MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2018:Overall +2Safety +6Reliability +6Cost of Ownership +2Technology +2Driving Experience +3
Ford logo
Mid-Size SUV

2019 Ford Explorer

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
1.68DGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
2.10C
Safety
1.68D
EfficiencyGas
0.00F
18 MPG combined · 335 mi range · $2,950/yr energy
Comfort
2.35C+
Value
1.34D
Ownership Cost
0.92F
Technology
0.99F
Driving Experience
1.97C-

The verdict

A struggling mid-size suv, strong on space and held back by efficiency.

Overall 1.68 (D) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is space & comfort at 2.35 (C+), its weakest efficiency & range at 0.00 (F). 3 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Space & Comfort
  • Reliability & Quality
  • Driving Experience

What holds it back

  • Efficiency & Range
  • Performance & Powertrain
  • Cost of Ownership

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Ford Explorer

Production history

1991present · 36 years · 6 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1199119941991Gen 2199520011995Gen 3200220052002Gen 4200620102006Gen 5201120192011Gen 62020now2020In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 1991

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 512018 · Overall: 53 (+2 vs 2017)2019 · Overall: 55 (+2 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 59 (+4 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 592022 · Overall: 57 (−2 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 59 (+2 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 62 (+3 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 65 (+3 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 66 (+1 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance44
56+12
Efficiency39
46+7
Safety47
83+36
Space64
62-2
Cost44
430
Reliability48
52+4
Tech39
76+36
Use-case56
67+11
Driving56
70+13
Value62
68+6

Best fit & conditions

FamilyC-56/100
Winter / inclementC-55/100
AdventureD54/100
CommuterD53/100
Work / TowF44/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Trims & configurations

4 trims

Scores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:

Active · baseST-LinePlatinumST

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainOne of the Explorer's weakest categories.0.90F
Horsepower
290 hp (3.5L Ti-VCT V6, standard on Base/XLT); 280 hp with optional 2.3L EcoBoost I4; 365 hp with 3.5L EcoBoost V6 (Sport/Platinum)
35/100
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

Volume trim (XLT) carries the naturally aspirated 3.5L V6 at 290 hp, the carryover base engine for the fifth-generation (U502) Explorer's final model year.

Torque
255 lb-ft (3.5L V6, standard on Base/XLT); 310 lb-ft with 2.3L EcoBoost I4; 350 lb-ft with 3.5L EcoBoost V6 (Sport/Platinum)
34/100
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

Base/volume 3.5L V6 peaks at 255 lb-ft; the optional turbo four actually out-torques it at 310 lb-ft, and the EcoBoost V6 tops the range at 350 lb-ft.

0–60 mph time
~7.6 s (3.5L V6 AWD, XLT); ~7.3 s FWD; ~5.5–6.0 s with 3.5L EcoBoost V6 (Sport/Platinum)
32/100
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

The carryover 3.5L V6/6-speed combination is a mid-pack sprinter for the segment; the EcoBoost V6 in Sport/Platinum is markedly quicker but is a lower-volume configuration.

Powertrain refinement55
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 3.5L V6 delivers linear, predictable power with no turbo lag, but response is unremarkable and the pairing with a dated 6-speed automatic blunts responsiveness compared to newer segment rivals with turbo or hybrid powertrains.

Transmission behavior48
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 6-speed automatic — carried over largely unchanged since the platform's 2011 debut — shifts competently but noticeably lags the 8-, 9-, and 10-speed units competitors had adopted by 2019, with occasional indecisive kickdowns and hunting on grades.

Max towing capacity
5,000 lbs (3.5L V6 or 3.5L EcoBoost V6, properly equipped with Class II/III Trailer Tow Package); 2,000 lbs with 2.3L EcoBoost I4
57/100
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Max conventional towing tops out at 5,000 lbs on V6 models with the factory tow package; the optional turbo-four is limited to 2,000 lbs due to cooling constraints.

AWD/4WD availability58
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

AWD is optional (not standard) across every trim, paired on upper trims with a Terrain Management System offering selectable drive modes (Normal, Mud/Ruts, Sand, Snow), but there is no low-range gearing or torque vectoring.

Off-road capability30
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

A unibody crossover platform with modest 7.9-in ground clearance and no dedicated off-road trim, skid plates, or locking differential; the Terrain Management System's drive modes offer light snow/mud/sand assistance only.

Powertrain lineup breadth50
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

Three gasoline engine choices (NA 3.5L V6, turbo 2.3L I4, twin-turbo 3.5L EcoBoost V6) cover mainstream and performance needs, but there is no hybrid, PHEV, or EV variant — electrification didn't arrive until the 2020 redesign.

2Efficiency & RangeThe Explorer's lowest-graded category.0.00F
Combined fuel economy
18 MPG combined (3.5L V6 AWD, volume trim); 20 MPG FWD; 21-22 MPG with 2.3L EcoBoost; 18 MPG with 3.5L EcoBoost twin-turbo (Sport/Platinum)
12/100
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

EPA combined rating for the volume 3.5L V6 AWD configuration, the standard engine across Base/XLT/Limited trims; FWD and EcoBoost variants vary around this figure.

City fuel economy
16 MPG city (3.5L V6 AWD); 17 MPG FWD; 18-19 MPG with 2.3L EcoBoost
13/100
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

EPA city rating for the volume 3.5L V6 AWD configuration.

Highway fuel economy
22 MPG highway (3.5L V6 AWD); 24 MPG FWD; 25-27 MPG with 2.3L EcoBoost
13/100
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

EPA highway rating for the volume 3.5L V6 AWD configuration.

Driving range
335 mi (3.5L V6 AWD, 18.6-gal tank); up to 370 mi FWD
17/100
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

EPA-estimated total range on a full tank for the volume 3.5L V6 AWD configuration (18.6-gallon tank at 18 MPG combined).

Estimated annual fuel cost
$2,950/yr (3.5L V6 AWD, 15k mi/yr); $2,600 FWD; $2,500-2,600 with 2.3L EcoBoost
27/100
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

EPA-estimated annual fuel cost for the volume 3.5L V6 AWD configuration at standard 15,000 mi/yr assumptions.

Fuel requirements90
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

All 2019 Explorer engines (3.5L V6, 2.3L EcoBoost, 3.5L EcoBoost twin-turbo) run on 87-octane regular unleaded; premium is recommended but not required for peak output on the turbocharged EcoBoost engines, mainly under towing/hot-weather loads.

3SafetyGrades below the middle of the scale.1.68D
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall (5 front / 5 side / 4 rollover)
100/100
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

NHTSA's full test battery on the 2019 Explorer (last year of the 5th generation) returned a 5-star overall rating, with 4 stars in the rollover sub-test pulling down an otherwise top result.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness38
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

The outgoing 5th-gen Explorer earned Good ratings in moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and rear, but the small overlap front test exposed a real structural weakness: Marginal on the driver side and Poor on the passenger side, where the IIHS documented 15 inches of lower hinge-pillar intrusion. That passenger-side failure alone disqualified it from any IIHS award for 2019.

Standard ADAS suite breadth35
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

Ford's Safe and Smart Package — forward collision warning with AEB, adaptive cruise, blind-spot monitoring, and lane-keep assist — was standard only on the range-topping Platinum trim for 2019; it was an optional package on XLT, Limited and Sport, and unavailable on the base trim. Most buyers on the volume XLT trim had to pay extra for any of it.

Automatic emergency braking performance60
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Pre-Collision Assist with AEB fitted to the 2019 Explorer used the same camera/radar hardware Ford was rolling out across the lineup that generation, generally competent in daytime vehicle-to-vehicle scenarios but with less-proven pedestrian/night performance than newer systems, and it wasn't standard equipment to begin with.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage50
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

BLIS blind-spot monitoring with cross-traffic alert was alert-only (no braking intervention) and, like the rest of the driver-assist suite, bundled into the optional Safe and Smart package on all but the top trim.

Lane keeping & centering45
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Explorer's Lane-Keeping System of this era was a warning-plus-nudge assist rather than true lane centering, and owner-forum discussion of the period system describes noticeable wander between corrective steering inputs.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist62
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Reviewers praised the optional adaptive cruise control's consistency, holding speed within about 1 mph and downshifting smoothly to maintain the gap, though it wasn't paired with a dedicated highway-assist mode and remained an upper-trim option.

Hands-free driving availability5
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway driving system existed on the 2019 Explorer or anywhere in Ford's 2019 lineup — BlueCruise didn't launch until the 2021 model year.

Headlight performance48
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

Headlight quality varied meaningfully by trim — reflector halogen units on lower trims lagged the projector/LED setups on upper trims — and headlight performance was cited alongside the small-overlap results as a factor keeping the 2019 Explorer out of IIHS award contention.

Outward visibility65
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

The boxy, upright 5th-gen Explorer greenhouse gives generally good forward and side sightlines for the class, with a standard backup camera compensating for the expected 3-row blind spots at the rear quarters.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability65
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

Second-row LATCH anchors on the 3-row Explorer are workable with wide rear door openings typical of the segment, though the tight lower anchor pockets common to this generation require some digging, per typical mid-size SUV LATCH experiences.

4Space & ComfortThe Explorer's best-graded category.2.35C+
Seating capacity
7 seats standard (2nd-row bench); 6 with optional 2nd-row captain's chairs
75/100
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

XLT volume trim seats 7 with the standard three-across second-row bench; second-row captain's chairs are optional and drop capacity to six.

Front headroom
41.4 in
88/100
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Manufacturer-published front headroom for the 5th-generation (2016-2019) Explorer, unchanged for 2019.

Front legroom
42.9 in
64/100
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Manufacturer-published front legroom, consistent across 2019 trims.

Rear headroom
40.6 in (2nd row)
100/100
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom is class-leading for the segment, a strength of the boxy 5th-gen Explorer body.

Rear legroom
39.5 in (2nd row)
79/100
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

Generous second-row legroom versus mid-size 3-row rivals, aided by the second row sliding fore/aft to free third-row space.

Third-row usability58
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

Third row (37.8 in headroom, 33.3 in legroom) fits kids or short-trip adults comfortably with the second row slid forward, but access and space still trail 3-row leaders like the Highlander/Pilot; reviewers recommend the optional sliding second-row buckets specifically to improve third-row access.

Cargo/trunk volume
43.9 cu ft (behind 2nd row, 3rd row folded)
34/100
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

Cargo volume behind the second row with the third row folded flat; corroborated across multiple spec aggregators for the 2019 model year.

Max cargo volume
81.7 cu ft (both rear rows folded)
59/100
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

Maximum cargo volume with both rear rows folded flat, a competitive figure for the mid-size 3-row class.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions55
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Conventional but adequate storage — center console, door pockets, available second-row underseat bins on captain's-chair models — with no standout innovation; the redesigned console/storage improvements arrived with the 6th-gen 2020 Explorer.

Seat comfort65
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

Soft-touch materials and comfortable, adult-friendly seats across all three rows; reviewers single out the optional sliding second-row buckets as more comfortable and supportive than the base bench.

Ride quality60
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

Composed and comfortable ride on standard suspension over most surfaces, but agility is limited and Sport-suspension/larger-wheel trims ride noticeably stiffer — not class-leading.

Cabin quietness50
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

Noise suppression is a specifically cited weak point for the 2019 Explorer relative to price-point expectations, with wind/road noise more noticeable than segment leaders.

Climate & comfort features58
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

Heated front seats and heated steering wheel are available from mid trims up, with ventilated front seats and rear-seat climate controls reserved for Limited/Platinum; not standard on the volume XLT.

5Cost of OwnershipOne of the Explorer's weakest categories.0.92F
Base MSRP
33,460 $ (Base FWD, incl. $1,095 destination)
79/100
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

Entry Base FWD trim starts at $32,365 plus Ford's $1,095 destination charge for 2019.

Volume-Trim Price
38,900 $ (XLT 4WD, as typically equipped, incl. $1,095 destination)
71/100
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

XLT was the Explorer's best-selling trim for 2019; 4WD MSRP with destination runs $37,645, with typically-selected options (Equipment Group, roof rails, remote start) pushing the as-equipped price to roughly $38,900.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
6,500 $
46/100
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 5th-generation Explorer (2011-2019) carries a below-average RepairPal reliability rating (3.5/5, 19th of 26 midsize SUVs) with a 26.6% chance of a major repair in the first 5 years, above the segment norm, pushing blended 5-year maintenance + repair costs toward the higher end of the class range.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
40 %
0/100
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 5th-generation Explorer depreciates faster than the segment norm (iSeeCars: 52.9% 5-yr depreciation vs. 50.1% for midsize SUVs), compounded by the 2019-specific carbon-monoxide/exhaust-odor complaints and lawsuit publicity that weighed on used-market demand for these model years.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
0/100
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Standard mainstream-brand bumper-to-bumper coverage, at the low end of the segment band.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi
0/100
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

Standard Ford powertrain coverage, at the low end of the segment band versus Hyundai/Kia's longer terms.

Complimentary maintenance & perks50
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

FordPass Rewards launched for 2019 model buyers with a points bonus redeemable toward service (worth roughly a couple of scheduled visits) plus a complimentary 2-year trial of Sync Connect remote features and roadside assistance bundled with the powertrain warranty term, but there was no true prepaid multi-year maintenance plan.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$29,840 (≈$23,340 depreciation + $6,500 maintenance)
52/100
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

$38,900 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (40% retained, or about $15,560) leaves about $23,340 in depreciation. Add the projected $6,500 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $29,840 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Explorer's strongest categories.2.10C
Predicted reliability58
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 Explorer sits in the last year of the long-running 2011-2019 generation, and predicted-reliability signals were mixed: Consumer Reports rated it around average with owner-reported gripes in the transmission and suspension categories, while J.D. Power's dependability data for the platform skewed above average.

Brand reliability track record48
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

Ford's brand-wide dependability standing in the 2018-2019 CR and J.D. Power studies was mid-pack to below average, not a top-tier finisher, consistent with the mixed model-level reliability signal.

Recall & TSB history54
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

NHTSA lists three recalls touching 2019 Explorers: a rear suspension toe-link fracture risk (2017-2019, steering-control concern), an engine block heater cord that could crack and short, and A-pillar trim clips that could detach (2011-2019) — a real but not systemic pattern, on top of the nameplate's earlier-generation exhaust-odor TSB history that had largely been addressed by this model year.

Powertrain durability reputation66
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 3.5L V6, 2.3L EcoBoost turbo-four, and 6-speed automatic had all been in Explorer/Ford-wide service since 2011-2015 by 2019, giving them a reasonably proven high-mileage track record with no systemic failure pattern, though EcoBoost owners report occasional turbo and carbon-buildup issues.

Interior material quality60
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

Base and XLT trims use plain cloth and hard plastics that reviewers called drab, while Limited and Platinum add convincing synthetic wood trim, dressier stitching, and quality leather that lift the perceived quality meaningfully by trim level.

Fit & finish66
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

Reviewers found trim pieces fit together well with generally tight assembly, noting only an occasional unpinpointed dash rattle; owner surveys separately flagged some paint and mechanical quality-control complaints.

Dealer & service network82
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

Ford operates one of the largest dealer and service networks in the US, giving Explorer owners broad geographic access to service even though satisfaction scores for the brand are closer to average than class-leading.

Parts availability & repair cost73
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

As one of the best-selling three-row SUVs in the US for nearly a decade by 2019, the Explorer benefits from abundant parts supply and a large aftermarket, with repair costs typical for a mainstream mid-size SUV rather than luxury-priced.

7Technology & InfotainmentGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.99F
Touchscreen size
8.0 in SYNC 3 touchscreen (XLT, Limited, Sport, Platinum); base trim uses a smaller 4.2 in non-touch display
12/100
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

The final year of the 5th-generation Explorer carries SYNC 3 on an 8-inch touchscreen across XLT and up, while the base trim retains a smaller 4.2-inch non-touch display, a generation behind rivals moving to larger standard screens.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness75
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

SYNC 3 replaced the widely criticized MyFord Touch system it superseded and was praised by contemporary reviewers for quick touch response, a clean tile-based menu structure, and retained physical climate/volume controls alongside the touchscreen.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto45
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

SYNC 3 supports Apple CarPlay and Android Auto on XLT and above but only via wired USB connection; no wireless projection option exists for this generation, and the base trim's non-touch display omits smartphone projection entirely.

Voice control & native navigation55
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

SYNC 3 voice recognition handles basic commands (climate, phone, media) reasonably well, and an embedded SYNC 3 Navigation system was an available option on Limited and Platinum rather than standard equipment, with most owners of this era defaulting to phone-projected maps instead.

Audio system quality65
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

Base audio is adequate for the segment while Limited and Platinum trims offer a 12-speaker Sony premium audio system that was well regarded for the class at the time.

Digital instrument cluster30
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 Explorer retains analog speedometer/tachometer gauges with only a small non-configurable LCD message-center screen between them rather than a full reconfigurable digital cluster, a known weak point versus newer rivals already offering full digital displays.

OTA update capability20
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

FordPass Connect's embedded modem enables remote-access features and a Wi-Fi hotspot but predates Ford's whole-vehicle OTA software update capability, which arrived on later model years; SYNC 3 map/software updates were limited to USB or Wi-Fi downloads scoped to the infotainment module.

Companion app & remote functions65
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

FordPass Connect, with its embedded 4G LTE modem, is standard across the entire 2019 Explorer lineup, enabling the free FordPass app for remote start with scheduling, lock/unlock, vehicle locate, and fuel-level checks at no extra hardware cost.

Charging ports & device power45
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 Explorer offers a modest set of USB-A smart-charging ports across rows plus multiple 12-volt outlets, adequate for the era but dated by USB-A-only ports and no wireless charging pad on this generation.

Keyless & remote access58
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

Proximity keyless entry with push-button start and standard remote start are available from XLT upward, with a hands-free power liftgate added on Limited and Platinum; no phone-as-key feature existed on this generation.

Camera & parking aids45
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

A rear backup camera is standard across the lineup, with front parking sensors and a front-view camera added on Limited and above, but this generation never offered a full 360-degree surround-view camera system.

Head-up display availability18
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

No head-up display was offered on any 2019 Explorer trim; the feature was not introduced to the Explorer lineup until the redesigned 2020 (6th-generation) model.

8Use-Case FitGrades below the middle of the scale.1.46D
Kid & car-seat practicality62
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

Tall door openings and a slide-forward second row make loading kids and gear straightforward, and the optional captain's chairs ease third-row car-seat access, but the tight lower LATCH anchor pockets typical of this generation add friction versus segment benchmarks.

Family safety package46
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

NHTSA's 5-star overall rating looks strong on paper, but the IIHS small-overlap front test exposed a real structural weakness (Poor on the passenger side, 15 in of hinge-pillar intrusion) that cost the 2019 Explorer any safety award, and Ford's Safe and Smart driver-assist package — AEB, blind-spot, lane-keep — was standard only on the range-topping Platinum, an option on the family-volume XLT.

Family road-trip comfort56
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

Class-leading second-row headroom (40.6 in) and generous legroom (39.5 in) make multi-hour rides comfortable for four-plus occupants, and 43.9 cu ft of cargo behind the second row swallows luggage with the third row in use, but cabin quietness was a specifically cited weak point and rear climate controls/heated-seat comfort features are reserved for Limited and above rather than standard on the volume trim.

Daily driving ease58
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

The composed, comfortable ride and upright greenhouse make stop-and-go traffic manageable, but the dated 6-speed automatic exhibits indecisive kickdowns versus rivals' higher-gear-count transmissions, and reviewers flagged limited agility as a daily-driving compromise.

Commuting cost efficiency42
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume 3.5L V6 returns EPA combined figures in the high-teens/low-20s for a mid-size SUV — unremarkable for the segment — and RepairPal data shows below-average 5-year maintenance/repair costs (26.6% chance of a major repair, above the segment norm), pushing real-world per-mile ownership costs above average.

Parking & maneuverability57
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

A standard rearview camera and generally good outward sightlines from the boxy 5th-gen greenhouse ease city parking for its footprint, but a front/rear parking-sensor and 360-degree camera are option-package items rather than standard, and the Explorer's size still makes tight urban maneuvering more effortful than compact-SUV rivals.

Work capability45
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

Max conventional towing tops out at 5,000 lbs even on V6 models with the factory Trailer Tow Package — usable for small trailers and light toys but well short of body-on-frame and larger unibody mid-size rivals that clear 6,000-8,700 lbs, and the optional turbo-four is capped at just 2,000 lbs.

Durability for work duty50
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 3.5L V6/6-speed automatic combination has been in Ford service since 2011 with no systemic failure pattern, giving it a reasonably proven track record, but Consumer Reports' average predicted-reliability rating and scattered suspension/transmission owner complaints keep it from a fleet-proven reputation for sustained hard-use duty.

Jobsite & upfit practicality36
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

As a crossover-based 3-row SUV with no bed, no factory onboard power outlet, and no dedicated upfit ecosystem, the Explorer offers only basic cargo tie-downs and optional roof rails/hitch — adequate for hauling gear inside the cabin but with few work-specific provisions.

Long-distance comfort & range57
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

A comfortable highway ride and an optional adaptive cruise control that reviewers praised as "ultra-consistent" support relaxed mile-eating, but road/wind noise intrusion was a specifically cited weak point and the ADAS suite that reduces driver fatigue is gated to upper trims.

Outdoor & adventure capability42
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Optional AWD with a Terrain Management System offers selectable Normal/Mud-Ruts/Sand/Snow modes for light gravel or foul-weather use, but just 7.9 in of ground clearance, no low-range gearing, and no skid plates or locking differential keep genuine off-pavement capability modest — the dedicated off-road Timberline trim didn't arrive until the following generation.

Gear & luggage flexibility61
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

81.7 cu ft of max cargo volume with both rear rows folded flat is competitive for the mid-size 3-row class, and available roof rails plus the factory Class II/III hitch extend capacity for roof boxes, bikes, or small trailers, though there is no underfloor storage bonus beyond the segment norm.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the Explorer's strongest categories.1.97C-
Handling & agility58
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 Explorer rides on the final year of the fifth-generation D4 unibody (front-drive-based, Volvo-derived platform), with a softer, comfort-tuned suspension that produces noticeable body roll and secure but unremarkable cornering compared to segment leaders like the Honda Pilot or Mazda CX-9.

Steering feel52
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Electric power steering on the 2019 Explorer is light at low speeds for easy maneuvering but is widely characterized as numb and lacking on-center feedback, a common criticism of this generation across trims.

Braking confidence58
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

Stopping power is adequate for the segment but pedal feel is soft and progressive rather than confidence-inspiring; no standout instrumented stopping-distance results were noted for the volume 2.3L EcoBoost/AWD configuration.

Powertrain smoothness & response68
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.3L EcoBoost turbo-four (280 hp/310 lb-ft) paired with a 6-speed automatic is generally smooth around town, though it exhibits some turbo lag off the line and the 6-speed gearbox feels dated next to segment rivals that had already moved to 8-, 9-, or 10-speed units by 2019.

Drivetrain noise & vibration63
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2.3L EcoBoost four is reasonably quiet at cruising speed but becomes noticeably coarser and more vocal under hard acceleration than the optional 3.5L V6 or the 3.5L EcoBoost V6 in the Platinum/Sport trims.

Turning circle
~38.7 ft curb-to-curb (XLT/Limited, consistent across trims)
41/100
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

Curb-to-curb turning diameter for the fifth-generation Explorer is approximately 38.7 ft, mid-pack within the mid-size SUV normalization band (34-42 ft); figure carried from manufacturer spec sheets for this generation, not independently re-verified via live search this run.

Driving position & ergonomics74
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently praise the Explorer's tall, commanding seating position and strong outward visibility, along with comfortable, well-bolstered front seats and a logically arranged dashboard with the SYNC 3 touchscreen (8-in on most trims) positioned within easy reach.

Fun-to-drive factor50
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 Explorer is a composed, comfort-oriented family hauler rather than an engaging drive; it lacks the sharper chassis tune and driver-focused character that Ford would later introduce with the 2020+ RWD-based redesign and ST performance variant.

10Value & Market PositionGrades below the middle of the scale.1.34D
Standard equipment generosity48
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Base and volume XLT trims carry cloth seats, an 8-way power driver's seat, a rearview camera, and a basic 4.2-inch SYNC display rather than SYNC 3 or a larger touchscreen; most Ford Co-Pilot360 driver-assist content is bundled into optional packages rather than standard, leaving base spec sparse for the class.

Feature value per dollar50
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

Roomy third row and best-in-class-for-its-era cargo capacity with all seats folded give real space per dollar, and the Sport's twin-turbo 3.5L EcoBoost V6 adds genuine performance content, but a dated small-screen infotainment system and interior tech that trails newer rivals hold overall value to merely fair.

Trim & configuration breadth74
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

Five well-spaced trims — Base, XLT, Limited, Sport, and Platinum — run from $32,365 to $54,165, with FWD or AWD on Base/XLT/Limited and AWD-only Sport and Platinum, giving a real spread from budget-family to performance and near-luxury buyers.

Sales popularity & market acceptance54
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Explorer remained a high-volume nameplate at 187,061 US units for calendar-year 2019, but that was down roughly 18% year-over-year as Ford wound down current-generation production ahead of the all-new 2020 model's launch, making it a steady but declining seller in its final year.

Brand desirability & image52
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

Ford carries solid, established mainstream-SUV credibility and the Explorer name has long nameplate recognition, but neither the brand nor this outgoing generation carries an aspirational halo versus segment leaders.

Deals & incentive availability78
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

With an all-new 2020 model already revealed, Ford ran repeated clearance-style incentives on 2019 stock through mid-2019 — $2,500 customer cash plus $500 select-inventory cash ($3,000 total) alongside 0% APR for 60 months — giving buyers real negotiating room without the pricing looking desperate.

Model freshness15
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 is the ninth and final model year of the fifth-generation Explorer (2011-2019) on an aging front-wheel-drive-based platform, with an all-new, completely redesigned sixth-generation model already revealed for 2020 — about as stale and replacement-imminent as a model gets.

Critical reception & awards40
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Reviewers liked the Sport's twin-turbo V6 power and sharper suspension tuning, but the broader lineup was consistently knocked for ungainly handling and dated cabin tech that trailed more modern three-row rivals, keeping it out of comparison-test wins or major awards in its final year.