MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2024:Overall +1Safety -1Reliability +2Efficiency & Range -5Cost of Ownership +5Technology +13Driving Experience +1
Mazda logo
Mid-Size SUV

2025 Mazda CX-90

PremiumGasPHEV
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
2.53C+GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.50D
Safety
3.62A-
EfficiencyGas
1.84C-
25 MPG combined · 460 mi range · $2,500/yr energy
Comfort
2.37C+
Value
3.58A-
Ownership Cost
1.94C-
Technology
2.67C+
Driving Experience
2.78B-

The verdict

A mixed-report mid-size suv, strong on safety and held back by reliability.

Overall 2.53 (C+) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is safety at 3.62 (A-), its weakest reliability & quality at 1.50 (D). 8 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Safety
  • Value & Market Position
  • Driving Experience

What holds it back

  • Reliability & Quality
  • Performance & Powertrain
  • Efficiency & Range

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Mazda CX-90

Production history

2024present · 3 years · 1 generations
Gen 12024now2024In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — gradedProduction began 2024

How it's evolved

3 scored model years · 20242026

02550751002024202520262024 · Overall: 662025 · Overall: 67 (+1 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 66 (−1 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024

Compare two years

vs
Performance56
54-2
Efficiency62
59-3
Safety84
81-3
Space64
67+3
Cost53
50-4
Reliability50
51+1
Tech56
67+11
Use-case66
67+2
Driving69
75+5
Value83
73-9

Best fit & conditions

FamilyB75/100
AdventureB-72/100
Winter / inclementB-71/100
CommuterC62/100
Work / TowC-58/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainOne of the CX-90's weakest categories.1.65D
Horsepower
280 hp (340 hp in Turbo S)
33/100
#26 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume 3.3 Turbo uses the standard-output mild-hybrid inline-six; the Turbo S is the range maximum.

Torque
332 lb-ft @ 2,000-3,500 rpm
55/100
#18 of 60 in classCompare all →

The standard-output 3.3 Turbo makes strong low-rpm torque for a three-row SUV.

0–60 mph time
7.2 seconds
38/100
#40 of 60 in classCompare all →

This is an instrumented result for a 2025 CX-90 with the representative 280-hp 3.3 Turbo powertrain.

Powertrain refinement60
#40 of 60 in classCompare all →

The inline-six is authoritative and polished once moving, but initial hesitation and uneven cold response keep it well short of premium-class leaders.

Transmission behavior58
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

The eight-speed is smooth in normal motion but low-speed clutch engagement can be clunky and inconsistent.

Max towing capacity
5,000 lbs when properly equipped (3,500 lbs on lower trims)
57/100
#14 of 60 in classCompare all →

The maximum applies to Turbo Premium Sport and Turbo S configurations with Mazda Genuine Towing Accessories.

AWD/4WD availability85
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

Rear-biased i-Activ AWD is standard throughout, with Kinematic Posture Control and expanded Mi-Drive modes on upper trims.

Off-road capability48
#26 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD and roughly eight inches of clearance support dirt-road use, but there is no dedicated off-road trim, low range, locker, or substantial underbody hardware.

Powertrain lineup breadth90
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

The lineup offers two outputs of a turbo inline-six mild hybrid plus a distinct plug-in hybrid, all with AWD.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the CX-90's weakest categories.1.84C-
3SafetyThe CX-90's best-graded category.3.62A-
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall
100/100
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 U.S.-market CX-90 AWD earned NHTSA's maximum overall rating.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness98
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 CX-90 is an IIHS Top Safety Pick+ and earns Good ratings in the small-overlap front, updated moderate-overlap front, and updated side tests.

Standard ADAS suite breadth94
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

Every 2025 gas trim, including the volume 3.3 Turbo Preferred, has all five core systems: AEB, stop-and-go adaptive cruise, lane-keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, and rear cross-traffic alert.

Automatic emergency braking performance88
#4 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard Smart Brake Support is Good in IIHS pedestrian testing, including strong nighttime avoidance, though the newer vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0 test is Acceptable rather than Good.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage78
#30 of 60 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and Vehicle Exit Warning are standard, but the volume Preferred's systems are primarily warnings; active Blind Spot Assist arrives with Premium Sport.

Lane keeping & centering65
#31 of 60 in classCompare all →

Lane-departure warning and lane-keep assist are standard and functional, but true lane centering via Cruising & Traffic Support is above the volume Preferred trim and reviewers find its curve behavior intrusive.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist72
#31 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume Preferred gets full-speed Mazda Radar Cruise Control with Stop & Go, but integrated lane-centering highway assistance is reserved for Premium Sport and above and trails segment leaders in refinement.

Hands-free driving availability0
#57 of 60 in classCompare all →

No 2025 CX-90 trim offers a hands-free highway-driving system; even Cruising & Traffic Support remains a hands-on driver-assistance feature.

Headlight performance68
#26 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume Preferred has Acceptable-rated LED projectors with automatic high beams; only the Turbo S Premium variants' curve-adaptive lamps earn Good, so performance varies by trim.

Outward visibility67
#38 of 60 in classCompare all →

The upright three-row driving position and standard rear camera provide adequate sightlines, but the long body has meaningful blind zones and the compensating 360-degree See-Through View is restricted to Premium Plus rather than the volume trim.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability95
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

IIHS awards its exceptional Good+ rating, with three complete LATCH positions and two more tether-only positions; the main minor drawback is short buckle stalks for booster-age children.

4Space & ComfortMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.37C+
Seating capacity
8 seats (7 optional with second-row captain's chairs)
100/100
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume 3.3 Turbo Preferred uses an eight-passenger bench-seat configuration, with a seven-seat option.

Front headroom
39.7 in without moonroof (39.2 in with moonroof)
54/100
#36 of 60 in classCompare all →

The published standard-roof measurement is used as directed; Preferred's moonroof reduces actual clearance slightly.

Front legroom
41.7 in
38/100
#27 of 60 in classCompare all →

Front legroom is adequate but not generous for a midsize three-row SUV.

Rear headroom
39.3 in without moonroof; about 38.6 in with moonroof
82/100
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom is generous by SUV standards, though the Preferred moonroof trims it modestly.

Rear legroom
39.4 in
78/100
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

Second-row legroom is competitive even though the packaging prioritizes driving proportions over maximum cabin space.

Third-row usability58
#13 of 60 in classCompare all →

The three-seat third row works for children and short adult trips, but 30.4 inches of legroom and difficult access keep it below family-hauler leaders.

Cargo/trunk volume
40.0 cu ft behind the second row (third row folded)
27/100
#18 of 60 in classCompare all →

Cargo space behind row two is modest for the vehicle's exterior size.

Max cargo volume
74.2 cu ft with rear rows folded
43/100
#21 of 60 in classCompare all →

Maximum capacity trails the roomiest three-row midsize SUVs.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions55
#46 of 60 in classCompare all →

Six USB-C ports and useful everyday bins help, but the driver-focused console and narrow cabin packaging provide no standout storage solution.

Seat comfort74
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

Supportive power-adjustable front seats and leather upholstery feel upscale, while tight third-row dimensions limit all-row comfort.

Ride quality66
#34 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 19-inch-wheel Preferred is composed and comfortable at speed, but the chassis remains firmer over sharp impacts than class leaders.

Cabin quietness72
#29 of 60 in classCompare all →

The premium-leaning cabin is well isolated in normal cruising, though the inline-six can sound less refined under load and some road noise remains.

Climate & comfort features70
#38 of 60 in classCompare all →

Preferred includes heated leather front seats, three-zone climate control, third-row vents and second-row shades; ventilation and heated rear seats require higher trims.

5Cost of OwnershipMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.94C-
Base MSRP
$39,500 (3.3 Turbo Select, including $1,455 destination)
64/100
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

The entry gas CX-90 combines a comparatively accessible midsize three-row price with standard AWD and a 280-hp inline-six mild-hybrid powertrain.

Volume-Trim Price
$42,600 (3.3 Turbo Preferred, including $1,455 destination)
62/100
#17 of 60 in classCompare all →

The Turbo Preferred is the representative volume gas trim, adding leather, heated front seats, a sunroof, the 12.3-inch touchscreen, wireless smartphone integration and parking sensors without moving into the costly performance/luxury tiers.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
$2,639 projected over 5 years
100/100
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

CarEdge's model-level estimate is below the framework's normal SUV range, though the CX-90's short history makes any five-year projection less certain than one for an established nameplate.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
56.9% projected retention after 5 years
56/100
#14 of 60 in classCompare all →

Projected retention is modestly better than the midsize-SUV average, but the CX-90 is still a young nameplate with limited observed five-year transaction history.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
0/100
#29 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda's basic coverage is the mainstream minimum and trails brands offering four- or five-year protection.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi
0/100
#24 of 60 in classCompare all →

Five years and 60,000 miles is standard mainstream coverage but well behind Hyundai and Kia's 10-year/100,000-mile term.

Complimentary maintenance & perks40
#54 of 60 in classCompare all →

There is no factory-paid scheduled maintenance, but Mazda includes 3-year/36,000-mile roadside assistance and a one-year Connected Services trial. Those useful but basic perks keep it near the top of the no-maintenance band.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$21,000 (≈$18,361 depreciation + $2,639 maintenance)
75/100
#10 of 60 in classCompare all →

$42,600 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (56.9% retained, or about $24,239) leaves about $18,361 in depreciation. Add the projected $2,639 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $21,000 in total.

6Reliability & QualityThe CX-90's lowest-graded category.1.50D
Predicted reliability38
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 gas CX-90 receives a below-average verdict from Consumer Reports based on an owner survey specific to this model year, while J.D. Power's carry-over 70/100 quality-and-reliability rating is only average. The direct owner-survey result outweighs the more favorable but inherited J.D. Power estimate.

Brand reliability track record64
#30 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda has strong older-vehicle dependability credentials but its recent standing is mixed rather than top-five consistent: it placed near the top in the 2025 VDS, then fell below the industry average in 2026 as newer platforms aged. That supports a mid-pack score, with the CX-90's model-specific weakness assessed separately.

Recall & TSB history42
#45 of 60 in classCompare all →

NHTSA lists two safety recalls for the 2025 vehicle, and both can affect safe operation: one disables or disrupts several warning, visibility and camera functions, while the other can cause an unexpected fuel-starvation stall. Numerous powertrain software bulletins and service programs across this young generation reinforce that this is heavier-than-typical early-life activity, even though the 2025 model avoids several launch-year-only recalls.

Powertrain durability reputation40
#56 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume 3.3 Turbo Preferred's inline-six, 48-volt mild-hybrid system and wet-clutch eight-speed were clean-sheet designs introduced one model year earlier, so they have no meaningful high-mileage record. Repeated control-module updates for shift shock, low-speed drivability and mild-hybrid faults make the early evidence worse than merely unproven, although most documented remedies are software-based rather than proof of universal mechanical failure.

Interior material quality86
#7 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume 3.3 Turbo Preferred provides leather upholstery and an unusually rich, restrained cabin for its roughly $41,000 base price. Multiple professional reviews place its soft-touch surfaces, design and perceived quality ahead of mainstream three-row rivals, while reserving Nappa leather and the most elaborate textile trim for higher grades.

Fit & finish62
#40 of 60 in classCompare all →

Professional assessments of physical assembly are favorable, but recurring owner reports of rattles, squeaks, leaks and electronic glitches keep the CX-90 well below the class-leading band. The result is generally solid visible craftsmanship undermined by inconsistent early-life execution on this still-new platform.

Dealer & service network68
#38 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda's dealer-service satisfaction is competitive, but its U.S. footprint is notably thinner than Honda's or Toyota's and is more metro-centered. That is adequate rather than exceptional support for a vehicle whose recalls and drivability fixes often require dealer software work.

Parts availability & repair cost55
#47 of 60 in classCompare all →

Routine support benefits from Mazda's established distribution, but this Japan-built model's longitudinal inline-six, 48-volt system and unique wet-clutch transmission have little aftermarket depth and are not shared with Mazda's high-volume transverse models. KBB's projected maintenance and repair bill is substantial, so ownership support is closer to premium-car cost than Mazda's inexpensive brand average.

7Technology & InfotainmentMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.67C+
Touchscreen size
12.3 in on 3.3 Turbo Preferred (10.25 in on Select)
62/100
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume Preferred gained Mazda's larger display for 2025.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness62
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

The rotary controller reduces reach distractions but layered menus and touch operation limited to phone projection make daily use less intuitive than rivals.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto100
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

Both wireless systems are standard on the representative Preferred, though the base Select remains wired.

Voice control & native navigation58
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

Basic voice command is available, but native Mazda Navigation starts at Premium Sport, so most Preferred owners will use phone projection.

Audio system quality72
#39 of 60 in classCompare all →

The standard eight-speaker system is adequate, while a desirable 12-speaker Bose system is available one trim higher.

Digital instrument cluster55
#46 of 60 in classCompare all →

Preferred retains a seven-inch TFT within conventional gauges; the fully digital 12.3-inch cluster starts at Premium Sport.

OTA update capability55
#44 of 60 in classCompare all →

Online updates cover Mazda Connect and map-related services, not regular feature-adding whole-vehicle software releases.

Companion app & remote functions60
#51 of 60 in classCompare all →

MyMazda supplies useful remote start, lock/unlock, hazards, vehicle finder and send-to-car functions, but no phone key and remote services can be subscription-gated.

Charging ports & device power82
#7 of 60 in classCompare all →

Preferred has six USB-C ports—two in every row—and wireless charging, an unusually complete device-power setup; an AC outlet requires Premium Plus.

Keyless & remote access72
#36 of 60 in classCompare all →

Advanced proximity entry, push-button start, app-based remote start and a power liftgate cover the essentials, but there is no phone-as-key and hands-free liftgate is higher-trim only.

Camera & parking aids72
#33 of 60 in classCompare all →

Front and rear sensors became standard on Preferred for 2025, but surround view and advanced cross-traffic braking remain Premium Plus equipment.

Head-up display availability68
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda's informative Active Driving Display is available, but only from Premium Sport rather than on the volume Preferred.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.50C+
Kid & car-seat practicality70
#31 of 60 in classCompare all →

Eight seats, a sliding/folding second row, rear shades and usable stroller space suit families, but narrow third-row access and only 14.9 cu ft behind it add friction.

Family safety package92
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

Excellent crash performance and a broad standard driver-assistance suite reach the affordable trims, including rear-seat alert.

Family road-trip comfort64
#37 of 60 in classCompare all →

Three-zone climate, third-row vents, shades and six USB-C ports help, but firm ride, tight row three and limited luggage room with all seats raised constrain long trips.

Daily driving ease67
#46 of 60 in classCompare all →

Good visibility aids, adaptive cruise and supportive controls reduce fatigue, but the large footprint, awkward shifter and occasional rolling-stop hesitation detract in traffic.

Commuting cost efficiency66
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

At 25 mpg combined on regular fuel, the mild-hybrid inline-six is efficient for a large AWD three-row SUV but cannot match hybrid rivals.

Parking & maneuverability51
#57 of 60 in classCompare all →

Parking sensors help, but the 200.8-inch body and 41.2-foot turning circle make urban maneuvering cumbersome; 360-degree view costs extra.

Work capability68
#8 of 60 in classCompare all →

The torquey 280-hp/332-lb-ft inline-six, AWD and up-to-5,000-pound tow rating handle moderate trailers, though it remains a passenger-focused crossover.

Durability for work duty55
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

The new longitudinal mild-hybrid platform has useful mechanical headroom but little fleet history, and the leather, premium-oriented cabin is not designed for abuse.

Jobsite & upfit practicality45
#21 of 60 in classCompare all →

Roof rails, a hitch accessory and cargo tie-down utility cover basics, but there is no meaningful onboard power, washable interior or commercial upfit ecosystem on Preferred.

Long-distance comfort & range74
#25 of 60 in classCompare all →

Supportive seating, 28-mpg highway economy, an 18.5-gallon tank and standard adaptive cruise make it a strong tourer, offset by firm impacts and third-row limitations.

Outdoor & adventure capability75
#17 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard rear-biased AWD, 8.0 inches of clearance, roof rails and up-to-5,000-pound towing support gravel roads and outdoor toys, though it is not a technical off-roader.

Gear & luggage flexibility65
#35 of 60 in classCompare all →

Split-folding rows, roof rails and hitch availability provide multiple options, but 40.0/74.2-cu-ft cargo figures trail more space-efficient rivals.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the CX-90's strongest categories.2.78B-
Handling & agility88
#2 of 60 in classCompare all →

Rear-biased AWD, sophisticated suspension and KPC deliver standout body control and agility for a three-row SUV.

Steering feel86
#2 of 60 in classCompare all →

Sharp, naturally weighted steering communicates grip and is a defining class-leading strength.

Braking confidence72
#18 of 60 in classCompare all →

Conventional gas-model brakes provide predictable daily control, but available reviews do not establish benchmark stopping performance or pedal feel.

Powertrain smoothness & response64
#34 of 60 in classCompare all →

The inline-six is fundamentally smooth and strong, but low-speed hesitation and occasional transmission roughness prevent luxury-grade polish.

Drivetrain noise & vibration68
#24 of 60 in classCompare all →

The inline-six has an appealing architecture and cruises smoothly, but its sound under load can be unexpectedly coarse for the premium positioning.

Turning circle
41.2 ft curb-to-curb
10/100
#56 of 60 in classCompare all →

The long-wheelbase CX-90 needs nearly the full width of the SUV normalization range.

Driving position & ergonomics78
#10 of 60 in classCompare all →

An eight-way power driver seat, lumbar support, clear sightlines and physical controls create a driver-centered cockpit, though the electronic shifter and infotainment layers are awkward.

Fun-to-drive factor86
#4 of 60 in classCompare all →

Its rear-biased balance, communicative steering and turbo inline-six give the CX-90 unusual character and engagement among mainstream three-row SUVs.

10Value & Market PositionOne of the CX-90's strongest categories.3.58A-
Standard equipment generosity81
#10 of 60 in classCompare all →

Even the $39,500 delivered Select includes AWD, seating for eight, a power liftgate, three-zone climate control, adaptive cruise, blind-spot monitoring and lane-keeping assist. The volume Preferred adds leather, heated seats, a sunroof, wireless phone integration and parking sensors at $42,600 delivered.

Feature value per dollar80
#4 of 60 in classCompare all →

A 280-hp turbo inline-six mild hybrid, standard rear-biased AWD, three rows and premium cabin presentation for roughly $42,600 in Preferred form is standout hardware for mainstream-SUV money. Tight third-row and cargo packaging keep it from dominating on pure family utility.

Trim & configuration breadth92
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

Nine 2025 trims span $38,045-$56,650 before destination, with regular-output and high-output inline-six gas variants plus three PHEVs and six-, seven- or eight-passenger layouts. That breadth is exceptional, although the many overlapping configurations can be confusing.

Sales popularity & market acceptance76
#18 of 60 in classCompare all →

The CX-90 quickly became a healthy-volume three-row entry: U.S. sales rose to 54,676 in 2024 and held at 55,156 in 2025. It is not a segment leader, but stable annual volume above 50,000 demonstrates strong acceptance for a new premium-positioned Mazda.

Brand desirability & image74
#25 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda carries a strong enthusiast and design reputation and the longitudinal inline-six platform gives the CX-90 genuine near-luxury credibility. The badge still lacks the status of established premium makes, which limits its image ceiling at upper-trim prices.

Deals & incentive availability82
#17 of 60 in classCompare all →

During the 2025 model year, subsidized financing, cash support and meaningful dealer discounts were commonly available, materially improving buyer value. The deals were strong without the gas model requiring the extreme lease support seen on some slow-selling EVs and PHEVs.

Model freshness88
#17 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 is only the second model year of the generation launched for 2024 and gains meaningful packaging, seating and safety-tech revisions plus the new Premium Sport trim. It remains very fresh, though it is not an all-new 2025 redesign.

Critical reception & awards84
#4 of 60 in classCompare all →

The current CX-90 won Car and Driver's five-way three-row SUV comparison and earned an Editors' Choice designation, with reviewers repeatedly praising steering, handling, powertrain character and cabin quality. Criticism of ride, transmission behavior and cramped third-row/cargo space prevents a higher score.