MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2025:Overall 0Safety 0Reliability -8Efficiency & Range +6Cost of Ownership 0Technology -1Driving Experience 0
Subaru logo
Mid-Size SUV

2026 Subaru Ascent

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2.46C+GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
2.42C+
Safety
3.46B+
EfficiencyGas
1.24D
23 MPG combined · 444 mi range · $2,650/yr energy
Comfort
2.88B-
Value
2.56C+
Ownership Cost
1.43D
Technology
2.00C
Driving Experience
1.96C-

The verdict

A mixed-report mid-size suv, strong on safety and held back by efficiency.

The 2026 Subaru Ascent is the all-weather, safety-first pick in the three-row class: standard Symmetrical all-wheel drive and the full EyeSight driver-assist suite on every trim, 8.7 inches of ground clearance that beats a Palisade or Pilot, a 5,000-pound tow rating, and 40.0 inches of second-row headroom that nothing else in the segment matches. What you give up is efficiency and polish — 23 MPG combined with no hybrid option anywhere in the lineup, roughly $2,650 a year in fuel, a 260-hp turbo four that drones through its CVT, and an interior and infotainment system that feel a generation behind a Telluride or Grand Highlander. The 3-year/36,000-mile basic and 5-year/60,000-mile powertrain warranty is the class minimum, and the platform dates to 2019. Buy it if snow, gravel and standard safety gear are what you actually need; look elsewhere if fuel bills or cabin tech top your list.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Every trim gets the full safety suite — including the cheap one
  • Eight seats and the airiest cabin in the class
  • Standard AWD, 8.7 inches of clearance, 5,000 pounds of tow

What holds it back

  • No hybrid, and the fuel bills prove it
  • Class-minimum warranty and nothing included after the sale
  • Infotainment and driver-assist tech feel a generation behind

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Subaru Ascent

Production history

2019present · 8 years · 1 generations
Gen 12019now2019In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — gradedProduction began 2019

How it's evolved

8 scored model years · 20192026

0255075100201920202021202220232024202520262019 · Overall: 582020 · Overall: 57 (−1 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 60 (+3 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 56 (−4 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 66 (+10 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 662025 · Overall: 662026 · Overall: 66

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019

Compare two years

vs
Performance47
50+2
Efficiency49
490
Safety73
80+8
Space70
72+2
Cost57
51-6
Reliability45
65+20
Tech43
59+17
Use-case62
72+10
Driving49
59+10
Value74
67-7

Best fit & conditions

FamilyB+80/100
AdventureB+79/100
Winter / inclementB-73/100
CommuterC+65/100
Work / TowC63/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainOne of the Ascent's weakest categories.1.31D
Horsepower
260 hp (2.4L turbo boxer, all trims)
28/100
#87 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Ascent carries over its sole 2.4L turbocharged boxer four (FA24DIT) making 260 hp across every trim — modest for a mid-size three-row versus the 285–290 hp of the Palisade/Telluride and 285 hp of the Grand Highlander.

Torque
277 lb-ft @ 2,000–4,800 rpm
40/100
#83 of 148 in classCompare all →

277 lb-ft with a broad, low-rpm plateau is the Ascent's best output metric — competitive with the Palisade (262) and Telluride (262) despite giving up peak hp.

0–60 mph time
~7.0 s (instrumented)
42/100
#81 of 148 in classCompare all →

Independent instrumented testing has placed the Ascent at roughly 7.0 seconds to 60 mph — mid-pack for the mainstream three-row segment.

Powertrain refinement60
#110 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers praise the torque plateau and effortless midrange but note noticeable turbo lag off idle and the boxer's coarser note under hard acceleration; refinement trails V6 rivals (Palisade/Telluride/Pilot) but is respectable.

Transmission behavior62
#116 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru's Lineartronic CVT is among the better CVTs — it simulates eight stepped ratios and responds decisively — but reviewers still cite audible drone under sustained acceleration versus geared automatics in the segment.

Max towing capacity
5,000 lbs (properly equipped)
57/100
#41 of 148 in classCompare all →

5,000-lb rating matches the Palisade, Telluride, Explorer, and Pilot for best-in-class among mainstream three-row crossovers — a genuine strength of the Ascent.

AWD/4WD availability88
#23 of 148 in classCompare all →

Symmetrical full-time AWD is standard on every trim — no FWD option exists — and higher trims add dual-function X-MODE with Snow/Dirt and Deep Snow/Mud presets plus Hill Descent Control. Class-leading AWD availability and sophistication for a mainstream three-row.

Off-road capability65
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

8.7 in of ground clearance, standard AWD, and X-MODE + Hill Descent Control make the Ascent one of the more trail-competent unibody three-rows — but no low-range, lockers, or dedicated off-road trim keeps it out of true off-road SUV company.

Powertrain lineup breadth25
#116 of 148 in classCompare all →

Take-it-or-leave-it: one 2.4L turbo boxer with CVT, no hybrid, no PHEV, no EV variant. Rivals (Highlander Hybrid, Grand Highlander Hybrid MAX, Pilot, Sorento in three flavors) offer meaningfully broader choice.

2Efficiency & RangeThe Ascent's lowest-graded category.1.24D
Combined fuel economy
23 MPG combined (22 on Limited/Touring/Onyx)
41/100
#95 of 148 in classCompare all →

Current-generation 2.4L turbocharged boxer with standard AWD and CVT carries over unchanged for 2026; combined MPG is modest for the 3-row mid-size SUV class.

City fuel economy
21 MPG city (20 on Limited/Touring/Onyx)
44/100
#90 of 148 in classCompare all →

Turbo-boxer AWD 3-row without any electrification; city MPG suffers from stop-and-go with the heavy full-time-AWD hardware.

Highway fuel economy
27 MPG highway (26 on Limited/Touring/Onyx)
44/100
#92 of 148 in classCompare all →

Highway MPG is respectable for a full-time-AWD 3-row with a 2.4L turbo, but well behind hybrid rivals like the Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid or Kia Sorento Hybrid.

Driving range
~444 mi (19.3-gal tank × 23 MPG combined; ~425 mi on Limited/Touring/Onyx)
51/100
#42 of 148 in classCompare all →

Large 19.3-gallon fuel tank compensates for modest combined MPG to deliver competitive real-world range for a 3-row family SUV.

Estimated annual fuel cost
~$2,650/yr (Premium at 23 MPG combined, regular gas, 15k mi/yr)
40/100
#101 of 148 in classCompare all →

EPA's standard 15k-mi/yr calculation on 23 combined MPG with regular unleaded puts the Ascent's fuel bill well above hybrid rivals but roughly in line with other non-electrified V6/turbo-4 AWD 3-rows.

Fuel requirements90
#19 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2.4L turbo boxer is engineered to run on 87-octane regular unleaded despite being turbocharged, avoiding the premium-fuel penalty many turbocharged mid-size SUVs incur.

3SafetyThe Ascent's best-graded category.3.46B+
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

Current-generation Ascent (WX platform, 2019+) has consistently earned NHTSA 5-star overall ratings; 2026 carries the same structure and restraint systems with no NHTSA re-test indicating a change.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness82
#32 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ascent has been an IIHS Top Safety Pick+ recipient in recent years with Good scores in original moderate and small overlap tests; the tougher 2023-updated moderate overlap (rear passenger) and new side-impact tests may drop it to Acceptable in one metric, keeping it competitive but not the segment benchmark.

Standard ADAS suite breadth88
#35 of 148 in classCompare all →

EyeSight Driver Assist Technology is standard on every trim — pre-collision braking (AEB), adaptive cruise, lane departure warning, lane keep assist and lane centering — and Blind-Spot Detection with Rear Cross-Traffic Alert is standard on every trim from base Premium up, a wider standard suite than most mainstream three-row SUVs.

Automatic emergency braking performance84
#29 of 148 in classCompare all →

EyeSight's stereo-camera AEB has historically earned Superior ratings in IIHS vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention and Advanced in pedestrian tests; the updated wide-angle EyeSight (2023 refresh) improved nighttime pedestrian response, though it still trails the strongest camera+radar systems in that specific test.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage80
#60 of 148 in classCompare all →

Blind-Spot Detection, Lane Change Assist, and Rear Cross-Traffic Alert are standard on every Ascent trim; system is alert-only (no active steering intervention) but coverage is broad and well-tuned.

Lane keeping & centering72
#79 of 148 in classCompare all →

EyeSight's Lane Centering Function operates above 37 mph and reviewers describe it as functional and predictable but less refined than Honda Sensing or Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 — occasional ping-ponging and late corrections on curves.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist76
#89 of 148 in classCompare all →

EyeSight adaptive cruise is full-speed-range with stop-and-go, and reviewers praise its smooth brake application and set-speed accuracy; combined with lane centering it delivers a competent hands-on highway assist but lacks route-based speed adjustment or curve-slowing features found in newer OEM systems.

Hands-free driving availability10
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru offers no hands-free driving system on any 2026 model, including the Ascent — EyeSight remains a hands-on-wheel Level 2 system.

Headlight performance72
#68 of 148 in classCompare all →

LED low- and high-beam headlights are standard with Steering Responsive Headlights on Premium and above; IIHS has generally rated Ascent headlights Good on higher trims and Acceptable on the base configuration. Auto high-beam is standard.

Outward visibility78
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ascent has one of the more airy greenhouses in the three-row class — relatively slim A-pillars, tall side glass, low beltline — and standard rearview camera plus available surround-view (Limited/Touring) compensate for the wide C-pillar. Reviewers regularly cite visibility as a strength.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability82
#23 of 148 in classCompare all →

Purpose-built family three-row with LATCH anchors in both second-row positions, tether anchors in all second- and third-row seats, wide-opening rear doors, and enough second-row travel to install rear-facing seats while preserving front-passenger room. IIHS has historically rated Ascent LATCH ease-of-use Good+.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Ascent's strongest categories.2.88B-
Seating capacity
8 seats (7 with optional 2nd-row captain's chairs; Onyx/Limited/Touring are 7-passenger)
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume Premium trim seats eight on a 60/40 second-row bench, matching the maximum for the mainstream three-row class; captain's chairs drop it to seven on upper trims. Replaces a placeholder that assumed a 6.4-seat average.

Front headroom
41.3 in (39.4 in with panoramic moonroof)
86/100
#22 of 148 in classCompare all →

41.3 in without the moonroof is near the top of the mid-size SUV band — the Ascent's tall, upright greenhouse is one of its defining traits and pays off directly here.

Front legroom
42.2 in
49/100
#35 of 148 in classCompare all →

42.2 in is mid-pack for the segment — ahead of the Pilot (41.0) and Telluride (41.4), behind the Palisade (44.1). Adequate rather than notable.

Rear headroom
40.0 in second row (39.3 in with panoramic moonroof)
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

40.0 in of second-row headroom tops the mid-size SUV normalization band; the boxy roofline and flat roof rail line give the Ascent genuinely class-leading rear head space.

Rear legroom
38.6 in second row (bench slides ~5.5 in fore/aft)
72/100
#68 of 148 in classCompare all →

38.6 in trails the Palisade and Telluride (42.4 each) and the Highlander (41.0) because the Ascent's second row is positioned to preserve an unusually usable third row; the 5.5-in slide range lets owners rebalance rows two and three.

Third-row usability60
#30 of 148 in classCompare all →

A real, kid-friendly third row rather than a token one — 31.7 in of legroom actually beats the Highlander (28.0) and matches the Telluride/Palisade (31.4) — but 36.3 in of headroom, a low, thigh-unsupportive cushion, and a tight aperture keep adults to short trips. Captain's chairs on upper trims add a walk-through; the bench-equipped volume Premium requires a tilt-and-slide. Placeholder 70 overstated it relative to segment leaders.

Cargo/trunk volume
47.5 cu ft behind 2nd row (17.8 cu ft behind 3rd row)
41/100
#22 of 148 in classCompare all →

47.5 cu ft with the third row folded is competitive with the Palisade (45.8) and Highlander (48.4) but well short of the Atlas (55.5); the more limiting number in daily family use is the 17.8 cu ft behind row three, among the smallest in the class.

Max cargo volume
86.5 cu ft (2nd and 3rd rows folded)
70/100
#28 of 148 in classCompare all →

86.5 cu ft with everything folded is squarely competitive for a 196.8-in three-row — essentially level with the Palisade (86.4), Telluride (87.0) and Pilot (87.0), behind the Atlas (96.6). Note some third-party listings quote a more conservative 75.6 cu ft for the same configuration.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions78
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

Storage is a signature Ascent strength: up to 19 cupholders, a deep center console with a sliding tray big enough for a tablet, oversized door bins, seatback pockets in both rear rows, an underfloor cargo well, and standard cargo-area tie-downs. Falls short of the 80+ band only because there is no true innovation (no frunk, no 120V outlet, no fold-flat front passenger seat).

Seat comfort72
#92 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front seats are repeatedly praised as supportive over long hauls, with 10-way power and lumbar on the volume Premium; the reclining second row is comfortable for adults. Held out of the top band by a flat, low third-row cushion and the absence of thigh-support extension anywhere in the range.

Ride quality72
#73 of 148 in classCompare all →

Long suspension travel paired with 8.7 in of ground clearance gives the Ascent an absorbent, unruffled ride over broken pavement that reviewers consistently call a strength — better isolated than the Pilot or Pathfinder. Some vertical float over big undulations, and the Onyx Edition's 20-in wheels trade away a noticeable amount of the compliance.

Cabin quietness68
#105 of 148 in classCompare all →

Wind and road noise are well suppressed at a steady highway cruise — reviewers describe the cabin as quiet — but the boxer-plus-CVT combination drones coarsely whenever the vehicle is asked to accelerate or climb, which is the Ascent's most consistently cited refinement flaw. The placeholder 77 ignored that penalty.

Climate & comfort features70
#109 of 148 in classCompare all →

Three-zone automatic climate control with second-row vents and controls is standard on every trim — including the base — which is genuinely generous, and heated front seats plus remote start arrive on the volume Premium. Ventilated front seats and a heated steering wheel are reserved for Limited/Touring, and heated second-row seats for the top trims, keeping it out of the 80+ band.

5Cost of OwnershipOne of the Ascent's weakest categories.1.43D
Base MSRP
$37,995 (Base, incl. destination)
68/100
#39 of 148 in classCompare all →

2026 Ascent Base trim MSRP carries forward roughly flat from the 2025 model (~$36,470 + ~$1,395 destination), consistent with Subaru's modest year-over-year price adjustments on the current generation.

Volume-Trim Price
~$41,000 (Premium, as typically equipped)
66/100
#35 of 148 in classCompare all →

Premium is the highest-volume Ascent trim and lands around $40,000-$41,500 as typically optioned with the popular options package; range across trims is roughly $38k Base to $50k Touring.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$5,500 over 5 years
62/100
#65 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ascent's projected 5-year maintenance + repair cost sits near the mid-size SUV segment average; the 2.4T boxer and CVT are mature, and Subaru dealer service pricing is competitive.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~52% of MSRP retained at 5 years
40/100
#47 of 148 in classCompare all →

Ascent retention is decent but not class-leading — Subaru's brand cachet is strongest in smaller models (Crosstrek/Forester); mid-size 3-row SUVs generally depreciate faster, and Ascent lands in line with segment norms.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
0/100
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru's standard 3-year/36,000-mile new-vehicle limited warranty sits at the industry-minimum end of the mid-size SUV field (Hyundai/Kia offer 5/60k basic).

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain
0/100
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru's 5-year/60,000-mile powertrain warranty is at the industry minimum for mid-size SUVs; Hyundai/Kia (10 yr/100k) and Mitsubishi (10 yr/100k) offer double.

Complimentary maintenance & perks42
#128 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru offers no complimentary scheduled-maintenance program on Ascent, unlike Toyota (2 yr/25k ToyotaCare) or Kia (nominal first-service). Perks are limited to standard 3-year/36,000-mile roadside assistance and a 3-year STARLINK Safety Plus connected-services trial (concierge on higher trims).

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$25,180 (≈$19,680 depreciation + $5,500 maintenance)
64/100
#36 of 148 in classCompare all →

$41,000 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (52% retained, or about $21,320) leaves about $19,680 in depreciation. Add the projected $5,500 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $25,180 in total.

6Reliability & QualityMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.42C+
Predicted reliability68
#46 of 148 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports has typically pegged the Ascent at Average (3/5) predicted reliability, trailing its Above-Average Subaru siblings (Forester, Outback) and clearly behind class leaders (Palisade, Grand Highlander). J.D. Power quality studies place it mid-pack. Mature platform in its lifecycle so no redesign risk, but the FA24 turbo and heavier three-row load have kept scores from climbing.

Brand reliability track record65
#69 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru consistently lands mid-pack in Consumer Reports brand reliability rankings (typically 10th–15th) and hovers near the industry average in J.D. Power VDS — better than most domestic and European rivals but well behind Toyota/Lexus/Mazda leaders.

Recall & TSB history62
#51 of 148 in classCompare all →

The current-generation Ascent has accumulated more recalls than an average mature vehicle — early rear-hub bolt (fire-risk) campaign, PCV valve replacements on the FA24, brake vacuum pump, Denso fuel pump, and various sensor/software campaigns. Nothing points to a single systemic defect, but the running total is heavier than the segment norm.

Powertrain durability reputation62
#77 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2.4L FA24DIT turbo boxer has a shorter and mixed track record than the naturally-aspirated FB25 — early PCV valve failures required a recall and long-term data past 100k miles is thin. The Lineartronic CVT is among the better CVTs but is working hard in a 4,700-lb three-row, and Subaru's boxer/CVT combination in the Ascent has not built the high-mileage durability résumé of a Honda J35 V6 or Toyota 2GR.

Interior material quality62
#123 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Ascent's cabin is functional and durable but dated — reviewers consistently flag hard plastics on the lower dash and doors, plain switchgear, and materials that trail the Palisade, Telluride, Grand Highlander, and CX-90 for perceived richness at the price. The modest 2026 refresh does not close the gap.

Fit & finish72
#68 of 148 in classCompare all →

Assembly at Subaru of Indiana Automotive (Lafayette) is consistently solid — the plant regularly performs well in JDP Initial Quality Studies, and Ascent panel gaps and interior assembly are tight with only scattered rattle complaints in the mature production run.

Dealer & service network68
#93 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru operates roughly 630 US dealerships — adequate coverage but sparser than Toyota, Honda, Ford, or Chevrolet, especially through the Sun Belt and Plains states. Service satisfaction is respectable, with Subaru scoring around mid-pack in J.D. Power CSI.

Parts availability & repair cost66
#67 of 148 in classCompare all →

RepairPal pegs Subaru annual maintenance near the industry average (~$600/yr). The turbo-boxer FA24 and Lineartronic CVT carry model-specific service costs (CVT fluid service, chain-related work later in life) versus a mainstream V6, and some non-common wear items can require dealer-only sourcing.

7Technology & InfotainmentMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.00C
Touchscreen size
11.6 in (standard on Premium and above; Base retains dual 7 in stacked layout)
54/100
#94 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 11.6-inch portrait Starlink Multimedia touchscreen carried over from the 2025 refresh is standard on Premium (the volume trim) and every trim above it; the entry Base trim keeps a dual-7-inch stacked display.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness54
#142 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently criticize the Starlink 11.6-inch system for laggy response, small tap targets, and heavy reliance on on-screen HVAC controls. Menu logic is dated versus Kia/Hyundai/Toyota three-row peers.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto85
#111 of 148 in classCompare all →

Every Ascent trim equipped with the 11.6-inch head unit ships with wireless Apple CarPlay and wireless Android Auto standard; only the entry Base trim is wired-only.

Voice control & native navigation58
#127 of 148 in classCompare all →

Command-based Starlink voice recognition is serviceable but not natural-language; TomTom-based native navigation is available on Limited/Touring but mid-pack in graphics and routing. Most owners default to CarPlay/Android Auto maps.

Audio system quality74
#92 of 148 in classCompare all →

Base six-speaker audio is adequate; the optional 14-speaker Harman Kardon premium system on Limited/Touring/Onyx is well-regarded and competitive in the three-row segment.

Digital instrument cluster42
#140 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Ascent retains analog primary gauges flanking a small central color multi-info display; no full-digital reconfigurable cluster is offered on any 2026 trim, trailing most three-row rivals.

OTA update capability55
#129 of 148 in classCompare all →

Starlink Connected Services delivers over-the-air updates to the infotainment head unit and navigation maps, but Subaru does not push vehicle-wide software or feature updates to powertrain, ADAS, or body modules.

Companion app & remote functions60
#134 of 148 in classCompare all →

MySubaru + Starlink Safety Plus/Security Plus covers remote start, lock/unlock, vehicle locate, and service reminders, but remote start/lock/locate require the paid Security Plus subscription after the trial. No digital key.

Charging ports & device power68
#120 of 148 in classCompare all →

The refreshed Ascent adds USB-C data ports up front plus USB-C charge ports for second and third rows, with wireless phone charging standard on Onyx/Limited/Touring. No 120V household outlet is offered.

Keyless & remote access72
#111 of 148 in classCompare all →

Proximity keyless entry with push-button start is standard on Premium and above (the volume trim), and hands-free power liftgate is standard on Onyx and Touring. App-based remote start is subscription-gated and there is no phone-as-key.

Camera & parking aids58
#136 of 148 in classCompare all →

Rear-view camera and rear cross-traffic alert are standard; a front-view camera is added on Onyx/Limited/Touring and Reverse Automatic Braking is available. Subaru still does not offer a 360-degree surround-view camera on the Ascent, a gap versus Palisade/Telluride/Grand Highlander.

Head-up display availability15
#126 of 148 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered on any 2026 Ascent trim, matching the rest of the current Subaru lineup.

8Use-Case FitOne of the Ascent's strongest categories.2.88B-
Kid & car-seat practicality78
#45 of 148 in classCompare all →

Purpose-built family three-row: wide-opening rear doors, LATCH in both second-row outboard positions, tether anchors in every second- and third-row seat, and a sliding second row that clears space for rear-facing seats. Captain's chairs (Limited/Touring) create a genuine walk-through to the third row.

Family safety package88
#8 of 148 in classCompare all →

One of the strongest standard-safety packages at a family-friendly price: EyeSight (AEB, adaptive cruise, lane keep/centering) is standard on every trim including the ~$38k Base, BSD/RCTA is standard from Premium up, and the Ascent carries NHTSA 5-star overall plus IIHS Top Safety Pick+ history. Rear Seat Reminder is standard.

Family road-trip comfort76
#58 of 148 in classCompare all →

Tri-zone climate, USB-C ports in all three rows, and a comfortable, quiet cabin make it a competent long-hauler for four to five, but the third row and behind-third-row cargo (~17.8 cu ft) are tighter than Palisade/Grand Highlander and no rear-seat entertainment is offered.

Daily driving ease74
#77 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard adaptive cruise with stop-and-go, standard AWD for bad weather, comfortable seats, and one of the airiest greenhouses in the class make daily use easy; noticeable turbo lag off idle and a laggy 11.6-inch touchscreen for HVAC take a small edge off.

Commuting cost efficiency52
#98 of 148 in classCompare all →

23 MPG combined (22 on higher trims) with no hybrid or PHEV option puts the Ascent near the bottom of the mid-size three-row commuter economy chart — Grand Highlander Hybrid (~36) and Sorento Hybrid (~35) save roughly $1,000/yr in fuel. The one saving grace is 87-octane regular.

Parking & maneuverability66
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

36.7-ft turning circle is respectable for a mid-size three-row (Palisade ~38.7 ft) and outward visibility is a genuine strength thanks to slim pillars and a low beltline, but the Ascent still lacks a surround-view camera on any 2026 trim — a real gap versus Palisade/Telluride/Grand Highlander/Pilot.

Work capability62
#35 of 148 in classCompare all →

5,000-lb tow rating (properly equipped) is best-in-class for mainstream three-row crossovers and ties Palisade/Telluride/Pilot/Explorer; the turbo boxer's 277 lb-ft plateau handles it well. Not a work truck (no bed, no integrated trailer-brake controller), but for a family SUV it punches above its weight for towing a boat or small trailer.

Durability for work duty66
#21 of 148 in classCompare all →

The FA24DIT turbo boxer + Lineartronic CVT has been in service since 2019 with a settled reliability profile, and Onyx trims add StarTex wipe-clean upholstery useful for messy loads; but Ascent is not a fleet vehicle, CVT under sustained heavy tow is unproven, and there is no heavy-duty variant.

Jobsite & upfit practicality60
#16 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard roof rails, cargo tie-downs, hitch receiver availability, and rear USB-C power are useful but modest for real work duty; there is no 120V household outlet, no bed, and Subaru's factory accessory ecosystem is small versus mainstream truck upfit options.

Long-distance comfort & range80
#48 of 148 in classCompare all →

~444-mile combined range from a 19.3-gal tank, comfortable and well-bolstered front seats, quiet cabin, and full-speed adaptive cruise with lane centering make it a strong mile-eater; the lack of hands-free assist and a slightly gruff engine note under load are the only real endurance limits.

Outdoor & adventure capability84
#14 of 148 in classCompare all →

8.7 in of ground clearance leads the mainstream three-row class (Grand Highlander 8.0, Palisade 7.9, Pilot 7.3), standard symmetrical AWD, dual-function X-MODE (Snow/Dirt + Deep Snow/Mud) with Hill Descent on upper trims, 5,000-lb tow for boats/trailers, and standard roof rails ready for a cargo box or bikes. Genuinely trail-competent for a family unibody three-row.

Gear & luggage flexibility74
#63 of 148 in classCompare all →

17.8 cu ft behind row three, ~47.5 behind row two, and ~86.5 max with everything folded — competitive but not best-in-class; standard roof rails (700-lb dynamic / 800-lb static capability), 60/40 third row, sliding second row, and 5,000-lb hitch capability give solid gear flexibility for camping and road-trip duty.

9Driving ExperienceMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.96C-
Handling & agility62
#116 of 148 in classCompare all →

Competent, secure handling for a three-row family SUV thanks to standard Symmetrical AWD and a low-mounted boxer engine, but body roll and steady-state understeer show its 4,600+ lb curb weight; not agile. Lands between Highlander (63) and Pilot (59.4) in the calibration set.

Steering feel58
#99 of 148 in classCompare all →

Electric power steering is accurately geared and light at parking speeds but delivers little on-center feedback or effort build-up mid-corner — typical numb family-SUV rack.

Braking confidence60
#130 of 148 in classCompare all →

Four-wheel discs deliver adequate stopping power for a mid-size three-row, but pedal is softer than segment leaders and published 70-0 mph stops are mid-pack (~180 ft range).

Powertrain smoothness & response57
#126 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 260-hp 2.4L turbo-boxer delivers strong midrange thrust (277 lb-ft at 2,000 rpm), but the Lineartronic CVT introduces elastic tip-in and holds high revs under load; simulated 'shift' steps mask but do not eliminate the rubber-band feel.

Drivetrain noise & vibration55
#122 of 148 in classCompare all →

The turbo-boxer plus CVT drone under acceleration is one of the Ascent's most consistently cited weaknesses; cruising refinement is fine, but wide-open-throttle noise is coarse and monotone. Placeholder value was too generous.

Turning circle
38.1 ft curb-to-curb
49/100
#54 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru publishes a 38.1 ft curb-to-curb turning diameter for the 2026 Ascent — mid-pack for a three-row mid-size SUV.

Driving position & ergonomics72
#86 of 148 in classCompare all →

One of the Ascent's genuine strengths: tall greenhouse, upright seating, excellent forward and quarter-window visibility, easy ingress, retained physical HVAC knobs, well-placed shifter and drive-mode controls.

Fun-to-drive factor55
#106 of 148 in classCompare all →

Family-hauler mission with numb steering, CVT drone, and modest chassis reward make this an appliance rather than a driver's SUV — not unpleasant, but nobody takes the long way home in one.

10Value & Market PositionMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.56C+
Standard equipment generosity72
#79 of 148 in classCompare all →

Base Ascent ships with content rivals charge extra for: standard Symmetrical AWD, EyeSight driver-assist suite (adaptive cruise, lane-keep, auto emergency braking), blind-spot monitoring, and 8-passenger seating with three-zone climate — Ford Explorer and Honda Pilot base FWD trims still charge extra for AWD.

Feature value per dollar72
#57 of 148 in classCompare all →

Solid content-per-dollar with all trims including AWD and full ADAS; loaded Touring lands well under a top Palisade Calligraphy or Telluride SX Prestige, but interior materials and infotainment tech per dollar trail those class benchmarks at the upper end.

Trim & configuration breadth72
#76 of 148 in classCompare all →

Six trims — Base, Premium, Onyx Edition, Limited, Touring, Onyx Edition Touring — spanning roughly $36k–$50k, with 7- or 8-passenger seating swaps and a black-trim off-road-leaning variant; single powertrain limits real configurability versus rivals offering hybrid or V6/turbo choices.

Sales popularity & market acceptance62
#88 of 148 in classCompare all →

Steady mid-pack seller in the 3-row class — historically ~55–65k US units/year, well below Palisade/Telluride/Grand Highlander volumes but respectable given Subaru's smaller dealer footprint and single-powertrain lineup.

Brand desirability & image74
#60 of 148 in classCompare all →

Subaru enjoys strong loyalty and a positive image around safety, all-weather capability, and outdoor lifestyle — halo that lifts the Ascent above brand-neutral perception, though it lacks the premium halo of Toyota/Honda for family haulers.

Deals & incentive availability62
#116 of 148 in classCompare all →

Modest but improving incentives typical for Subaru — occasional lease specials and financing programs, without heavy hood cash; Ascent generally transacts near MSRP but not at markup, with some negotiability at slower-moving trims.

Model freshness52
#114 of 148 in classCompare all →

Current generation launched for 2019 with a 2023 mid-cycle refresh; by MY2026 the platform is seven years old and outclassed by the newer Grand Highlander, refreshed Palisade, and next-gen Pilot — a redesign is expected in the near term.

Critical reception & awards65
#95 of 148 in classCompare all →

Well-reviewed for standard safety content, ride comfort, and AWD capability, but typically finishes mid-pack (5th–7th) in 3-row comparison tests behind Grand Highlander, Telluride, Palisade, and Pilot; IIHS Top Safety Pick+ is a repeat strength.