MotorGPA
Find My Match
Model year:2026+9 not yet gradedHistory & evolution ↓
Nissan logo
Compact SUV

2026 Nissan Rogue

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2.14CGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.87C-
Safety
3.50A-
EfficiencyGas
3.16B
31 MPG combined · 450 mi range · $1,600/yr energy
Comfort
2.00C
Value
2.54C+
Ownership Cost
1.92C-
Technology
2.81B-
Driving Experience
2.10C

The verdict

A mixed-report compact suv, strong on safety and held back by performance.

The 2026 Rogue is the value play in the compact SUV class: it starts around $30,700 — roughly $1,600 under a CR-V LX — comes with Nissan's full Safety Shield 360 driver-assist suite on every trim including the base car, and the volume SV AWD near $34,500 throws in a 12.3-inch screen with Google built-in, wireless CarPlay and a 360-degree camera. Where it wins is the stuff you touch daily: Zero Gravity seats, rear doors that swing to nearly 90 degrees for car seats, and 44.3 inches of front legroom. Where it loses is under the hood and down the road — the 1.5L three-cylinder VC-Turbo is coarse and unproven, is covered by only a 5-year/60,000-mile powertrain warranty, and sits behind an engine-bearing recall on this generation, while resale hovers near 54 percent at five years against roughly 68-71 percent for a CR-V. Buy it if the discount and the standard equipment matter more than the badge; skip it if you want a hybrid, a long warranty, or money back at trade-in time.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Every trim gets the full safety suite
  • A genuinely roomy, comfortable place to sit
  • Priced under the class leaders, and dealers deal

What holds it back

  • The warranty is the shortest thing about it
  • Not a towing or working vehicle
  • The powertrain is the real risk in this car

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Nissan Rogue

Production history

2008present · 19 years · 3 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1200820132008Gen 2201420202014Gen 32021now2021In production2026 — graded2025 — not yet graded2024 — not yet graded2023 — not yet graded2022 — not yet graded2021 — not yet graded2020 — not yet graded2019 — not yet graded2018 — not yet graded2017 — not yet gradedProduction began 2008
202661+9 not yet graded

Best fit & conditions

FamilyB+78/100
AdventureB74/100
CommuterB74/100
Winter / inclementC+67/100
Work / TowF42/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Trims & configurations

4 trims

Scores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:

S · baseSVSLPlatinum

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe Rogue's lowest-graded category.0.10F
Horsepower
201 hp (1.5L VC-Turbo, premium fuel); 195 hp on 87 octane — same output on every gas trim S through Platinum
13/100
#117 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume SV trim uses the KR15DDT 1.5L variable-compression turbo three-cylinder, rated 201 hp on premium and 195 hp on regular — a single output across the whole gas range, so there is no step-up engine to lift the model-range max. 201 hp sits low in the 150–550 hp SUV band even though it is competitive against compact-SUV rivals specifically.

Torque
225 lb-ft @ 2,800–4,400 rpm (premium); 222 lb-ft on 87 octane
26/100
#113 of 148 in classCompare all →

The VC-Turbo's strength is torque rather than peak power — 225 lb-ft on a broad plateau from 2,800 rpm makes the Rogue feel more urgent in traffic than its 201 hp suggests, and it out-torques the CR-V's 1.5T (179 lb-ft) and Forester's NA 2.5 (178 lb-ft) by a wide margin.

0–60 mph time
~7.8 s (SV/SL AWD, instrumented); published tests of the VC-Turbo Rogue range roughly 7.6–8.2 s
28/100
#116 of 148 in classCompare all →

The VC-Turbo Rogue is meaningfully quicker than the 2.5L it replaced (~8.5 s) and quicker than the gas CR-V (~8.4 s) and Forester (~8.5 s), though it trails the hybrid RAV4 (~7.0 s). Roughly mid-pack among compact SUVs, low in the absolute 3.5–9.5 s SUV band.

Powertrain refinement57
#124 of 148 in classCompare all →

The variable-compression three-cylinder delivers strong, flexible mid-range thrust and pulls cleanly once boost arrives, but reviewers consistently flag a coarse three-cylinder thrum under load, some off-idle lag, and audible vibration at idle. Competent and torque-rich rather than genuinely refined — in line with the Escape's 1.5L EcoBoost I3 (60) and slightly ahead of the Forester's boxer four (58).

Transmission behavior60
#124 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan's Xtronic CVT is one of the better-tuned units in the class — it holds a natural-feeling ratio in normal driving and uses stepped programming under hard throttle to mask the drone — but it still flares and drones when pushed, and there is no true manual mode. Sits between the Forester's Lineartronic (55) and Honda's G-Design Shift CVT (66).

Max towing capacity
1,500 lbs when properly equipped (all gas trims)
7/100
#113 of 148 in classCompare all →

1,500 lbs is a token rating — enough for a small utility trailer or a pair of jet skis and nothing more. It matches the gas CR-V and Forester but falls far behind compact SUVs engineered to tow, such as the CX-50 (3,500 lbs) and Escape 2.0L EcoBoost (3,500 lbs), and sits near the floor of the 1,000–8,000 lb SUV band.

AWD/4WD availability62
#132 of 148 in classCompare all →

Intelligent AWD is optional on every trim from base S to Platinum rather than restricted to upper trims, and AWD models add a drive-mode selector with Snow, Off-Road and Tow settings. Operation is conventional on-demand front-drive-based AWD with no low range or true torque vectoring, so it lands with the CR-V (60) and well short of the Forester's standard symmetrical AWD (88).

Off-road capability42
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

Roughly 8.2 inches of ground clearance on AWD models and an Off-Road drive mode give the Rogue light-duty dirt-road ability, and the Rock Creek trim adds all-terrain tires and unique styling. There are no lockers, skid plates, or low-range hardware, and Rock Creek is more appearance package than capability upgrade — comparable to the CR-V TrailSport (45), below the Forester's X-MODE hardware (68).

Powertrain lineup breadth42
#67 of 148 in classCompare all →

The gas Rogue is a one-engine lineup — the 1.5L VC-Turbo and Xtronic CVT are the only combination offered from S to Platinum, with FWD/AWD the sole drivetrain choice. That is materially narrower than the CR-V's gas-plus-hybrid pairing (65) or the Escape's four powertrains (84). Scored at the top of the single-powertrain band rather than the bottom because Nissan has electrified Rogue variants (plug-in hybrid and e-Power) in play; their 2026 US availability could not be confirmed this run and would raise this item to roughly 60 if they are on sale.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Rogue's strongest categories.3.16B
Combined fuel economy
31 MPG combined (SV AWD volume config); 33 MPG combined FWD
88/100
#42 of 148 in classCompare all →

EPA combined 31 MPG for the volume SV AWD configuration of the 1.5L VC-Turbo three-cylinder with Xtronic CVT; FWD trims rate 33 MPG combined. Ratings are unchanged carryover for the T33 generation, which has held 30/37/33 FWD and 28/34/31 AWD since the VC-Turbo replaced the 2.5L four for 2022.

City fuel economy
28 MPG city (SV AWD volume config); 30 MPG city FWD
88/100
#44 of 148 in classCompare all →

EPA city 28 MPG for the SV AWD volume config, 30 MPG FWD. The turbo three-cylinder gives up ground on the city cycle to two-motor hybrid rivals (CR-V hybrid 40-43 city, RAV4 hybrid 40+), which is where the Rogue's lack of a mainstream hybrid costs it most.

Highway fuel economy
34 MPG hwy (SV AWD volume config); 37 MPG hwy FWD
88/100
#43 of 148 in classCompare all →

EPA highway 34 MPG AWD / 37 MPG FWD. Highway is the Rogue's strongest cycle — the small-displacement turbo and tall CVT ratios make it competitive with, and in FWD form better than, most hybrid compact SUVs on the highway cycle.

Driving range
~450 mi (SV AWD volume config); ~479 mi FWD
53/100
#36 of 148 in classCompare all →

14.5-gallon tank x 31 combined MPG = ~450 mi for the SV AWD volume config; FWD trims reach ~479 mi on the same tank. Solid mid-pack range for a gas compact SUV, though well short of hybrid rivals that clear 550 mi.

Estimated annual fuel cost
~$1,600/yr (SV AWD volume config); ~$1,500/yr FWD
83/100
#42 of 148 in classCompare all →

At EPA's standard 15,000 mi/yr and 55/45 city/highway split, 31 combined MPG on regular unleaded works out to roughly $1,600/yr for the SV AWD volume config, about $1,500/yr for FWD. That undercuts a gas CR-V AWD (~$1,700/yr at 29 combined) but runs $100-200/yr above the best hybrid compact SUVs.

Fuel requirements70
#98 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 1.5L VC-Turbo makes its full 201 hp / 225 lb-ft on premium; regular 87-octane is permitted but drops output to roughly 194 hp / 222 lb-ft. Nothing about the car requires premium and the penalty for running regular is small, but the split rating keeps it out of the top band occupied by rivals rated on regular outright (CR-V, RAV4). No diesel, E85, or charging infrastructure considerations on the gas trims.

3SafetyThe Rogue's best-graded category.3.50A-
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall (5 frontal, 5 side, 4 rollover)
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

The third-generation (T33) Rogue has carried a 5-star NHTSA overall rating since the 2021 launch, and the 2026 model year is a styling/tech refresh of the same structure rather than a new platform, so the rating carries forward. Replaces a placeholder value of 4.1 stars.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness80
#37 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue has been a consistent IIHS award winner through this generation with Good results in the small-overlap and updated side tests, but the updated moderate-overlap (rear-passenger) test is the weak spot that has kept it at the edge of Top Safety Pick+ rather than clear of it. Scored at the bottom of the award band rather than the middle to reflect that.

Standard ADAS suite breadth86
#63 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan Safety Shield 360 is standard on every Rogue trim including the base S — AEB with pedestrian detection, blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert, lane departure warning, rear automatic braking and high-beam assist — with Intelligent Cruise Control also standard. That is a genuinely comprehensive standard suite and a real content advantage over rivals that gate blind-spot monitoring to mid trims.

Automatic emergency braking performance65
#114 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan's forward AEB rates well on the legacy vehicle-to-vehicle and daytime pedestrian evaluations, but the Rogue has not shown standout results under the tougher 2023-onward IIHS front crash prevention protocol that weights nighttime pedestrian scenarios and higher closing speeds. Placed in the middle band accordingly.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage78
#82 of 148 in classCompare all →

Blind Spot Warning and Rear Cross Traffic Alert are standard on all trims as part of Safety Shield 360, with Blind Spot Intervention (active steering nudge) added on upper trims. Held below the top band because there is no safe-exit/rear-occupant door alert and no trailer-aware blind-spot coverage.

Lane keeping & centering74
#62 of 148 in classCompare all →

Lane Departure Warning is standard and ProPILOT Assist adds steering-assist lane centering on SV and above. Reviewers describe the centering as competent and unobtrusive but prone to drifting toward lane edges on sweeping curves and poorly marked roads — solidly mid-band rather than best-in-class.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist78
#68 of 148 in classCompare all →

Intelligent Cruise Control is standard with full-speed-range stop-and-go, and ProPILOT Assist with Navi-link adds speed adjustment for curves and interchanges plus a hold function in traffic. Well-integrated and among the better mainstream systems, but it brakes late in cut-in situations and resumes less smoothly than the class leaders.

Hands-free driving availability62
#38 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue offers hands-free highway driving via ProPILOT Assist 2.1 on the top Platinum trim, working on mapped divided highways with automated lane-change assistance. That puts it ahead of the RAV4 and CR-V, which offer no hands-free option at all, but the mapped-road coverage and top-trim-only availability fall well short of mature Super Cruise or BlueCruise deployments.

Headlight performance78
#33 of 148 in classCompare all →

LED headlights are standard across the range and have rated Good or Acceptable through this generation, with automatic high-beam assist included in the standard Safety Shield 360 package. Not scored in the top band because the base-trim projector setup rates below the upper trims' units.

Outward visibility78
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue's upright greenhouse, tall side glass and relatively slim A-pillars give it better-than-average natural sightlines for a compact SUV, and the Intelligent Around View Monitor 360-degree camera on upper trims covers the remaining blind zones. Thick rear pillars and a rising beltline keep it out of the top band.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability82
#23 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue's signature near-90-degree rear doors make car-seat installation unusually easy, and the rear bench is wide with generous legroom and accessible lower anchors. Scored in the top band on access, held just inside it because three-across with full-size seats is still a squeeze in a compact SUV.

4Space & ComfortMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.00C
Seating capacity
5 seats (all trims: S, SV, SL, Platinum)
25/100
#52 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue is a strictly two-row, five-seat compact SUV across every trim — no third row or six-seat configuration has ever been offered on the third-generation (T33) car. Replaces a placeholder value of 6.3 seats, which was not a real Rogue configuration.

Front headroom
41.1 in (39.4 in with panoramic moonroof)
82/100
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan publishes 41.1 in of front headroom for the T33 Rogue without the panoramic moonroof, dropping to roughly 39.4 in when the roof is fitted — a strong figure for the compact class and well clear of the RAV4 (37.9 in) and CR-V (40.0 in).

Front legroom
44.3 in
96/100
#12 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan quotes 44.3 in of front legroom, among the largest published numbers in the compact SUV class; the figure is measured generously relative to some rivals, but the Rogue's front seating position is genuinely roomy and reviewers consistently note the airy front cabin.

Rear headroom
39.2 in (38.5 in with panoramic moonroof)
80/100
#51 of 148 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom of 39.2 in is competitive for the segment and only marginally behind the CR-V (39.3 in) and RAV4 (39.5 in); the panoramic moonroof costs roughly three-quarters of an inch.

Rear legroom
38.5 in (rear bench slides fore/aft)
71/100
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

At 38.5 in the Rogue's second row is roomy enough for adults and helped by a sliding/reclining bench and near-90-degree rear door opening, but it trails the class-leading CR-V (41.0 in) by a meaningful margin.

Third-row usability18
#80 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue has no third row in any trim or model year of the current generation — buyers needing seven seats are pushed up to the Pathfinder. Scored in the low band per the item's guidance for two-row SUVs rather than omitted. The previous 62 was a placeholder implying seating the vehicle does not offer.

Cargo/trunk volume
36.5 cu ft behind 2nd row (≈31.6 cu ft on trims with Bose subwoofer / cargo floor raised)
21/100
#59 of 148 in classCompare all →

Roughly 36.5 cu ft behind the second row on the volume SV, with the Divide-N-Hide floor at its lowest setting; trims carrying the Bose premium audio subwoofer lose around five cubic feet. Competitive but a step behind the CR-V (39.3 cu ft). The prior 63 cu ft placeholder was far outside any real compact-SUV figure.

Max cargo volume
74.1 cu ft seats folded (≈70.6 cu ft with Bose subwoofer)
42/100
#57 of 148 in classCompare all →

About 74.1 cu ft with the 60/40 second row folded — mid-pack for the compact class, between the RAV4 (70.4) and CR-V (76.5), with a near-flat load floor and a wide, square opening that make the space easy to use.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions76
#23 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Divide-N-Hide cargo system — reversible, repositionable panels that split the hold into hidden compartments or create a flat load floor — is a genuine differentiator, backed by a deep center console with a pass-through, large door bins and rear-seat USB ports. Short of true segment-standout innovation, but above the class average.

Seat comfort78
#51 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan's NASA-inspired Zero Gravity front seats are one of the Rogue's most consistently praised attributes, with well-judged cushioning and support over long stints; the rear bench reclines. Held below 80 because lower trims get limited seat adjustment and less bolstering, so the best of it lands on SL/Platinum.

Ride quality74
#64 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue rides on the softer, more absorbent end of the compact class and settles well on the highway, though the 19-inch wheels on SL/Platinum introduce some sharpness over broken pavement and body control is unremarkable when pushed.

Cabin quietness66
#110 of 148 in classCompare all →

Wind and road noise are well suppressed at highway cruise thanks to acoustic front glass and added insulation, but the 1.5L three-cylinder VC-Turbo is audibly coarse and drones under hard acceleration — the most common noise complaint about this generation. Score unchanged from the placeholder value by coincidence, not carry-over.

Climate & comfort features70
#109 of 148 in classCompare all →

Dual-zone automatic climate control, heated front seats, heated steering wheel and remote start are available from the mid trims up, with heated rear seats and a panoramic moonroof reserved for SL/Platinum. Ventilated front seats are not part of the Rogue's typical equipment list, which caps the score below the class leaders.

5Cost of OwnershipOne of the Rogue's weakest categories.1.92C-
Base MSRP
~$30,700 (S FWD incl. destination)
86/100
#20 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue S FWD anchors the lineup well below the compact-SUV average, undercutting the CR-V LX ($32,315) and RAV4 by roughly $1,500-2,500 — aggressive entry pricing has long been central to Rogue volume strategy. Figure carried forward from MY2025 with a typical model-year increase applied.

Volume-Trim Price
~$34,500 (SV AWD, volume trim, incl. destination)
82/100
#22 of 148 in classCompare all →

SV is the long-standing Rogue volume trim and AWD is the majority mix in the segment; SV AWD as typically equipped lands near $34,500, roughly $2,300 under a CR-V EX-L. Estimated from the MY2025 trim walk (SV ~+$2,350 over S, AWD ~+$1,500).

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$6,200 over 5 years (incl. CVT repair exposure)
51/100
#90 of 148 in classCompare all →

Routine service intervals and Nissan parts pricing are mid-pack for the class, but the Xtronic CVT remains the Rogue's dominant out-of-warranty repair risk and pushes projected 5-year cost above the Honda/Toyota compact-SUV benchmarks (~$5,400-5,800). Estimated from segment norms and Nissan's repair-cost history.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~54% after 5 years (vs ~68-71% CR-V, ~60% segment avg.)
47/100
#38 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is the Rogue's weakest ownership dimension. Heavy incentive and fleet participation depress used values relative to the CR-V and RAV4, historically leaving Rogue retention in the low-50s against a ~60% segment average. Estimated from Nissan's long-run residual pattern in the compact-SUV class.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
0/100
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan's new-vehicle limited warranty is the industry-baseline 3 years / 36,000 miles — matching Honda, Toyota, Ford and GM but trailing Hyundai/Kia (5 yr / 60,000 mi) by a full two years. Nissan has held these terms unchanged for many years.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain
0/100
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan's 5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain coverage sits at the bottom of the framework band and is half the 10 yr / 100,000 mi protection from Hyundai, Kia and Mitsubishi — a real weakness given the CVT is the component buyers most worry about.

Complimentary maintenance & perks52
#88 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan includes no complimentary scheduled maintenance on the Rogue — a clear gap against ToyotaCare (2 yr / 25,000 mi) and Honda Service Pass (2 yr / 24,000 mi). What buyers get is roadside assistance bundled with the 3-yr/36k basic warranty plus NissanConnect Services and SiriusXM trial periods, which places it at the floor of the 'basic roadside only' band.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$22,070 (≈$15,870 depreciation + $6,200 maintenance)
72/100
#26 of 148 in classCompare all →

$34,500 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (54% retained, or about $18,630) leaves about $15,870 in depreciation. Add the projected $6,200 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $22,070 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Rogue's weakest categories.1.87C-
Predicted reliability60
#79 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mixed signals: the T33 Rogue has drawn roughly average-to-decent predicted reliability marks from J.D. Power and Consumer Reports in recent years, but that sits against an unresolved 1.5L VC-Turbo engine-bearing recall campaign and Nissan's Xtronic CVT reputation, which keeps it below the CR-V/RAV4 tier. Dropped from the placeholder 70 to reflect the powertrain risk that dominates this nameplate's dependability picture.

Brand reliability track record57
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan is a mid-pack dependability brand, not a top-5 one: it typically lands in the middle of J.D. Power's Vehicle Dependability Study and mid-to-lower in Consumer Reports' brand rankings, well behind the Toyota, Lexus, Honda, Subaru and Hyundai/Kia names that dominate this segment. The long shadow of Nissan's CVT durability history keeps the brand out of the upper band.

Recall & TSB history45
#125 of 148 in classCompare all →

This generation carries a systemic powertrain recall, not just routine campaigns: Nissan recalled T33 Rogues with the 1.5L VC-Turbo over engine bearing failure traced to manufacturing debris, a risk of engine damage or stall rather than a trim or software fix. A powertrain-integrity recall of that scale puts the item in the sub-50 band per the scoring guidance, even though 2026 production should incorporate the corrected process.

Powertrain durability reputation40
#142 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 1.5L VC-Turbo three-cylinder is the most mechanically novel engine in the compact-SUV class — a variable-compression multi-link mechanism with no high-mileage track record — and it is paired with an Xtronic CVT from a family with a long, well-documented durability problem. Combined with the engine-bearing recall, this is the guidance's 'unproven high-risk design' band; the placeholder 85 was flatly wrong for this powertrain.

Interior material quality73
#85 of 148 in classCompare all →

Cabin materials are a genuine T33 strength and the main reason this category is not lower: reviewers have consistently called the upper trims near-premium for a mainstream compact SUV, with quilted semi-aniline leather on Platinum, broad soft-touch coverage and good switchgear feel. The volume SV is plainer with more hard plastic in low-touch zones, which holds it short of class-leading.

Fit & finish69
#88 of 148 in classCompare all →

Assembly quality is solid and unremarkable — the Rogue posts roughly average initial-quality results with no pattern of rattles or panel-gap complaints in reviews, which is squarely the 'generally solid with scattered complaints' band. Nudged down from the placeholder because nothing supports a top-band claim.

Dealer & service network72
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

Coverage is a strength — Nissan runs roughly a thousand US dealers, so parts and service are within reach almost anywhere — but service satisfaction is the weak half of the item, with Nissan typically mid-to-lower in customer-service studies and no complimentary scheduled-maintenance program to bring owners back. Adequate-to-good, not the dense-plus-well-regarded top band the placeholder 83 implied.

Parts availability & repair cost70
#55 of 148 in classCompare all →

As one of the best-selling SUVs in the US the Rogue has abundant, cheap routine parts and deep independent-shop familiarity, which alone would justify a higher score. It is held to the middle of the normal band by two expensive failure modes — CVT replacement and the specialized VC-Turbo engine, which few independents will rebuild — so tail risk on a major repair sits above segment norm.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Rogue's strongest categories.2.81B-
Touchscreen size
12.3 in on SV and above (8.0 in on base S)
62/100
#56 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Rogue carries over the refreshed third-generation (T33) cabin, where the volume SV trim gets the 12.3-inch NissanConnect touchscreen with Google built-in and only the base S retains the 8.0-inch unit. Score is recomputed from the 12.3 in volume-trim value against the SUV band.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness73
#101 of 148 in classCompare all →

NissanConnect with Google built-in on the 12.3-inch screen is quick, logically laid out and, unusually for the class, keeps a real volume knob plus separate physical climate controls — the reason it grades above the CR-V and Tucson. It stops short of the top band because the graphics and menu design are plain next to the newest Hyundai/Kia and 2026 RAV4 systems, and the base S 8.0-inch system is a visibly older experience.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto84
#121 of 148 in classCompare all →

Wireless Apple CarPlay and wireless Android Auto come standard on the volume SV and every trim above it, which is the full-marks configuration for this item. Held just below the top band because the base S trim's 8.0-inch system is the weaker implementation (wireless CarPlay but wired Android Auto), so the lineup is not uniformly wireless.

Voice control & native navigation84
#48 of 148 in classCompare all →

Google built-in puts native Google Maps and Google Assistant natural-language voice on the volume trim — genuinely best-in-class native navigation rather than something owners bypass for phone projection, and it also enables Play Store apps. Kept out of the 90s because the Google services depend on connected-services data that reverts to a paid subscription after the included trial, and the base S falls back to Nissan's older voice system with no native nav.

Audio system quality72
#99 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 10-speaker Bose premium system is available on the upper SL and Platinum trims and is competent but not a standout, while the volume SV runs a 6-speaker base setup that reviewers describe as merely adequate. That is a solidly mid-pack showing in a class where Harman Kardon and Bose upgrades are common.

Digital instrument cluster68
#106 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 12.3-inch fully configurable digital cluster is offered, but on the upper SL and Platinum trims — the volume SV runs a 7-inch color drive-assist display flanked by analog gauges, which is the classic partial-digital middle band.

OTA update capability60
#111 of 148 in classCompare all →

Over-the-air updates on the Rogue cover the infotainment side — system software, apps and Google map data on Google built-in cars — rather than whole-vehicle software. There is no track record of Nissan pushing feature-adding OTA updates to powertrain, chassis or driver-assist modules on this platform, which places it squarely in the infotainment-only band.

Companion app & remote functions62
#125 of 148 in classCompare all →

The NissanConnect Services app covers the core set — remote start with climate preconditioning, remote lock/unlock, vehicle locate, alerts and maintenance info — but it is subscription-gated once the included trial ends, the Rogue offers no phone-as-key, and app-store sentiment for NissanConnect is mediocre on reliability and login friction.

Charging ports & device power72
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front and second-row USB-A plus USB-C ports cover both rows and wireless phone charging is available from the volume SV upward, which is a solid mainstream-compact showing. It misses the top band because there is no household 120V outlet and the wireless pad is package- or trim-dependent rather than standard fleet-wide.

Keyless & remote access76
#86 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan Intelligent Key proximity entry, push-button start and key-fob remote engine start are standard across the lineup including the base S, which is better than several rivals that reserve remote start for upper trims. It sits below the top band because the hands-free Motion Activated Liftgate is limited to SL/Platinum and the Rogue has no phone-as-key.

Camera & parking aids76
#81 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan's Intelligent Around View Monitor is one of the better 360-degree systems in the class — crisp, with a genuinely useful off-angle/3D view and moving-object detection — and it reaches the volume SV rather than being top-trim-only, backed by front and rear sonar. Short of the top band because there is no automated parking assist on the Rogue.

Head-up display availability58
#89 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 10.8-inch color head-up display is offered but only on the range-topping Platinum trim, so a volume-trim SV buyer cannot get one at any price. That is the definition of the middle band — available, but out of reach on the trim most people buy.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.53C+
Kid & car-seat practicality82
#19 of 148 in classCompare all →

Family logistics are the Rogue's signature strength: rear doors that open to nearly 90 degrees, a sliding/reclining second-row bench, and the Divide-N-Hide cargo floor make car-seat installs and stroller loading unusually easy for a compact SUV. Replaces a placeholder score that understated a segment-leading trait.

Family safety package78
#62 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan Safety Shield 360 is standard on every trim including the base S, so families buying at the volume price point get AEB with pedestrian detection, blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert and rear automatic braking without paying up. ProPILOT Assist arrives at SV, and Rear Door Alert is standard.

Family road-trip comfort71
#83 of 148 in classCompare all →

Good but not class-leading for four-plus on a long haul: rear vents, first- and second-row USB-A/USB-C, a sliding rear bench and a large 36.5 cu ft hold behind row two, offset by rear legroom that trails the CR-V and rear amenities such as heated rear seats that are confined to the top trim.

Daily driving ease78
#53 of 148 in classCompare all →

A relaxed commuter: light steering, comfort-biased tuning, standard Zero Gravity front seats, good outward visibility and ProPILOT Assist with stop-and-go from SV upward. The three-cylinder VC-Turbo's coarse note under hard acceleration is the main thing keeping it out of the top band.

Commuting cost efficiency63
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

Competitive per-mile costs for a gas-only compact SUV, but the Rogue has no hybrid option in this configuration, so it gives up roughly a quarter of the economy to the hybrid CR-V and RAV4 that dominate the commuter use case. Premium fuel is recommended to reach the full 201 hp.

Parking & maneuverability78
#22 of 148 in classCompare all →

Easy to place in a city: a tidy compact-SUV footprint, a tight turning circle, an upright glasshouse with good sightlines, and Nissan's Intelligent Around View Monitor with Moving Object Detection plus front and rear sonar on the trims most buyers choose.

Work capability38
#102 of 148 in classCompare all →

Not meaningfully a work vehicle. Maximum towing is roughly 1,500 lbs — at the bottom of the compact SUV class and well under the RAV4 and turbo Escape's 3,500 lbs — with no bed, no payload-oriented structure and little torque reserve under load through the CVT. The 74.1 cu ft hold is the only genuinely work-useful attribute. Corrects a placeholder that badly overstated capability (the cat1 towing figure on file is also still a placeholder).

Durability for work duty42
#105 of 148 in classCompare all →

The powertrain is the problem for hard-duty use: the 1.5L variable-compression turbo three-cylinder paired to an Xtronic CVT is complex and unproven under sustained load, and it sits behind Nissan's long-running CVT durability reputation. Wear-friendly cloth on S/SV helps, but nothing about this drivetrain reads fleet-proven. Corrects a placeholder that implied fleet-grade toughness.

Jobsite & upfit practicality48
#46 of 148 in classCompare all →

Few work-oriented provisions. There are cargo tie-down hooks, roof rails on SV and above, an accessory hitch and the Divide-N-Hide floor's reversible wipe-clean panel, but no 120V onboard AC outlet, no washable cabin option and effectively no commercial upfit ecosystem behind it.

Long-distance comfort & range79
#53 of 148 in classCompare all →

A genuinely good mile-eater. Zero Gravity front seats are a standout for seat endurance, ProPILOT Assist takes real strain out of highway stints, acoustic laminated glass keeps cruising noise down, and the tank is good for roughly 450-480 miles between stops.

Outdoor & adventure capability62
#83 of 148 in classCompare all →

Fine for trailheads and gravel — Intelligent AWD with selectable drive modes including an off-road setting, roughly 8.2 in of ground clearance and roof rails on most trims — but the ~1,500 lb tow ceiling rules out most boats, teardrops and utility trailers, and there is no factory all-terrain hardware package.

Gear & luggage flexibility79
#38 of 148 in classCompare all →

One of the more flexible cargo bays in the class thanks to Divide-N-Hide: a multi-position floor that creates either a hidden underfloor well or a flat load deck, combined with a 60/40 near-flat-folding bench, roof rails and 74.1 cu ft of maximum space. Corrects a placeholder that read this as restrictive.

9Driving ExperienceMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.10C
Handling & agility63
#109 of 148 in classCompare all →

The third-generation (T33) Rogue is tuned firmly toward comfort: body motions are well controlled and grip is adequate (roughly 0.82 g skidpad in published testing), so it is secure and predictable, but it leans early and never rewards a quick pace the way a CX-5, Sportage or CR-V does. Solidly mid-pack for a compact SUV — competent, not agile.

Steering feel58
#99 of 148 in classCompare all →

Accurate and light enough to make parking and low-speed maneuvering easy, but the electric assist is the Rogue's least communicative dynamic trait — reviewers repeatedly call it numb, with little build-up of weight or feedback as cornering loads rise. Precise enough to place the car, uninformative about what the front tires are doing.

Braking confidence70
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

A quiet strength: instrumented 60–0 mph stops for the T33 Rogue land in the low-to-mid 120-foot range, competitive with the CR-V (120 ft) and Sportage (124 ft) and better than the 2026 RAV4 Hybrid's 127 ft, with a firm, linear pedal that is easy to modulate. No regen-blending complication on the gas powertrain.

Powertrain smoothness & response57
#126 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 1.5L VC-Turbo three-cylinder's 225 lb-ft plateau from 2,800 rpm gives genuinely strong mid-range response once boost arrives, and the Xtronic CVT's simulated steps mask the usual rubber-band effect under hard throttle. Held back by off-idle turbo lag, a hesitant low-speed tip-in calibration, and auto stop/start restarts that a three-cylinder cannot hide as well as a four.

Drivetrain noise & vibration50
#133 of 148 in classCompare all →

The most consistently criticized aspect of how the Rogue drives. The three-cylinder has an inherent thrum at idle and a coarse, offbeat character under load, and the CVT holds revs high enough to drone on highway grades. Wind and road isolation at a steady cruise is good — acoustic glass on upper trims helps — but the powertrain itself is the noise source, which is why this sits below the CR-V (64) and RAV4 (60), whose four-cylinder hybrids draw similar but milder complaints.

Turning circle
37.4 ft curb-to-curb (SV AWD); larger-wheel Platinum trims measure marginally more
58/100
#30 of 148 in classCompare all →

37.4 ft curb-to-curb is mid-pack for a compact SUV — a shade wider than the CR-V (37.3 ft) and the 2026 RAV4 (36.9 ft), and unremarkable within the 34–42 ft SUV band, though tight enough that the Rogue is easy to park in practice.

Driving position & ergonomics78
#37 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue's strongest dynamic-adjacent trait. Nissan's Zero Gravity front seats are a genuine long-haul advantage, the H-point is high with a low beltline and slim pillars for excellent outward vision, door openings are unusually wide and square for easy ingress, and the cabin retains physical climate and volume controls alongside the touchscreen. Marginally ahead of the CR-V (76) and level with the RAV4 (78).

Fun-to-drive factor45
#137 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue is engineered as transport, not entertainment: numb steering, comfort-first damping, a CVT, and a thrummy three-cylinder add up to a car nobody takes the long way home in. It does its job calmly and without irritation, which keeps it out of the bottom of the band, but no enthusiast outlet recommends it on driving enjoyment.

10Value & Market PositionMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.54C+
Standard equipment generosity73
#77 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard content is one of the Rogue's genuine strengths: Safety Shield 360 is fitted to every trim including the base S — AEB with pedestrian detection, blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert, lane departure warning, rear automatic braking and high-beam assist — alongside standard Intelligent Cruise Control, LED headlights, Nissan Intelligent Key with push-button start and remote engine start. Rivals routinely gate blind-spot monitoring and remote start to mid or upper trims, so a base Rogue arrives better equipped than a base CR-V or Tucson; it stops short of the top band because the S trim still runs the 8.0-inch screen and the good infotainment starts at SV.

Feature value per dollar70
#69 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue undercuts its main rivals on sticker while matching or beating them on content — roughly $30,700 to start against a CR-V LX at ~$32,315, and a volume SV AWD near $34,500 that includes the 12.3-inch NissanConnect screen with Google built-in, wireless CarPlay/Android Auto, the Around View 360-degree camera and ProPILOT Assist, a combination rivals charge into the high $30Ks for. Held to the upper-middle band rather than the standout band by two real costs the sticker hides: there is no hybrid on the volume trims at a moment when CR-V and RAV4 buyers get one, and Rogue resale retention (~54% at five years vs ~68-71% for a CR-V) hands back much of the purchase-price advantage.

Trim & configuration breadth62
#115 of 148 in classCompare all →

Four well-spaced trims (S, SV, SL, Platinum) plus the Rock Creek appearance package cover the range from a genuinely equipped base car to a near-premium Platinum with quilted semi-aniline leather, and Intelligent AWD is optional on every trim rather than reserved for the upper end. The gap is powertrain: the 1.5L VC-Turbo and Xtronic CVT are the only combination offered across the entire volume lineup, so buyers get no engine or hybrid choice at all — narrower than the CR-V's gas-plus-hybrid split or the Escape's multi-powertrain range.

Sales popularity & market acceptance84
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Rogue is consistently a top-three seller in the compact-SUV class — the largest segment in the US market — trailing only the RAV4 and CR-V and clearing every other nameplate here by a wide margin, and it is the volume backbone of Nissan's US business. That is squarely in the segment-leader band; it is held below the 90s because the trajectory is flat-to-softening late in the generation and a meaningful share of the volume is supported by incentives and fleet participation rather than pure retail pull.

Brand desirability & image52
#138 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nissan is a neutral-to-weak brand in this segment rather than an aspirational one, and the placeholder 85 badly overstated it. The badge carries a well-documented CVT durability reputation, mid-pack dependability standings, a history of discount-led selling, and the weakest residuals among the mainstream Japanese brands — all of which drag on the Rogue rather than lift it. It sits at the bottom of the neutral band, well behind Toyota, Honda and Subaru in the same cross-shop, but above genuinely damaged brands because Nissan retains broad familiarity, a thousand-dealer network and real loyalty among value buyers.

Deals & incentive availability86
#14 of 148 in classCompare all →

Scored on buyer benefit, this is the Rogue's strongest dimension in the category. Nissan supports the Rogue with among the most aggressive incentive programs in the class — routine cash allowances, subvented low-APR financing and heavily supported lease offers — and dealers negotiate freely on a high-inventory, late-generation volume model. A buyer willing to shop can expect to pay meaningfully under MSRP, which is close to unheard of on a CR-V or RAV4. Kept just below the 90s because the same discounting is what erodes resale later, so the benefit is front-loaded rather than free.

Model freshness52
#114 of 148 in classCompare all →

2026 is roughly the sixth model year of the third-generation T33 Rogue, which launched for MY2021 and took its mid-cycle refresh for MY2024 (restyled front end, 12.3-inch NissanConnect with Google built-in, ProPILOT Assist 2.1). The cabin tech is therefore still current, but the platform and its sole VC-Turbo/CVT powertrain are late-cycle, rivals have redesigned around it, and an e-POWER step for the nameplate has been signalled — so a 2026 buyer faces real redesign risk within a short window. That is the bottom of the mid-cycle band, not the middle.

Critical reception & awards58
#124 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently like the Rogue's cabin quality, near-90-degree rear doors, standard safety content, ride comfort and cargo space, and it earns solid recommendations — but it is very rarely the pick of a compact-SUV comparison test, finishing behind the CR-V, RAV4, CX-5/CX-50, Forester and the Tucson/Sportage pair in most published rankings. The recurring criticisms are structural to the car rather than trim-specific: three-cylinder coarseness, CVT drone under load, inert handling and the absence of a volume hybrid. It holds an IIHS award but not a clean Top Safety Pick+, and it has no 10Best or NACTOY win to point to. Placed in the lower half of the well-reviewed band, with the VC-Turbo engine-bearing recall a further drag on its current standing.