiniti logo
Compact Luxury SUV

2025 Infiniti QX55

LuxuryGas
Manufacturer site ↗
1.81C-GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
2.80B-
Safety
2.62C+
EfficiencyGas
0.90F
25 MPG combined · 400 mi range · $2,750/yr energy
Comfort
0.80F
Value
1.47D
Ownership Cost
0.43F
Technology
1.63D
Driving Experience
2.34C+

The verdict

A struggling compact luxury suv, strong on reliability and held back by performance.

The 2025 Infiniti QX55 is the QX50 with a sloped fastback roof, and that roof is the whole story: it costs 4.5 cu ft of cargo behind the rear seat (26.9 vs 31.4) and 11 cu ft with the seats folded (54.1 vs 65.1), plus an inch and a half of rear headroom. What you get in return is styling, standard AWD on every trim, and one of the most complete standard safety suites in the compact luxury class — ProPILOT Assist, blind-spot intervention, and rear automatic braking are all included on the $51,345 base Luxe. What you pay for it is a 268-hp VC-Turbo tied to a CVT that reviewers uniformly criticize, 25 combined MPG on required premium fuel, and the worst resale in the segment at 37.4% retained after five years. Buy it only if you love the look and negotiate hard — the discounts are real, and they need to be.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • A genuinely complete safety suite, standard on every trim
  • Cheap to maintain by luxury standards
  • The discounts are unusually deep

What holds it back

  • The coupe roof eats the SUV part
  • Brutal depreciation
  • Infotainment is a generation behind

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Infiniti QX55

Production history

20222025 · 4 years · 1 generations
Gen 1202220252022Ended 20252025 — graded2024 — not yet graded2023 — not yet graded2022 — not yet gradedProduction began 2022
202557+3 not yet graded

Best fit & conditions

FamilyB-73/100
CommuterB-70/100
Winter / inclementC+66/100
AdventureC-59/100
Work / TowF31/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe QX55's lowest-graded category.0.41F
Horsepower
268 hp
30/100
#31 of 60 in classCompare all →

Single 2.0L VC-Turbo four-cylinder rated at 268 hp across all trims; no higher-output option offered for the coupe-styled QX55.

Torque
280 lb-ft
41/100
#33 of 60 in classCompare all →

Peak torque of 280 lb-ft from the variable-compression 2.0L turbo; identical to the QX50 with a single powertrain across trims.

0–60 mph time
6.7 s
47/100
#26 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD adds a small weight penalty over the FWD QX50; instrumented tests land in the mid-6-second range and carry over unchanged for 2026.

Powertrain refinement60
#40 of 60 in classCompare all →

The VC-Turbo delivers strong mid-range shove but reviewers flag a coarse note under load and low-load turbo lag masked by the CVT — respectable in isolation but not class-leading against inline-sixes and hybrids in the compact luxury field.

Transmission behavior48
#57 of 60 in classCompare all →

The XTRONIC CVT is the QX55's most-criticized dynamic trait — recurring reviewer complaints about drone under acceleration, rubbery response, and a disconnected feel versus the 8- to 10-speed autos in Q5, X3, GV70, RDX, and XT5.

Max towing capacity
1,500 lbs (properly equipped)
7/100
#50 of 60 in classCompare all →

Rated for 1,500 lbs when properly equipped — modest for the segment and notably lower than the mechanically similar QX50 (3,000 lbs), reflecting the coupe body's positioning as a style-first crossover.

AWD/4WD availability75
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

Intelligent AWD is standard on every QX55 trim (Luxe, Essential, Sensory) with active front/rear torque distribution — a step above the QX50 in default AWD coverage — but there is no low range, no terrain-select modes, and no torque-vectoring rear axle.

Off-road capability25
#55 of 60 in classCompare all →

Pavement-first coupe-crossover: roughly 8.4 in ground clearance, no skid plates, no lockers, no terrain-select or hill-descent hardware, no off-road trim, and a low-riding fastback profile that further limits departure angle.

Powertrain lineup breadth22
#47 of 60 in classCompare all →

One and only one powertrain: the 2.0L VC-Turbo gas I-4 with CVT. No hybrid, PHEV, or EV variant — a notable gap versus Q5, XC60, NX, RDX, GV70, and XT5 rivals that all offer at least one electrified option.

2Efficiency & RangeGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.90F
Combined fuel economy
25 MPG combined (AWD, VC-Turbo 2.0L)
53/100
#23 of 60 in classCompare all →

EPA-rated 25 combined MPG across all QX55 trims — coupe-styled sibling of the QX50 uses the identical 268-hp VC-Turbo 2.0L I4 with CVT and standard AWD. Below segment norm for compact luxury SUVs, where hybrids and efficient turbo-fours reach 28-30 combined.

City fuel economy
22 MPG city
50/100
#27 of 60 in classCompare all →

EPA-rated 22 MPG city. VC-Turbo 2.0L I4 with CVT and no hybrid assist trails segment leaders (Lexus NX Hybrid, Lincoln Corsair GT PHEV, Audi Q5 hybrid) in stop-and-go driving.

Highway fuel economy
28 MPG highway
50/100
#29 of 60 in classCompare all →

EPA-rated 28 MPG highway — modest for a compact luxury SUV given the VC-Turbo's variable-compression tech was designed to boost highway efficiency. The coupe roofline gives no meaningful aero advantage over the QX50 in EPA testing.

Driving range
~400 mi combined (16.0-gal tank × 25 MPG)
38/100
#35 of 60 in classCompare all →

16.0-gallon tank × 25 combined MPG yields ~400 miles per fill-up. Middling for a gas-only compact luxury SUV — hybrid rivals routinely clear 500 miles per tank.

Estimated annual fuel cost
$2,750/yr (EPA estimate, premium gasoline, 15k mi/yr)
35/100
#37 of 60 in classCompare all →

EPA lists ~$2,750/yr fuel cost at 15,000 mi/yr — high because premium gasoline is required and combined efficiency is only 25 MPG. Roughly $700-$1,000/yr worse than hybrid-equipped compact luxury rivals.

Fuel requirements35
#55 of 60 in classCompare all →

Infiniti requires premium unleaded gasoline (91 octane minimum) for the VC-Turbo 2.0L across all QX55 trims — 91 is required, not merely recommended, per the owner's manual. That adds ~$0.50/gal versus regular. No E85 or diesel option; no plug-in charging to offset fuel stops.

3SafetyOne of the QX55's strongest categories.2.62C+
NHTSA overall rating
4 stars frontal (no overall rating assigned)
50/100
#38 of 60 in classCompare all →

NHTSA has not assigned an overall star rating to the QX55 in any model year through 2025 (carryover to 2026). Only a 4-star frontal-crash result exists; side and rollover components were not published, so no composite overall was calculated.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness66
#27 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mixed IIHS crashworthiness results — Good in moderate overlap front, Acceptable in the updated side test, and small overlap driver-side not tested. No Top Safety Pick award for any QX55 model year.

Standard ADAS suite breadth88
#23 of 60 in classCompare all →

Every trim (LUXE, ESSENTIAL, SENSORY) gets a comprehensive standard suite: Predictive Forward Collision Warning, Forward Emergency Braking with pedestrian detection, Blind Spot Warning with intervention, Lane Departure Warning, Rear Cross Traffic Alert, Rear Automatic Braking, High Beam Assist, and ProPILOT Assist. This exceeds most Compact Luxury SUV rivals where BSM or ACC often gate to upper trims.

Automatic emergency braking performance74
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

System includes Forward Emergency Braking with pedestrian detection and Predictive Forward Collision Warning (uses radar to monitor two vehicles ahead), a step above basic AEB. IIHS has not published a front-crash-prevention (vehicle-to-vehicle or pedestrian day/night) grade for the QX55, so credit is limited to the specified capability rather than tested outcomes.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage84
#11 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard Blind Spot Warning plus Blind Spot Intervention (active steering nudge) and standard Rear Cross Traffic Alert with Rear Automatic Braking on every trim — a stronger baseline than most Compact Luxury SUV rivals, which typically ship alert-only BSM.

Lane keeping & centering74
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

ProPILOT Assist provides lane centering plus adaptive cruise on the highway and is standard on every trim, but reviewer commentary consistently rates it as competent rather than class-leading — smoother than early lane-keep systems yet more prone to occasional wander than the best premium centering (BMW, Mercedes).

Adaptive cruise & highway assist77
#25 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard Intelligent Cruise Control with full-speed-range stop-and-go integrates with ProPILOT Assist steering support for capable single-lane highway assist. Refined for the segment but lacks the added-value features (route/curve speed adaptation, lane-change assist) offered by BMW/Mercedes counterparts.

Hands-free driving availability25
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

The QX55 offers no hands-free highway system — ProPILOT Assist requires steady hands-on-wheel input. Infiniti has no BlueCruise/Super Cruise/FSD analog in market, and none was announced for the QX55 before it was discontinued after 2025.

Headlight performance66
#34 of 60 in classCompare all →

LED headlights standard with High Beam Assist across the range; adaptive front lighting arrives on ESSENTIAL and above. IIHS has not published a headlight rating for the QX55, and the base LUXE trim lacks the adaptive/curve-following behavior that typically earns Good ratings.

Outward visibility62
#48 of 60 in classCompare all →

Fastback coupe roofline and thick D-pillars materially compromise rear and rear-quarter sightlines, a common critique in reviews. Camera compensation helps — Around View Monitor with Moving Object Detection is available from ESSENTIAL, and blind-spot monitoring plus rear parking sensors are standard — but the volume LUXE trim lacks the 360° camera and shows the coupe's visibility deficit most clearly.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability70
#42 of 60 in classCompare all →

Rear legroom of 38.7 in is respectable for a compact-luxury coupe SUV, but the sloping roofline eats rear headroom and the smaller rear door aperture (versus the boxier QX50) makes installing rear-facing seats and reaching lower anchors modestly harder. Three-across seating is tight in width.

4Space & ComfortOne of the QX55's weakest categories.0.80F
Seating capacity
5 seats
25/100
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

The QX55 is a two-row compact luxury coupe-SUV with a 60/40 split rear bench, seating five across all Luxe, Essential, and Sensory trims. Corrects prior placeholder that listed seven seats (which appears to have been carried over from the three-row QX60).

Front headroom
39.4 in (with standard moonroof)
48/100
#45 of 60 in classCompare all →

The QX55 comes standard with a moonroof on every trim, so the with-moonroof measurement is the volume-trim reference. Front headroom is competitive but lower than the QX50 without-moonroof spec.

Front legroom
39.6 in
0/100
#56 of 60 in classCompare all →

Front legroom is identical to the QX50 sibling and sits just below the compact-luxury SUV normalization band. Prior placeholder of 43.1 in was substantially overstated.

Rear headroom
36.9 in (coupe roofline)
22/100
#60 of 60 in classCompare all →

The sloped coupe roofline is the QX55's core styling trade-off — rear headroom drops by more than an inch versus the QX50 with moonroof. Taller adults will feel the pinch.

Rear legroom
38.7 in
73/100
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Same sliding second-row bench as the QX50 preserves class-competitive rear legroom despite the coupe styling — the wheelbase and rear-seat mechanism carry over unchanged.

Third-row usability15
#34 of 60 in classCompare all →

The QX55 is strictly a two-row, five-passenger coupe-SUV — no third row is offered on any trim. Prior placeholder implied a token third row that does not exist.

Cargo/trunk volume
26.9 cu ft behind 2nd row
3/100
#48 of 60 in classCompare all →

The sloped rear glass and lower liftgate opening cost the QX55 roughly 4.5 cu ft behind the second row versus the QX50, putting it near the bottom of the compact-luxury SUV segment for practicality.

Max cargo volume
54.1 cu ft (seats folded)
0/100
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

Maximum cargo with rear seats folded sits below the compact-luxury SUV normalization band — a direct consequence of the coupe roof and shorter cargo bay. Prior placeholder of 94.8 cu ft was drastically overstated.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions55
#46 of 60 in classCompare all →

Interior is functionally identical to the QX50 — standard center console bin, decent door pockets, and a covered forward tray with USB power. Competent but nothing standout like an underfloor trunk or party-trick compartments.

Seat comfort68
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

Same well-cushioned front seats as the QX50 with power adjustment and heat standard on every QX55 trim; semi-aniline quilted leather on Sensory. Reviewers note comfort for shorter drives, though bottom cushions can feel flat on long stints.

Ride quality66
#34 of 60 in classCompare all →

Compliant, comfort-tuned ride carrying over from the QX50, but every QX55 rides on 20-inch wheels (vs 19s on lower QX50s), which introduces a bit more impact harshness over broken pavement. Not segment-leading, and body control lags sharper-handling German rivals.

Cabin quietness73
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Acoustic windshield glass and thick sound insulation deliver above-average highway isolation, though the VC-Turbo four-cylinder gets vocal under hard throttle and 20-inch wheels admit a touch more road noise than the QX50.

Climate & comfort features74
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

The QX55 skips the QX50's base Pure trim, so heated front seats, dual-zone auto climate, power liftgate, and moonroof are standard across the lineup. Ventilated fronts, heated rear seats, and heated wheel arrive on Essential/Sensory. Slightly richer than the QX50 baseline but rear climate remains basic.

5Cost of OwnershipOne of the QX55's weakest categories.0.43F
Base MSRP
$51,345 (Luxe AWD $50,150 + $1,195 dest.)
34/100
#40 of 60 in classCompare all →

Base Luxe AWD trim MSRP $50,150 for the 2026 model year, plus estimated $1,195 destination charge consistent with Infiniti's 2025–2026 pricing.

Volume-Trim Price
$56,295 (Essential AWD $55,100 + $1,195 dest.)
29/100
#39 of 60 in classCompare all →

Essential AWD is the typical volume trim on Infiniti luxury coupe-SUVs — adds Bose audio, navigation, and Around View Monitor most buyers spec. Listed at $55,100 MSRP before ~$1,195 destination.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
$3,692 over 5 years (~$738/yr)
89/100
#7 of 60 in classCompare all →

Nissan/Infiniti VC-Turbo drivetrain and mature platform keep scheduled maintenance moderate for a luxury brand; below-average total for the compact luxury SUV segment.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
37.4% retained after 5 years
0/100
#51 of 60 in classCompare all →

Infiniti brand suffers heavy depreciation; the QX55's coupe-SUV niche and shared powertrain with the slow-selling QX50 depress residuals below the segment floor.

Basic warranty
4 yr / 60,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
50/100
#5 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard Infiniti new-vehicle limited warranty covers 4 years/60,000 miles — a year longer than the 3/36 mainstream benchmark but shorter than Genesis/Jaguar's 5-year term.

Powertrain warranty
6 yr / 70,000 mi powertrain
20/100
#12 of 60 in classCompare all →

Infiniti powertrain coverage is 6 years/70,000 miles — average for luxury but well short of Genesis (10/100k), Mitsubishi, or Hyundai's 10-year offerings.

Complimentary maintenance & perks75
#6 of 60 in classCompare all →

Infiniti Premium Care includes 3 years of complimentary scheduled maintenance plus complimentary valet service for maintenance visits, alongside 4-year roadside assistance and connected-services trials — solid but shorter than BMW's 3-yr/36k and less lavish than Genesis's valet-pickup program.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$38,933 (≈$35,241 depreciation + $3,692 maintenance)
29/100
#43 of 60 in classCompare all →

$56,295 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (37.4% retained, or about $21,054) leaves about $35,241 in depreciation. Add the projected $3,692 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $38,933 in total.

6Reliability & QualityThe QX55's best-graded category.2.80B-
Predicted reliability70
#11 of 60 in classCompare all →

QX55 shares the QX50's VC-Turbo/CVT drivetrain and infotainment; Consumer Reports has trended around average for the QX50 line, and J.D. Power quality scores for Infiniti compacts have been mixed rather than top-tier.

Brand reliability track record74
#17 of 60 in classCompare all →

Infiniti has trended mid-pack in recent J.D. Power Vehicle Dependability Studies (occasionally slightly above segment average), while Consumer Reports typically places the brand in the middle of luxury rankings — not a top-5 dependability brand.

Recall & TSB history76
#7 of 60 in classCompare all →

The current QX55 generation has had a modest number of recalls (fuel pump, backup camera, seat belt-related campaigns shared with QX50) but nothing systemic or fire/powertrain-catastrophic. Typical activity for a low-volume luxury compact.

Powertrain durability reputation65
#25 of 60 in classCompare all →

The VC-Turbo 2.0L variable-compression engine is mechanically complex and unproven at high mileage, and Nissan/Infiniti's Jatco CVTs carry a lingering durability question mark despite recent improvements. Not a red-flag drivetrain, but not a proven long-life family either.

Interior material quality76
#25 of 60 in classCompare all →

Reviewers generally praise the QX55's quilted leather, contrast stitching, and semi-aniline upgrades on higher trims, though hard plastics remain in low-touch zones and the dual-screen layout looks dated versus newer luxury rivals. Competitive-to-good for the price, not class-leading.

Fit & finish76
#12 of 60 in classCompare all →

Assembly quality is solid with tight panel gaps and consistent trim, and initial-quality reports for the QX55/QX50 line have been generally acceptable. No pattern of rattles or misalignment complaints in recent reviews.

Dealer & service network60
#47 of 60 in classCompare all →

Infiniti runs roughly 200 US dealers — meaningfully thinner than Lexus (~240), BMW, Mercedes, or Audi — and dealer-service satisfaction ratings have been middle-of-pack. Coverage is adequate in metro markets but sparse in some regions.

Parts availability & repair cost69
#30 of 60 in classCompare all →

Parts availability is normal for a mainstream luxury brand thanks to Nissan platform sharing, but the VC-Turbo engine and specialized CVT can push out-of-warranty repair bills above typical luxury-compact levels. Aftermarket support is limited compared with German rivals.

7Technology & InfotainmentGrades below the middle of the scale.1.63D
Touchscreen size
8.0 in upper (paired with 7.0 in lower InTouch screen)
12/100
#52 of 60 in classCompare all →

QX55 shares the QX50's dual-screen InTouch layout — an 8.0-inch upper display for infotainment stacked over a 7.0-inch lower touchscreen for climate/vehicle functions; upper-screen diagonal is small versus segment norms.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness55
#55 of 60 in classCompare all →

The InTouch dual-screen system is functional but widely criticized as laggy and less intuitive than segment leaders (Lexus NX, Audi Q5, BMW X3); split layout requires reaching between two panels for common tasks.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto62
#53 of 60 in classCompare all →

Wireless Apple CarPlay is standard on most trims, but Android Auto remains wired-only — an asymmetry that hurts against rivals offering both wireless.

Voice control & native navigation55
#52 of 60 in classCompare all →

Built-in navigation is offered on upper trims, but the voice assistant is a legacy embedded system; reviewers recommend using phone projection instead of the native experience.

Audio system quality78
#24 of 60 in classCompare all →

Optional Bose Performance Series 16-speaker system on the top Sensory trim is a genuine strength and one of the better-tuned premium systems near this price; base six-speaker audio is only adequate.

Digital instrument cluster55
#46 of 60 in classCompare all →

The cluster uses a hybrid analog gauge layout with a central color info display rather than a full-digital reconfigurable cluster — behind Audi Virtual Cockpit, BMW Live Cockpit, and Mercedes MBUX peers.

OTA update capability40
#58 of 60 in classCompare all →

QX55 platform predates Infiniti's OTA rollout; updates are largely dealer-service, with limited (if any) whole-vehicle over-the-air capability.

Companion app & remote functions60
#51 of 60 in classCompare all →

MyINFINITI app handles remote start/lock/locate and basic scheduling but requires an ongoing InConnect subscription and lacks digital-key functionality; UI is basic compared with BMW/Mercedes/Audi apps.

Charging ports & device power70
#36 of 60 in classCompare all →

USB-A + USB-C ports in both rows with wireless phone charging available on Sensory; no household AC outlet, and USB-C count trails newer luxury rivals.

Keyless & remote access72
#36 of 60 in classCompare all →

Intelligent Key with push-button start, remote start via key fob and app, and available motion-activated hands-free liftgate — solid coverage; no phone-as-key.

Camera & parking aids76
#25 of 60 in classCompare all →

Around View Monitor with Moving Object Detection (360° camera) is a QX55 strength — clear image, standard on upper trims and available lower in the range; front/rear sonar is standard on volume trim.

Head-up display availability18
#45 of 60 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered on any QX55 trim — a notable omission versus BMW X3, Lexus NX, Audi Q5, and Volvo XC60.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.93C-
Kid & car-seat practicality72
#27 of 60 in classCompare all →

Same sliding 60/40 rear bench and 38.7 in rear legroom as the QX50 keep car-seat access reasonable, but the coupe roofline drops rear headroom to 36.9 in (vs QX50's 38.4) which pinches taller rear-facing seats, and cargo behind row 2 falls to 26.9 cu ft — thin for a stroller-plus-groceries load.

Family safety package82
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

ProPILOT Assist is standard across every QX55 trim (Luxe/Essential/Sensory) with AEB, pedestrian detection, BSW, RCTA, rear AEB, adaptive cruise with stop-and-go, LDW/LKA, and rear-door alert. Backed by NHTSA 5-star overall on the shared platform; absence from the 2026 IIHS TSP list keeps it out of the top tier.

Family road-trip comfort66
#32 of 60 in classCompare all →

Acoustic windshield keeps the cabin quiet at cruise and dual-zone climate is standard, but the sloped coupe roof cuts rear headroom to 36.9 in (adults feel it on multi-hour trips) and max cargo of 54.1 cu ft makes four-passenger luggage a squeeze. No rear climate zone or rear entertainment.

Daily driving ease76
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

Comfort-tuned chassis, ProPILOT Assist standard (stop-and-go ACC + lane centering), and heated front seats standard across the lineup make daily driving relaxed. Standard 20-inch wheels add some impact harshness over broken pavement versus QX50, and the coupe C-pillar cuts over-the-shoulder visibility a touch.

Commuting cost efficiency55
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Same 25 combined MPG (22/28) with premium-fuel requirement as the QX50 makes per-mile cost meaningfully higher than segment hybrids (Lexus NX Hybrid, Lincoln Corsair GT PHEV, Audi Q5 hybrid all 28-30+ combined on regular). Insurance mid-pack in the mid-$2K/yr range. Not a cheap commuter.

Parking & maneuverability76
#11 of 60 in classCompare all →

Compact-luxury footprint (~186.6 in long, 74.9 in wide) and Around View Monitor with moving-object detection make urban parking manageable. Rear visibility is compromised by the sloped fastback and thick C-pillar more than on the boxier QX50; ~38 ft turning circle is average.

Work capability24
#53 of 60 in classCompare all →

Infiniti does not publish a factory tow rating for the QX55 — aftermarket hitches are typically limited to ~2,000 lbs. No bed, five-seat two-row layout, and just 54.1 cu ft max cargo (below the QX50) leave even less room for work duty. Genuinely not a work vehicle.

Durability for work duty42
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

Luxury interior with soft-touch surfaces and quilted semi-aniline leather on Sensory is aimed at pampering, not abuse. Shares the VC-Turbo/CVT with the QX50 including its variable-compression complexity concerns, and the QX55 has essentially no fleet/commercial presence.

Jobsite & upfit practicality32
#42 of 60 in classCompare all →

Four basic cargo tie-downs, no factory 120V outlet, no upfit ecosystem beyond generic aftermarket roof racks. Cargo floor is carpeted rather than washable and the sloped tailgate opening restricts loading tall gear.

Long-distance comfort & range76
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

Quiet cabin (acoustic windshield, thick insulation), comfortable front seats with available massage on Sensory, and ProPILOT Assist reduce highway fatigue. ~400 mi range on a fill (16.0 gal × 25 mpg) is solid for a gas SUV; 16-speaker Bose available. Standard 20-inch wheels shave a bit off the polish versus rivals like the Volvo XC60 or Audi Q5.

Outdoor & adventure capability48
#56 of 60 in classCompare all →

Intelligent AWD is standard on all QX55 trims, but ~7.0 in ground clearance, no off-road drive modes, no factory tow rating, and only 54.1 cu ft max cargo — down on the QX50 — limit adventure utility. Handles gravel and bike-rack duty; nothing more.

Gear & luggage flexibility45
#59 of 60 in classCompare all →

60/40 split-folding rear bench (no 40/20/40 pass-through) and just 54.1 cu ft max cargo — 11 cu ft down on the QX50 and near the bottom of the compact-luxury SUV segment. Sloped fastback restricts tall/bulky items; hitch is dealer/aftermarket only, roof rails available.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the QX55's strongest categories.2.34C+
Handling & agility65
#36 of 60 in classCompare all →

Shares the QX50's chassis and AWD system with modestly firmer sport-oriented tuning to match the coupe styling, but reviewers describe handling as soft, sleepy, and less composed than segment leaders like the X4, Macan, or GV70. Body control is adequate; grip is unremarkable.

Steering feel58
#37 of 60 in classCompare all →

Electric power steering is light and vague with little feedback; reviewers report the available adaptive steering feels disconnected and requires constant highway corrections. Sport mode adds weight but no communication.

Braking confidence70
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Ventilated front / solid rear disc brakes deliver progressive pedal feel and adequate stopping performance shared with the QX50 platform; no fade issues reported but distances are mid-pack for the class.

Powertrain smoothness & response62
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2.0L VC-Turbo (268 hp / 280 lb-ft) offers strong low-end torque, but the paired Xtronic CVT is the QX55's persistent refinement weak point — reviewers cite jerky simulated shifts, inconsistent part-to-full throttle transitions, and rubber-band feel under hard acceleration.

Drivetrain noise & vibration58
#43 of 60 in classCompare all →

CVT drone under load is the QX55's most-cited refinement complaint — the engine holds high RPM during acceleration, producing coarse, buzzy sound atypical of a luxury coupe SUV. Isolation at cruise is acceptable.

Turning circle
36.4 ft
70/100
#10 of 60 in classCompare all →

Curb-to-curb turning diameter of 36.4 ft is above-average for the compact luxury SUV segment (band 34–42 ft) and a genuine city maneuverability strength.

Driving position & ergonomics68
#39 of 60 in classCompare all →

Front seating position and control layout inherit the QX50's strengths — broad adjustment range and physical HVAC controls — but the fastback coupe roofline noticeably compromises rearward visibility and over-the-shoulder sightlines versus the QX50 or upright rivals.

Fun-to-drive factor58
#32 of 60 in classCompare all →

Despite the coupe styling suggesting sporting intent, the QX55 is characterized as style-over-substance — clunky CVT, numb steering, and firm-but-busy ride keep it firmly in the appliance bucket versus genuinely engaging picks like the Macan, Stelvio, or RDX A-Spec.

10Value & Market PositionGrades below the middle of the scale.1.47D
Standard equipment generosity68
#35 of 60 in classCompare all →

Base LUXE trim comes reasonably equipped with standard AWD, power moonroof, heated leatherette seats, dual-screen 8.0/7.0 in InTouch infotainment with wireless Apple CarPlay, ProPILOT Assist 1.0 (adaptive cruise + lane centering), and full ADAS suite (AEB, BSW, RCTA). Competitive rather than generous — Genesis GV70 and Acura RDX include more standard tech and premium materials at similar base prices.

Feature value per dollar48
#59 of 60 in classCompare all →

Poor value proposition — starting near $58K and pushing $70K loaded for a 268 hp 2.0L VC-Turbo tied to a CVT that reviewers consistently criticize as a segment-worst drivetrain. Rivals Genesis GV70 (turbo 6-cyl option), BMW X4, Audi Q5 Sportback, and Mercedes GLC Coupe deliver stronger powertrains, more polished interiors, and better resale for similar or lower money.

Trim & configuration breadth52
#51 of 60 in classCompare all →

Narrow lineup: three trims (LUXE, ESSENTIAL, SENSORY), all AWD-only with the identical 2.0L VC-Turbo + CVT — no engine, drivetrain, or performance-variant choice. Adequate to walk buyers up a price ladder but no meaningful configuration flexibility vs. rivals that offer multiple engines and RWD/AWD.

Sales popularity & market acceptance32
#55 of 60 in classCompare all →

Slow seller — QX55 US volume runs in the low-thousands per year, well behind Audi Q5 Sportback, BMW X4, Mercedes GLC Coupe, and Genesis GV70, and it drags on a shrinking Infiniti dealer footprint. Trajectory has been declining since launch.

Brand desirability & image48
#58 of 60 in classCompare all →

Infiniti has faded from its 2010s peak — brand perception now trails Lexus, Genesis, and the German three, with a contracting dealer network and lingering questions about the brand's long-term US commitment. Image is neutral to weak rather than aspirational, hurting resale and cross-shopping.

Deals & incentive availability80
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

One of the few consumer bright spots: slow sales and aging inventory drive aggressive Infiniti lease specials, loyalty cash, and dealer discounts on the QX55, routinely landing thousands off MSRP. Buyers who negotiate typically clear real money off compared with tight-pricing German rivals.

Model freshness38
#48 of 60 in classCompare all →

Current generation launched for 2022MY on the aging QX50 platform with no meaningful refresh since; sibling QX50 has been pulled from the US market and QX55's future is uncertain pending a rumored QX65 replacement. Buyers face imminent-replacement / discontinuation risk that hurts resale.

Critical reception & awards44
#55 of 60 in classCompare all →

Consistently placed at or near the bottom of compact luxury coupe-SUV comparisons — reviewers praise the exterior styling but pan the CVT drone, cramped coupe-roof rear seat, dated infotainment, and value equation. No major awards (no NACTOY, 10Best, or Top Pick recognition).