MotorGPA
Find My Match
Model year:2026+4 not yet gradedHistory & evolution ↓
Chrysler logo
Minivan

2026 Chrysler Voyager

EconomyGas
Manufacturer site ↗
1.77C-GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.54D
Safety
2.18C
EfficiencyGas
0.90F
22 MPG combined · 418 mi range · $2,700/yr energy
Comfort
2.56C+
Value
1.65D
Ownership Cost
0.67F
Technology
2.02C
Driving Experience
2.21C

The verdict

A struggling minivan, strong on space and held back by performance.

The 2026 Voyager is the cheapest way into a new minivan, and what you get for roughly $42,000 is a genuine Chrysler Pacifica underneath — same body, same 287-hp V6, same fold-into-the-floor Stow 'n Go seats that open 140.5 cu ft of flat cargo space no rival can match. What you give up is nearly everything else: one trim, one powertrain, no all-wheel drive, no hybrid, 22 MPG combined, and a driver-assist list that leaves out features Honda, Toyota and Kia make standard on their base vans. The bigger catch is the back end of ownership — this is the segment's worst van for holding its value, so the money saved at the dealer largely comes back out at trade-in. Buy it if you need maximum space for minimum cash and plan to keep it a long time; almost every other shopper is better served by a discounted Pacifica or a Carnival.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Class-leading cargo space, and every Voyager gets the full trick
  • Real family-hauling space in all three rows
  • Cheap to insure, cheap to fix, cheap to fuel up (per gallon)

What holds it back

  • Fuel economy is the worst in the segment, with no hybrid escape hatch
  • Depreciation and warranty give back most of the savings
  • Driver-assistance features rivals give you for free are missing here

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Chrysler Voyager

Production history

1984present · 43 years · 5 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 5 yearsGen 1198419901984Gen 2199119951991Gen 3199620001996Gen 4200120192001Gen 52020now2020In production2026 — graded2025 — not yet graded2022 — not yet graded2021 — not yet graded2020 — not yet gradedProduction began 1984
202656+4 not yet graded

Best fit & conditions

FamilyC+68/100
AdventureC+65/100
CommuterC-59/100
Work / TowD54/100
Winter / inclementF43/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe Voyager's lowest-graded category.0.37F
Horsepower
287 hp (3.6L Pentastar V6) — sole powertrain, all trims
34/100
#1 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is the de-contented version of the Pacifica on the same RU platform and uses the identical naturally-aspirated 3.6L Pentastar V6 rated at 287 hp @ 6,400 rpm. Unlike the Pacifica there is no PHEV alternative, so this is the only output figure in the lineup.

Torque
262 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm
36/100
#1 of 5 in classCompare all →

Peak torque of 262 lb-ft at 4,000 rpm from the Pentastar V6 — mid-pack for the minivan segment and identical to the Pacifica's gas powertrain. No low-end electric assist is available since the Voyager is not offered as a hybrid.

0–60 mph time
~7.2 s (estimated, FWD V6)
38/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

No instrumented test of the 2026 Voyager is available. Estimated at ~7.2 s from instrumented Pacifica gas FWD results (7.2–7.5 s), adjusted marginally quicker because the Voyager carries less standard equipment and is the lighter, FWD-only configuration. Adequate but unremarkable for the segment.

Powertrain refinement70
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Pentastar V6 is a mature, well-sorted engine with linear, lag-free delivery and no forced induction to manage — reviewers consistently describe it as smooth and responsive. Scored level with the Pacifica's gas V6 since the powertrain is mechanically identical.

Transmission behavior60
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Uses the same ZF-based 9-speed 948TE automatic as the gas Pacifica. Much improved over early versions of that gearbox but still drawing periodic criticism for gear hunting and unhurried kickdown; behind the Odyssey's smoother 10-speed. Scored level with the Pacifica for the shared unit.

Max towing capacity
3,600 lbs (when properly equipped with Trailer-Tow Group)
37/100
#1 of 5 in classCompare all →

Shares the Pacifica's chassis, V6 and 9-speed, which carry a 3,600 lb rating with the Trailer-Tow Group. Availability of that group on the value-oriented Voyager trim lineup is the uncertainty — where the group is not ordered the van is not tow-rated, so real-world capability for most Voyagers on dealer lots is effectively nil.

AWD/4WD availability12
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is front-wheel drive only across the lineup — Chrysler reserves the Auto AWD system for the Pacifica. That is a clear disadvantage against the Pacifica, Sienna (AWD available) and Carnival, and puts the Voyager in the lowest band alongside the FWD-only Odyssey.

Off-road capability15
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

A pavement-only family minivan: roughly 5.4 in of ground clearance, no skid plates, no terrain or drive modes, no off-road trim, and — unlike the Pacifica — not even the mitigation of optional AWD for slippery surfaces. Scored just below the Pacifica for that reason.

Powertrain lineup breadth20
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

One powertrain, one drivetrain: the 3.6L V6 with the 9-speed automatic driving the front wheels. No turbo option, no hybrid, no PHEV, no AWD — squarely the 'take-it-or-leave-it' band, and the narrowest lineup among mainstream minivans given the Pacifica's PHEV and the Sienna's standard hybrid.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Voyager's weakest categories.0.90F
Combined fuel economy
22 MPG combined (3.6L Pentastar V6, 9-speed, FWD — all trims)
35/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is the de-contented Pacifica and shares its sole powertrain — the 287-hp 3.6L Pentastar V6 with the 9-speed automatic, front-drive only — rated at 22 MPG combined. There is no AWD or hybrid variant to move the figure, so 22 MPG describes the entire lineup.

City fuel economy
19 MPG city (3.6L V6 FWD — all trims)
31/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

19 MPG city is weak even by minivan standards — a ~4,500-lb box moved by a naturally aspirated V6 with no electric assist. The hybrid Sienna nearly doubles it at 36 MPG city, and city driving is exactly where a family van spends most of its life.

Highway fuel economy
28 MPG highway (3.6L V6 FWD — all trims)
50/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

Highway is the Pentastar's best case: the tall top gear drops cruising revs enough for 28 MPG, matching Pacifica FWD and Odyssey and beating the Carnival V6's 26 MPG. Road-trip economy is the one place this powertrain is genuinely competitive.

Driving range
~418 mi (19.0-gal tank × 22 MPG combined)
43/100
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

A 19.0-gallon tank at 22 MPG combined works out to roughly 418 miles — mid-pack for the segment and enough for a normal travel day, but well short of the hybrid Sienna's ~648 miles.

Estimated annual fuel cost
$2,700/yr (15k mi/yr at EPA reference regular-unleaded price)
38/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

At 22 MPG combined the Voyager burns roughly 680 gallons a year over 15,000 miles, landing near $2,700 at EPA's reference regular price. Its low sticker is partly given back at the pump — the Sienna costs about $1,300/yr less to fuel, which compounds badly over a long ownership period.

Fuel requirements88
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Pentastar V6 is specified for 87-octane regular, with no premium recommendation and no diesel or E85 complication — the cheapest pump at any station is the correct one. That flexibility is this powertrain's clearest efficiency-side virtue and the reason the annual cost is not worse than it is.

3SafetyOne of the Voyager's strongest categories.2.18C
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall (RU-platform result shared with Pacifica)
100/100
#1 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is the de-contented variant of the Pacifica on the identical RU unibody with the same crash structure, wheelbase and restraints, and NHTSA has rated it 5 stars overall in prior model years. The 2026 Pacifica carries a verified 5-star overall rating in this dataset, and no structural change is known for 2026.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness52
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

Sharing the Pacifica's structure, the Voyager inherits the same crashworthiness profile: Good in the original small-overlap front test but Marginal in the updated moderate-overlap test (elevated second-row injury risk) and Acceptable in the updated side test. It earns no Top Safety Pick, and its lower-spec equipment removes any remaining award path, so it sits a touch below the Pacifica.

Standard ADAS suite breadth60
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is sold as a single value-oriented LX trim positioned beneath the Pacifica Select, and that de-contenting lands hardest on driver assistance: forward AEB and lane-departure warning are expected standard, but blind-spot monitoring and adaptive cruise — standard or near-standard across the Pacifica range — are understood to be optional or unavailable. That is the mid band, well short of the Odyssey (87), Sienna (89) and Carnival (89), all of which fit a full suite to their base trims.

Automatic emergency braking performance65
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

When fitted, the Voyager uses the same Stellantis forward-collision hardware as the Pacifica, whose IIHS front crash prevention rates Acceptable vehicle-to-vehicle with Advanced daytime and nighttime pedestrian results. Scored below the Pacifica's 72 because the base van may carry a lesser sensor configuration and the system's standard fitment across the trim is unconfirmed.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage45
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-path detection is a trim-gated feature in the Chrysler minivan lineup — standard from the Pacifica Limited up and packaged on Select — so on the single entry-level Voyager trim it is expected to be optional at best. Alert-only where present, with no active intervention. This is the clearest ADAS gap against rivals that make BSM/RCTA standard on every trim (Odyssey 82, Sienna 84, Carnival 88).

Lane keeping & centering55
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

LaneSense lane-departure warning with corrective steering torque is expected on the Voyager, and reviewers consistently describe the Chrysler system as a nudge-style keep-assist rather than true confident centering. Scored below the Pacifica's 65 to reflect the possibility that the base trim gets warning-only LaneSense without the Plus steering intervention.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist48
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Adaptive cruise with stop-and-go is standard across the Pacifica range but is understood to be optional or absent on the entry Voyager, leaving conventional fixed-speed cruise as the likely standard fitment — the 0-49 'basic cruise only' band. There is no integrated highway-assist mode in any case.

Hands-free driving availability0
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway driving system is offered on the 2026 Voyager at any price. Stellantis has not brought a BlueCruise/Super Cruise equivalent to its minivans, and the Voyager is the least-equipped vehicle in that lineup.

Headlight performance52
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

IIHS headlight ratings are trim-specific, and the Pacifica's lamps rate only Acceptable. As the base variant the Voyager is expected to carry the lower-output projector setup, which historically lands at the Acceptable/Marginal boundary — scored below the Pacifica's 65 accordingly, and well behind the Sienna's Good-rated LED range (85).

Outward visibility82
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Body, glass area and seating position are identical to the Pacifica, so the Voyager gets the same excellent minivan sightlines — tall greenhouse, low beltline, large side glass and a deep rear window. It loses the available 360-degree surround-view camera, but natural visibility is strong enough that the omission costs little.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability80
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Identical body and rear-door architecture to the Pacifica: wide sliding-door openings, a flat floor and easily reached second-row LATCH anchors make car-seat installation among the easiest in the class, with a usable third row for boosters. Scored a shade below the Pacifica for the base trim's lesser second-row seat adjustability.

4Space & ComfortThe Voyager's best-graded category.2.56C+
Seating capacity
7 seats (2nd-row Stow 'n Go bucket seats + 3-place 3rd-row bench); single LX trim, no 8-passenger bench option
75/100
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Voyager is sold in one LX trim seating 7 via 2nd-row buckets and a 60/40 third-row bench. Unlike Sienna, Carnival and Odyssey it offers no 8-passenger configuration, costing it the top of the band.

Front headroom
39.4 in front headroom (no sunroof offered on Voyager LX)
48/100
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Shares the RU-platform Pacifica body, so front headroom is the no-sunroof figure of 39.4 in — the Voyager LX has no sunroof option, so the 38.4 in reduced figure quoted for sunroof-equipped Pacificas does not apply here.

Front legroom
41.1 in front legroom
24/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

41.1 in of front legroom sits low in the minivan band (40–44.5 in), though it is actually better than Odyssey (40.9) and Sienna (40.3) — the whole segment clusters near the bottom of this band, so the score understates real-world front room.

Rear headroom
39.4 in 2nd-row headroom (no sunroof or rear-seat entertainment offered)
85/100
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The flat roofline and absence of any sunroof or rear-entertainment headliner hardware on the base LX preserve the full 39.4 in of 2nd-row headroom — a case where decontenting actually helps the numbers.

Rear legroom
39.0 in 2nd-row legroom (Stow 'n Go buckets slide fore/aft to trade room with the 3rd row)
75/100
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

39.0 in of 2nd-row legroom is generous in absolute terms and the sliding Stow 'n Go buckets let owners rebalance 2nd- and 3rd-row space, but it trails the 39.9–40.9 in offered by Sienna, Carnival and Odyssey.

Third-row usability76
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Identical third row to the Pacifica — roughly 38.7 in headroom and 36.5 in legroom, genuinely usable by adults on medium trips, with easy tilt-and-slide access past the 2nd-row buckets. Scored a couple of points under the Pacifica because the base van does without the third-row sunshades, extra USB ports and rear-seat amenities that make the back bench pleasant on long hauls.

Cargo/trunk volume
87.5 cu ft behind the 2nd row (3rd row stowed into the floor); 32.3 cu ft behind the 3rd row up
68/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

Third-row Stow 'n Go drops flush into the floor well without removing seats, opening a large flat load bay behind the 2nd row. Comfortably past the top of the 25–80 cu ft band.

Max cargo volume
140.5 cu ft with both rows folded into the floor (gas V6 — no PHEV battery to block 2nd-row Stow 'n Go)
63/100
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

Dual Stow 'n Go leaves a flat floor from the front seatbacks to the tailgate without lifting a single seat out of the van. Because the Voyager is gas-only, it never suffers the ~100 cu ft ceiling the Pacifica PHEV lives with, so the entry van matches the best cargo hold in the segment.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions82
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

Keeps the segment's best structural trick — the Stow 'n Go floor bins double as deep hidden storage whenever the seats are upright — plus a large center console and door bins. Drops well below the Pacifica because the LX forgoes Stow 'n Vac, the household power outlet, rear-seat entertainment and the denser multi-row USB provision.

Seat comfort62
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Cloth upholstery over the same thin, fold-into-the-floor Stow 'n Go frames that reviewers already call the least plush buckets in the segment, and the base trim's limited seat adjustment leaves less scope to dial in a long-haul driving position. Fine for school runs, noticeably behind Odyssey and Carnival on a full day's drive.

Ride quality80
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

Same well-damped RU-platform suspension that makes the Pacifica one of the better-riding minivans, and the LX's smaller wheels with taller sidewalls take a little more sting out of broken pavement than the Pacifica's 18s and 20s. FWD-only means none of the added firmness the AWD models carry.

Cabin quietness70
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The body structure is the same, but the entry van goes without the acoustic laminated glass and thicker insulation package fitted to Pacifica trims, so more road roar and Pentastar V6 boom reach the cabin. Still acceptable rather than loud — a minivan's tall glass area sets a floor here.

Climate & comfort features46
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

This is where the Voyager's single-trim, price-leader positioning bites hardest: tri-zone climate with 3rd-row vents is there, but heated front seats, a heated steering wheel and ventilated seats are absent with no trim to climb to, and there is no leather or rear climate control head. Because there are no upper trims to rescue it, the sparse-equipment band is the honest read even though the same body offers all of it as a Pacifica.

5Cost of OwnershipOne of the Voyager's weakest categories.0.67F
Base MSRP
~$41,990 incl. $1,995 destination (LX, the sole retail trim)
58/100
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager exists to undercut the Pacifica: same RU platform, same 287-hp Pentastar V6, fewer features, roughly $3,500–$4,000 less on the sticker. That still leaves it near $42,000 — the cheap-minivan reputation the nameplate carried through 2022 (under $30,000) is gone, because the 2025 retail relaunch repositioned the Voyager as what used to be the Pacifica Touring.

Volume-Trim Price
~$43,500 as typically equipped (LX with the popular option group); no upper trims offered
60/100
#1 of 5 in classCompare all →

With a single retail trim, the volume price is simply the LX with the option group most buyers add, which puts it around $43,500 — cheaper than a Pacifica Limited (~$49,240), an Odyssey EX-L or a Sienna XLE, and roughly level with a Carnival EX. The narrow trim ladder means there is no way to spend much more, which is the Voyager's whole pitch.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$4,800 over 5 years (~$960/yr maintenance plus repairs)
72/100
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

Mechanically identical to the Pacifica FWD — the Pentastar V6 and 9-speed automatic are high-volume, long-serving Stellantis hardware with cheap parts and universal service coverage. The Voyager should run modestly under the Pacifica's ~$5,000 because it carries less to break: no PHEV hardware, less power-operated equipment on the base spec, smaller wheels and tires, less electronic content.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~41.5% of MSRP retained after 5 years (~58.5% depreciation)
5/100
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The single worst number in this scorecard, and at weight 3 it drags the whole category down. The Voyager stacks every residual-killing factor at once: Chrysler-brand depreciation, base-spec configuration, and — uniquely — a 2023–2024 fleet-only run that dumps ex-rental vans into exactly the used market a five-year-old Voyager has to compete in. Most of the money saved at the dealer comes back out at trade-in.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
0/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

Standard Chrysler basic coverage, applied brand-wide — 3 years / 36,000 miles. That sits at the very floor of the segment band and matches Toyota and Honda, but Kia's 5-yr/60k makes it look thin, and a value-first buyer is exactly the buyer who feels a short warranty.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain (no hybrid variant, so no HV-battery coverage applies)
0/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

5 yr / 60,000 mi — bottom of the band, half of Kia's 10-yr/100k. The Pacifica at least offers a PHEV whose 10-yr/100k battery coverage adds something; the Voyager is gas-only, so there is no longer-term coverage anywhere in the lineup.

Complimentary maintenance & perks30
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Chrysler includes no factory scheduled maintenance — Stellantis sells prepaid service plans instead — which caps this item below 50 per the scoring guidance. What buyers do get is a genuinely long 5-yr/60,000-mi roadside assistance term and the standard Uconnect connected-services trial. Rated level with the Pacifica since the programs are brand-wide, and below the Sienna (ToyotaCare, 2 yrs of included service) and Carnival (longer roadside plus Kia Connect).

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$30,248 (≈$25,448 depreciation + $4,800 maintenance)
51/100
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

$43,500 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (41.5% retained, or about $18,053) leaves about $25,448 in depreciation. Add the projected $4,800 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $30,248 in total.

6Reliability & QualityGrades below the middle of the scale.1.54D
Predicted reliability50
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is a de-contented Pacifica on the same RU platform, so it inherits the Pacifica's below-average predicted-reliability baseline, but it avoids the two variants that drag that baseline hardest — there is no PHEV and no AWD, only the FWD 3.6L V6. Model-specific predicted-reliability data is thin because the Voyager spent 2023-2024 as a fleet-only model and only returned to US retail for 2025, so it is rated just above the Pacifica rather than on its own survey record.

Brand reliability track record35
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Chrysler has sat in the bottom third of Consumer Reports brand reliability rankings for several consecutive years and below the industry average in J.D. Power's Vehicle Dependability Study, on a product line thin enough (Pacifica and Voyager) that one weak nameplate defines the brand score. Scored identically to the 2026 Pacifica, since this is a brand-level judgment and both are the same brand in the same year.

Recall & TSB history50
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is exposed to the RU generation's gas-model recall stream — side-curtain airbag, 9-speed transmission and rearview-camera/electrical campaigns — which is heavier than segment norm but not systemic. Critically, it is not exposed to the Pacifica PHEV high-voltage battery fire campaigns, the most severe actions on this platform, which is why it scores above the Pacifica.

Powertrain durability reputation60
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The 3.6L Pentastar V6 is one of the best-proven high-mileage engines in the Stellantis portfolio, in production since 2011 across millions of units, and the Voyager offers nothing else. The offsetting risk is the ZF-derived 948TE 9-speed automatic, which has a documented record of shift-quality and durability complaints across FCA/Stellantis applications; scored above the Pacifica because there is no PHEV drivetrain in the mix.

Interior material quality58
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager exists to hit a lower price than the Pacifica and the cabin shows it — cloth upholstery, a smaller base infotainment screen, more hard plastic on the doors and lower dash, and none of the Pinnacle-grade trim that earns the Pacifica its class-leading materials rating. The underlying architecture and layout are good, so it lands mid-pack rather than poor, but it gives up roughly 20 points to its own showroom sibling.

Fit & finish55
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Same body, same RU architecture and the same Windsor Assembly line as the Pacifica, so assembly consistency should be effectively identical — generally solid panel fit with scattered owner reports of interior rattles and trim squeaks emerging in early ownership. Scored level with the Pacifica; nothing about the lower trim content changes how the body is built.

Dealer & service network58
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Coverage is not the problem — the combined Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep/Ram store network is dense nationwide and a Voyager can be serviced almost anywhere. The drag is service satisfaction, where Chrysler has repeatedly landed below the mass-market average in J.D. Power Customer Service Index work. Identical network to the Pacifica, so scored identically.

Parts availability & repair cost74
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

This is the Voyager's strongest reliability-category showing. Every wear item is shared with the Pacifica and the wider Pentastar universe, so parts are abundant through both dealer and independent channels at competitive prices, with a healthy aftermarket. It scores above the Pacifica specifically because there is no PHEV variant — no high-voltage pack, no dealer-only hybrid components inflating the average repair picture.

7Technology & InfotainmentMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.02C
Touchscreen size
10.1 in (Uconnect 5, standard — LX is the sole trim, no larger screen offered)
36/100
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager shares the post-2021-refresh RU dashboard with the Pacifica, which carries the 10.1-inch Uconnect 5 touchscreen across every trim; the Voyager LX inherits the same head unit rather than the 7-inch Uconnect 4 unit fitted to the pre-hiatus 2020–21 Voyager. Replaces a placeholder 11.6 in value that no Chrysler minivan has ever used.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness76
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Uconnect 5 is the same software and hardware the Pacifica runs — quick boot, snappy touch response, logical menu structure, and physical HVAC controls retained beneath the screen. Scored a couple of points under the Pacifica only because the Voyager runs the feature-thin configuration (no embedded nav tile, fewer connected services) rather than because the system behaves differently.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto88
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

Wireless Apple CarPlay and wireless Android Auto come with Uconnect 5 and are standard on the LX — and since LX is the only 2026 Voyager trim, phone projection is standard fleet-wide. This is the Voyager's single strongest technology attribute and the main reason it does not fall further behind the segment.

Voice control & native navigation52
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Uconnect 5's natural-language voice assistant carries over, but embedded TomTom connected navigation is a Pacifica upper-trim feature and is not part of the Voyager's value configuration — so owners are dependent on CarPlay/Android Auto maps. Functional voice, no native nav, which puts it in the middle of the 50–79 band rather than the top.

Audio system quality47
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager LX runs the base six-speaker Uconnect audio system with no upgrade path — the 13-speaker Alpine and 19-speaker Harman Kardon systems are Pacifica-only. Base sound is adequate for a family van, but the total absence of a premium option on any trim is what drops this below the halfway mark against rivals that all offer branded audio.

Digital instrument cluster55
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Same hybrid cluster as the Pacifica: a 7-inch reconfigurable color driver information display flanked by analog gauges, not a full-digital screen. Content is useful and configurable, but the presentation is a generation behind the 12.3-inch full-digital clusters offered by Carnival and Sienna.

OTA update capability60
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Uconnect 5 receives over-the-air software updates via Wi-Fi or the embedded modem, but the scope is infotainment and connected services rather than whole-vehicle feature additions. Scored a notch under the Pacifica because the Voyager has no embedded navigation to receive OTA map updates.

Companion app & remote functions62
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Chrysler Connect app covers remote start, remote lock/unlock, vehicle locator and diagnostics, and MY26 Chrysler vehicles include a long complimentary Chrysler Connect ONE term — real value on a sub-$42k van. Marked down from the Pacifica for the absence of any digital-key capability and because base-trim remote-start hardware fitment on the LX could not be confirmed.

Charging ports & device power60
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The RU cabin distributes USB-A/USB-C charging across all three rows, which keeps the Voyager respectable for a family hauler, but the wireless charging pad (Ultra Console) and the 115V household outlet are both Pacifica-only equipment with no Voyager option box to tick.

Keyless & remote access62
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Keyless Enter 'N Go proximity entry with push-button start is expected standard on the LX, and the 2025 retail relaunch added power sliding doors and a power liftgate as standard content — solid for the price. Held well below the Pacifica because hands-free (kick-activated) sliding doors and liftgate are Pacifica-exclusive and no phone-as-key exists anywhere in the Chrysler minivan line.

Camera & parking aids52
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

ParkView rear backup camera is standard (federally mandated) and ParkSense rear park assist is expected on the LX, which satisfies the basics for a 204-inch van. But the 360-degree surround-view camera and front parking sensors ride in the Pacifica's Safety Sphere package, leaving the Voyager with no path to surround view at any price — a real handicap in a vehicle this large.

Head-up display availability20
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered on the Voyager on any trim — the color HUD is a Pacifica Limited/Pinnacle feature and the Voyager's single LX trim has no option group that includes it. Scored in the 0–49 "not offered" band per the item guidance.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.14C
Kid & car-seat practicality74
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Keeps the RU-platform hardware that makes a minivan great for kids — dual sliding doors with huge openings, a low step-in height, second-row Stow 'n Go bucket seats that slide for walk-through access, and easily reached LATCH anchors. But the Voyager is the decontented Pacifica: the single LX trim drops FamCAM interior camera and Stow 'n Vac, and power sliding doors/liftgate are an option rather than standard equipment, which is a real daily annoyance with an armful of kid. Strong fundamentals, thin family tech.

Family safety package55
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Crash structure is the Pacifica's — NHTSA 5-star overall, but the same 2026 IIHS picture applies, with Marginal in the updated moderate-overlap test and no Top Safety Pick. The bigger gap is ADAS: the Voyager LX carries forward-collision warning with active braking and blind-spot monitoring with rear cross path, but does not get the Pacifica's standard full-speed adaptive cruise with stop-and-go or LaneSense lane-keep, and there is no surround-view option. Adequate safety floor at a low price, with the assistance features families most value missing.

Family road-trip comfort72
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Space is untouched from the Pacifica — 38.7 in of third-row headroom and 36.5 in of legroom make the back row genuinely adult-usable, and 87.5 cu ft behind the second row swallows a family's luggage. What the Voyager gives up is amenity: cloth seats, no Uconnect Theater rear-seat entertainment, no heated second row, and less sound deadening than the acoustic-glass Pacifica. Comfortable and roomy for long hauls, sparse in the back-seat extras that keep kids quiet.

Daily driving ease66
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Same 287-hp 3.6L Pentastar V6 and 9-speed 948TE as the Pacifica, so low-speed manners, the compliant ride, and the commanding minivan sightlines all carry over intact. It loses the Pacifica's standard full-speed adaptive cruise with stop-and-go, which is exactly the feature that takes the sting out of stop-and-go commuting, and inherits the 9-speed's occasional part-throttle gear hunting. Easy to drive, less relaxing in traffic than the van it is based on.

Commuting cost efficiency50
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

The 3.6L V6 with no hybrid assist returns roughly 19/28/22 MPG city/highway/combined in FWD form — near the bottom of the minivan class and miles behind the Sienna hybrid's ~36 MPG combined. The Voyager claws back a little ground on the rest of the per-mile equation: regular 87 octane, FWD only so no AWD economy penalty, smaller wheels and cheaper tires, plentiful Pentastar parts, and lower insurance premiums than the pricier Pacifica. Cheap to buy and service, expensive to fuel.

Parking & maneuverability58
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

A ~204-inch van is never a city car, but the tall greenhouse, low beltline, huge glass area and 39.7-ft FWD turning circle make it easier to place than the footprint suggests, and sliding doors are a genuine advantage in tight parking bays. Unlike the Pacifica, no 360-degree surround-view camera is offered at any price, leaving the standard rear camera to do all the work in tight spots.

Work capability57
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Dual Stow 'n Go is standard on every Voyager, and folding both rows into the floor opens 140.5 cu ft of flat, enclosed, lockable load space — enough for plywood, ladders, or a day's worth of trade tools without a rack, and better weather protection than any pickup bed. Towing is limited to the platform's 3,600-lb rating and only with a trailer-tow setup that is not a standard fitment on the single LX trim, there is no AWD, and the FWD chassis is not built for sustained heavy payload. A capable light-duty hauler, not a work truck.

Durability for work duty52
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager has something the Pacifica does not: an actual fleet track record. It spent 2023–2024 as a fleet-only model in rental, livery and commercial service, and the cloth seats and hard-wearing plastics of the LX cabin shrug off abuse far better than the Pacifica's Nappa-and-chrome interior. Working against it is the same below-average Chrysler reliability record — Consumer Reports and J.D. Power both place the RU minivan under the segment average, and the 948TE 9-speed has a mixed durability history across Stellantis products.

Jobsite & upfit practicality50
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The fold-flat Stow 'n Go floor and wipe-clean cloth-and-plastic LX cabin are the work-friendly parts, and the underfloor bins are useful lockable tool storage when the seats are up. Beyond that the provisions are thin: no 115V household outlet, few tie-downs, no washable-floor or work-van package, no roof rails on the base trim, and no upfitter ecosystem — Stellantis points commercial buyers at the Ram ProMaster instead.

Long-distance comfort & range66
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The well-damped RU chassis is a genuinely good highway platform and the 19-gallon tank at 22 MPG combined gives roughly 415 miles between fills. But the long-haul equation is where decontenting bites hardest: no adaptive cruise to shoulder the driver-fatigue load, cloth seats without ventilation or extended adjustment, and less acoustic glass and insulation than the Pacifica, so more road and wind noise reaches the cabin over a full day's drive.

Outdoor & adventure capability42
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Firmly pavement-bound. The Voyager is FWD only — the Pacifica's optional on-demand Auto AWD, one of just two AWD systems in the segment, is not offered here — and it carries about 5.4 in of ground clearance, no skid plates and no terrain modes. Roof rails are not base equipment and the trailer-tow setup is not a given on the LX, so even carrying bikes or kayaks takes aftermarket help. Camping in the back is the one real strength: dual Stow 'n Go makes a flat, sealed sleeping platform in seconds.

Gear & luggage flexibility86
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager's headline strength and the cheapest way to buy it. Both second- and third-row seats drop flat into the floor without removal for 140.5 cu ft of unobstructed, enclosed cargo — no rival minivan matches that, and unlike the Pacifica lineup there is no PHEV variant whose battery blocks second-row Stow 'n Go, so every Voyager gets the full trick. The underfloor bins double as hidden storage with the seats up. Only the missing roof rails and uncertain hitch availability keep it from matching the Pacifica's 90.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the Voyager's strongest categories.2.21C
Handling & agility65
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is the de-contented Pacifica on the identical RU unibody platform with the same FWD suspension hardware, so it inherits the Pacifica's composed, car-like body control — secure but soft-edged and floaty at the limit. Scored a few points under the Pacifica (68) because the LX runs exclusively on 17-inch wheels with taller-sidewall tires, trading a little lateral grip and turn-in crispness for ride compliance.

Steering feel62
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

Same electric-assist rack and tuning as the Pacifica: accurate and light enough to make parking-lot maneuvers easy, but essentially devoid of feedback. Typical minivan calibration prioritizing low effort over engagement; no Voyager-specific hardware difference separates it from the Pacifica's 63.

Braking confidence65
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

Shares the Pacifica's brake hardware while carrying less standard equipment, so stopping performance should be at least on par with the Pacifica's about-average class result, with a progressive pedal. There is no PHEV variant, so none of the regen-blending inconsistency that affects the electrified Pacifica applies here.

Powertrain smoothness & response67
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The 287 hp / 262 lb-ft 3.6L Pentastar V6 paired with the 9-speed automatic is a mature, naturally aspirated combination with linear, lag-free tip-in and no forced induction to manage. Held marginally below the Pacifica because the gas V6 and its 9AT — which can still show occasional low-speed hesitation — are the whole story here, with no smoother PHEV variant in the range.

Drivetrain noise & vibration67
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Pentastar is pleasant and unobtrusive at cruise and never coarse, though it is audible under hard acceleration. Scored below the Pacifica's 72 because the Voyager LX is the decontented entry model and forgoes the acoustic laminated glass and added sound insulation that give higher Pacifica trims their hushed highway manners.

Turning circle
39.7 ft curb-to-curb (FWD — sole configuration)
29/100
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager shares the Pacifica's 121.6-in wheelbase, FWD-only layout and front suspension geometry, so its curb-to-curb turning diameter matches the Pacifica's FWD figure of 39.7 ft. Wide for the segment — this is a long-wheelbase minivan — though the Pacifica's AWD penalty does not apply since the Voyager is not offered with AWD.

Driving position & ergonomics70
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Inherits the Pacifica's commanding upright seating position, excellent outward sightlines, easy ingress/egress and logical Uconnect layout with real physical climate controls. Marked down from the Pacifica's 74 because the single LX trim has a narrower seat-adjustment range and omits the memory settings and surround-view camera that help higher Pacifica trims fit every driver and place the van in tight spots.

Fun-to-drive factor63
#3 of 5 in classCompare all →

It has the segment's strongest mainstream engine and the same fundamentally composed chassis reviewers praise in the Pacifica, so it is never unpleasant — but the Voyager is explicitly the value buy of the range, on the smallest wheels and without the equipment that makes the Pacifica feel special. Pleasant and capable, not a van anyone takes the long way home in.

10Value & Market PositionGrades below the middle of the scale.1.65D
Standard equipment generosity52
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager exists as the deliberately decontented Pacifica: the volume LX trim carries cloth seating, base wheels and a pared-back feature list, with power sliding doors, power liftgate, heated seats and the fuller driver-assist suite either reserved for the Limited or bundled into options. Stow 'n Go second- and third-row seating is the one genuinely class-exclusive item included, but rivals' base trims — notably the Carnival LX and Sienna LE — bundle power doors and a complete ADAS package as standard for money the Voyager does not save you.

Feature value per dollar63
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

This is the Voyager's entire reason to exist and it is a real but narrow case: it is the least expensive way into a new minivan in the US market, and the money still buys the 287-hp 3.6L Pentastar V6, seven seats and fold-into-the-floor Stow 'n Go — capability no rival offers at the bottom of its range. Against that, the gas-only V6 is the thirstiest powertrain in the class, resale is the segment's weakest, and the price walk up to a materially better-equipped Pacifica Select is small enough that the saving rarely feels decisive.

Trim & configuration breadth40
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The narrowest lineup in the segment by a wide margin — essentially two trims (LX and Limited), a single 3.6L V6 powertrain, front-wheel drive only, and very limited option flexibility. There is no hybrid or PHEV path, no AWD, and no seating-configuration choice, so a buyer whose needs move even slightly upmarket is pushed out of the nameplate and into the Pacifica.

Sales popularity & market acceptance45
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager is the smallest seller in an already-shrinking segment and its volume has historically skewed heavily toward fleet and rental channels — the nameplate was pulled from retail entirely for several model years before returning as a retail offering, which is not the trajectory of a healthy seller. Retail acceptance is thin because Chrysler's own Pacifica absorbs most of the demand.

Brand desirability & image47
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

Chrysler is a diminished two-nameplate brand with below-average reliability standing, and the Voyager carries an additional drag the Pacifica does not: years of rental-fleet association that buyers and the used market both price in. There is no aspirational halo here, and the badge actively works against resale.

Deals & incentive availability85
#1 of 5 in classCompare all →

Far and away the Voyager's strongest card as a purchase. Stellantis is among the most incentive-heavy manufacturers in the market, and a slow-selling entry minivan sitting on dealer lots is exactly the profile that attracts stacked cash rebates, subvented financing and genuine negotiating room. Heavy discounting signals soft demand, but this item scores buyer benefit and the buyer benefit is large.

Model freshness40
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

The Voyager rides the RU architecture that launched for MY2017 and took its one substantive refresh for MY2021, making 2026 roughly the ninth model year on the platform with only detail changes since. The nameplate's retail revival is a marketing move, not a new vehicle, and a full redesign of the Chrysler minivan is overdue enough that replacement risk is real for a 2026 buyer.

Critical reception & awards55
#5 of 5 in classCompare all →

The generation's award pedigree — MotorTrend Car of the Year, NACTOY Utility of the Year, repeated comparison-test wins — belongs to the Pacifica, not the Voyager, and reviewers rarely include the Voyager in group tests at all. When they do assess it the verdict is consistent and lukewarm: competent underlying minivan, sound V6, Stow 'n Go is a genuine draw, but the equipment gap makes it hard to recommend over a discounted Pacifica or a better-equipped base Carnival. It sits at or near the bottom of published minivan rankings.