MotorGPA
Find My Match
Model year:2026+9 not yet gradedHistory & evolution ↓
Nissan logo
Mid-Size Sedan

2026 Nissan Altima

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
1.87C-GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
2.33C+
Safety
2.47C+
EfficiencyGas
2.42C+
32 MPG combined · 518 mi range · $1,550/yr energy
Comfort
2.49C+
Value
1.70C-
Ownership Cost
1.68D
Technology
1.45D
Driving Experience
1.91C-

The verdict

A struggling mid-size sedan, strong on space and held back by performance.

The 2026 Nissan Altima is the discount option in a mid-size sedan class that has moved on without it. Roughly $28,400 to start and about $31,100 for the volume SV undercuts a Camry or Accord by a couple thousand dollars, and you get Nissan's full Safety Shield 360 suite standard on every trim, excellent front seats and — uniquely against the Accord — all-wheel drive orderable on any trim for about $1,400. But this is the eighth year of an unchanged design: one 188-hp 2.5-liter four with a droning CVT, no hybrid anywhere in the lineup while the Camry is hybrid-only, 35.2 inches of rear legroom against the Accord's 40.8, and five-year resale near 43% that hands most of your upfront savings back at trade-in. It makes sense as a comfortable, cheap-to-buy commuter — not as the long-haul family car in this segment.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • One of the cheapest ways into a mid-size sedan — and Nissan deals hard
  • Front seats and front-row space that are genuinely class-leading
  • The full driver-assist suite standard, even on the cheapest trim

What holds it back

  • No hybrid — in the segment where hybrids won
  • Slow, and loud about it
  • You give the discount back at trade-in — and the warranty is the class floor

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Nissan Altima

Production history

1993present · 34 years · 6 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1199319971993Gen 2199820011998Gen 3200220062002Gen 4200720122007Gen 5201320182013Gen 62019now2019In production2026 — graded2025 — not yet graded2024 — not yet graded2023 — not yet graded2022 — not yet graded2021 — not yet graded2020 — not yet graded2019 — not yet graded2018 — not yet graded2017 — not yet gradedProduction began 1993
202658+9 not yet graded

Best fit & conditions

CommuterC+65/100
FamilyC61/100
Winter / inclementC61/100
AdventureC-58/100
Work / TowF27/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Trims & configurations

4 trims

Scores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:

S · baseSVSRSL

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe Altima's lowest-graded category.0.23F
Horsepower
188 hp (2.5L I4, FWD; 182 hp with AWD)
15/100
#42 of 49 in classCompare all →

Volume trim (SV) uses the 2.5L PR25DD naturally aspirated four rated 188 hp FWD / 182 hp AWD, unchanged across the L34 generation. Output is low-to-mid-pack for a mid-size sedan now that rivals run hybrid or turbo powertrains.

Torque
180 lb-ft (2.5L I4, FWD; 178 lb-ft with AWD)
18/100
#38 of 49 in classCompare all →

Peak torque of 180 lb-ft arriving at a high 3,600 rpm is modest against hybrid rivals that deliver instant motor torque off the line.

0–60 mph time
7.6 s (2.5 FWD; ~7.9 s AWD)
29/100
#39 of 49 in classCompare all →

Roughly 7.6 seconds to 60 mph in the volume 2.5 FWD configuration — adequate but slower than the Camry hybrid (~7.0 s) and Accord hybrid (~6.6 s) that set the segment's current pace.

Powertrain refinement58
#45 of 49 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.5 has no turbo lag and responds cleanly at part throttle, but turns coarse and vocal when worked hard and lacks the low-end shove of the segment's electrified powertrains. Solidly mid-band: smooth in normal use, unrefined under load.

Transmission behavior57
#46 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan's Xtronic CVT is among the better executions of the type — smooth in traffic, with simulated steps under hard acceleration — but it still drones on highway merges and holds high revs in a way conventional automatics and hybrid e-CVTs avoid.

AWD/4WD availability63
#39 of 49 in classCompare all →

AWD is optional across the trim range rather than restricted to a top trim — a genuine Altima advantage over the FWD-only Accord. Operation is basic on-demand torque transfer with no terrain modes, low range, or torque vectoring, which caps it in the mid band.

Powertrain lineup breadth22
#47 of 49 in classCompare all →

A single naturally aspirated 2.5L engine with one transmission is the entire lineup — no hybrid, no plug-in, no EV variant, and the 2.0L VC-Turbo that once topped the range is understood to have been dropped. Drivetrain choice (FWD/AWD) is the only meaningful variation, which lands this in the bottom band.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Altima's strongest categories.2.42C+
Combined fuel economy
32 MPG combined (2.5L FWD); 30 MPG with AWD
58/100
#25 of 49 in classCompare all →

The sixth-generation (L34) Altima's 2.5L four with Xtronic CVT has been EPA-rated 32 MPG combined in FWD form since the 2023 refresh, and 2026 is a carryover year with no powertrain change; AWD drops to 30 MPG. Mid-pack for a non-hybrid mid-size sedan, well behind the hybrid Camry and Accord.

City fuel economy
27 MPG city (2.5L FWD); 26 MPG with AWD
50/100
#28 of 49 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.5L gets no hybrid assist in traffic, so city economy is the weakest part of the Altima's EPA line — barely half what a hybrid Camry returns around town.

Highway fuel economy
39 MPG highway (2.5L FWD); 36 MPG with AWD
71/100
#24 of 49 in classCompare all →

Highway is the Altima's strongest efficiency figure — a tall CVT top ratio and slippery sedan body deliver 39 MPG, competitive with non-hybrid rivals and the core of its case as a long-commute car.

Driving range
~518 mi (16.2 gal tank × 32 MPG combined)
62/100
#5 of 49 in classCompare all →

A 16.2-gallon tank at the 32 MPG combined rating yields roughly 518 miles between fill-ups — above average for the mid-size sedan class, and closer to 630 miles on a highway-heavy tank.

Estimated annual fuel cost
~$1,550/yr (15,000 mi/yr, regular gas)
75/100
#20 of 49 in classCompare all →

At 32 MPG combined the Altima burns about 469 gallons over 15,000 miles; on regular unleaded that is roughly $1,550 a year — cheap by whole-market standards, but several hundred dollars a year worse than a hybrid mid-size sedan.

Fuel requirements88
#14 of 49 in classCompare all →

The 2.5L four runs on regular 87-octane unleaded across every trim, with no premium recommendation anywhere in the lineup since the VC-Turbo was discontinued — the simplest and cheapest fueling story in the segment.

3SafetyOne of the Altima's strongest categories.2.47C+
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall (4-star frontal, 5-star side and rollover; generation-level NCAP result for the L34 Altima)
100/100
#1 of 49 in classCompare all →

The sixth-generation (L34) Altima carries a 5-star NHTSA overall rating, with frontal impact the weak leg at 4 stars and side impact and rollover at 5; the 2026 car is a carryover of that structure and is scored against the generation-level result rather than a separately published 2026 test.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness46
#49 of 49 in classCompare all →

The Altima posts Good results across the legacy IIHS battery — both small-overlap tests and the original moderate overlap — and was a Top Safety Pick early in this generation, but it grades below Good in the updated moderate-overlap (rear-passenger) evaluation and holds no current award. A key updated test at Marginal is what pulls this into the bottom band rather than the middle one.

Standard ADAS suite breadth78
#33 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan Safety Shield 360 is standard on every Altima trim including the base S — AEB with pedestrian detection, rear automatic braking, blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert, lane departure warning and high-beam assist — which is broader standard content than most mainstream midsize rivals, where blind-spot monitoring is still trim-gated. The gap is adaptive cruise with lane centering: ProPILOT Assist starts at SV, so the base S goes without.

Automatic emergency braking performance55
#49 of 49 in classCompare all →

AEB covers vehicles and pedestrians on every trim and is backed by standard rear automatic braking, which few midsize rivals match, but Nissan's forward system dates to this generation's 2019 launch and has not distinguished itself in the harder updated front crash prevention protocol — the higher closing speeds and nighttime-pedestrian scenarios that now separate the class.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage72
#36 of 49 in classCompare all →

Blind Spot Warning and Rear Cross Traffic Alert are standard on the base trim rather than trim-gated as on much of the segment, and standard rear automatic braking adds genuine intervention behind the car. It stays out of the top band because the blind-spot system is alert-only — no steering or braking correction into an occupied lane — and no safe-exit or rear-occupant alert is offered.

Lane keeping & centering65
#43 of 49 in classCompare all →

Lane departure warning is standard and ProPILOT Assist adds true lane centering from SV up, which reviewers find steady on well-marked highways; it is marked down because the centering is trim-gated, hands-on only, and hands back earlier than the best systems on faded markings and tighter curves.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist70
#47 of 49 in classCompare all →

ProPILOT Assist pairs full-speed-range adaptive cruise — including stop-and-hold in traffic — with lane centering, and it is among the smoother mainstream implementations for gap management and resume. It loses points for not reaching the base S trim and for being the plain ProPILOT Assist rather than a Navi-link version with map-based speed adjustment on the volume trim.

Hands-free driving availability5
#42 of 49 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway driving is offered on the Altima at any trim or price. ProPILOT Assist requires hands on the wheel, and Nissan fields no BlueCruise/Super Cruise equivalent in the US midsize-sedan class.

Headlight performance58
#47 of 49 in classCompare all →

LED headlights are standard across the range since the 2023 refresh and high-beam assist comes with Safety Shield 360 on every trim, but IIHS has graded this generation's volume-trim lighting at Acceptable rather than Good, with the better-rated projector setup historically tied to the upper trims — squarely the mid-band pattern.

Outward visibility66
#29 of 49 in classCompare all →

Forward and side sightlines are good for a modern sedan — a relatively low cowl and slim A-pillars — but the fastback-influenced roofline, high rear deck and thick C-pillars pinch the over-the-shoulder and rear views, and the 360-degree camera that would compensate is confined to the upper trims.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability66
#32 of 49 in classCompare all →

Midsize rear-seat width and 35-plus inches of rear legroom make the Altima genuinely workable for two child seats, and wide-opening rear doors help; the anchors themselves are the compromise — lower anchors set deep in the seat bight that require digging, and only two lower-anchor positions with the center position tether-only.

4Space & ComfortThe Altima's best-graded category.2.49C+
Seating capacity
5 seats (2+3, all trims)
100/100
#1 of 49 in classCompare all →

The Altima is a conventional five-passenger mid-size sedan with a three-place rear bench on every trim (S, SV, SR, SL); no trim reduces or adds seating.

Front headroom
39.2 in (37.8 in with moonroof)
80/100
#20 of 49 in classCompare all →

Front headroom is 39.2 in without the moonroof, near the top of the mid-size sedan range; the power moonroof on SV and SL trims cuts it to 37.8 in.

Front legroom
43.8 in
95/100
#7 of 49 in classCompare all →

At 43.8 in the Altima offers among the most front legroom in the mid-size class — a genuine standout dimension and one of the car's strongest packaging attributes.

Rear headroom
37.5 in (36.9 in with moonroof)
63/100
#19 of 49 in classCompare all →

Rear headroom of 37.5 in is mid-pack for the segment; the fastback-influenced roofline costs a little clearance, and the moonroof drops it to 36.9 in on so-equipped trims.

Rear legroom
35.2 in
32/100
#31 of 49 in classCompare all →

Rear legroom of 35.2 in is the Altima's clearest packaging weakness — well short of the Accord (~40.8 in) and Camry (~38 in), and the reason the generous front legroom does not translate into class-leading family space.

Cargo/trunk volume
15.4 cu ft
54/100
#18 of 49 in classCompare all →

A 15.4 cu ft trunk is competitive-to-good for a mid-size sedan, with a wide opening and a 60/40 split-folding rear seatback to extend it for longer items.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions57
#42 of 49 in classCompare all →

Storage is competent but conventional: a usable covered center console bin, decent door pockets, a phone shelf ahead of the shifter with USB-A/USB-C, and a 60/40 folding rear seat — but no standout innovation such as a configurable console, underfloor bins, or onboard power.

Seat comfort73
#30 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan's NASA-inspired Zero Gravity front seats are a real, repeatedly praised strength for long-haul comfort and are the Altima's best comfort attribute; the rear bench is flatter with a low cushion and less thigh support, which caps the score below the Accord.

Ride quality68
#40 of 49 in classCompare all →

The Altima is tuned toward comfort — it rounds off broken pavement well and stays settled on the highway — though the sport-tuned SR on 19-in wheels is noticeably firmer and body control trails the segment's best.

Cabin quietness55
#41 of 49 in classCompare all →

Highway wind and road noise are about average for the class, but the 2.5-liter four paired with the Xtronic CVT drones under hard acceleration and on grades, which is the intrusion reviewers single out most often.

Climate & comfort features58
#44 of 49 in classCompare all →

Dual-zone automatic climate control, heated front seats and a heated steering wheel are available from the mid trims up, but there are no ventilated seats anywhere in the lineup, no rear climate zone, and remote start is the extent of pre-conditioning — mid-trim-and-up coverage rather than a rich standard set.

5Cost of OwnershipGrades below the middle of the scale.1.68D
Base MSRP
~$28,400 incl. destination (S FWD; ~$27,150 MSRP + ~$1,250 destination)
81/100
#10 of 49 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Altima is a carryover of the sixth-generation (L34) car, so the entry S trim continues to open well below the mid-size mainstream benchmarks — roughly $2,000 under a base Camry and a similar margin under a base Accord. Undercutting on sticker is the Altima's core commercial argument now that it fields no hybrid, and it is the item this category scores best on.

Volume-Trim Price
~$31,100 incl. destination (SV FWD, the volume trim); line ranges ~$28,400 (S) to ~$36,600 (SL), AWD ~+$1,400 on any trim
79/100
#10 of 49 in classCompare all →

The SV is the volume Altima — it adds ProPILOT Assist, the larger displays, alloy wheels and the dual-zone climate content that make the car feel mid-size rather than rental-grade, and it is where most retail buyers land. So equipped it still sits under a Camry SE, and AWD is a modest flat adder available across the range rather than a top-trim-only option, which is a genuine packaging advantage over the FWD-only Accord.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$4,900 over 5 years (~$980/yr scheduled maintenance plus repairs)
63/100
#20 of 49 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.5L PR25DD is a simple, cheap engine to service — no turbo, regular fuel, conventional maintenance intervals — and dropping the VC-Turbo removed the lineup's most complex and expensive-to-fix powertrain. What keeps this only good rather than class-leading is the Xtronic CVT: it is the component with the segment's worst out-of-warranty repair reputation, and a replacement is a four-figure event once the 60,000-mile powertrain term lapses. Costs also run above a Sentra's on tires and brakes given the larger platform and 17–19-inch wheels.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~43% of MSRP retained at 5 years (~57% depreciation)
27/100
#28 of 49 in classCompare all →

This is the Altima's worst ownership number and, at weight 3, the single item that does most of the damage to the category — it is why a car that is cheap to buy is not cheap to own. Large rental and fleet volume floods the used market, heavy incentive spend on new units drags transaction prices below sticker, buyer wariness about Nissan CVTs suppresses private-party demand, and a non-hybrid gas sedan in a segment that has gone electrified is the least wanted configuration on a used lot. The discount taken up front is substantially handed back at trade-in.

Basic warranty
3 years / 36,000 miles bumper-to-bumper
0/100
#40 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan's New Vehicle Limited Warranty runs 3 years or 36,000 miles — the industry floor and the bottom of the framework band. It matches Toyota and Honda but is two years and 24,000 miles short of what Hyundai and Kia hand a Sonata or K5 buyer at the same price point.

Powertrain warranty
5 years / 60,000 miles powertrain
0/100
#26 of 49 in classCompare all →

Powertrain coverage is 5 years or 60,000 miles, again the band floor. It matters more on this car than on most rivals because the Xtronic CVT is exactly the component Altima shoppers most want covered, and it comes off warranty at 60,000 miles — half the mileage Hyundai and Kia give an original owner, and with none of the long electrified-hardware coverage a hybrid Camry buyer gets on the parts that worry them.

Complimentary maintenance & perks52
#35 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan includes no complimentary scheduled maintenance on the Altima — there is no ToyotaCare or Hyundai Complimentary Maintenance equivalent, so the first oil change is out of pocket. What is included keeps it in the 'basic roadside only' band rather than the zero band: roadside assistance runs alongside the 3-year/36,000-mile basic term, and SV and above get a NissanConnect Services trial with remote start, emergency calling and automatic collision notification through the app. There are no fuel or charging credits and nothing that offsets the short warranty terms.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$22,627 (≈$17,727 depreciation + $4,900 maintenance)
67/100
#14 of 49 in classCompare all →

$31,100 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (43% retained, or about $13,373) leaves about $17,727 in depreciation. Add the projected $4,900 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $22,627 in total.

6Reliability & QualityMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.33C+
Predicted reliability65
#31 of 49 in classCompare all →

The Altima's predicted-reliability case is average-band, and 2026 is the most settled version of it: the L34 generation is in its eighth model year with no significant new content, and the complex 2.0L VC-Turbo variable-compression engine has been withdrawn, leaving one long-serving naturally aspirated four as the whole lineup. That maturity is a real plus, but the Xtronic CVT keeps the prediction from rising above mid-pack, and Nissan's brand-level drag pulls model-level forecasts down with it.

Brand reliability track record57
#40 of 49 in classCompare all →

Brand-level item, so this matches the figure already carried for the 2026 Sentra and Versa in this dataset. Nissan sits in the lower-middle of multi-year dependability — consistently behind Toyota, Honda and Hyundai in Consumer Reports brand rankings and at or below industry average in J.D. Power's Vehicle Dependability Study — with the CVT legacy as the specific drag on its long-term numbers.

Recall & TSB history66
#32 of 49 in classCompare all →

Recall exposure across this generation has been moderate in count and component-level — supplier- and software-driven campaigns rather than a repeating powertrain, fire or safety-system defect — which keeps it clear of the sub-50 band. A MY2026 car also benefits from eight years of accumulated running changes on a design that is no longer being revised. The blemish is on the TSB side, where CVT judder, control-software reflash and fluid/cooling bulletins remain a recurring service theme across Nissan's CVT lineup.

Powertrain durability reputation56
#47 of 49 in classCompare all →

Engine and transmission pull in opposite directions, which lands this squarely in the mixed-history band. The 2.5L PR25DD four is a low-stress unit from a long Nissan mid-size lineage with no significant high-mileage red flag, and dropping the VC-Turbo removed the lineup's genuinely unproven, mechanically complex option. Against that, the Jatco Xtronic CVT is the single weakest link: the Altima was the model that did the most damage to Nissan's transmission reputation, and while current units are materially improved over the 2013-2018 population, the family has never demonstrated Toyota- or Honda-grade high-mileage durability.

Interior material quality65
#45 of 49 in classCompare all →

Acceptable for the money without ever being a selling point. The Altima's genuine strength is seating — Nissan's Zero Gravity front seats draw consistent praise — and upper SR/SL trims add leather-appointed surfaces and better trim inserts, but the dash architecture dates to 2019 and the lower cabin, console and door bases carry obvious hard plastics. Against newer mid-size rivals it reads as the oldest cabin in the class, which is what holds it below the Camry rather than any single material failing.

Fit & finish68
#42 of 49 in classCompare all →

Solid with scattered complaints, which is the middle of the band. The Altima is built on a mature, high-volume US line running the same body for eight years, and process maturity of that kind generally shows up as consistent panel fit and few assembly-defect patterns. What keeps it off the top band is Nissan's near-industry-average standing in initial-quality measures and recurring reviewer notes on road and wind noise, which owners read as build quality even where assembly itself is sound.

Dealer & service network68
#37 of 49 in classCompare all →

Brand-level item, held consistent with the other 2026 Nissans in this dataset. Physical access is not the problem — Nissan runs one of the larger US franchised networks, comparable in dealer count to Honda. What caps the score is mid-pack service satisfaction and a network that has been contracting under Nissan's US sales decline and restructuring, which adds some access risk in thinner markets across a long ownership period.

Parts availability & repair cost78
#14 of 49 in classCompare all →

The category's clear strength. The Altima has been one of America's highest-volume sedans for three decades, so OEM and aftermarket parts are cheap and universally stocked, every independent shop knows the car, and routine service costs sit at or below the mid-size average. Two things keep it out of the top band: a CVT replacement is a four-figure big-ticket item that shows up disproportionately in this model's long-term cost tail, and the L34 is late in its life cycle, which over a long ownership horizon shifts more parts supply toward the aftermarket.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Altima's weakest categories.1.45D
Touchscreen size
8 in standard (S and the volume SV); 12.3 in standard on SR and SL
12/100
#42 of 49 in classCompare all →

The L34 Altima carries the screen hardware set at the MY2023 facelift into 2026 unchanged: an 8-inch touchscreen on S and the volume SV, with the 12.3-inch display reserved for SR and SL. Eight inches sits near the bottom of the sedan normalization band and is the same volume-trim screen the Camry LE/SE has — but where Toyota at least offers 12.3 inches two trims up the ladder, the Altima's older dash architecture means the big screen is a genuine trim-walk purchase rather than a mid-range feature. The previous placeholder value of 11.1 inches did not correspond to any screen Nissan fits to this car.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness64
#47 of 49 in classCompare all →

NissanConnect on the Altima is easy to live with and hard to be impressed by. The layout is shallow and legible, and Nissan kept a real volume knob, tuning control and separate rotary climate dials rather than burying HVAC in the screen — worth genuine credit on a daily-driver sedan. What holds it to the middle band is age: this is the pre-Google-built-in Nissan stack in its eighth model year, with dated graphics and a small panel in a wide bezel on the volume SV. It reads below Toyota Audio Multimedia in the Camry (76) and well behind the Accord's Google system (80), a step under the redesigned Sentra (72), and above the smaller, more basic Versa unit (60).

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto60
#42 of 49 in classCompare all →

Wireless Apple CarPlay is standard across the Altima range including the base S, but Android Auto is wired-only on every trim — a long-standing asymmetry on this Nissan head unit. That is the middle band by definition ('wired standard / wireless on upper trims') and it is a real, daily annoyance for roughly half the buying public. It lands just above the Versa (58), whose base grade is wired for both, and far behind the Camry (90) and Corolla, where both protocols are wireless on every grade; the Sentra's newer stack (82) shows what the same brand does one showroom row over.

Voice control & native navigation52
#48 of 49 in classCompare all →

Built-in navigation comes only with the 12.3-inch system on SR and SL, so the volume SV has no native maps at all and depends entirely on phone projection. The native voice layer is conventional command-and-control recognition for phone, audio and climate rather than a natural-language assistant. That is a bottom-of-the-middle-band result: better than the Versa (45), which offers no native nav on any grade, but clearly behind the Camry's subscription-gated but capable Cloud Navigation (64) and nowhere near the Google Maps and Google Assistant the Accord (86) and Sentra (78) put in front of the driver.

Audio system quality64
#42 of 49 in classCompare all →

Base trims run a plain six-speaker system, but a nine-speaker Bose Premium Audio setup is available at the top of the range and Bose tunes Nissan cabins well — having a credible branded upgrade that is not locked behind a four-figure package stack is worth real credit in this class. It sits above the Camry (62), whose nine-speaker JBL is buried in a $3,810 XLE/XSE package, and just under the Sentra (68) and Accord (72), the latter on the strength of a twelve-speaker Bose system.

Digital instrument cluster45
#46 of 49 in classCompare all →

The Altima is the mid-size sedan with no full-digital option anywhere in the range: every trim, up to and including a loaded SL, keeps physical analog dials flanking a 7-inch colour Advanced Drive-Assist Display. The MY2023 facelift added the big centre screen without touching the cluster. A 7-inch colour ADAD is a respectable partial-digital display and keeps this above the Versa (38), but the absence of any configurable full-digital panel is a hard ceiling — the Camry (68), Accord (74) and Sentra (74) all put one within reach, and the previous placeholder score of 72 credited hardware the Altima does not offer.

OTA update capability40
#46 of 49 in classCompare all →

Over-the-air capability on this generation is thin and trim-dependent: the connected 12.3-inch SR/SL system can take map and infotainment software updates over the air, while the 8-inch head unit on the volume SV is effectively dealer- and USB-serviced. There is no whole-vehicle OTA that adds features to the powertrain or driver aids. That places it below the middle band most rivals now occupy — the Camry and Sentra (both 60) and the Accord (76) all run infotainment-and-maps OTA on the trims people buy — while staying above the Versa (25), which has no OTA path at all.

Companion app & remote functions60
#43 of 49 in classCompare all →

NissanConnect Services covers the expected core set through the MyNISSAN app — remote engine start and climate, remote lock/unlock, vehicle locator, alarm and maintenance alerts — on a complimentary trial that converts to a paid subscription, and there is no phone-as-key on the Altima. Mid-band, and effectively the same brand-level provision already scored on the Sentra (62); it lands a shade lower only because connected services do not reach the base S. It stays clearly behind the Camry (72), whose Remote Connect trial runs an unusually generous five years.

Charging ports & device power60
#45 of 49 in classCompare all →

The provision is adequate rather than generous: USB-A and USB-C ports in the front console with a second pair for rear passengers on SV and above, and a wireless charging pad confined to the upper SR/SL end of the range. Rear-row ports are the part that matters most for a family sedan and the Altima has them; what costs it ground is that the Camry (74) makes wireless charging standard from its base LE while the Altima still treats it as a top-trim item, and there is no household AC outlet. It lands under the Sentra (70) and Accord (72) and well above the Versa (40), which has no rear ports at all.

Keyless & remote access70
#41 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan Intelligent Key with proximity entry and push-button ignition is standard across the Altima range — including the base S, which is not a given in this class — and fob-based remote engine start arrives with the volume SV. That is the full practical convenience set most buyers shop for. The cap is the same as on every other Nissan here: no phone-as-key and no hands-free trunk release. Level with the Accord (70), a shade under the Sentra (72), below the Camry (76), whose app-based Digital Key at least exists.

Camera & parking aids72
#29 of 49 in classCompare all →

This is the category's standout and the one place the Altima's age costs it nothing. Nissan's Intelligent Around View Monitor — a genuine 360-degree surround view with moving-object detection — reaches the volume SV rather than sitting at the top of the range, and front and rear sonar come with it. That is a better parking package than the Camry can offer (60, where the Panoramic View Monitor needs a package stacked on a package on the two priciest grades) and than the Accord offers at all (58, no surround view on any trim). It stops short of the top band only because the camera resolution is mid-generation and there is no automated parking function.

Head-up display availability10
#45 of 49 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered on the 2026 Altima at any trim, including a fully loaded SL — Nissan reserves HUD for higher models such as the Rogue Platinum and Ariya, and no generation of the Altima has offered one. Bottom band by definition; the previous placeholder score of 56 credited hardware the car does not have. The Accord shares the miss (28) while the Camry's 10-inch HUD (58) is the only real point of separation among mainstream mid-size sedans.

8Use-Case FitOne of the Altima's weakest categories.1.54D
Kid & car-seat practicality58
#28 of 49 in classCompare all →

Mid-size proportions, wide-opening rear doors and a 15.4 cu ft trunk with a 60/40 fold make the Altima workable for two child seats and a stroller, but 35.2 in of rear legroom is the segment's tightest short of the compacts — a rear-facing seat crowds the front passenger — and the lower LATCH anchors sit deep in the seat bight rather than under easy covers. Handles family duty with real compromises. Re-scored from placeholder against the measured rear-seat dimensions and LATCH assessment.

Family safety package68
#35 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan puts Safety Shield 360 — AEB with pedestrian detection, rear automatic braking, blind-spot warning and rear cross-traffic alert — plus Rear Door Alert on the base S, so families shopping the cheapest trim get the full core suite, and NHTSA rates the car 5 stars overall. It stays out of the top band because the Altima no longer earns a Top Safety Pick: it grades below Good in the updated IIHS moderate-overlap (rear-passenger) test, headlights are only Acceptable, and ProPILOT Assist is gated above the base trim. Re-scored from placeholder.

Family road-trip comfort58
#31 of 49 in classCompare all →

The front half is genuinely good for long hauls — Zero Gravity seats and a comfort-tuned ride — and the 15.4 cu ft trunk holds a family's luggage with all seats occupied, but the back is where road trips get thin: 35.2 in of legroom, a flat low-cushion bench, no rear climate zone, rear USB ports only from SV up, and CVT drone on grades. Comfortable for medium trips, short of the Camry and Accord for a full day in the car. The placeholder score was too generous.

Daily driving ease72
#42 of 49 in classCompare all →

Commuting is the Altima's natural habitat: the Xtronic CVT is smooth and step-free at low speed, 188 hp is ample for merges, the Zero Gravity seat keeps fatigue down, ProPILOT Assist adds full-speed adaptive cruise with stop-and-hold from the volume SV, and Nissan kept physical climate and volume controls. It misses the top band for the engine drone under load, the lack of any EV-mode or one-pedal smoothness that hybrid rivals bring to stop-and-go, and ProPILOT not reaching the base S. Re-scored from placeholder.

Commuting cost efficiency55
#31 of 49 in classCompare all →

Regular 87-octane, a simple naturally aspirated four with no turbo to service, and about $1,550/yr in fuel make the Altima cheap in absolute terms, but 32 MPG combined and just 27 city is a long way off the hybrid mid-size sedans that now define this segment's commuting math, and Altima insurance quotes run materially above its rivals. Average per-mile cost for the class that a Camry or Accord hybrid beats by roughly $600 a year. Re-scored from placeholder.

Parking & maneuverability64
#33 of 49 in classCompare all →

The Altima carries a full mid-size footprint near 193 in long, and the fastback roofline, high rear deck and thick C-pillars pinch the over-the-shoulder view — but Nissan's Intelligent Around View Monitor puts a true 360-degree camera with moving-object detection on the volume SV rather than at the top of the range, which does more for tight parking than anything a rival offers at that price. Manageable with camera help, and better equipped for it than most of the class. Re-scored from placeholder.

Work capability18
#10 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan publishes no US tow rating for the Altima on any trim, and a unibody sedan with a 188 hp naturally aspirated four has no bed, no meaningful payload headroom and no powertrain margin under load. The sealed 15.4 cu ft trunk with a 60/40 pass-through is the entire work story. Not meaningfully work-capable — the placeholder score of 60 was far too high for a mid-size sedan, and this lands in line with the Camry (18) and Accord (18).

Durability for work duty50
#6 of 49 in classCompare all →

The Altima is one of the most heavily fleet- and rental-deployed sedans in the US, which is exactly the hard-use, high-mileage validation this item rewards, and the PR25DD 2.5L is a simple, cheap, long-serving engine with wear-friendly cloth interiors on S and SV. What holds it to the middle band is the Xtronic CVT — the component with the weakest durability reputation in the car, and the one that comes off warranty at 60,000 miles. Re-scored from placeholder.

Jobsite & upfit practicality17
#14 of 49 in classCompare all →

There is no 120V household outlet or inverter anywhere in the range, no factory roof-rail or hitch provision, no washable flooring or wear-surface option, and no upfit ecosystem of any kind. The 60/40 folding rear seatback and a handful of trunk hooks are the only work-adjacent provisions. Bottom band by definition — the placeholder 58 credited features the car does not have.

Long-distance comfort & range70
#35 of 49 in classCompare all →

This is the Altima's strongest mission. Zero Gravity front seats are a repeatedly praised long-haul asset, the ride is tuned for comfort, 39 MPG highway on a 16.2-gallon tank gives roughly 630 highway miles between stops, and ProPILOT Assist adds adaptive cruise plus lane centering from SV to take the edge off interstate hours. It falls short of the Camry and Accord on cabin quietness — CVT drone on grades — and offers no ventilated seats or head-up display. Re-scored from placeholder.

Outdoor & adventure capability46
#6 of 49 in classCompare all →

All-wheel drive is optional on every Altima trim for about $1,400 — a genuine advantage over the FWD-only Accord and the reason gravel roads, ski trips and bad-weather travel are within reach. Everything else is pavement-bound: sedan ground clearance, no published tow rating, no roof-rail or crossbar provision, no drive or terrain modes, no AC outlet for camping, and a sealed trunk rather than a flat load bay. Placeholder was close; adjusted down slightly to sit just under the Camry (50), whose AWD is paired with a more capable powertrain.

Gear & luggage flexibility53
#19 of 49 in classCompare all →

The 15.4 cu ft trunk is competitive-to-good for a mid-size sedan and opens wide, and the 60/40 split-folding seatback creates a pass-through for skis or flat-packed boxes. But a sedan's narrow trunk aperture is the hard limit — bulky gear is a squeeze — and there are no roof rails, no factory hitch for a bike or cargo rack, no underfloor bins and no frunk. Fits normal luggage; anything tall does not fit at all. Re-scored from placeholder.

9Driving ExperienceMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.91C-
Handling & agility61
#47 of 49 in classCompare all →

The L34 Altima's wide track and independent multi-link rear suspension deliver secure, predictable cornering with moderate body roll, but the platform dates to 2019 and reviewers consistently place it behind the Accord and the XV80 Camry for body control and chassis response. The SR's sport-tuned dampers and 19-in wheels sharpen it marginally without changing the character.

Steering feel57
#46 of 49 in classCompare all →

The electric rack is accurately geared and light enough to make the Altima easy in parking lots and on the highway, but it is heavily isolated — weight builds artificially off-center and there is essentially no road texture fed back through the wheel. Precise enough for confident placement; nothing more.

Braking confidence60
#47 of 49 in classCompare all →

Stopping distances from 70 mph land in the high-170-ft range for the 2.5 — mid-pack for a roughly 3,200-lb mid-size sedan — and the pedal is firm enough to modulate but somewhat soft in the first inch of travel. No regen blending to complicate the pedal since there is no electrified variant.

Powertrain smoothness & response60
#45 of 49 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.5L paired to the Xtronic CVT is shudder-free and lag-free in normal driving — no gear hunting, no turbo lag, no stop/start roughness — but 188 hp through a CVT gives the familiar rubber-band response under hard throttle, where revs flare ahead of road speed. Adequate rather than well-calibrated.

Drivetrain noise & vibration54
#47 of 49 in classCompare all →

The clearest refinement weakness. The 2.5L is unobtrusive at a steady cruise, but merging or climbing pins the CVT at high rpm and produces the drone reviewers reliably flag; the engine also turns coarse near its 6,000-rpm power peak. Vibration through the controls is well isolated — the problem is noise character, not harshness.

Turning circle
37.4 ft curb-to-curb (S/SV/SL on 17-18-in wheels); slightly wider on the SR's 19-in wheels
43/100
#17 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan's published curb-to-curb turning diameter for the L34 Altima is 37.4 ft on the volume trims' 17- and 18-in wheels — mid-pack for a mid-size sedan (identical to the Camry LE, slightly tighter than the Accord's 38.1 ft) but well off the tight-turning compacts. The previous placeholder value of 35.5 ft was too optimistic for this wheelbase.

Driving position & ergonomics75
#29 of 49 in classCompare all →

The strongest part of the Altima's driving experience. Nissan's Zero Gravity front seats are well regarded for long-haul support, front legroom of 43.8 in and headroom of 39.2 in accommodate tall drivers, and the cabin retains physical HVAC and audio knobs plus a power driver's seat from SV up. Marks come off for the low seating position and thick rear pillars that pinch over-shoulder visibility.

Fun-to-drive factor48
#48 of 49 in classCompare all →

With the VC-Turbo gone from the lineup, the 2026 Altima is tuned purely as quiet, easy transport and there is nothing left to reward a longer route home — no engine note worth hearing, no throttle immediacy through the CVT, and steering too isolated to make a good road interesting. Competent and forgettable.

10Value & Market PositionMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.70C-
Standard equipment generosity64
#43 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan Safety Shield 360 standard across the range and ProPILOT Assist from the SV grade are genuinely generous for the price, but the rest of the base S spec is plain — cloth, six speakers, 8-inch screen, no remote start until SV and no built-in navigation below SR. Competitive rather than class-leading content at base and volume trims.

Feature value per dollar52
#48 of 49 in classCompare all →

At roughly $31,100 for the volume SV the Altima asks near-Camry money while delivering 188 hp, a single 2.5L/CVT powertrain and no hybrid option, against a Camry that is hybrid-only for similar outlay. Content-for-price sits behind the segment's fresher rivals even before factoring the Altima's weak resale.

Trim & configuration breadth60
#41 of 49 in classCompare all →

Four well-spaced trims with all-wheel drive orderable on every one of them is real configurability and a point of difference against Accord and most rivals. Offsetting that, the range collapsed to a single engine and single transmission once the VC-Turbo was dropped, with no hybrid or performance variant to choose.

Sales popularity & market acceptance68
#19 of 49 in classCompare all →

The Altima remains a six-figure-volume nameplate and one of the stronger sellers in a shrinking mid-size class, typically placing behind Camry and Accord but ahead of Sonata and K5. The trajectory is the problem: volume has fallen well off the nameplate's peak across the L34 generation, with a meaningful share going to fleet.

Brand desirability & image45
#48 of 49 in classCompare all →

Nissan's brand equity in the US sits below neutral: lingering CVT reliability baggage, a reputation for subprime-heavy retail and fleet placement, and ongoing corporate restructuring coverage all weigh on the badge. The Altima carries more of that association than any other Nissan car line, and it shows in the model's resale.

Deals & incentive availability80
#18 of 49 in classCompare all →

Scored on buyer benefit as the item directs: the Altima is one of the most discountable cars in its class, routinely carrying cash allowances, subsidized APR and aggressive lease support, with wide dealer negotiability on top. The same market softness that wrecks its residuals makes it cheap to transact.

Model freshness32
#48 of 49 in classCompare all →

2026 is the eighth model year of the L34 generation, and even the MY2023 facelift is now four years old, leaving an aging platform with no hybrid and legacy infotainment while newer Nissans have moved on. With no announced successor, buyers also face genuine uncertainty about replacement or discontinuation of the nameplate.

Critical reception & awards44
#49 of 49 in classCompare all →

Reviewers reliably place the Altima in the bottom half of mid-size sedan rankings and it does not win comparison tests, with criticism concentrated on CVT drone, a dated cabin and the absence of a hybrid. Credit remains for ride comfort, front-seat space and available AWD, but the car carries no significant recent award.