MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2025:Overall +1Safety +1Reliability +1Cost of Ownership +9Technology -2Driving Experience +6
Ford logo
Mid-Size SUV

2026 Ford Explorer

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2.47C+GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.48D
Safety
3.67A-
EfficiencyGas
1.06D
23 MPG combined · 412 mi range · $2,600/yr energy
Comfort
2.19C
Value
2.63C+
Ownership Cost
0.88F
Technology
3.13B
Driving Experience
2.71B-

The verdict

A mixed-report mid-size suv, strong on safety and held back by ownership.

The 2026 Explorer is America's best-selling three-row SUV for good reasons — a 5-star NHTSA crash rating, an IIHS Top Safety Pick, a standard 13.2-inch Google-powered touchscreen on every trim, and a genuinely off-road-capable Tremor version no Highlander or Pilot can match. What it does not offer is peace of mind about the long run: Consumer Reports scores its predicted reliability 30/100 and pulled its Recommended badge, resale is projected around 45% after five years, and the warranty is a bare 3-year/36,000-mile term. It also gives up ground on running costs, at 23 MPG combined and roughly $2,600 a year in fuel with no hybrid anywhere in the lineup. Buy it for the tech, safety and dealer network at roughly $47,155 as typically equipped — and go in expecting to pay for that ownership risk on the back end.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Crash-test scores and standard safety gear are top-shelf
  • The best infotainment in the mainstream three-row class
  • Everybody sells it, and everybody can fix it

What holds it back

  • Consumer Reports tells shoppers to avoid it
  • Depreciation and warranty are the worst part of the deal
  • Thirsty, with no hybrid to escape to

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Ford Explorer

Production history

1991present · 36 years · 6 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1199119941991Gen 2199520011995Gen 3200220052002Gen 4200620102006Gen 5201120192011Gen 62020now2020In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 1991

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 512018 · Overall: 53 (+2 vs 2017)2019 · Overall: 55 (+2 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 59 (+4 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 592022 · Overall: 57 (−2 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 59 (+2 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 62 (+3 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 65 (+3 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 66 (+1 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance44
56+12
Efficiency39
46+7
Safety47
83+36
Space64
62-2
Cost44
430
Reliability48
52+4
Tech39
76+36
Use-case56
67+11
Driving56
70+13
Value62
68+6

Best fit & conditions

FamilyB+79/100
AdventureB75/100
Winter / inclementB-71/100
CommuterC63/100
Work / TowD51/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Trims & configurations

4 trims

Scores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:

Active · baseST-LinePlatinumST

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.73C-
Horsepower
300 hp (2.3L EcoBoost I4, ST-Line/Active/Tremor); 365–400 hp with 3.0L EcoBoost V6 (Platinum/ST)
38/100
#52 of 148 in classCompare all →

Volume trim (ST-Line) runs the 2.3L turbo I4 at 300 hp; the optional 3.0L twin-turbo V6 ranges 365 hp (Platinum) to 400 hp (ST).

Torque
310 lb-ft (2.3L I4); up to 415 lb-ft with 3.0L V6 (ST)
49/100
#64 of 148 in classCompare all →

Volume 2.3L I4 peaks at 310 lb-ft; V6 ST variant reaches 415 lb-ft.

0–60 mph time
6.8 s (2.3L I4, ST-Line); ~5.3–5.5 s with 3.0L V6 (ST)
45/100
#73 of 148 in classCompare all →

Base/volume I4 configuration is a mid-pack mid-size-SUV sprinter; the ST V6 is notably quicker but is a low-volume performance trim.

Powertrain refinement65
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2.3L EcoBoost I4 delivers adequate low-end torque with mild turbo lag off idle; smooth enough for daily driving but lacks the effortless punch of segment-leading turbo-hybrid rivals.

Transmission behavior72
#80 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ford's 10-speed automatic shifts smoothly in normal driving with minor calibration refinements for 2026; some owner/forum reports still note occasional hunting on grades, short of best-in-class crispness.

Max towing capacity
5,300 lbs (2.3L I4); 5,600 lbs (3.0L V6, properly equipped)
66/100
#36 of 148 in classCompare all →

Max conventional towing tops out at 5,600 lbs with the V6 and Class III Trailer Tow Package; the I4 configuration is rated slightly lower at 5,300 lbs. Some secondary sources conflate both engines at a flat 5,000 lbs, but manufacturer-aligned dealer spec pages consistently cite the higher, engine-differentiated figures.

AWD/4WD availability62
#132 of 148 in classCompare all →

RWD is standard with Ford's Intelligent 4WD available across the trim range (standard on Tremor and ST V6); system offers selectable drive modes but no low-range gearing outside Tremor's off-road setup.

Off-road capability68
#19 of 148 in classCompare all →

The dedicated Tremor trim brings genuine hardware — all-terrain tires, TORSEN limited-slip rear differential, underbody protection, and 8.7-inch ground clearance — putting it a notch above typical crossover-based mid-size SUVs, though short of body-on-frame off-roaders.

Powertrain lineup breadth52
#56 of 148 in classCompare all →

Two gas EcoBoost engines (2.3L I4, 3.0L V6) cover the range but there is no hybrid, PHEV, or EV variant, unlike several mid-size SUV rivals now offering electrified options.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Explorer's weakest categories.1.06D
3SafetyThe Explorer's best-graded category.3.67A-
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars (NHTSA overall, 2026 Explorer)
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

NHTSA awarded the 2026 Ford Explorer its highest possible overall crash-test rating.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness78
#42 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS named the 2026 Explorer a Top Safety Pick (not TSP+) after tightening 2026 criteria; it earned Good ratings across small/moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraints, with only two Acceptable results (driver lower leg/foot in small overlap, driver pelvis in side impact).

Standard ADAS suite breadth85
#70 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ford Co-Pilot360 is standard on every 2026 Explorer trim, bundling forward-collision warning with AEB, lane-departure warning, lane-keeping assist, automatic high beams, blind-spot monitoring (BLIS), and adaptive cruise with stop-and-go — a broad standard suite for the segment.

Automatic emergency braking performance85
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS rated the Explorer's front crash prevention Good for both vehicle-to-vehicle and pedestrian scenarios, a requirement for its Top Safety Pick award.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage78
#82 of 148 in classCompare all →

Blind Spot Information System (BLIS) is standard fleet-wide, but rear cross-traffic alert and the fuller Co-Pilot360 Assist+ package (360 camera, active park assist) are reserved for higher trims.

Lane keeping & centering70
#91 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard lane-keeping assist and lane-departure warning perform adequately in reviews but aren't singled out for best-in-class smoothness compared to rivals with more refined centering.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist78
#68 of 148 in classCompare all →

Adaptive cruise with stop-and-go is standard and capable, but the more integrated hands-free highway assist (BlueCruise) is limited to the Platinum and ST trims rather than being broadly available.

Hands-free driving availability75
#29 of 148 in classCompare all →

BlueCruise hands-free highway driving (with a 90-day trial) is available and covers a mature, wide network of divided highways, but is restricted to the Platinum and ST trims rather than the full range.

Headlight performance85
#15 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS rated the 2026 Explorer's headlights Good, a contributing factor to its Top Safety Pick award.

Outward visibility72
#73 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers note a bright, glassy cabin with good outward sightlines for the segment; a four-camera 360-degree view is available (not standard) to compensate for typical mid-size SUV blind spots.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability85
#8 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Explorer offers four full LATCH position sets (two second-row, two third-row on applicable trims) with easily located anchors and wide door openings, making multi-seat installs easy.

4Space & ComfortMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.19C
Seating capacity
6 (2nd-row captain's chairs, standard on Active 100A/Active/Tremor/Platinum) or 7 with 2nd-row bench (standard on ST-Line, optional elsewhere except Tremor)
50/100
#50 of 148 in classCompare all →

Captain's chairs are the standard, volume-trim layout at 6 seats; a 35/30/35 bench bumping capacity to 7 is standard only on ST-Line and optional on other non-Tremor trims.

Front headroom
40.7 in (38.9 in on Platinum with standard panoramic roof)
74/100
#44 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front headroom is generous on non-panoramic-roof trims; Platinum trades roughly 1.8 in for its standard glass roof.

Front legroom
42.9 in (43.0 in on Active 100A/Active)
64/100
#26 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front legroom is mid-pack for the mid-size three-row class, essentially flat across trims.

Rear headroom
40.5 in 2nd row (38.2 in on Platinum with panoramic roof)
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom is class-leading on non-panoramic-roof trims, exceeding the SUV norm even after the Platinum roof penalty.

Rear legroom
37.0 in 2nd row (37.5 in on Active 100A/Active)
58/100
#111 of 148 in classCompare all →

Second-row legroom is competitive but not segment-leading; captain's chairs and bench trims are within half an inch of each other.

Third-row usability40
#55 of 148 in classCompare all →

Third row (31.8 in legroom, 38.9 in headroom) is a known weak point — cramped, low seating position, and cumbersome access even with second-row tumble features; kid-only for anything beyond short trips.

Cargo/trunk volume
46.0 cu ft behind 2nd row (3rd row folded); 16.3 cu ft behind 3rd row
38/100
#27 of 148 in classCompare all →

Cargo volume with the third row folded is on the smaller side for the mid-size three-row class.

Max cargo volume
85.8 cu ft with 2nd and 3rd rows folded
68/100
#29 of 148 in classCompare all →

Max cargo with all rear seats folded is above the segment midpoint, a strength when rows aren't in use.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions60
#106 of 148 in classCompare all →

Cubbies throughout the cabin and a large vertical SYNC 4A touchscreen area provide competitive everyday storage, but nothing rises to class-leading innovation (no giga console or in-cabin trunk).

Seat comfort75
#73 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front seats are comfortable, supportive, and generously adjustable; second-row captain's chairs are widely praised as comfortable and roomy.

Ride quality60
#121 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ride is planted but firmer than most three-row rivals, with more road imperfections transmitted into the cabin than class leaders, though owners report a generally smooth, well-absorbed ride.

Cabin quietness78
#55 of 148 in classCompare all →

Acoustic-laminate front side glass and enhanced sound dampening deliver little wind noise and reduced road noise — a genuine strength for the segment.

Climate & comfort features72
#99 of 148 in classCompare all →

Tri-zone automatic climate with rear auxiliary controls is broadly available, and heated/ventilated/massaging front seats plus heated 2nd-row seats and a heated steering wheel are available on upper trims — good coverage without being standard fleet-wide.

5Cost of OwnershipThe Explorer's lowest-graded category.0.88F
Base MSRP
40,160 $ (Active 100A RWD, incl. $1,695 destination)
62/100
#47 of 148 in classCompare all →

Entry Active 100A RWD trim starts at $38,465 plus Ford's $1,695 destination charge for 2026.

Volume-Trim Price
47,155 $ (ST-Line 4WD, as typically equipped)
51/100
#56 of 148 in classCompare all →

ST-Line is the volume-selling trim for 2026; 4WD MSRP with destination sits just under $47,200, matching average transaction prices.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
5,400 $
63/100
#58 of 148 in classCompare all →

Industry class estimates for the Explorer span roughly $3,200–$6,000 over 5 years; a blended midpoint for the volume AWD 4-cylinder configuration lands near $5,400.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
45 %
17/100
#89 of 148 in classCompare all →

Explorer depreciation estimates run higher than the midsize-SUV segment norm (~50% retention), reflecting its weaker resale reputation versus Highlander/Telluride/Pathfinder rivals.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
0/100
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard mainstream-brand bumper-to-bumper coverage, at the low end of the segment band.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi
0/100
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard Ford powertrain coverage, at the low end of the segment band versus Hyundai/Kia's longer terms.

Complimentary maintenance & perks60
#68 of 148 in classCompare all →

FordPass Rewards grants a welcome bonus of roughly 42,000 points (about $210 in service credit), covering roughly the first two years of scheduled maintenance visits, plus roadside assistance bundled through the powertrain warranty term and a FordPass Connect trial — solid but shorter than rivals with true multi-year prepaid maintenance plans.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$31,335 (≈$25,935 depreciation + $5,400 maintenance)
49/100
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

$47,155 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (45% retained, or about $21,220) leaves about $25,935 in depreciation. Add the projected $5,400 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $31,335 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Explorer's weakest categories.1.48D
Predicted reliability32
#142 of 148 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports gives the 2026 Explorer a predicted reliability score of just 30/100 based on owner data from the 2023-2025 model years, and pulled its Recommended badge — one of only a handful of 2026 vehicles CR explicitly tells shoppers to avoid, despite decent road-test and owner-satisfaction scores.

Brand reliability track record38
#126 of 148 in classCompare all →

Long-term dependability is Ford's weak spot: J.D. Power's 2026 Vehicle Dependability Study (3-year-old vehicles) ranks Ford among the bottom 10 mainstream/luxury brands at 228 problems per 100 vehicles, even though Ford topped the separate initial-quality (first 90 days) study the same year.

Recall & TSB history45
#125 of 148 in classCompare all →

This generation (2020-2026 unibody Explorer) opened with serious safety recalls — a driveshaft-disconnect rollaway risk and an engine-fire risk on Police Interceptor models (25 recalls on the 2020 model year alone) — and a 2023 turbocharger oil-supply-tube crack recall (loss of oil pressure/possible fire) shows the pattern hasn't fully disappeared, though recall counts have dropped sharply on 2024-2025 models.

Powertrain durability reputation58
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2.3L EcoBoost turbo-four (in production since 2015 across Explorer/Edge/Mustang/Bronco/Ranger) is a known quantity with no systemic failure pattern, but owners and TSBs report recurring turbo oil-line and carbon-buildup issues; Ford's 2025 dual-injection update addresses carbon buildup, and the 10-speed automatic has had scattered software-related shift-quality complaints rather than hard failures.

Interior material quality60
#131 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers note upgraded soft-touch surfaces and contrast stitching on the refreshed cabin, a step up from the outgoing design, but owner surveys still flag interior/build quality as the Explorer's weakest attribute relative to its styling and comfort.

Fit & finish80
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ford placed #1 among mainstream brands in the 2026 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (152 problems per 100 vehicles, best of any mainstream automaker), a 41 PP100 improvement year-over-year and a strong proxy for assembly consistency and out-of-the-gate defect rates on the Explorer's build.

Dealer & service network85
#14 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ford/Lincoln run one of the largest dealer networks in the US at roughly 2,800 locations nationwide, giving Explorer owners exceptional service-access density in every region.

Parts availability & repair cost72
#47 of 148 in classCompare all →

As a high-volume mainstream 3-row SUV, the Explorer benefits from wide parts availability and a large aftermarket, with repair costs typical for the mainstream mid-size SUV class rather than dealer-only or premium pricing.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Explorer's strongest categories.3.13B
Touchscreen size
13.2 in (standard across all trims)
73/100
#43 of 148 in classCompare all →

The redesigned 2026 Explorer standardizes a 13.2-inch center touchscreen across every trim, a large jump over the outgoing 10.4/11.4-inch setup.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness80
#43 of 148 in classCompare all →

The new Android-based Ford Digital Experience replaces the prior SYNC 4 UI with smartphone-like swipe gestures, pinch-to-zoom maps, and split-screen layouts, drawing praise for responsiveness in early dealer/media coverage.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto92
#15 of 148 in classCompare all →

Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard equipment on every 2026 Explorer trim, matching the segment's best-in-class offerings.

Voice control & native navigation85
#40 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Ford Digital Experience embeds Google built-in — Google Assistant voice control and Google Maps with real-time traffic and eco-routing — standard on the 13.2-inch display, a major upgrade over the prior SYNC voice/nav stack.

Audio system quality75
#90 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 10-speaker Bang & Olufsen system is standard on ST-Line, Tremor, and ST, stepping up to a 14-speaker B&O setup with subwoofer on Platinum — solid mid-pack premium audio for the segment.

Digital instrument cluster80
#87 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 12.3-inch configurable digital instrument cluster is now standard across the entire 2026 Explorer lineup rather than gated to upper trims.

OTA update capability78
#49 of 148 in classCompare all →

Explorer runs Ford's Power-Up over-the-air platform, which pushes whole-vehicle software updates (not just maps/infotainment) that can add new features post-purchase.

Companion app & remote functions66
#107 of 148 in classCompare all →

The FordPass app covers remote start, lock/unlock, vehicle locate, and status at no added cost, but the richer connected features (5G Wi-Fi hotspot, streaming) require the paid Ford Connectivity Package rather than being bundled free.

Charging ports & device power62
#133 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ports are abundant — up to 8 USB-C outlets spread across rows — but Ford deleted the wireless charging pad from the 2026 Explorer lineup entirely, a step back from prior model years.

Keyless & remote access74
#99 of 148 in classCompare all →

Proximity keyless entry and FordPass remote start are broadly available, and the new Open On Approach feature auto-opens the power liftgate when the fob is within ~3 feet, though that liftgate feature is standard only on ST and Platinum.

Camera & parking aids62
#133 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 360-degree split-view camera is standard on ST-Line, Tremor, ST, and Platinum, but is not offered on the volume Active Base/Active 200A trims, which get rear camera and sensors only — matching the mid-tier band for this item.

Head-up display availability55
#99 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 10.1-inch head-up display is offered, but it's positioned as a premium-trim feature primarily tied to Platinum rather than being broadly available.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.53C+
Kid & car-seat practicality76
#64 of 148 in classCompare all →

Wide rear door openings and standard second-row captain's chairs (bench available) make loading kids and gear easy; PowerFold third row on upper trims helps but LATCH access isn't a standout versus segment leaders.

Family safety package87
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS Top Safety Pick+ and a 5-star NHTSA overall rating are paired with Ford Co-Pilot360 (AEB, blind-spot with cross-traffic alert, lane-keeping, rear camera) standard across every 2026 trim — no paywalled safety tech at the entry price point.

Family road-trip comfort74
#71 of 148 in classCompare all →

37.5 in of second-row legroom and 31.8 in in the third row keep multi-hour trips comfortable for most families, and the available 110V/150W outlet plus 6-8 USB ports serve devices well, but 16.3 cu ft behind the third row is only mid-pack and the wireless charging pad was deleted for 2026.

Daily driving ease64
#129 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2.3L EcoBoost has enough low-end torque for effortless traffic driving, but the 10-speed automatic carries a well-documented reputation for harsh, jerky, or delayed shifts that undercuts everyday smoothness.

Commuting cost efficiency58
#78 of 148 in classCompare all →

Volume 2.3L EcoBoost trims return 27-29 MPG highway (roughly mid-20s combined) — average for a mid-size 3-row gas SUV; the hybrid's 38 MPG highway is a stronger option but not the volume powertrain, and V6 ST/Tremor variants drop to 22-25 MPG.

Parking & maneuverability68
#60 of 148 in classCompare all →

A roughly 39-foot turning circle and mid-size 3-row footprint are typical for the class — manageable with the standard rear camera but no advantage over rivals like the Highlander or Pilot.

Work capability58
#45 of 148 in classCompare all →

Every 2026 Explorer includes a standard Class III Tow Package rated to 5,000 lbs with a 2-inch receiver and 7-wire harness — solid for a crossover-based SUV but on par with, not ahead of, segment rivals like the Telluride and Palisade, and there's no cargo bed for real work loads.

Durability for work duty38
#122 of 148 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports rates the current-generation Explorer's reliability well below average, driven largely by chronic 10-speed transmission failures (harsh shifting, slipping, complete failure) and multiple related recalls including unintended rollaway — a poor foundation for sustained hard use.

Jobsite & upfit practicality52
#29 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard hitch wiring, factory roof rails compatible with crossbar carriers, and an available 110V/150W outlet cover light-duty needs, but there's no meaningful upfit ecosystem or washable cargo surfaces aimed at work use.

Long-distance comfort & range72
#92 of 148 in classCompare all →

Generous second-row space, a composed highway ride, and Co-Pilot360 driver-assist features reduce fatigue on long hauls; the 2.3L's mid-20s combined economy means more fuel stops than hybrid rivals, tempering an otherwise strong mile-eater case.

Outdoor & adventure capability78
#26 of 148 in classCompare all →

The new-for-2026 Tremor trim brings genuine off-road tuning — 8.7 in ground clearance, off-road-tuned suspension, underbody protection, and a Torsen limited-slip rear axle — a real differentiator versus most family 3-row SUVs, with AWD and roof rails available across the range.

Gear & luggage flexibility76
#55 of 148 in classCompare all →

85.8 cu ft of max cargo with the second and third rows folded, PowerFold third-row seating on upper trims, factory roof rails, and a standard tow hitch give the Explorer strong gear-hauling flexibility for a 3-row SUV.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the Explorer's strongest categories.2.71B-
Handling & agility74
#38 of 148 in classCompare all →

The CD6 rear-drive-based platform gives the volume-trim (2.3L EcoBoost) Explorer quick steering and a firm suspension tune that make it feel more agile than its size suggests, with a planted, composed feel through corners for a 3-row midsize SUV — above-average for the class but not class-leading like the sportier ST.

Steering feel72
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

Steering on mainstream trims is quick and direct with good on-center precision, though feedback is filtered compared to the sharper, more performance-tuned ST calibration.

Braking confidence70
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

No instrumented stopping-distance test was found for the 2026 volume trim; reviews of performance variants note 'good' brakes with red-painted calipers on ST/Tremor, implying adequate but unremarkable pedal feel on the mainstream configuration.

Powertrain smoothness & response76
#57 of 148 in classCompare all →

The standard 2.3L EcoBoost turbo-four (300 hp/310 lb-ft) paired with a 10-speed automatic delivers responsive acceleration and smooth, predictable shifts for daily driving and highway passing, with a settled and refined ride even at speed.

Drivetrain noise & vibration69
#86 of 148 in classCompare all →

The turbocharged four-cylinder is generally unobtrusive at cruise but becomes more vocal under hard acceleration than the V6 units offered by some three-row rivals; no dedicated interior noise measurement was found for 2026.

Turning circle
38.7 ft curb-to-curb (consistent across trims)
41/100
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

Curb-to-curb turning diameter is 38.7 ft across all 2026 Explorer trims, mid-pack for the mid-size SUV segment band (34-42 ft).

Driving position & ergonomics78
#37 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers praise the intuitive control layout ('everything sits exactly where you'd reach for it naturally'), supportive front seats, and a clear 13.2-in touchscreen paired with an available 12.3-in digital cluster; physical climate buttons remain below the screen, though one reviewer wanted more dedicated buttons.

Fun-to-drive factor65
#58 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume EcoBoost trim is pleasant and composed but leans toward appliance-like family-hauler duty; the ST trim injects genuine enjoyment with its rear-biased chassis tune, but that character isn't present on the mainstream Active/XLT configuration being scored.

10Value & Market PositionMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.63C+
Standard equipment generosity70
#98 of 148 in classCompare all →

Base Active trim ($38,465) comes with the new 13.2-inch SYNC 4A touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, and Ford Co-Pilot360 driver-assist as standard, which is competitive but not class-leading equipment generosity for a mid-size 3-row.

Feature value per dollar64
#98 of 148 in classCompare all →

Solid tech and capability spread across the range is undercut by 2026's reliability concerns, keeping value perception fair rather than a standout bargain.

Trim & configuration breadth80
#40 of 148 in classCompare all →

Five distinct trims — Active ($38,465), ST-Line, Platinum ($50,965), new off-road Tremor ($49,460), and performance ST ($54,905) — cover family, luxury, off-road, and performance buyers across a wide price band.

Sales popularity & market acceptance92
#6 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Explorer is America's best-selling 3-row SUV and led the segment with 222,706 units sold in 2025, up 14.7% year-over-year and its best sales year since 2020.

Brand desirability & image60
#117 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ford is a well-established mainstream brand with strong SUV/truck credibility but no aspirational halo, and 2026 reliability headlines are a modest drag on image.

Deals & incentive availability68
#104 of 148 in classCompare all →

Meaningful factory incentives are commonly available — cash back and subsidized financing plus lease specials — without indicating desperation pricing.

Model freshness64
#95 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 6th-generation Explorer platform dates to 2020; 2026 brings a mid-cycle refresh (new front fascia, LED lighting, larger touchscreen, new off-road Tremor trim) rather than an all-new architecture.

Critical reception & awards60
#118 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Explorer earned an IIHS Top Safety Pick+ award and positive reviews for cabin ergonomics and tech, but Consumer Reports pulled its recommended status over below-average predicted reliability, making reception mixed rather than a clear comparison-test winner.