MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2024:Overall +1Safety +1Reliability +4Cost of Ownership -3Technology +3Driving Experience -1
Subaru logo
Mid-Size SUV

2025 Subaru Ascent

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
2.49C+GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
3.02B
Safety
3.43B+
EfficiencyGas
0.85F
22 MPG combined · 425 mi range · $2,800/yr energy
Comfort
2.73B-
Value
2.07C
Ownership Cost
1.43D
Technology
2.05C
Driving Experience
2.00C

The verdict

A mixed-report mid-size suv, strong on safety and held back by efficiency.

Overall 2.49 (C+) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is safety at 3.43 (B+), its weakest efficiency & range at 0.85 (F). 7 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Safety
  • Reliability & Quality
  • Space & Comfort

What holds it back

  • Efficiency & Range
  • Performance & Powertrain
  • Cost of Ownership

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Subaru Ascent

Production history

2019present · 8 years · 1 generations
Gen 12019now2019In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — gradedProduction began 2019

How it's evolved

8 scored model years · 20192026

0255075100201920202021202220232024202520262019 · Overall: 582020 · Overall: 57 (−1 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 60 (+3 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 56 (−4 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 66 (+10 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 662025 · Overall: 662026 · Overall: 66

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019

Compare two years

vs
Performance47
50+2
Efficiency49
490
Safety73
80+8
Space70
72+2
Cost57
51-6
Reliability45
65+20
Tech43
59+17
Use-case62
72+10
Driving49
59+10
Value74
67-7

Best fit & conditions

FamilyB+81/100
AdventureB76/100
Winter / inclementB74/100
CommuterC61/100
Work / TowD46/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainOne of the Ascent's weakest categories.1.20D
Horsepower
260 hp @ 5,600 rpm (2.4L turbo BOXER, every 2025 trim)
28/100
#38 of 60 in classCompare all →

Every 2025 Ascent trim uses the same direct-injection turbocharged 2.4L FA24F flat-four; there is no output split across the range, so the volume Premium and the top Onyx Edition Touring make identical power.

Torque
277 lb-ft @ 2,000–4,800 rpm
40/100
#37 of 60 in classCompare all →

Peak torque arrives at just 2,000 rpm and holds across a wide plateau, which is what makes a 2.4L four workable in a 4,600-lb three-row; the figure is common to all trims.

0–60 mph time
≈7.0 s (independent tests cluster 6.8–7.1 s)
42/100
#31 of 60 in classCompare all →

Carry-over FA24F powertrain, so figures from recent model years apply; instrumented runs land just either side of 7.0 seconds, mid-pack for a mainstream three-row and quicker than the naturally aspirated V6 rivals it replaced.

Powertrain refinement68
#23 of 60 in classCompare all →

The turbo four is quiet at cruise and its 2,000-rpm torque plateau makes part-throttle response feel effortless, but reviewers consistently note a beat of turbo lag from rest and a coarse, thrashy note when the CVT holds high revs under full load.

Transmission behavior58
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

The Lineartronic CVT with 8-speed stepped manual mode is smooth and well-matched to the engine's flat torque curve in normal driving, but it produces the characteristic drone under hard acceleration and its simulated ratios are a workaround rather than a fix.

Max towing capacity
5,000 lbs (all trims, properly equipped)
57/100
#14 of 60 in classCompare all →

5,000 lbs is the highest rating Subaru has ever given a vehicle and it applies across the 2025 trim range rather than being locked to a tow package on upper trims; strong for a unibody three-row, well short of a body-on-frame SUV.

AWD/4WD availability85
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive is standard on every 2025 trim — there is no front-drive Ascent at any price — and it is backed by X-MODE with Hill Descent Control, dual-function (Snow/Dirt plus Deep Snow/Mud) on the upper trims. It falls short of a perfect score only for the absence of a low range or locking differential.

Off-road capability52
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

8.7 inches of ground clearance beats most three-row crossovers and X-MODE with Hill Descent Control handles snow, gravel and mud competently, but there is no Wilderness-grade Ascent: no low range, no locker, no skid plates, and the Onyx Edition's 20-inch wheels and street tires push the other way.

Powertrain lineup breadth18
#56 of 60 in classCompare all →

One engine, one transmission, one drivetrain across all six 2025 trims — the 2.4L turbo four with Lineartronic CVT and standard AWD. No hybrid, no plug-in, no alternative engine anywhere in the range, at a time when most mid-size three-rows offer at least an electrified option.

2Efficiency & RangeThe Ascent's lowest-graded category.0.85F
Combined fuel economy
22 MPG combined (Premium, the 2025 entry/volume trim); 21 MPG on Limited/Touring/Onyx
35/100
#45 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru dropped the Base trim for 2025, making Premium the entry point and the volume seller; it carries the 22-MPG rating, while the heavier upper trims on larger wheels drop to 21. Every Ascent is AWD, so there is no front-drive figure to quote.

City fuel economy
20 MPG city (Premium); 19 MPG on Limited/Touring/Onyx
38/100
#42 of 60 in classCompare all →

The turbo four's city figure is ordinary for a ~4,600-lb three-row with standard all-wheel drive, and there is no hybrid variant to lift it.

Highway fuel economy
26 MPG highway (Premium); 25 MPG on Limited/Touring/Onyx
38/100
#44 of 60 in classCompare all →

Highway economy is the Ascent's better side of the ledger and is what underpins Subaru's "over 500 miles of highway range" claim, but it still trails the front-drive-capable rivals in the segment.

Driving range
≈425 mi combined (19.3-gal tank × 22 MPG); ≈500 mi highway, ≈405 mi on Limited/Touring/Onyx
45/100
#27 of 60 in classCompare all →

A 19.3-gallon tank — unchanged since the nameplate launched — paired with the 22-MPG combined rating gives roughly 425 miles between fills, respectable rather than class-leading for a family three-row.

Estimated annual fuel cost
$2,800/yr (Premium, EPA 15k mi/yr on regular); $2,950/yr on Limited/Touring/Onyx
33/100
#40 of 60 in classCompare all →

EPA's estimate at standard assumptions puts the Ascent toward the costlier end of the mid-size three-row field, a direct consequence of 22 MPG combined with no electrified option to fall back on.

Fuel requirements90
#11 of 60 in classCompare all →

Despite being turbocharged and direct-injected, the FA24F is rated on 87-octane regular unleaded with no premium recommendation, so the per-gallon penalty other turbo three-rows carry does not apply here.

3SafetyThe Ascent's best-graded category.3.43B+
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall (5 frontal, 5 side, 4 rollover)
100/100
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 Ascent carries NHTSA's top overall result, with five stars in both the frontal and side barrier tests; only the rollover measure — where a tall three-row crossover is always penalized — comes back at four stars.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness77
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

A 2025 IIHS Top Safety Pick — Subaru's eighth consecutive year for the Ascent — with Good in small overlap front on both driver and passenger sides and Good in the updated side test, but only Acceptable in the updated moderate overlap front test with the rear-seat dummy. That single Acceptable is exactly what separates it from the TSP+ the Solterra earned the same year, so it sits below the all-Good threshold.

Standard ADAS suite breadth90
#9 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru deleted the stripped base trim for 2025, so the entry Premium carries the full suite: EyeSight with the new Wide-Angle Mono Camera (pre-collision braking, full-range adaptive cruise with lane centering, lane departure), Blind-Spot Detection with Lane Change Assist, Rear Cross-Traffic Alert, Reverse Automatic Braking and the newly standard Emergency Stop Assist. Nothing on the core AEB/ACC/LKA/BSM/RCTA list is a trim upgrade — it loses points only because the 360-degree surround-view monitor and DriverFocus attention monitoring start at Limited.

Automatic emergency braking performance82
#18 of 60 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the Ascent's pedestrian front crash prevention Good, and the underlying runs are strong rather than borderline: collisions avoided outright in both daytime crossing-child trials and in the nighttime crossing-adult trials on high and low beams. The one soft spot is the nighttime parallel-adult scenario, where the system avoided the impact on high beams but failed to slow at all on low beams at both 25 and 37 mph — a real-world-relevant gap that keeps it out of the top band.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage80
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

Blind-Spot Detection with Lane Change Assist and Rear Cross-Traffic Alert are standard on every 2025 trim, and Reverse Automatic Braking adds genuine intervention rather than just a chime when backing out. It stops short of the top of the band because the blind-spot side is alert-only — no steering countermeasure — and there is no safe-exit alert for rear passengers.

Lane keeping & centering68
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Lane departure warning, lane keep assist and lane centering (tied to adaptive cruise) are standard, and the 2025 switch to EyeSight's Wide-Angle Mono Camera widens the field of view. But Cars.com's test drivers found the lane departure assist and the collision warning noticeably over-eager, and switching the nagging features off leaves a dashboard warning light that cannot itself be dismissed — functional assistance with rough edges rather than the quiet confidence the top band describes.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist76
#26 of 60 in classCompare all →

Advanced Adaptive Cruise Control with Lane Centering is standard across the range and works through the full speed range including stop-and-go, and 2025 adds Emergency Stop Assist, which brings the vehicle to a halt if the driver becomes unresponsive. It is a capable, well-integrated system rather than a refined one — there is no branded highway-assist mode, and the same over-sensitive collision warning that bothers reviewers rides along with it.

Hands-free driving availability5
#45 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru offers no hands-free highway system on any 2025 Ascent trim. EyeSight is a hands-on lane-centering assist and the DriverFocus camera on upper trims exists to enforce attention, not to enable hands-off operation — nothing comparable to BlueCruise, Super Cruise or ProPILOT Assist 2.0 is available at any price.

Headlight performance88
#5 of 60 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the headlights Good across every 2025 trim — no trim-dependent downgrade, which is the single most common way a three-row crossover loses its award. Steering Responsive LED headlights with High Beam Assist are standard from the entry Premium up, so the volume buyer gets the curve-adaptive units rather than paying up for them.

Outward visibility78
#9 of 60 in classCompare all →

A low beltline, large glass area and high seating position give the Ascent better natural sightlines than most three-rows, helped by small triangular quarter windows ahead of the doors. Thick windshield pillars are the recurring complaint, and camera compensation is uneven — the 360-degree surround-view monitor and the smart rear-view mirror are Limited-and-up equipment, so the volume Premium relies on the standard rear camera alone.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability82
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates LATCH ease of use Good and credits the Ascent with extra anchor positions beyond the required minimum, and the eight-passenger bench configuration allows three child seats abreast in the second row with additional anchors in the third. The offset is packaging: the cabin is roughly two inches narrower than segment rivals, so three-across is achievable but tight, and the third row is genuinely kid-only.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Ascent's strongest categories.2.73B-
Seating capacity
8 seats (Premium, 2nd-row bench); 7 seats with captain's chairs — Onyx Edition, Bronze Edition, Touring and Onyx Edition Touring are 7-passenger only
100/100
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 volume trim is the Premium, which is now the entry model after the Base trim was dropped, and it is offered in both 8-passenger bench and 7-passenger captain's-chair configurations — eight seats is the maximum for the mainstream three-row class.

Front headroom
41.2 in (40.4 in with the panoramic moonroof fitted to Limited/Touring)
84/100
#13 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume Premium has no moonroof, so it gets the full 41.2 in — near the top of the mid-size SUV band and a direct payoff of the Ascent's tall, upright greenhouse.

Front legroom
42.2 in
49/100
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

42.2 in is mid-pack for the three-row segment — ahead of the Pilot (41.0) and Telluride (41.4) but behind the Palisade (44.1). Adequate rather than notable.

Rear headroom
40.0 in second row (38.7 in with panoramic moonroof)
100/100
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

40.0 in of second-row headroom sits at the top of the mid-size SUV normalization band; the flat roofline gives the Ascent genuinely class-leading rear head space on the moonroof-free Premium.

Rear legroom
38.6 in second row (bench slides fore/aft to trade with the third row)
72/100
#31 of 60 in classCompare all →

38.6 in trails the Palisade and Telluride (42.4 each) and the Highlander (41.0) because the Ascent positions its second row forward to preserve an unusually usable third row; the sliding bench lets owners rebalance rows two and three.

Third-row usability60
#11 of 60 in classCompare all →

A real, kid-usable third row rather than a token one — 31.7 in of legroom beats the Highlander (28.0) and matches the Telluride/Palisade (31.4) — but 36.2 in of headroom, a low cushion with little thigh support and a tight aperture keep adults to short hops. The volume Premium's bench requires a tilt-and-slide; the walk-through belongs to the captain's-chair trims.

Cargo/trunk volume
43.5 cu ft behind the 2nd row with the 3rd row folded (42.1 with moonroof); 17.8 cu ft behind the 3rd row
34/100
#15 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru's own 2025 spec sheet publishes 43.5 cu ft with the third row folded — short of the Palisade (45.8), Highlander (48.4) and Atlas (55.5). The tighter number in daily family use is the 17.8 cu ft behind row three, among the smallest in the class.

Max cargo volume
75.6 cu ft with 2nd and 3rd rows folded (72.8 cu ft with panoramic moonroof)
46/100
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

75.6 cu ft is the figure Subaru publishes on both the spec sheet and the consumer site, and it is modest for a 196.8-in three-row — the Palisade, Telluride and Pilot all clear 86 cu ft. An 82.9-in load floor with everything folded partly offsets the volume deficit for long items.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions78
#5 of 60 in classCompare all →

Storage is a signature Ascent strength: up to 19 cupholders, a deep center console with a sliding tray, oversized door bins, seatback pockets in both rear rows, an underfloor cargo well and standard cargo tie-downs. It stays out of the 80+ band only because nothing here is an innovation — no frunk, no 120V outlet, no fold-flat front passenger seat.

Seat comfort72
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Front seats are consistently praised as supportive over long stints, and for 2025 the entry Premium gains an 8-way power driver's seat plus standard heated fronts; the reclining, sliding second row is comfortable for adults. Held out of the top band by a flat, low third-row cushion and no thigh-support extension anywhere in the range.

Ride quality73
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

Soft spring tuning, a 113.8-in wheelbase, a stiff Subaru Global Platform shell and 8.7 in of clearance give absorbent impact isolation that reviewers call a strength; the volume Premium's 18-in wheels on 245/60 tires ride noticeably better than the 20-in/245-50 setup on Onyx, Limited, Bronze and Touring.

Cabin quietness66
#40 of 60 in classCompare all →

Steady-state cruising refinement is acceptable, but road and wind noise are specifically called out as notable in 2025 reviews, and the turbo-boxer plus CVT drones coarsely whenever the vehicle is asked to accelerate or climb — the Ascent's most consistently cited refinement flaw.

Climate & comfort features72
#30 of 60 in classCompare all →

Deleting the Base trim for 2025 lifted the floor: every 2025 Ascent now has tri-zone automatic climate with second-row independent controls and vents, heated front seats, heated mirrors and a wiper de-icer as standard, plus keyless access with push-button start. Ventilated front seats, a heated steering wheel and heated second-row seats remain Limited/Touring-and-up, keeping it below the 80+ band.

5Cost of OwnershipOne of the Ascent's weakest categories.1.43D
Base MSRP
$40,215 delivered (Premium, $38,795 + $1,420 D&D); $1,570 D&D in Alaska
62/100
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru eliminated the outgoing Base trim for 2025, so Premium becomes the entry point and the entry price steps up accordingly; Subaru's own release frames the increase as just $340 for comparable content.

Volume-Trim Price
$40,215 delivered (Premium — both the entry and the volume trim for 2025). Range $40,215 Premium to $51,415 Onyx Edition Touring; Onyx Edition $43,615, Limited $47,415
68/100
#14 of 60 in classCompare all →

With Base deleted, Premium is simultaneously the entry trim and the volume seller, and it arrives already carrying the previously optional Convenience Package plus the 11.6-inch multimedia system, so 'typically equipped' and 'as listed' are effectively the same car.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
≈$6,419 over 5 yr on Edmunds' dealer-retail basis ($5,533 scheduled maintenance + $886 repairs); owner-basis estimates run far lower at ~$2,700–$2,800 (KBB, CarEdge)
47/100
#48 of 60 in classCompare all →

The boxer four's timing-chain layout and Subaru's 6,000-mile service interval keep scheduled work routine, but dealer-rate labor on a horizontally opposed engine is not cheap and the spread between dealer-retail and owner-basis estimates is roughly 2:1.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
≈51% of MSRP retained at 5 yr (≈49% depreciation) — below the Subaru brand average and well behind Toyota's three-rows
37/100
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

The Ascent is the weakest retainer in Subaru's lineup: it does not carry the Outback/Crosstrek cult premium, and softening demand for the aging first generation pushes residuals below the segment's Toyota and Kia benchmarks.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
0/100
#29 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru's limited warranty is the segment's floor term — matched by Toyota and Honda, but half the length of the Hyundai/Kia coverage that direct rivals like the Telluride and Palisade carry.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain; 5 yr / unlimited mi rust perforation
0/100
#24 of 60 in classCompare all →

5/60 is the mainstream default and the bottom of the framework's band; with a single gas powertrain there is no hybrid or battery coverage to extend it, unlike the Highlander and Pilot hybrids' 8–10 year component terms.

Complimentary maintenance & perks52
#38 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru of America does not run a national included-maintenance program — "Maintain the Love" complimentary maintenance is a regional/retailer offer (typically 1 yr/12,000 mi, 2 yr/24,000 mi in some markets) rather than a factory entitlement, so a buyer cannot count on it. What is guaranteed is the 3-year/36,000-mile roadside assistance and three years of MySubaru (STARLINK) Safety connected services, which is longer roadside coverage than ToyotaCare's two years but with none of the scheduled service.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$26,124 (≈$19,705 depreciation + $6,419 maintenance)
62/100
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

$40,215 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (51% retained, or about $20,510) leaves about $19,705 in depreciation. Add the projected $6,419 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $26,124 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Ascent's strongest categories.3.02B
Predicted reliability70
#11 of 60 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports predicts about-average reliability for the Ascent and lists it among its Recommended Subarus, but it trails the above-average Forester/Outback/Crosstrek and the class-leading Palisade and Grand Highlander. U.S. News puts its reliability at 80/100 — mid-pack for mid-size SUVs. 2025 is a mature, well-sorted year deep into the 2019 generation with no redesign risk, which lifts it above the segment median.

Brand reliability track record80
#14 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru is a genuine top-tier reliability brand right now, not a mid-pack one: it placed second overall in Consumer Reports' 2025 reliability rankings (score 63, behind only Toyota's 66) and topped CR's Auto Brand Report Card for the second consecutive year. J.D. Power's VDS is the softer of the two signals — Subaru fell outside the 2025 top ten but registered 181 PP100 in the 2026 study, good for roughly sixth. Held below the 85+ band because the two major studies disagree on how high it ranks.

Recall & TSB history85
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 Ascent's recall record is exceptionally clean: NHTSA's own database returns exactly one campaign against it, 26V436000, an incorrect Gross Axle Weight Rating printed on the certification label — a sticker replacement with no mechanical defect. The generation's real recall burden was front-loaded onto the 2019–2020 launch years (nine and five campaigns, including the B-pillar spot welds, PCV valve, Denso fuel pump and driveshaft), and none of those carry into 2025. NHTSA complaint volume for the year is likewise low and diffuse, with no cluster above two per component.

Powertrain durability reputation63
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

The weakest link in an otherwise strong reliability case. The 2.4L FA24DIT turbo boxer has settled into a decent record — owners commonly report 200k-mile service with maintenance — but it carries a known oil-seepage pattern at the PCV hose joint and an early PCV recall on the 2019–2020 cars. The bigger question is the high-torque TR730 Lineartronic CVT, which handles substantially more torque than Subaru's other CVTs in a ~4,700-lb three-row; owners report hesitation from a stop, harsh Park-to-Drive engagement, and a thin but real thread of complete failures under 60,000 miles. Neither component has the high-mileage résumé of a Honda J35 or Toyota 2GR V6.

Interior material quality62
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

Reviewers land consistently on 'agreeably average' — a durable, function-first cabin with some soft-touch surfaces and dash-covering pleather, but visible hard plastics that cheapen the impression at a ~$40k starting price. It does not reach the perceived richness of the Palisade, Telluride, Grand Highlander or CX-90. Materials improve up the range, with StarTex in the new Bronze and Onyx Editions and perforated leather in Touring trims, but the volume Premium trim is the one being scored.

Fit & finish72
#18 of 60 in classCompare all →

Assembly at Subaru of Indiana Automotive in Lafayette is solid and consistent, and by 2025 the Ascent is six years into its production run with the launch-year body issues long resolved — the 2018 missing-spot-weld campaign covered just 293 vehicles and never recurred. Panel gaps and interior assembly are tight, with only scattered rattle complaints rather than a systemic pattern.

Dealer & service network88
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

A standout strength. Subaru of America ranked highest among mass-market brands in the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. Customer Service Index, topping every Voice of the Customer measure — service initiation, service advisor, service facility, vehicle pick-up and service quality — and repeated at the top of the mass-market SUV category in 2026 with 887 of 1,000. Held short of the 90s only because the ~640-retailer network is meaningfully thinner than Toyota's or Chevrolet's and skews toward the Northeast, Pacific Northwest and Colorado, leaving parts of the South and Southwest with longer drives.

Parts availability & repair cost73
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

Parts are readily available through a 640-retailer network and Subaru enjoys unusually strong enthusiast aftermarket support as a brand, but Ascent-specific aftermarket is thin next to a Highlander or Pilot, and running costs sit above the industry norm. RepairPal puts Subaru at $617 average annual repair cost and 3.5/5 overall, 14th of 32 brands, with repair frequency low (0.3 shop visits per year) — the cost per visit, not the number of visits, is what pulls this down. Turbo and boxer-specific service items add labor cost relative to a transverse V6.

7Technology & InfotainmentMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.05C
Touchscreen size
11.6 in, standard on every 2025 trim (new for 2025 — the 6.5-in dual-screen setup left with the discontinued Base trim)
54/100
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

The portrait 11.6-inch STARLINK Multimedia Plus display became standard across the whole 2025 line, so the volume Premium gets the largest screen the Ascent offers; 11.6 in is respectable but no longer large by 2025 mid-size SUV standards.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness62
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 11.6-in tablet runs an updated STARLINK build for 2025 and keeps genuinely useful hardware — a volume knob and physical temperature buttons flanking the screen — but the system still absorbs climate, X-MODE and vehicle settings into menus and is regularly described as slower to respond than the best in the class.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto90
#26 of 60 in classCompare all →

Both wireless Apple CarPlay and wireless Android Auto are standard on every 2025 trim including the entry Premium — a headline 2025 change and squarely in the top band.

Voice control & native navigation55
#52 of 60 in classCompare all →

Built-in navigation is not available on the volume Premium at all — the STARLINK Multimedia Navigation system starts at Limited — and STARLINK's command-based voice recognition handles basic audio/phone/climate requests without the natural-language fluency of the best systems, so most owners default to CarPlay or Android Auto for maps.

Audio system quality70
#42 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume Premium's standard system is an unremarkable six-speaker setup, but a genuinely strong 14-speaker Harman Kardon QuantumLogic surround system with a dedicated center channel and subwoofer is available from Limited up, which is a competitive premium option for the class.

Digital instrument cluster32
#59 of 60 in classCompare all →

No 2025 Ascent trim offers a configurable full-digital gauge display — the instrument binnacle is conventional analog dials with a small colour information display, supplemented by the separate multi-function display atop the dash. This is the Ascent's clearest technology deficit against the Palisade, Telluride and Pilot, all of which offer 12.3-in digital clusters.

OTA update capability58
#35 of 60 in classCompare all →

New for 2025, the STARLINK system can pull software updates wirelessly rather than requiring a dealer visit — real progress, but the scope is infotainment/maps rather than the whole-vehicle, feature-adding OTA that earns the top band.

Companion app & remote functions60
#51 of 60 in classCompare all →

MySubaru with STARLINK Safety and Security Plus covers the core set — remote start with climate, remote lock/unlock, vehicle locator, automatic collision notification and SOS — but the useful remote functions sit behind a paid subscription after the trial and there is no phone-as-key or digital key sharing.

Charging ports & device power65
#51 of 60 in classCompare all →

Dual third-row USB-A ports became standard for 2025, so all three rows are now served, and Limited-and-up cars carry up to six ports with USB-C in the front rows. It stays mid-band because the volume Premium has the thinnest allocation, wireless phone charging is Limited-and-up, and no trim offers a 120V household outlet.

Keyless & remote access72
#36 of 60 in classCompare all →

Folding the old Convenience Package into the entry Premium made Keyless Access with Push-Button Start and a power rear gate standard on every 2025 Ascent, with remote engine start available through the app. Short of the top band because there is no hands-free kick-activated liftgate and no phone-as-key.

Camera & parking aids62
#50 of 60 in classCompare all →

Reverse Automatic Braking became standard across the line for 2025 alongside the rear camera, which is a meaningful parking-safety addition on the entry trim — but the Surround View Monitor and front-view camera start at Limited, so the volume Premium parks a 196.8-in SUV on a rear camera alone without front sensors.

Head-up display availability10
#52 of 60 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered on any 2025 Ascent trim, including the $51,415 Onyx Edition Touring — a feature the Palisade, Telluride and Grand Highlander all make available.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.47C+
Kid & car-seat practicality80
#10 of 60 in classCompare all →

Family logistics are the Ascent's core competence: wide, square door openings on a 71.6-in-tall body, a second row that slides and reclines to clear space for rear-facing seats, LATCH provision that this vehicle's safety scoring rates highly, eight-passenger capacity on the volume Premium and 19 cupholders. The limit is the 17.8 cu ft behind row three, which a double stroller fills.

Family safety package88
#6 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 Ascent is close to a best case for a family buying the cheapest trim: five-star NHTSA overall, and for 2025 Blind-Spot Detection with Lane Change Assist, Rear Cross-Traffic Alert, Reverse Automatic Braking, Emergency Stop Assist and Emergency Lane Keep Assist all became standard across the line, on top of EyeSight with adaptive cruise and lane centering. Nothing important is paywalled above the $40,215 entry point.

Family road-trip comfort74
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

Tri-zone climate with independent second-row controls and vents is standard on every 2025 trim, third-row USB-A ports were added for 2025, and second-row space is generous. Held back because with all three rows occupied there is only 17.8 cu ft for luggage, rear-seat entertainment is not offered, and the Cabin Connect intercom is an upper-trim item.

Daily driving ease76
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

Light 13.5:1 steering, a tall upright seating position with excellent sightlines, a CVT that is genuinely smooth at low speed, and standard EyeSight adaptive cruise with lane centering make stop-and-go duty low-effort. Auto Vehicle Hold is standard. The only real daily irritants are the screen-based climate menus and the powertrain's noise when hurried.

Commuting cost efficiency45
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

22 MPG combined on regular fuel and roughly $2,800 a year is unremarkable for a 2025 three-row and looks poor beside the hybrid options families now cross-shop — a Highlander Hybrid or Grand Highlander Hybrid nearly halves the fuel bill, and no Ascent trim offers any electrification.

Parking & maneuverability55
#45 of 60 in classCompare all →

A 196.8-in body with a 38.0-ft turning circle is ordinary for the class, and while the tall glasshouse gives unusually good outward visibility for a big SUV, the volume Premium has to manage on a rear camera with no front or rear parking sensors and no surround view — those start at Limited.

Work capability45
#31 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 5,000-lb tow rating is genuinely strong for a unibody crossover with a 2.4-litre four and matches the Pilot and Telluride, but there is no bed, no payload headroom worth quoting, and a CVT that reviewers do not associate with sustained heavy hauling — this is trailer-a-boat-on-weekends capability, not a work tool.

Durability for work duty50
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

The Subaru Global Platform shell and the 2.4T boxer have a solid consumer reliability record and the brand's service network is broad, but the Ascent has no commercial-fleet history and the Lineartronic CVT — the subject of the nameplate's most publicised early-life trouble — is the component a hard-use buyer would worry about.

Jobsite & upfit practicality45
#21 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard roof rails and cargo tie-downs plus Subaru's deep accessory catalogue cover light-duty needs, and StarTex water-repellent upholstery on the Onyx trims is genuinely wipe-clean, but there is no onboard AC power on any trim, no bed, and nothing resembling an upfit ecosystem.

Long-distance comfort & range76
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

A 19.3-gal tank at 26 MPG highway gives roughly 500 highway miles between stops, the seats are praised over long stints, the long wheelbase soaks up interstate expansion joints, and EyeSight's adaptive cruise with lane centering is standard on the volume trim. Road and wind noise plus boxer/CVT drone on grades keep it out of the top band.

Outdoor & adventure capability80
#12 of 60 in classCompare all →

This is the Ascent's second natural mission: Symmetrical AWD with X-MODE standard on every trim, dual-function X-MODE with Deep Snow/Mud on Onyx, Bronze, Limited and Touring, 8.7 in of ground clearance, 5,000 lb of towing for a small trailer, and standard roof rails feeding the largest rack-accessory catalogue in the mainstream market. Short of the top band only because it is a road-biased crossover with an 17.6-degree approach angle, not a body-on-frame off-roader.

Gear & luggage flexibility72
#24 of 60 in classCompare all →

Folding both rear rows opens an 82.9-in load floor 45.9 in. wide between the wheel housings at a low 32.0-in liftover, with underfloor storage and standard roof rails and a factory hitch to take overflow. What holds it mid-band is raw volume — 75.6 cu ft is 10-plus cubic feet behind the Palisade, Telluride and Pilot.

9Driving ExperienceMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.00C
Handling & agility62
#43 of 60 in classCompare all →

Secure, predictable handling for a three-row family SUV: the low-mounted boxer keeps the centre of gravity down, the Subaru Global Platform shell is stiff, and Active Torque Vectoring trims understeer — but 4,449 lb on soft springs means body roll and early push, and nothing about it is agile.

Steering feel58
#37 of 60 in classCompare all →

The electric rack is quick enough at 13.5:1 and 2.6 turns lock-to-lock and is easy to place, but it is light and largely mute — little on-centre definition and no effort build-up as cornering load rises. Typical numb family-SUV steering.

Braking confidence60
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

Large ventilated discs at all four corners — 13.1 in front, 13.0 in rear — with Brake Assist and brake override give adequate, repeatable stopping power for a 4,400-lb SUV, but the pedal is soft off the top and published 70-0 mph results for this generation sit mid-pack around 180 ft.

Powertrain smoothness & response58
#48 of 60 in classCompare all →

277 lb-ft available from 2,000 rpm suits a CVT well and part-throttle response is smooth and lag-free, but the Lineartronic still flares revs and holds them under real load, and its eight simulated ratios mask rather than eliminate the elastic feel. Carried over unchanged for 2025.

Drivetrain noise & vibration55
#46 of 60 in classCompare all →

Cruising refinement is fine and liquid-filled engine mounts keep vibration out of the controls, but the turbo-boxer plus CVT drone at wide-open throttle is coarse and monotone, and it is the single most consistently cited flaw of this powertrain.

Turning circle
38.0 ft curb-to-curb (all trims)
50/100
#18 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru publishes 38.0 ft curb-to-curb for the 2025 Ascent — squarely mid-pack for a 196.8-in three-row mid-size SUV.

Driving position & ergonomics74
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

One of the Ascent's genuine strengths: a tall greenhouse with thin pillars and a big quarter window, an upright commanding seating position with 41.2 in of headroom, easy ingress at a 71.6-in body height, retained physical temperature and volume controls, and an 8-way power driver's seat now standard on the entry Premium. The main demerit is climate and X-MODE functions living inside the touchscreen.

Fun-to-drive factor55
#38 of 60 in classCompare all →

Competent and unobjectionable but entirely uninvolving — numb steering, a droning CVT and a chassis tuned for isolation mean nobody takes the long way home in an Ascent. It is a well-executed appliance, which is exactly the brief.

10Value & Market PositionMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.07C
Standard equipment generosity75
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

Every 2025 Ascent includes Symmetrical AWD, EyeSight, and — new for 2025 — Blind-Spot Detection with Lane Change Assist and Rear Cross-Traffic Alert plus Emergency Stop Assist across the whole line, while the Premium entry trim now carries the formerly optional Convenience Package and the 11.6-inch multimedia system. Rivals routinely charge $1,500–2,000 for AWD alone, though the Ascent still withholds leather, ventilated seats and the surround-view camera to upper trims.

Feature value per dollar70
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

On price the Ascent undercuts the class — Cars.com's seven-SUV comparison had it as the cheapest entry — and standard AWD plus a 5,000-lb tow rating is a lot of capability for the money. What it cannot answer for is content per dollar higher up: a narrower cabin, a kids-only third row, the segment's worst measured fuel economy in that same test, and no hybrid at any price mean rivals deliver more usable vehicle for similar outlay.

Trim & configuration breadth62
#35 of 60 in classCompare all →

Six trims spanning $40,215 to $51,415 with two new-for-2025 additions (Bronze Edition, Onyx Edition Touring) and a 7- or 8-passenger choice on Premium and Limited is a well-spaced ladder. It is held back by having exactly one drivetrain answer — one engine, one CVT, AWD only — where most of the class offers at least a hybrid and an FWD/AWD split.

Sales popularity & market acceptance40
#50 of 60 in classCompare all →

The Ascent has been sliding since its 2019 debut year and 2025 was its weakest since launch, down roughly a fifth year over year and far behind the Telluride, Pilot and the two Highlanders. Volume is still real rather than negligible, but the trajectory is clearly downward and continued falling through early 2026.

Brand desirability & image72
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru carries one of the strongest owner-loyalty and brand-affinity positions among mainstream makes, built on standard AWD, safety credentials and an outdoors identity that transfers cleanly to a three-row family car. It is a well-liked brand rather than an aspirational one, and the halo is thinner on the Ascent than on the Outback or Crosstrek — which is part of why its residuals trail the brand average.

Deals & incentive availability64
#44 of 60 in classCompare all →

Subaru does not put large national cash rebates on the Ascent, but falling volume and an aging generation make dealers negotiable, subsidized low-APR financing is routinely available on the model line, and the $500 educator and military programs stack on top. Real buyer benefit is there without being desperation pricing — but it is meaningfully less than the outright cash on the hood at some rivals.

Model freshness32
#53 of 60 in classCompare all →

2025 is the seventh model year of the first-generation Ascent launched for 2019, on the same platform, engine and CVT it debuted with; the only significant intervention was the 2023 facelift. For a 2025 buyer the replacement risk is concrete — a substantially updated 2026 car with a 13.1-inch portrait screen was already on the way, with a full next-generation redesign expected shortly after.

Critical reception & awards52
#48 of 60 in classCompare all →

Reviewers respect the Ascent's safety record, visibility, standard AWD and pricing, and the awards it does win are safety awards — its eighth straight IIHS Top Safety Pick (the plus went to the Solterra, not the Ascent) and a KBB safest-cars listing. In head-to-head comparisons it loses: Cars.com placed it dead last among seven three-row SUVs, and Edmunds' summary judgment is that a buyer who wants a modern three-row should look elsewhere.