The verdict
A mixed-report mid-size suv, strong on safety and held back by ownership.
The 2026 Explorer is America's best-selling three-row SUV for good reasons — a 5-star NHTSA crash rating, an IIHS Top Safety Pick, a standard 13.2-inch Google-powered touchscreen on every trim, and a genuinely off-road-capable Tremor version no Highlander or Pilot can match. What it does not offer is peace of mind about the long run: Consumer Reports scores its predicted reliability 30/100 and pulled its Recommended badge, resale is projected around 45% after five years, and the warranty is a bare 3-year/36,000-mile term. It also gives up ground on running costs, at 23 MPG combined and roughly $2,600 a year in fuel with no hybrid anywhere in the lineup. Buy it for the tech, safety and dealer network at roughly $47,155 as typically equipped — and go in expecting to pay for that ownership risk on the back end.
Jump to scoresStrengths
- Crash-test scores and standard safety gear are top-shelf
- The best infotainment in the mainstream three-row class
- Everybody sells it, and everybody can fix it
What holds it back
- Consumer Reports tells shoppers to avoid it
- Depreciation and warranty are the worst part of the deal
- Thirsty, with no hybrid to escape to
Top alternatives
Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Ford Explorer
2.79B-
Kia TellurideMid-Size SUVBetter at: Warranty & resaleSame money buys a nicer cabin, a more usable third row, far better projected resale, and a 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty instead of Ford's 5-year/60,000-mile term.
Compare
2.43C+
Honda PilotMid-Size SUVBetter at: ReliabilityThe pick if you plan to keep the car a decade — much stronger predicted reliability and depreciation, plus a roomier third row and a smoother V6 in place of the 10-speed complaints.
Compare
2.88B-
Toyota Grand HighlanderMid-Size SUVBetter at: Third row & MPGBuilt for adults in row three with real cargo room behind it, and its hybrid drivetrains cut deep into the Explorer's 23 MPG combined and roughly $2,600-a-year fuel bill.
CompareHow it's evolved
10 scored model years · 2017–2026
Subject scores by year
Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.
| Year | Performance | Efficiency | Safety | Space | Cost | Reliability | Tech | Use-case | Driving | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 56 | 46 | 83 | 62 | 43 | 52 | 76 | 67 | 70 | 68 |
| 2025 | 54 | 46 | 82 | 66 | 34 | 51 | 77 | 65 | 64 | 61 |
| 2024 | 55 | 46 | 81 | 64 | 49 | 48 | 53 | 65 | 63 | 66 |
| 2023 | 57 | 45 | 73 | 65 | 53 | 42 | 51 | 57 | 63 | 59 |
| 2022 | 55 | 49 | 67 | 64 | 47 | 40 | 56 | 65 | 63 | 60 |
| 2021 | 53 | 47 | 80 | 64 | 56 | 41 | 52 | 62 | 69 | 58 |
| 2020 | 54 | 45 | 78 | 63 | 47 | 37 | 51 | 58 | 67 | 62 |
| 2019 | 44 | 23 | 55 | 64 | 44 | 61 | 45 | 52 | 59 | 50 |
| 2018 | 44 | 23 | 49 | 64 | 42 | 55 | 43 | 59 | 56 | 58 |
| 2017 | 44 | 39 | 47 | 64 | 44 | 48 | 39 | 56 | 56 | 62 |
Compare two years
Best fit & conditions
Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →
Subject profile
Trims & configurations
4 trimsScores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:
Detailed scoring by subject
1Performance & PowertrainMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.73C-
Volume trim (ST-Line) runs the 2.3L turbo I4 at 300 hp; the optional 3.0L twin-turbo V6 ranges 365 hp (Platinum) to 400 hp (ST).
Volume 2.3L I4 peaks at 310 lb-ft; V6 ST variant reaches 415 lb-ft.
Base/volume I4 configuration is a mid-pack mid-size-SUV sprinter; the ST V6 is notably quicker but is a low-volume performance trim.
The 2.3L EcoBoost I4 delivers adequate low-end torque with mild turbo lag off idle; smooth enough for daily driving but lacks the effortless punch of segment-leading turbo-hybrid rivals.
Ford's 10-speed automatic shifts smoothly in normal driving with minor calibration refinements for 2026; some owner/forum reports still note occasional hunting on grades, short of best-in-class crispness.
Max conventional towing tops out at 5,600 lbs with the V6 and Class III Trailer Tow Package; the I4 configuration is rated slightly lower at 5,300 lbs. Some secondary sources conflate both engines at a flat 5,000 lbs, but manufacturer-aligned dealer spec pages consistently cite the higher, engine-differentiated figures.
RWD is standard with Ford's Intelligent 4WD available across the trim range (standard on Tremor and ST V6); system offers selectable drive modes but no low-range gearing outside Tremor's off-road setup.
The dedicated Tremor trim brings genuine hardware — all-terrain tires, TORSEN limited-slip rear differential, underbody protection, and 8.7-inch ground clearance — putting it a notch above typical crossover-based mid-size SUVs, though short of body-on-frame off-roaders.
Two gas EcoBoost engines (2.3L I4, 3.0L V6) cover the range but there is no hybrid, PHEV, or EV variant, unlike several mid-size SUV rivals now offering electrified options.
2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Explorer's weakest categories.1.06D
EPA combined rating for the volume 2.3L EcoBoost AWD configuration; V6 and RWD variants vary slightly around this figure.
EPA city rating for the volume 2.3L EcoBoost AWD configuration.
EPA highway rating for the volume 2.3L EcoBoost AWD configuration.
EPA-estimated total range on a full tank for the volume AWD configuration.
EPA-estimated annual fuel cost for the volume AWD configuration at standard 15,000 mi/yr assumptions.
Both the 2.3L I4 and 3.0L V6 EcoBoost engines run on regular unleaded gasoline; no premium requirement or specialized fuel/charging needs.
3SafetyThe Explorer's best-graded category.3.67A-
NHTSA awarded the 2026 Ford Explorer its highest possible overall crash-test rating.
IIHS named the 2026 Explorer a Top Safety Pick (not TSP+) after tightening 2026 criteria; it earned Good ratings across small/moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraints, with only two Acceptable results (driver lower leg/foot in small overlap, driver pelvis in side impact).
Ford Co-Pilot360 is standard on every 2026 Explorer trim, bundling forward-collision warning with AEB, lane-departure warning, lane-keeping assist, automatic high beams, blind-spot monitoring (BLIS), and adaptive cruise with stop-and-go — a broad standard suite for the segment.
IIHS rated the Explorer's front crash prevention Good for both vehicle-to-vehicle and pedestrian scenarios, a requirement for its Top Safety Pick award.
Blind Spot Information System (BLIS) is standard fleet-wide, but rear cross-traffic alert and the fuller Co-Pilot360 Assist+ package (360 camera, active park assist) are reserved for higher trims.
Standard lane-keeping assist and lane-departure warning perform adequately in reviews but aren't singled out for best-in-class smoothness compared to rivals with more refined centering.
Adaptive cruise with stop-and-go is standard and capable, but the more integrated hands-free highway assist (BlueCruise) is limited to the Platinum and ST trims rather than being broadly available.
BlueCruise hands-free highway driving (with a 90-day trial) is available and covers a mature, wide network of divided highways, but is restricted to the Platinum and ST trims rather than the full range.
IIHS rated the 2026 Explorer's headlights Good, a contributing factor to its Top Safety Pick award.
Reviewers note a bright, glassy cabin with good outward sightlines for the segment; a four-camera 360-degree view is available (not standard) to compensate for typical mid-size SUV blind spots.
The Explorer offers four full LATCH position sets (two second-row, two third-row on applicable trims) with easily located anchors and wide door openings, making multi-seat installs easy.
4Space & ComfortMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.19C
Captain's chairs are the standard, volume-trim layout at 6 seats; a 35/30/35 bench bumping capacity to 7 is standard only on ST-Line and optional on other non-Tremor trims.
Front headroom is generous on non-panoramic-roof trims; Platinum trades roughly 1.8 in for its standard glass roof.
Front legroom is mid-pack for the mid-size three-row class, essentially flat across trims.
Second-row headroom is class-leading on non-panoramic-roof trims, exceeding the SUV norm even after the Platinum roof penalty.
Second-row legroom is competitive but not segment-leading; captain's chairs and bench trims are within half an inch of each other.
Third row (31.8 in legroom, 38.9 in headroom) is a known weak point — cramped, low seating position, and cumbersome access even with second-row tumble features; kid-only for anything beyond short trips.
Cargo volume with the third row folded is on the smaller side for the mid-size three-row class.
Max cargo with all rear seats folded is above the segment midpoint, a strength when rows aren't in use.
Cubbies throughout the cabin and a large vertical SYNC 4A touchscreen area provide competitive everyday storage, but nothing rises to class-leading innovation (no giga console or in-cabin trunk).
Front seats are comfortable, supportive, and generously adjustable; second-row captain's chairs are widely praised as comfortable and roomy.
Ride is planted but firmer than most three-row rivals, with more road imperfections transmitted into the cabin than class leaders, though owners report a generally smooth, well-absorbed ride.
Acoustic-laminate front side glass and enhanced sound dampening deliver little wind noise and reduced road noise — a genuine strength for the segment.
Tri-zone automatic climate with rear auxiliary controls is broadly available, and heated/ventilated/massaging front seats plus heated 2nd-row seats and a heated steering wheel are available on upper trims — good coverage without being standard fleet-wide.
5Cost of OwnershipThe Explorer's lowest-graded category.0.88F
Entry Active 100A RWD trim starts at $38,465 plus Ford's $1,695 destination charge for 2026.
ST-Line is the volume-selling trim for 2026; 4WD MSRP with destination sits just under $47,200, matching average transaction prices.
Industry class estimates for the Explorer span roughly $3,200–$6,000 over 5 years; a blended midpoint for the volume AWD 4-cylinder configuration lands near $5,400.
Explorer depreciation estimates run higher than the midsize-SUV segment norm (~50% retention), reflecting its weaker resale reputation versus Highlander/Telluride/Pathfinder rivals.
Standard mainstream-brand bumper-to-bumper coverage, at the low end of the segment band.
Standard Ford powertrain coverage, at the low end of the segment band versus Hyundai/Kia's longer terms.
FordPass Rewards grants a welcome bonus of roughly 42,000 points (about $210 in service credit), covering roughly the first two years of scheduled maintenance visits, plus roadside assistance bundled through the powertrain warranty term and a FordPass Connect trial — solid but shorter than rivals with true multi-year prepaid maintenance plans.
$47,155 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (45% retained, or about $21,220) leaves about $25,935 in depreciation. Add the projected $5,400 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $31,335 in total.
6Reliability & QualityOne of the Explorer's weakest categories.1.48D
Consumer Reports gives the 2026 Explorer a predicted reliability score of just 30/100 based on owner data from the 2023-2025 model years, and pulled its Recommended badge — one of only a handful of 2026 vehicles CR explicitly tells shoppers to avoid, despite decent road-test and owner-satisfaction scores.
Long-term dependability is Ford's weak spot: J.D. Power's 2026 Vehicle Dependability Study (3-year-old vehicles) ranks Ford among the bottom 10 mainstream/luxury brands at 228 problems per 100 vehicles, even though Ford topped the separate initial-quality (first 90 days) study the same year.
This generation (2020-2026 unibody Explorer) opened with serious safety recalls — a driveshaft-disconnect rollaway risk and an engine-fire risk on Police Interceptor models (25 recalls on the 2020 model year alone) — and a 2023 turbocharger oil-supply-tube crack recall (loss of oil pressure/possible fire) shows the pattern hasn't fully disappeared, though recall counts have dropped sharply on 2024-2025 models.
The 2.3L EcoBoost turbo-four (in production since 2015 across Explorer/Edge/Mustang/Bronco/Ranger) is a known quantity with no systemic failure pattern, but owners and TSBs report recurring turbo oil-line and carbon-buildup issues; Ford's 2025 dual-injection update addresses carbon buildup, and the 10-speed automatic has had scattered software-related shift-quality complaints rather than hard failures.
Reviewers note upgraded soft-touch surfaces and contrast stitching on the refreshed cabin, a step up from the outgoing design, but owner surveys still flag interior/build quality as the Explorer's weakest attribute relative to its styling and comfort.
Ford placed #1 among mainstream brands in the 2026 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (152 problems per 100 vehicles, best of any mainstream automaker), a 41 PP100 improvement year-over-year and a strong proxy for assembly consistency and out-of-the-gate defect rates on the Explorer's build.
Ford/Lincoln run one of the largest dealer networks in the US at roughly 2,800 locations nationwide, giving Explorer owners exceptional service-access density in every region.
As a high-volume mainstream 3-row SUV, the Explorer benefits from wide parts availability and a large aftermarket, with repair costs typical for the mainstream mid-size SUV class rather than dealer-only or premium pricing.
7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Explorer's strongest categories.3.13B
The redesigned 2026 Explorer standardizes a 13.2-inch center touchscreen across every trim, a large jump over the outgoing 10.4/11.4-inch setup.
The new Android-based Ford Digital Experience replaces the prior SYNC 4 UI with smartphone-like swipe gestures, pinch-to-zoom maps, and split-screen layouts, drawing praise for responsiveness in early dealer/media coverage.
Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard equipment on every 2026 Explorer trim, matching the segment's best-in-class offerings.
The Ford Digital Experience embeds Google built-in — Google Assistant voice control and Google Maps with real-time traffic and eco-routing — standard on the 13.2-inch display, a major upgrade over the prior SYNC voice/nav stack.
A 10-speaker Bang & Olufsen system is standard on ST-Line, Tremor, and ST, stepping up to a 14-speaker B&O setup with subwoofer on Platinum — solid mid-pack premium audio for the segment.
A 12.3-inch configurable digital instrument cluster is now standard across the entire 2026 Explorer lineup rather than gated to upper trims.
Explorer runs Ford's Power-Up over-the-air platform, which pushes whole-vehicle software updates (not just maps/infotainment) that can add new features post-purchase.
The FordPass app covers remote start, lock/unlock, vehicle locate, and status at no added cost, but the richer connected features (5G Wi-Fi hotspot, streaming) require the paid Ford Connectivity Package rather than being bundled free.
Ports are abundant — up to 8 USB-C outlets spread across rows — but Ford deleted the wireless charging pad from the 2026 Explorer lineup entirely, a step back from prior model years.
Proximity keyless entry and FordPass remote start are broadly available, and the new Open On Approach feature auto-opens the power liftgate when the fob is within ~3 feet, though that liftgate feature is standard only on ST and Platinum.
A 360-degree split-view camera is standard on ST-Line, Tremor, ST, and Platinum, but is not offered on the volume Active Base/Active 200A trims, which get rear camera and sensors only — matching the mid-tier band for this item.
A 10.1-inch head-up display is offered, but it's positioned as a premium-trim feature primarily tied to Platinum rather than being broadly available.
8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.53C+
Wide rear door openings and standard second-row captain's chairs (bench available) make loading kids and gear easy; PowerFold third row on upper trims helps but LATCH access isn't a standout versus segment leaders.
IIHS Top Safety Pick+ and a 5-star NHTSA overall rating are paired with Ford Co-Pilot360 (AEB, blind-spot with cross-traffic alert, lane-keeping, rear camera) standard across every 2026 trim — no paywalled safety tech at the entry price point.
37.5 in of second-row legroom and 31.8 in in the third row keep multi-hour trips comfortable for most families, and the available 110V/150W outlet plus 6-8 USB ports serve devices well, but 16.3 cu ft behind the third row is only mid-pack and the wireless charging pad was deleted for 2026.
The 2.3L EcoBoost has enough low-end torque for effortless traffic driving, but the 10-speed automatic carries a well-documented reputation for harsh, jerky, or delayed shifts that undercuts everyday smoothness.
Volume 2.3L EcoBoost trims return 27-29 MPG highway (roughly mid-20s combined) — average for a mid-size 3-row gas SUV; the hybrid's 38 MPG highway is a stronger option but not the volume powertrain, and V6 ST/Tremor variants drop to 22-25 MPG.
A roughly 39-foot turning circle and mid-size 3-row footprint are typical for the class — manageable with the standard rear camera but no advantage over rivals like the Highlander or Pilot.
Every 2026 Explorer includes a standard Class III Tow Package rated to 5,000 lbs with a 2-inch receiver and 7-wire harness — solid for a crossover-based SUV but on par with, not ahead of, segment rivals like the Telluride and Palisade, and there's no cargo bed for real work loads.
Consumer Reports rates the current-generation Explorer's reliability well below average, driven largely by chronic 10-speed transmission failures (harsh shifting, slipping, complete failure) and multiple related recalls including unintended rollaway — a poor foundation for sustained hard use.
Standard hitch wiring, factory roof rails compatible with crossbar carriers, and an available 110V/150W outlet cover light-duty needs, but there's no meaningful upfit ecosystem or washable cargo surfaces aimed at work use.
Generous second-row space, a composed highway ride, and Co-Pilot360 driver-assist features reduce fatigue on long hauls; the 2.3L's mid-20s combined economy means more fuel stops than hybrid rivals, tempering an otherwise strong mile-eater case.
The new-for-2026 Tremor trim brings genuine off-road tuning — 8.7 in ground clearance, off-road-tuned suspension, underbody protection, and a Torsen limited-slip rear axle — a real differentiator versus most family 3-row SUVs, with AWD and roof rails available across the range.
85.8 cu ft of max cargo with the second and third rows folded, PowerFold third-row seating on upper trims, factory roof rails, and a standard tow hitch give the Explorer strong gear-hauling flexibility for a 3-row SUV.
9Driving ExperienceOne of the Explorer's strongest categories.2.71B-
The CD6 rear-drive-based platform gives the volume-trim (2.3L EcoBoost) Explorer quick steering and a firm suspension tune that make it feel more agile than its size suggests, with a planted, composed feel through corners for a 3-row midsize SUV — above-average for the class but not class-leading like the sportier ST.
Steering on mainstream trims is quick and direct with good on-center precision, though feedback is filtered compared to the sharper, more performance-tuned ST calibration.
No instrumented stopping-distance test was found for the 2026 volume trim; reviews of performance variants note 'good' brakes with red-painted calipers on ST/Tremor, implying adequate but unremarkable pedal feel on the mainstream configuration.
The standard 2.3L EcoBoost turbo-four (300 hp/310 lb-ft) paired with a 10-speed automatic delivers responsive acceleration and smooth, predictable shifts for daily driving and highway passing, with a settled and refined ride even at speed.
The turbocharged four-cylinder is generally unobtrusive at cruise but becomes more vocal under hard acceleration than the V6 units offered by some three-row rivals; no dedicated interior noise measurement was found for 2026.
Curb-to-curb turning diameter is 38.7 ft across all 2026 Explorer trims, mid-pack for the mid-size SUV segment band (34-42 ft).
Reviewers praise the intuitive control layout ('everything sits exactly where you'd reach for it naturally'), supportive front seats, and a clear 13.2-in touchscreen paired with an available 12.3-in digital cluster; physical climate buttons remain below the screen, though one reviewer wanted more dedicated buttons.
The volume EcoBoost trim is pleasant and composed but leans toward appliance-like family-hauler duty; the ST trim injects genuine enjoyment with its rear-biased chassis tune, but that character isn't present on the mainstream Active/XLT configuration being scored.
10Value & Market PositionMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.63C+
Base Active trim ($38,465) comes with the new 13.2-inch SYNC 4A touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, and Ford Co-Pilot360 driver-assist as standard, which is competitive but not class-leading equipment generosity for a mid-size 3-row.
Solid tech and capability spread across the range is undercut by 2026's reliability concerns, keeping value perception fair rather than a standout bargain.
Five distinct trims — Active ($38,465), ST-Line, Platinum ($50,965), new off-road Tremor ($49,460), and performance ST ($54,905) — cover family, luxury, off-road, and performance buyers across a wide price band.
The Explorer is America's best-selling 3-row SUV and led the segment with 222,706 units sold in 2025, up 14.7% year-over-year and its best sales year since 2020.
Ford is a well-established mainstream brand with strong SUV/truck credibility but no aspirational halo, and 2026 reliability headlines are a modest drag on image.
Meaningful factory incentives are commonly available — cash back and subsidized financing plus lease specials — without indicating desperation pricing.
The 6th-generation Explorer platform dates to 2020; 2026 brings a mid-cycle refresh (new front fascia, LED lighting, larger touchscreen, new off-road Tremor trim) rather than an all-new architecture.
The 2026 Explorer earned an IIHS Top Safety Pick+ award and positive reviews for cabin ergonomics and tech, but Consumer Reports pulled its recommended status over below-average predicted reliability, making reception mixed rather than a clear comparison-test winner.
