MotorGPA
Find My Match
Model year:2026+9 not yet gradedHistory & evolution ↓
Mitsubishi logo
Compact SUV

2026 Mitsubishi Outlander

MainstreamGasPHEV
Manufacturer site ↗
1.93C-GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.98C-
Safety
2.23C
EfficiencyGas
1.89C-
27 MPG combined · 392 mi range · $2,300/yr energy
Comfort
2.04C
Value
2.50C+
Ownership Cost
3.19B
Technology
2.90B-
Driving Experience
1.98C-

The verdict

A struggling compact suv, strong on ownership and held back by performance.

The 2026 Outlander sells one thing no other mainstream compact SUV offers: a standard third row, in a $31,740 package backed by a 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty and a cabin that looks like it costs more than it does. What you trade for that is pace and polish — the new 174-hp 1.5-liter turbo takes 8.4 seconds to reach 60 mph, drones under load, and returns just 27 MPG combined with all-wheel drive, which is ordinary for a gas SUV and poor for anything wearing a hybrid badge. Cargo space is the other casualty: 30.6 cu ft behind the second row trails a CR-V by nearly nine, and only 10.9 cu ft survives with all seven seats up. Buy it for the seats, the warranty and the discounts; skip it if you want the third row to be genuinely usable or the resale value to hold at 52% after five years.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Best-in-class warranty and included maintenance
  • Three rows standard — in a compact SUV
  • Big-screen tech standard on the cheapest trim

What holds it back

  • The new engine is slow and loud
  • Cargo space is small for the size of the car
  • Mild-hybrid fuel economy that misses on both counts

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Mitsubishi Outlander

Production history

2003present · 24 years · 4 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1200320062003Gen 2200720132007Gen 3201420212014Gen 42022now2022In production2026 — graded2025 — not yet graded2024 — not yet graded2023 — not yet graded2022 — not yet graded2021 — not yet graded2020 — not yet graded2019 — not yet graded2018 — not yet graded2017 — not yet gradedProduction began 2003
202658+9 not yet graded

Best fit & conditions

Winter / inclementB-72/100
FamilyB-70/100
AdventureC+67/100
CommuterC+66/100
Work / TowD46/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe Outlander's lowest-graded category.0.27F
Horsepower
174 hp (1.5T mild hybrid, all gas trims); 297 hp combined (Outlander PHEV)
6/100
#131 of 148 in classCompare all →

For 2026 Mitsubishi replaced the 2.5L naturally aspirated four (181 hp) with a Mitsubishi-developed 1.5L turbo four backed by a 48-volt belt-driven starter-generator, standard on every gas trim including the volume SE. Output actually drops 7 hp versus 2025, leaving the Outlander near the bottom of the compact-SUV power range; the separate PHEV is the power trim at 297 hp.

Torque
206 lb-ft @ 3,000–4,000 rpm (1.5T mild hybrid)
21/100
#116 of 148 in classCompare all →

The turbo-plus-48V setup is the one place the new powertrain gains on the old 2.5L — 206 lb-ft versus 181, delivered across a broad 3,000–4,000 rpm plateau rather than at a single high peak, which is what makes the car feel livelier around town.

0–60 mph time
8.4 s (tested, 1.5T S-AWC); PHEV roughly 2.5 s quicker
18/100
#124 of 148 in classCompare all →

Instrumented testing puts the 4,034-lb mild-hybrid Outlander at 8.4 seconds to 60 mph and 16.5 seconds at 83 mph in the quarter — slower than most compact-SUV rivals and unchanged in character from the outgoing 2.5L despite the torque gain.

Powertrain refinement62
#101 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 48V system meaningfully improves low-speed manners — reviewers call the stop/start among the smoothest in the class and note the engine feels livelier and quieter at part throttle than the old 2.5L. Ask for real acceleration, though, and the small turbo four flares to high rpm and gets coarse, so it lands mid-pack rather than high.

Transmission behavior52
#143 of 148 in classCompare all →

The CVT uses simulated step ratios that keep revs settled at a cruise, but it is still a CVT behind a modest turbo four: hard throttle produces the familiar flare-and-drone before the ratio catches up. Acceptable, not competitive with the class's better conventional automatics.

Max towing capacity
2,000 lbs (gas, properly equipped); 1,500 lbs PHEV
14/100
#104 of 148 in classCompare all →

With the factory hitch the gas Outlander is rated at 2,000 lbs — enough for a small utility trailer or a pair of jet skis, and well behind the 3,500-lb ratings offered by turbocharged rivals like the CX-50 and Sportage/Tucson. The PHEV, despite far more power, is rated lower still at 1,500 lbs.

AWD/4WD availability78
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

S-AWC is offered on every 2026 gas trim and is standard equipment on the Ralliart and Trail Edition as well as on the PHEV, so all-wheel drive is genuinely available across the range rather than gated to the top. The system is more sophisticated than the segment norm, adding Active Yaw Control torque vectoring and six selectable drive modes; the only thing holding it out of the top band is that it remains a paid option on the mainstream ES/LE/SE/SEL trims and there is no low range.

Off-road capability58
#37 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 line now includes a genuine light-duty off-road trim — the Trail Edition pairs standard S-AWC with 8.4 in of ground clearance, a front skid plate, P235/60R18 all-terrain tires and side/corner/fender protectors — which lifts it out of the purely pavement-oriented band the pre-Trail-Edition lineup occupied. It stays mid-band rather than high because it remains a unibody crossover with no low-range transfer case, no locking differentials and only modest clearance versus true trail rigs.

Powertrain lineup breadth68
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

Two distinct and both electrified powertrains: the new 1.5T 48V mild hybrid across the entire gas range and a genuinely different 297-hp plug-in hybrid with 45 miles of electric range and standard S-AWC. There is no third choice — no conventional full hybrid, no larger engine, no BEV — and the Ralliart and Trail Edition are appearance/hardware trims rather than powertrain variants, so it covers mainstream needs well without reaching the top band.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Outlander's weakest categories.1.89C-
Combined fuel economy
27 MPG combined (1.5T mild hybrid, S-AWC volume config); 28 MPG FWD; 73 MPGe / 27 MPG gas-only for Outlander PHEV
65/100
#62 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 refresh drops the old 2.5L for a new 1.5L turbo (Mitsubishi's 4B40) with a 48-volt belt-driven starter-generator, moving the AWD Outlander from 26 to 27 MPG combined — a real but small gain that still leaves it behind the CR-V and roughly level with the Tucson 2.5 AWD. The PHEV is the efficiency story in this lineup at 73 MPGe.

City fuel economy
26 MPG city (1.5T mild hybrid, S-AWC volume config); 26 MPG FWD
75/100
#56 of 148 in classCompare all →

City is where the 48V system actually earns its keep — up 2 MPG from the 2025 2.5L's 24, thanks to smoother stop/start and low-speed electric assist off the belt-driven starter-generator. It is still only a mild hybrid that cannot drive the car on electricity, so it comes nowhere near the two-motor full hybrids that post 38–43 MPG in town.

Highway fuel economy
30 MPG highway (1.5T mild hybrid, S-AWC volume config); 31 MPG FWD
63/100
#65 of 148 in classCompare all →

Highway economy is flat year over year at 30 MPG AWD — the 48V assist does almost nothing at a steady cruise, and the smaller turbo engine still has to push the same frontal area and roughly 4,000 lb of curb weight. Mid-pack for a compact SUV.

Driving range
392 mi (14.5 gal × 27 MPG, S-AWC volume config); 406 mi FWD; 420 mi total for the PHEV
35/100
#91 of 148 in classCompare all →

Total range works out to 392 miles for the AWD gas car, up about 15 miles from 2025 purely on the efficiency gain since the 14.5-gallon tank carries over. That sits below the midpoint of the 230–600 mi SUV band — the modest tank, not the engine, is the limiter.

Estimated annual fuel cost
$2,300/yr (S-AWC volume config); $2,200/yr FWD
54/100
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

EPA's standard 15,000 mi/yr estimate lands at $2,300 for the AWD gas Outlander — only about $50 better than the 2025 2.5L, and a costly figure for a compact SUV. Buyers who want the running-cost win in this lineup have to step up to the PHEV and charge it regularly.

Fuel requirements90
#19 of 148 in classCompare all →

Nothing about running this car is expensive or complicated: the 1.5L turbo is rated on regular 87-octane with no premium recommendation for full output, and the PHEV takes regular as well while adding cheap overnight Level 1/2 home charging. The only asterisk is that the PHEV's DC fast-charge port remains CHAdeMO — a connector that has all but disappeared from US public networks, and one fitted only to SEL and Black Edition trims — which is irrelevant to the volume gas trim and to home charging.

3SafetyMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.23C
NHTSA overall rating
4 stars overall (4 frontal / 5 side / 4 rollover); PHEV rated 5 stars overall
50/100
#91 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Outlander carries a 4-star NHTSA overall rating — 4 stars frontal, 5 side, 4 rollover — while the AWD-only PHEV is separately rated 5 stars overall. The volume gas-side trim is the 4-star result, so that is the value scored.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness48
#130 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Outlander was freshly rated by IIHS and still earned no award: the updated moderate overlap front test — the rear-passenger evaluation — comes back Marginal on restraint performance even though structure and driver protection are Good. Mitsubishi did revise the front structure and passenger-side knee airbag for 2026 to improve passenger-side small overlap, but that change does not touch the result that blocks the award.

Standard ADAS suite breadth76
#109 of 148 in classCompare all →

The base ES already includes Forward Collision Mitigation with pedestrian detection, highway-speed AEB, blind-spot warning with lane change assist, rear cross-traffic alert, rear AEB, driver attention alert, auto high beams, rear parking sensors and 11 airbags — standard blind-spot coverage on the cheapest trim beats most compact SUVs. It falls short of a full suite because adaptive cruise waits for the LE and lane keeping/centering for the SE.

Automatic emergency braking performance68
#99 of 148 in classCompare all →

Forward Collision Mitigation with pedestrian detection is standard on every trim and the system has historically rated Superior for both vehicle-to-vehicle and daytime vehicle-to-pedestrian performance, but there is still no published result under the harder updated front crash prevention protocol that weights nighttime pedestrian scenarios.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage72
#113 of 148 in classCompare all →

Blind Spot Warning with Lane Change Assist, rear cross-traffic warning and reverse automatic emergency braking are standard on every trim including the base ES, which is ahead of class norm — but coverage stays alert-only, with no active steering intervention and no safe-exit warning.

Lane keeping & centering66
#108 of 148 in classCompare all →

Lane Keep Assist, Lane Departure Prevention and lane centering arrive only with MI-PILOT Assist on the SE and above, so the two cheapest trims — including the new-for-2026 LE that does get adaptive cruise — go without centering entirely. Reviewers describe the steering assist as gentle and dependent on clearly visible markings rather than confidently self-centering.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist70
#119 of 148 in classCompare all →

MI-PILOT Assist pairs full-range adaptive cruise with Stop & Go and Navi-link, which reads map data to slow for curves, ramps and interchanges — a genuinely useful feature at this price — and for 2026 plain adaptive cruise drops one trim to the new LE. It is still held back by the base ES having no adaptive cruise at all and by a system reviewers rate competent rather than polished.

Hands-free driving availability12
#85 of 148 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway system is offered at any trim or price. MI-PILOT Assist is explicitly a hands-on system requiring continuous steering-wheel contact and driver engagement.

Headlight performance86
#11 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the Outlander's LED headlights Good with no trim-dependent downgrade — the usual place compact SUVs lose points — and automatic high beams are standard from the base ES, with all exterior lighting now LED. A minor glare finding on low beams keeps it short of the top of the band.

Outward visibility72
#73 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers found sightlines helpful and the footprint manageable for a three-row vehicle, with a genuinely useful surround-view camera in tight spaces — but that camera only starts at the LE, and third-row packaging thickens the rear pillars relative to two-row rivals.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability84
#16 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the LATCH hardware Good for ease of use — two complete sets in the outboard second-row positions plus a center tether anchor — and the sliding second row gives up to 39.9 inches of legroom behind wide rear door openings, so a rear-facing seat does not force the front passenger forward.

4Space & ComfortMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.04C
Seating capacity
7 seats (three rows standard on every trim, gas and PHEV)
75/100
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

Three-row 7-passenger seating is standard across the entire 2026 Outlander lineup — ES, LE, SE, Trail Edition, Ralliart and SEL — and unusually for a plug-in hybrid, all three PHEV trims carry the third row as standard too. That is two seats more than the compact-SUV norm (CR-V, RAV4, Tucson, Rogue are all five-seaters).

Front headroom
40.6 in (without panoramic roof)
72/100
#50 of 148 in classCompare all →

First-row headroom of 40.6 in measured without the panoramic glass roof, which is the figure the framework asks for; trims fitted with the panoramic roof (SEL) give up roughly two inches. Carried over unchanged for 2026 — the greenhouse was untouched by the 1.5T mild-hybrid swap.

Front legroom
41.7 in
38/100
#52 of 148 in classCompare all →

First-row legroom of 41.7 in sits in the bottom half of the SUV band — the Outlander gives its length to the second and third rows rather than the front, so front occupants get merely adequate stretch-out room by class standards.

Rear headroom
39.1 in (second row, without panoramic roof)
78/100
#54 of 148 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom of 39.1 in is near the top of the SUV normalization band and a genuine strength — the tall, boxy roofline the fourth-generation Outlander adopted pays off directly here.

Rear legroom
39.9 in (second row, sliding — maximum)
82/100
#35 of 148 in classCompare all →

The sliding, reclining 40/20/40 second row opens to 39.9 in of legroom, a mid-size figure in a compact-SUV footprint and among the best in the class — Consumer Reports singles out its leg and foot room. The catch is that it trades directly against the third row.

Third-row usability46
#51 of 148 in classCompare all →

Having a third row at all is a real point of difference in the compact class, but by measurement it is token seating: 18.7 in of legroom and 34.5 in of headroom, so it works for small children on short hops and nothing more. Reviewers single out headroom as the worse of the two problems, and using row three costs both cargo space and second-row travel.

Cargo/trunk volume
30.6 cu ft behind the second row (third row folded); 10.9 cu ft behind the third row
10/100
#80 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is the price of the third row: with row three folded the Outlander holds 30.6 cu ft, well short of two-row compact rivals (CR-V ~39, RAV4 ~37) because the folded third-row seatbacks and the deeper rear structure eat into the floor. With all seven seats up, only 10.9 cu ft remains — grocery-run territory.

Max cargo volume
64.3 cu ft (all rear seats folded)
21/100
#77 of 148 in classCompare all →

64.3 cu ft with both rear rows down sits in the lower quarter of the SUV band — competitive with two-row compacts but nowhere near the three-row mid-size SUVs the seating count invites comparison with. The load floor is flat once folded, which helps usability more than the raw number suggests.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions72
#34 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 update is specifically a storage update: Mitsubishi redesigned the center console with repositioned cupholders, a reshaped wireless charging pad and an armrest bin 45% larger than before. Add large door pockets, a 40/20/40 split second row, rear USB-C ports and an available AC outlet and it is comfortably above class average — but there is no headline innovation on the order of a giga console or underfloor frunk, so it stays out of the top band.

Seat comfort74
#74 of 148 in classCompare all →

Raised from 68: the 2026 Consumer Reports road test finds the front seats grippy and supportive with their suede sections, and first-drive reviews consistently praise thigh and shoulder support and well-defined seatback bolsters — better than the earlier read on this generation. The second row is roomy and reclines; what keeps it out of the top band is the third row, which is a comfort liability rather than an asset.

Ride quality64
#108 of 148 in classCompare all →

Lowered from 70: Mitsubishi retuned dampers, springs, bushings and stabilizer bars plus the steering map, and some reviewers do report a flat, relaxed ride — but the 2026 Consumer Reports road test is blunt that the gas model 'smacks harshly over bumps' on its 20-inch wheels and still trails the Rogue it shares a platform with for ride and refinement. The PHEV is the better-riding of the two, still stiff but less harsh.

Cabin quietness70
#96 of 148 in classCompare all →

Lowered from 76: 2026 adds sound-deadening material, better seals and quieter cabin surfaces, and the cabin is clearly calmer than budget-leaning rivals — but Consumer Reports pins elevated wind noise on the large sunroof, and the class benchmarks (CR-V) remain quieter. The PHEV, running on electric power, is the quieter of the two powertrains; the 1.5T with CVT makes itself heard under load.

Climate & comfort features72
#99 of 148 in classCompare all →

The upper half of the range is genuinely well equipped for a mainstream compact — SE brings heated front seats, heated steering wheel and wireless charging, and SEL adds ventilated front seats, heated second-row seats, three-zone automatic climate control, a panoramic roof and rear window sunshades. It loses points at the bottom: the base ES goes without heated seats or wireless charging entirely, so the good stuff starts a trim or two up.

5Cost of OwnershipThe Outlander's best-graded category.3.19B
Base MSRP
$31,740 (ES FWD, incl. $1,745 destination); ES S-AWC $33,540 — lineup runs to ~$46,190 Black Edition S-AWC
83/100
#24 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mitsubishi's 2026 Outlander pricing-and-packaging release puts the ES FWD at $29,995 plus $1,745 destination, one of the cheapest ways into a three-row-capable compact SUV even after a $600 model-year increase. Re-scored from placeholder against the real 2026 price sheet.

Volume-Trim Price
$37,540 (SE S-AWC, volume trim, incl. destination); SE FWD $35,740 — trims: ES $31,740 · LE $33,740 · SE $35,740 · SEL $40,440 FWD, +$1,800 for S-AWC
74/100
#30 of 148 in classCompare all →

SE S-AWC is the representative volume configuration — it carries the equipment most buyers want (heated seats, power liftgate, adaptive cruise) with Mitsubishi's signature S-AWC all-wheel drive. SE and SEL both rose about $2,000 for 2026, eroding some of the Outlander's traditional price advantage.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$4,400 over 5 yr / 75,000 mi (KBB: $3,669 maintenance + $659 repairs = $4,328)
78/100
#26 of 148 in classCompare all →

Among the cheaper compact SUVs to keep running: simple 1.5T mild-hybrid mechanicals, inexpensive parts, and 2 yr / 30,000 mi of included maintenance that absorbs the early service visits. Comes in below the RAV4 (~$5,200) and CR-V (~$5,800) already scored in this dataset.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~52% of MSRP retained after 5 years (iSeeCars measures 52.5%; segment average ~60%)
40/100
#47 of 148 in classCompare all →

The weak link in the Outlander's cost case. It sheds value roughly eight points faster than the compact-SUV average and some 16 points faster than a RAV4 or CR-V, which claws back much of the low sticker price by year five. Trimmed a half-point below the iSeeCars figure for 2026's price increases and Mitsubishi's thin dealer/brand demand.

Basic warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

Best-in-class basic coverage, matching Hyundai/Kia and running two full years longer than the 3 yr / 36,000 mi that Toyota, Honda, Mazda, Nissan and Subaru all offer. This is the core of Mitsubishi's value pitch.

Powertrain warranty
10 yr / 100,000 mi powertrain (original owner; subsequent owners get the balance of 5 yr / 60,000 mi)
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

Tops the normalization band outright. The catch is transferability — the 10-year term is original-owner only, so a second owner drops to the 5 yr / 60,000 mi basic term, which is part of why the resale figure above stays soft.

Complimentary maintenance & perks78
#17 of 148 in classCompare all →

A genuinely strong package: 2 yr / 30,000 mi of included maintenance (more miles than ToyotaCare's 25,000) paired with 5 yr / unlimited-mile roadside assistance that matches Hyundai's and more than doubles Toyota's two years. Scored above the RAV4 (75) for the longer roadside term but below the Tucson (90), whose 3 yr / 36,000 mi maintenance covers more services.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$22,419 (≈$18,019 depreciation + $4,400 maintenance)
71/100
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

$37,540 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (52% retained, or about $19,521) leaves about $18,019 in depreciation. Add the projected $4,400 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $22,419 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Outlander's weakest categories.1.98C-
Predicted reliability62
#70 of 148 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports predicts about-average reliability for the 2026 Outlander and U.S. News lists a 75/100 predicted score (its 'Average' band), but both predictions extrapolate from 2023-2024 cars that used the old 2.5L — 2026 swaps in an all-new 1.5T mild-hybrid, which resets the first-year risk clock and pulls this below the average-predicting mainstream rivals.

Brand reliability track record52
#107 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mitsubishi's dependability standing is erratic rather than consistently bad: it topped the mass-market field in the 2024 J.D. Power VDS, then fell to 26th at 256 PP100 in 2025, far worse than that study's industry average. Consumer Reports carries too few Mitsubishi models to rank the brand at all, so there is no second data stream to steady the read.

Recall & TSB history68
#30 of 148 in classCompare all →

Fourth-generation recall activity is typical in count and mild in severity — no fire, powertrain, or airbag campaigns — but the rearview-camera software defect needed a second, expanded campaign in 2025 after the 2023 fix proved incomplete, and complaint patterns around CVT shudder and false forward-collision braking sit behind the formal recall record.

Powertrain durability reputation50
#132 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume 2026 gas Outlander runs an all-new, Mitsubishi-designed 1.5L turbo with the brand's first 48V BISG mild-hybrid system — zero US mileage history — bolted to a CVT lineage that already draws documented shudder and cold-shift complaints in this generation. The PHEV's 2.4L MIVEC twin-motor hardware is genuinely proven since 2013, and the 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty is real backing, but the representative powertrain is unproven.

Interior material quality78
#61 of 148 in classCompare all →

Cabin materials are the Outlander's strongest quality argument and punch above a $31,740 starting price — reviewers repeatedly call the interior richer than the badge implies, with semi-aniline quilted leather available on upper trims. Held short of the top band because the volume ES/SE trims carry noticeably more hard plastic than the near-luxury range-toppers reviewers praise.

Fit & finish65
#106 of 148 in classCompare all →

Assembly quality reads as generally solid with no pattern of panel-gap or rattle complaints in owner or press reports, and 2026 adds sound deadening plus a redesigned center console. Mitsubishi's mid-pack initial-quality standing and the CVT drone reviewers still call out under load keep it out of the top band.

Dealer & service network40
#141 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is the Outlander's clearest ownership liability: Mitsubishi entered 2026 with roughly 299 US stores, down from 355 in 2019 and still contracting, against roughly 1,000-1,240 for Honda and Toyota — many metros have no convenient Mitsubishi service point at all. Historical customer-service scores are respectable, but density, not politeness, is what fails here.

Parts availability & repair cost58
#92 of 148 in classCompare all →

Running repair costs land right at the compact-SUV norm and the ten-year outlook beats the SUV average, which is the good news. The offset is structural: aftermarket depth is far thinner than for a RAV4 or CR-V, the new-for-2026 1.5T and 48V hardware will be dealer-only for years, and a 300-store network makes parts logistics slower than the sticker cost suggests.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Outlander's strongest categories.2.90B-
Touchscreen size
12.3 in (standard on every trim, ES through SEL)
62/100
#56 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Outlander makes the 12.3-inch Smartphone-link Display Audio screen standard across the entire lineup rather than reserving it for upper trims, so the volume trim and the base trim get the same display.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness72
#106 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers call the updated software more intuitive than earlier Mitsubishi systems, with sharp graphics and plain-language labeling instead of safety-system acronyms, and Mitsubishi retains physical climate controls; the knock is noticeable lag when moving between menus.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto92
#15 of 148 in classCompare all →

Both wireless Apple CarPlay and wireless Android Auto are standard on every 2026 trim including the $29,995 ES — a stronger position than most compact-SUV rivals that still make the base trim wired-only.

Voice control & native navigation65
#119 of 148 in classCompare all →

Built-in TomTom-based navigation with ADAS map data is standard on all trims, which is unusual at this price, but the native voice system is command-based rather than natural-language and most owners default to Siri or Google Assistant through phone projection.

Audio system quality75
#90 of 148 in classCompare all →

An eight-speaker system is standard and the Dynamic Sound Yamaha Ultimate 12-speaker premium system is available on the SE Tech package and the SEL Premium package — a credible branded upgrade, though it sits behind expensive option packages rather than being standard on an upper trim.

Digital instrument cluster70
#103 of 148 in classCompare all →

ES and LE run a smaller 7-inch information display between conventional gauges; the crisp 12.3-inch configurable full-digital cluster is standard on SEL and optional on the volume SE only through the Tech package, so it is an upper-trim feature.

OTA update capability72
#74 of 148 in classCompare all →

For 2026 the Outlander gains embedded AT&T 5G that carries over-the-air updates beyond maps — Mitsubishi cites software, safety-system and security-patch delivery without a dealer visit — but it is not the regular feature-adding whole-vehicle OTA cadence of the best EV-era systems.

Companion app & remote functions62
#125 of 148 in classCompare all →

My Mitsubishi Connect covers the core remote set — remote start, lock/unlock, horn and lights, vehicle finder, parental controls and service scheduling — with a two-year included trial before paid renewal, but there is no phone-as-key and the app is unremarkable next to Hyundai/Kia and Toyota equivalents.

Charging ports & device power68
#120 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front USB-C is standard on every trim, wireless charging arrives at LE and is standard on SE and above, and rear ports come with the higher trims; the gas volume trim has no household outlet, though the PHEV adds 1500W AC power supply.

Keyless & remote access68
#128 of 148 in classCompare all →

Push-button start is standard lineup-wide but proximity keyless entry starts at LE/SE rather than ES, a power liftgate arrives at SE with a hands-free height-adjustable version on SEL, and remote start comes via the Connect app; no phone-as-key is offered.

Camera & parking aids78
#68 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 360-degree multi-view camera is standard from SE upward — i.e. on the volume trim, not just the top one — with front parking sensors available and a digital rearview camera mirror in the SEL Premium package; there is no automated parking system.

Head-up display availability64
#71 of 148 in classCompare all →

A large 10.8-inch full-color head-up display exists but is locked to the $3,050 Premium Package on the top SEL trim, putting it out of reach of the volume SE buyer.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.19C
Kid & car-seat practicality74
#74 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard three-row seating for seven is close to unique among mainstream compact SUVs, and the 40:20:40 sliding second row plus an IIHS "Good" LATCH ease-of-use rating makes seat installs and daily loading straightforward. Held back by only 10.9 cu ft behind the third row — a stroller plus a week's gear means folding row three — and by the power liftgate not arriving until the SE trim.

Family safety package68
#104 of 148 in classCompare all →

Crashworthiness is strong and the base ES already carries forward collision mitigation with pedestrian detection, blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert, lane departure warning and rear automatic braking — better standard content than most base compact SUVs. But the 2026 Outlander is absent from IIHS's 2026 award list after years of Top Safety Pick wins, side torso/pelvis protection is only Acceptable, and MI-PILOT Assist (adaptive cruise with lane centering) is withheld until the SE.

Family road-trip comfort66
#95 of 148 in classCompare all →

Rear amenities are good for the money — a dedicated second-row climate zone with dual vents, two USB-C ports, a 120V AC outlet, plus heated outboard seats and pull-up sunshades on upper trims — and 2026 added sound deadening for a quieter cabin. The ceiling is the packaging: 18.7 in of third-row legroom is children-only, and with all seven seats occupied there are just 10.9 cu ft left for luggage.

Daily driving ease70
#104 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently call out a plush suspension, well-weighted steering, comfortable supportive front seats and a quiet cabin — easy, low-fatigue traffic manners for the price. The new 174-hp 1.5T mild-hybrid is smoother off the line than the old 2.5L thanks to the 48V assist, but the CVT still drones under throttle and Consumer Reports says refinement trails the class leaders.

Commuting cost efficiency60
#76 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume gas trim's 28 mpg combined is ordinary for a compact SUV and poor for anything wearing a hybrid badge — Mitsubishi's 48V system is a mild hybrid, so it lands nowhere near the 39–40 mpg CR-V and RAV4 hybrids that commuters cross-shop. Cheap consumables and below-average shop costs help, and the PHEV's 45 miles of EV range covers most commutes outright, but that variant starts $13k higher.

Parking & maneuverability65
#80 of 148 in classCompare all →

Compact-SUV footprint, an upright greenhouse and good outward visibility make it easy enough to place in traffic and parking structures. The ~36 ft turning circle is wider than class norms — a consequence of packaging a third row on this wheelbase — and the 360-degree camera plus front parking sensors are SE-and-up, leaving the base ES with just a reversing camera.

Work capability45
#80 of 148 in classCompare all →

A unibody family crossover with a 2,000 lb maximum tow rating and no meaningful payload headroom — enough for a small utility trailer, a pair of jet skis or a landscape load, and marginally better than a CR-V or Rogue, but nowhere near a work tool. The 30.6 cu ft behind the second row is small because the third row eats the space, and the 174-hp CVT powertrain works hard under any real load.

Durability for work duty48
#84 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty is the strongest backstop in the segment and the Nissan-shared CMF-C/D platform is proven, but nothing here reads as fleet-tough: the 1.5T mild-hybrid is brand new for 2026 with no service history, Mitsubishi sits near the bottom of J.D. Power's dependability study, and a shrinking dealer network makes downtime harder to resolve. Only the Trail Edition offers wear-friendly water-resistant upholstery.

Jobsite & upfit practicality45
#56 of 148 in classCompare all →

Provisions are consumer-grade: a second-row 120V AC outlet, standard roof rails, basic cargo tie-downs and a 2,000 lb accessory hitch, with no commercial upfit ecosystem behind them. The one genuine work asset is PHEV-only — dual 1,500W AC outlets that can run corded tools or a jobsite compressor off the 22.7 kWh pack — but that is a $43k-plus variant rather than the volume trim being scored.

Long-distance comfort & range70
#102 of 148 in classCompare all →

A solid, unglamorous mile-eater: 2026 added sound deadening, front seats are comfortable with available ventilation, and MI-PILOT Assist's adaptive cruise plus lane centering meaningfully cuts highway fatigue. Range is fine rather than exceptional — roughly 400 miles between fills on 28 mpg combined, 420 miles for the PHEV — and the lane-centering hardware is not available on the base ES.

Outdoor & adventure capability68
#56 of 148 in classCompare all →

8.3 in of ground clearance is at the top of the compact-SUV range, and S-AWC with selectable drive modes is more sophisticated than the reactive AWD most rivals use — genuinely competent on gravel, snow and forest-service roads. The Trail Edition adds skid plates, body protectors and wipe-clean seats for a camping-oriented buyer, but the 2,000 lb tow ceiling and lack of low range cap what toys it can bring.

Gear & luggage flexibility60
#105 of 148 in classCompare all →

Configurability is good — a 40:20:40 sliding second row that passes long items through while keeping two seats usable, a flat-folding third row, underfloor storage and standard roof rails. Raw volume is the weak point: 64.3 cu ft maximum and 30.6 cu ft behind the second row both sit well below the class benchmarks, because the third row consumes space five-seat rivals give to cargo.

9Driving ExperienceMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.98C-
Handling & agility63
#109 of 148 in classCompare all →

Secure and predictable rather than engaging: a wide stance and well-tuned suspension keep body roll moderate and controlled, and S-AWC torque vectoring adds cornering confidence, but soft body motions and a pronounced front-to-back pitch keep it well short of the class athletes. Scored below the segment's handling leaders and near the mainstream compact-SUV midpoint.

Steering feel60
#90 of 148 in classCompare all →

The steering revisions carried over from the prior model year give the 2026 car real on-center precision and at least some weight, an improvement reviewers consistently credit — but it remains light and short on genuine feedback, landing in the 'precise enough but numb' band.

Braking confidence58
#134 of 148 in classCompare all →

Stopping power is average for the class and smooth stops are easy to modulate, but the pedal is soft and the suspension's rebound pitch after a stop undermines confidence. The PHEV's stronger 2026 regen blends well and adds a usable one-pedal mode, though it hands back to the friction brakes at about 15 mph.

Powertrain smoothness & response50
#139 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 model year replaces the 2.5L naturally aspirated four with a 174-hp/206-lb-ft turbocharged 1.5L (4B40) and a 48-volt mild-hybrid system, and the combination with the CVT is the vehicle's weakest dynamic trait: turbo lag on tip-in and a CVT that flares revs before delivering. The 48V system does smooth restarts and adds low-speed assist, and the separate PHEV powertrain is markedly better, but the volume gas trim is scored here.

Drivetrain noise & vibration46
#140 of 148 in classCompare all →

The new turbo 1.5L is measurably coarser than the 2.5L it replaces — noisy cold, a high-pitched whine under acceleration, and a sustained CVT drone at high rpm, plus a low-frequency highway hum. Added cabin insulation helps at cruise but does not mask the powertrain under load, placing this in the intrusive band. The PHEV is notably quieter.

Turning circle
36.1 ft curb-to-curb (20-in wheels; 34.8 ft on 18-in wheels)
74/100
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

36.1 ft curb-to-curb for the volume 20-inch-wheel configuration (SE and above), tightening to 34.8 ft on the 18-inch wheels fitted to ES and LE. Mid-pack for a compact SUV and unchanged by the 2026 powertrain swap.

Driving position & ergonomics80
#24 of 148 in classCompare all →

A clear strength. The elevated seating position gives good sightlines in every direction, the 8-way power driver's seat with power lumbar covers a wide range of body sizes, and Mitsubishi kept physical controls for the functions that matter instead of burying them in the touchscreen.

Fun-to-drive factor48
#134 of 148 in classCompare all →

Comfortable and competent but emotionally inert, and the 2026 engine change makes it more so: a droning, 8.4-second powertrain and light, distant steering leave nothing to seek out a back road for. The Ralliart trim arriving later in 2026 is a styling and accessory package, not a chassis or powertrain upgrade.

10Value & Market PositionOne of the Outlander's strongest categories.2.50C+
Standard equipment generosity78
#33 of 148 in classCompare all →

The base ES is unusually well stocked for the money: a 12.3-inch touchscreen with navigation and wireless CarPlay/Android Auto, dual-zone auto climate, LED lighting, 18-in alloys, a full active-safety suite and — uniquely in the compact class — a standard third row, all under $32,000 delivered. It falls short of the top band only because adaptive cruise (MI-PILOT) waits for the SE and AWD is an $1,800 extra.

Feature value per dollar73
#54 of 148 in classCompare all →

Content-for-price is genuinely strong at the bottom of the range — three rows, a big screen and a class-best warranty for compact-SUV money — but the proposition thins out as you climb, with the SEL Black Edition near $44k and the PHEV opening at $43,245 against rivals that deliver more refinement for the same outlay. The 2026 downsizing to a 174-hp 1.5T also means less performance per dollar than the 2.5L it replaced.

Trim & configuration breadth84
#21 of 148 in classCompare all →

One of the widest ladders in the segment: seven gas trims spanning roughly $31.7k to $44k, FWD or S-AWC on most, plus a parallel PHEV line — and 2026 adds three new rungs (LE, Ralliart, SEL Black Edition) while dropping Platinum. Buyers get value, rugged, sporty-look and loaded flavors plus two electrification levels, which is more configuration choice than CR-V or Tucson offer.

Sales popularity & market acceptance34
#134 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Outlander is a marginal player in America's largest segment and is shrinking: about 35,900 US sales in 2025 was a roughly 21% drop year over year, and Q1 2026 fell another ~23%, against CR-V and RAV4 volumes an order of magnitude higher. Its obscurity is concrete enough that Cars.com left it out of a compact-SUV comparison test on volume grounds.

Brand desirability & image38
#144 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mitsubishi is among the weakest mainstream badges in the US — thin dealer coverage, declining brand value and depreciation well behind the Japanese mainstream — and that drags on the Outlander's residuals and cross-shopping. The long warranty and a well-regarded dealer experience keep it out of the basement, but nobody buys this car for the badge.

Deals & incentive availability85
#17 of 148 in classCompare all →

Scored as buyer benefit, this is the Outlander's strongest card: large stacked cash rebates, a loyalty bonus and long-term 0% financing are routinely on the table, and nobody pays MSRP. Leases are the weak spot, since soft residuals make the monthly math unattractive relative to the cap-cost discount.

Model freshness78
#58 of 148 in classCompare all →

The fourth generation launched for 2022 and has had two substantive consecutive updates — a 2025 mid-cycle refresh of the styling, interior materials, sound deadening and chassis tuning, then an all-new mild-hybrid powertrain plus three new trims for 2026 — so the platform is mid-cycle but the product is current with no redesign imminent.

Critical reception & awards55
#133 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers respect the cabin, the warranty and the standard third row but consistently rank it behind the CR-V, RAV4, Tucson and CX-5, and the 2026 powertrain swap drew pointed criticism for noise and refinement rather than praise. It holds decent aggregate scores and strong crash ratings but has no comparison-test wins or major awards to point to.