MotorGPA
Find My Match
Model year:2026+9 not yet gradedHistory & evolution ↓
Mitsubishi logo
Subcompact SUV

2026 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

EconomyGas
Manufacturer site ↗
0.78FGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
2.17C
Safety
0.79F
EfficiencyGas
1.70C-
26 MPG combined · 411 mi range · $2,350/yr energy
Comfort
0.22F
Value
1.55D
Ownership Cost
3.63A-
Technology
0.00F
Driving Experience
1.08D

The verdict

A struggling subcompact suv, strong on ownership and held back by performance.

The 2026 Outlander Sport is the cheapest way to put a brand-new all-wheel-drive SUV in your driveway — $24,995 before destination, with AWD standard on all seven trims and a 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty behind it. Everything else is the price of that bargain: a 148-hp engine that needs about 10.4 seconds to reach 60 mph, 26 MPG combined that trails every modern rival, 21.7 cu ft of cargo space that's among the smallest of any SUV, and a design that has been on sale essentially unchanged since 2011. There's no adaptive cruise, no lane-keeping assist, no wireless CarPlay, and no digital gauge cluster at any price. Buy it if the monthly payment and the warranty are what matter most and you accept a slow, loud, dated car in exchange; cross-shop almost anything else if they aren't.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Class-leading warranty coverage
  • The cheapest new SUV with standard all-wheel drive
  • Cheap to keep running

What holds it back

  • Genuinely slow, and noisy about it
  • Missing driver-assist features rivals include as standard
  • Technology stuck a decade behind

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Production history

2011present · 16 years · 1 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 12011now2011In production2026 — graded2025 — not yet graded2024 — not yet graded2023 — not yet graded2022 — not yet graded2021 — not yet graded2020 — not yet graded2019 — not yet graded2018 — not yet graded2017 — not yet gradedProduction began 2011
202642+9 not yet graded

Best fit & conditions

CommuterD53/100
Winter / inclementD52/100
FamilyF39/100
AdventureF39/100
Work / TowF28/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe Outlander Sport's lowest-graded category.0.00F
Horsepower
148 hp (2.0L; 168 hp with the 2.4L on SEL)
0/100
#140 of 148 in classCompare all →

Six of the seven 2026 trims (S, ES, LE, SE, Trail Edition, Ralliart) use the naturally aspirated 2.0-liter MIVEC four at 148 hp; only the SEL steps up to the 2.4-liter's 168 hp. Volume trims are 2.0L, and 148 hp falls below the bottom of the SUV normalization band.

Torque
145 lb-ft (2.0L; 167 lb-ft with the 2.4L on SEL)
4/100
#141 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.0-liter makes 145 lb-ft, barely above the 130 lb-ft floor of the SUV band; the SEL's 2.4-liter adds 22 lb-ft.

0–60 mph time
≈10.4 s (2.0L AWC; published tests range 10–12 s)
0/100
#145 of 148 in classCompare all →

With 148 hp hauling a ~3,300 lb all-wheel-drive crossover through a CVT, 0–60 lands around 10.4 seconds — slower than the 9.5 s bottom of the SUV band, so the item bottoms out. Reviewers uniformly call the acceleration inadequate for passing and short on-ramps.

Powertrain refinement38
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2.0-liter MIVEC four is an old, naturally aspirated design that gets loud and coarse whenever it is asked for anything, and there is no electrification to smooth the low end. Reviewers consistently flag engine noise and strained delivery rather than lag, placing it below the Honda HR-V in the same subcompact set.

Transmission behavior45
#147 of 148 in classCompare all →

The CVT is calibrated smoothly enough in light-throttle driving — U.S. News calls it 'pretty smooth and relatively unobtrusive' — but with only 148 hp to work with it holds high revs under load and produces the classic drone, plus a low-frequency hum at steady highway speed. Six pre-programmed ratios are available but there is no genuine manual-mode satisfaction.

Max towing capacity
Not rated for towing
0/100
#131 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mitsubishi publishes no US tow rating for the Outlander Sport and offers no factory hitch — the CVT is not rated for trailer duty. This is a genuine zero-capability reading, not missing data.

AWD/4WD availability78
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

For 2026 Mitsubishi made All-Wheel Control standard across all seven trims — front-drive is gone — making this the cheapest standard-AWD SUV on sale at $24,995. The driver-selectable 2WD / 4WD Auto / 4WD Lock system with Active Stability Control and Hill Start Assist is more than most subcompact rivals offer, though it stops short of low range or true torque vectoring.

Off-road capability52
#52 of 148 in classCompare all →

8.5 inches of standard ground clearance is genuinely good for a subcompact crossover and the 4WD Lock mode helps in snow and on loose surfaces, but that is the extent of it: no skid plates, no locking differential, no all-terrain rubber, and modest approach/departure angles. The Trail Edition is a cosmetic package — black wheels, black lower body and mirrors, a hood decal — with no added hardware.

Powertrain lineup breadth34
#93 of 148 in classCompare all →

Two engines nominally, but they are variants of the same naturally aspirated MIVEC four paired with the same CVT, and the 2.4-liter is walled off in the single top SEL trim. No turbo, no hybrid, no PHEV and no EV — a notable gap given the Outlander PHEV sits in the same showroom.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Outlander Sport's strongest categories.1.70C-
Combined fuel economy
26 MPG combined (2.0L AWC volume trim); 25 MPG (2.4L SEL)
59/100
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Outlander Sport carries over the 148-hp 2.0L MIVEC four with a CVT and — new for the current lineup — All-Wheel Control standard on every trim, so there is no thriftier FWD configuration to quote. 26 MPG combined is well below the subcompact-SUV field, where non-hybrid rivals sit at 29–30 and hybrids clear 40.

City fuel economy
23 MPG city (2.0L AWC volume trim; 2.4L SEL also 23)
56/100
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

23 MPG city is near the bottom of the subcompact-SUV class — a consequence of standard AWD on a 15-year-old GA-platform design with no start-stop hybrid assist. Hybrid rivals (Kona Hybrid, Corolla Cross Hybrid, Niro) roughly double it in city driving.

Highway fuel economy
29 MPG hwy (2.0L AWC volume trim); 28 MPG (2.4L SEL)
56/100
#75 of 148 in classCompare all →

29 MPG highway is the vehicle's best showing and mid-pack rather than poor — the low-output 2.0L and tall CVT gearing hold up at steady cruise even with the AWC hardware attached.

Driving range
~411 mi combined (15.8-gal tank × 26 MPG); ~458 mi hwy, ~363 mi city
41/100
#64 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 15.8-gallon tank paired with 26 MPG combined yields roughly 411 miles between fills — a genuinely competitive figure, because the relatively large tank offsets the mediocre economy. Highway range stretches to about 458 miles.

Estimated annual fuel cost
~$2,350/yr (2.0L AWC volume trim); ~$2,400/yr (2.4L SEL)
52/100
#78 of 148 in classCompare all →

At EPA's standard assumptions — 15,000 mi/yr, 55% city / 45% highway, $3.99/gal regular — the 23/29 MPG ratings burn roughly 590 gallons a year, about $2,350. That is $150–$400 more per year than the class-leading non-hybrids and roughly double a Corolla Cross Hybrid's bill.

Fuel requirements90
#19 of 148 in classCompare all →

Runs on 87-octane regular unleaded with no premium requirement, no diesel or E85 complication, and no charging hardware to install — the cheapest and simplest fuel spec available. It does not reach the very top of the band only because the poor economy means more visits to that cheap pump.

3SafetyGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.79F
NHTSA overall rating
4 stars overall (4 frontal / 5 side / 4 rollover)
50/100
#91 of 148 in classCompare all →

NHTSA rates the carryover Outlander Sport 4 stars overall — 4 stars frontal, 5 stars side, 4 stars rollover (16.9% rollover probability). Replaces the placeholder 3.8-star estimate with the real tested figure.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness52
#122 of 148 in classCompare all →

Crashworthiness results are mostly Good but were earned under IIHS's retired test protocols; the Outlander Sport has never been a Top Safety Pick and has not been run through the updated moderate-overlap or updated side tests that now gate the award.

Standard ADAS suite breadth34
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard content on the volume ES is limited to Forward Collision Mitigation with pedestrian detection, lane departure warning and automatic high beams. Adaptive cruise and lane-keeping assist are not offered on any trim, and blind-spot warning with rear cross-traffic alert is reserved for SE/SEL — a bottom-of-class suite for a 2026 subcompact SUV.

Automatic emergency braking performance55
#136 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS rated the standard front crash prevention system Superior for vehicle-to-vehicle under the original low/moderate-speed protocol, and pedestrian detection is included, but the system has never been evaluated under the current pedestrian or higher-speed front crash prevention tests.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage40
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

Blind Spot Warning with Lane Change Assist and Rear Cross Traffic Alert are alert-only and unavailable on the S, ES and LE trims that carry the model's volume — buyers must move up to SE or SEL to get coverage that rivals include as standard.

Lane keeping & centering25
#147 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Outlander Sport offers lane departure warning only — an audible/visual alert with no steering intervention. There is no lane keep assist and no lane centering on any trim.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist20
#147 of 148 in classCompare all →

Conventional fixed-speed cruise control is the only option — adaptive cruise is not available on any 2026 Outlander Sport trim, and Mitsubishi's MI-PILOT Assist highway-assist package is exclusive to the larger Outlander.

Hands-free driving availability20
#51 of 148 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway driving system is offered — Mitsubishi markets nothing comparable to BlueCruise or Super Cruise, and the Outlander Sport lacks even the adaptive cruise and lane centering such a system would build on.

Headlight performance45
#139 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS has rated multiple headlight variants on this generation and none reached Good, with the volume-trim units landing in the Marginal-to-Acceptable range; standard automatic high beams across the 2026 lineup partly offset the weak low-beam reach.

Outward visibility50
#142 of 148 in classCompare all →

Upright glass and a high seating position help forward sightlines, but thick oblong rear roof pillars and a small rear window restrict the view aft, and camera compensation stops at the federally mandated backup camera on volume trims — a 360-degree view is confined to upper trims.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability60
#135 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the LATCH hardware Acceptable — two full sets of lower anchors for the outboard positions plus three tether anchors — but the short 105.1-inch wheelbase means rear-facing seats squeeze the front occupants and three-across is impractical.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Outlander Sport's weakest categories.0.22F
Seating capacity
5 seats (two rows, every trim)
25/100
#52 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Outlander Sport is a two-row subcompact SUV seating five on every trim from S through Trail Edition — no third row or six-seat configuration is offered.

Front headroom
39.4 in (front, without sunroof)
48/100
#110 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front headroom of 39.4 in is mid-pack for the SUV band and generous for the subcompact class — the tall, boxy greenhouse of this long-running design is one of its genuine strengths.

Front legroom
41.6 in (front)
36/100
#69 of 148 in classCompare all →

41.6 in of front legroom sits in the lower-middle of the SUV band — adequate for most drivers but short of the 43-in-plus figures posted by newer subcompact rivals.

Rear headroom
37.9 in (second row)
47/100
#127 of 148 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom of 37.9 in benefits from the upright roofline; the rear bench is the one place the aging packaging still measures competitively.

Rear legroom
36.3 in (second row)
52/100
#120 of 148 in classCompare all →

36.3 in of second-row legroom is above the middle of the SUV band and among the better numbers in the subcompact segment — the 105.1-in wheelbase is spent on passengers rather than cargo.

Third-row usability6
#136 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Outlander Sport has no third row and never has — it is a strictly two-row, five-seat subcompact SUV, so this item scores at the floor. Buyers needing seven seats are pushed to the larger Outlander, which is a different vehicle on a different platform.

Cargo/trunk volume
21.7 cu ft behind the second row
0/100
#113 of 148 in classCompare all →

At 21.7 cu ft behind the rear seats the Outlander Sport falls below the 25 cu ft floor of the SUV normalization band, so it scores zero — the short body trades cargo depth for the rear legroom above, and it is one of the smallest holds of any SUV in the dataset.

Max cargo volume
49.5 cu ft with the rear seats folded
0/100
#122 of 148 in classCompare all →

Maximum cargo of 49.5 cu ft with the 60/40 bench folded is also below the SUV band floor of 55 cu ft, scoring zero. It undercuts even close rivals like the HR-V (55.1) and Crosstrek (54.7) that already bottom out this item.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions48
#143 of 148 in classCompare all →

Storage is the plain, dated basics — a modest center console bin, small cupholders, unlined door pockets and a shallow glovebox, with no underfloor cargo bin, fold-flat front passenger seat, or onboard power beyond a 12V outlet and USB ports. Nothing is missing outright, but nothing is clever either, and the 2011-era console layout wastes space newer rivals exploit.

Seat comfort50
#145 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front seats are supportive if plain, but reviewers describe the leather-trimmed versions as hard and inflexible, and consumer reviews single out the cushions as uncomfortable on longer drives. Adjustability is limited — power adjustment is driver-only and confined to upper trims, with no lumbar on lower trims — and the flat rear bench offers little thigh support.

Ride quality42
#145 of 148 in classCompare all →

The suspension is the vehicle's weakest comfort trait: harsh over sharp bumps yet floaty over smooth undulations, with the body wandering on the highway and over rough surfaces. Reviewers explicitly fault it for lacking the compliance of newer subcompact rivals — a consequence of a chassis that has run largely unchanged since 2011.

Cabin quietness38
#145 of 148 in classCompare all →

One of the loudest cabins in the segment. Reviewers report plenty of engine and wind noise at highway speed, with traffic and road-surface roar plus audibly loud climate-control fans; the CVT is smooth but lets the four-cylinder drone under load. There is no acoustic glass or active noise cancellation to offset it.

Climate & comfort features48
#144 of 148 in classCompare all →

Automatic climate control is standard across the lineup and heated front seats plus a heated steering wheel are available, but only from the LE trim upward — base S/ES buyers get manual comfort basics. There are no ventilated seats, no rear-seat climate vents or second-row zone, and no remote pre-conditioning, leaving the equipment list thin against subcompact rivals that bundle more in.

5Cost of OwnershipThe Outlander Sport's best-graded category.3.63A-
Base MSRP
$26,590 (2026 Outlander Sport 2.0 S, $24,995 + $1,595 destination)
96/100
#8 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Outlander Sport opens at $24,995 before a $1,595 destination charge, making it one of the cheapest new SUVs on sale in the US and near the bottom of the entire SUV normalization band. Price is the model's single strongest ownership argument against much newer rivals.

Volume-Trim Price
$30,190 delivered (SE 2.0; ES 2.0 is $28,190 and All-Wheel Control adds roughly $2,000)
92/100
#11 of 148 in classCompare all →

The mid-pack SE — the trim reviewers point to as the value pick for adding heated seats, upgraded trim and extra driver aids — lands at $28,595 plus $1,595 destination, or about $30,190 as typically equipped. Even a well-equipped Outlander Sport stays under the price of a base compact SUV, and the whole seven-trim ladder tops out around $33,000.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
≈$4,200 over 5 years / ~$840 per year (maintenance plus out-of-pocket repairs)
82/100
#17 of 148 in classCompare all →

A naturally aspirated 2.0-liter four with a CVT, cheap parts and long service intervals keeps scheduled maintenance modest, and the first two years/30,000 miles are covered by Mitsubishi at no charge. Repair exposure in the window is unusually low because the 5-year/60,000-mile bumper-to-bumper warranty spans nearly the entire five years, where most rivals' basic coverage ends at 3 years/36,000 miles.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
≈51% of MSRP retained after 5 years (below the ~62% subcompact-SUV average)
37/100
#53 of 148 in classCompare all →

Depreciation is the item that undoes much of the low purchase price. The Outlander Sport gives back value faster than its class average — a consequence of a design dating to 2011, heavy incentive support, and Mitsubishi's thin brand equity — and KBB lists weak resale outright as a drawback of the 2026 car.

Basic warranty
5 years / 60,000 miles bumper-to-bumper
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mitsubishi's 5-year/60,000-mile New Vehicle Limited Warranty tops the SUV normalization band and beats the 3-year/36,000-mile coverage of nearly every mainstream rival, including the HR-V, Crosstrek and Corolla Cross this car is cross-shopped against.

Powertrain warranty
10 years / 100,000 miles powertrain (original owner)
100/100
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty is the ceiling of the band and matches Hyundai/Kia for the longest coverage in the industry — meaningful reassurance on a CVT-equipped car. It applies to the original owner only; later owners get the balance of the 5-year/60,000-mile basic coverage.

Complimentary maintenance & perks78
#17 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mitsubishi Motors Confidence bundles two years/30,000 miles of complimentary scheduled maintenance (three services covering oil and filter, tire rotations, cabin filter and inspections) with 5 years of unlimited-mileage roadside assistance — a genuinely strong package for a sub-$27,000 SUV. It stops short of the top band because the maintenance period is two years rather than three-plus and the connected-services trial is short and limited to upper trims.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$18,993 (≈$14,793 depreciation + $4,200 maintenance)
80/100
#11 of 148 in classCompare all →

$30,190 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (51% retained, or about $15,397) leaves about $14,793 in depreciation. Add the projected $4,200 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $18,993 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Outlander Sport's strongest categories.2.17C
Predicted reliability66
#56 of 148 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports expects about-average reliability for the 2026 Outlander Sport, and RepairPal rates it 4.0/5.0 (7th of 26 in its class) with low repair severity and frequency. A 2026 model that is a straight carryover of a design in continuous production since 2011 carries essentially no new-model risk, which is the main thing propping this score above the Mitsubishi brand average.

Brand reliability track record52
#107 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mitsubishi finished near the bottom of J.D. Power's 2025 Vehicle Dependability Study at 256 PP100 (industry average roughly 200), and Consumer Reports has repeatedly lacked enough model coverage to rank the brand at all, telling shoppers to 'keep an extra close eye' on it. RepairPal's cost-weighted view is far kinder (Mitsubishi 4.0/5.0, 6th of 32 brands), so the signals conflict rather than converge on bottom-third.

Recall & TSB history72
#16 of 148 in classCompare all →

Recent Mitsubishi recall activity has centered on the larger Outlander and Outlander PHEV — the 25V369 rearview-camera software campaign (2022-2024 Outlander, 2023-2025 Outlander PHEV) and the liftgate gas-spring corrosion recall expanded in April 2026 to 102,815 2014-2020 Outlanders — none of which touch the Outlander Sport. The Sport's own 862 lifetime NHTSA complaints are concentrated in the mid-2010s cars; the current-spec years are quiet.

Powertrain durability reputation58
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2.0L MIVEC four (148 hp, six of seven trims) is a simple, long-proven naturally aspirated engine with a good high-mileage record, and the 168-hp 2.4L in the SEL is equally well understood. The CVT is the liability: 288 of the model's 862 NHTSA complaints are transmission-related — shudder, hesitation, overheating and outright failure, worst on 2014-2016 cars and the subject of a December 2021 class action — though later units improved and the 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty backs the risk.

Interior material quality45
#147 of 148 in classCompare all →

A cabin architecture unchanged in substance since 2011 means hard plastics nearly everywhere and switchgear that reviewers uniformly describe as outdated — well behind the Corolla Cross, HR-V and Seltos on perceived quality. The ergonomics are sound and controls are clearly marked, which keeps it out of the very bottom band, but nothing here reads as competitive for the money by 2026 standards.

Fit & finish62
#114 of 148 in classCompare all →

Fifteen model years of continuous production have wrung the assembly variability out of this body — reviewers call it sturdy, and rattle/misalignment complaints are not a theme in the Outlander Sport's NHTSA record the way transmission complaints are. Cheap materials cap how solid it can feel, but the pieces are consistently put together.

Dealer & service network55
#124 of 148 in classCompare all →

Coverage is thin and getting thinner: roughly 297 US Mitsubishi dealers as of early 2026, down 56 net since 2019 — the third-largest net loss among mainstream brands — which leaves real geographic holes for service. What offsets it is service satisfaction: Mitsubishi topped the mass-market segment of J.D. Power's Customer Service Index at 884, so owners who can reach a store tend to be treated well.

Parts availability & repair cost78
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

Running costs are a genuine strength — $498 average annual repair and maintenance against $521 for the segment and $652 fleet-wide, with RepairPal rating both severity and frequency of repairs below average. Fifteen years of one basic design means parts are commodity items and widely cross-compatible, and the 2-year/30,000-mile complimentary maintenance plus 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain coverage shift more of the early bills off the owner.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Outlander Sport's weakest categories.0.00F
Touchscreen size
8.0 in (standard on all seven trims for 2026)
12/100
#140 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 8.0-inch Smartphone Link Display Audio unit is now standard across the whole 2026 range — the S and ES gave up their 7-inch screen for it — but 8.0 inches is the smallest center display of any 2026 subcompact SUV and there is no larger screen offered at any price.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness44
#147 of 148 in classCompare all →

Smartphone Link Display Audio is a low-resolution, slow, visually dated unit that reviewers describe as 'very basic' — the software is essentially the 2011 architecture with a bigger panel bolted on. Retained hard buttons and a real volume knob keep it from being genuinely frustrating, and standard CarPlay/Android Auto means most owners never touch the native menus, which is the only reason it clears the bottom of the band.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto47
#140 of 148 in classCompare all →

The real 2026 story is that wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto finally became standard on every trim including the base S — previously an upper-trim feature. Wireless projection, though, is not offered on any trim at any price, which puts it below rivals like the HR-V that at least offer it on a top trim and well behind a Trax or Kicks where wireless is standard.

Voice control & native navigation30
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

There is no factory navigation on any 2026 Outlander Sport trim — mapping exists only if you plug in a phone — and the native voice function is a basic Bluetooth command set for phone and audio rather than anything resembling a natural-language assistant. Siri and Google Assistant work through the projection interface, so the capability is not absent, but none of it is the vehicle's own.

Audio system quality36
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

Four speakers on the S, ES, LE, Trail Edition and Ralliart and six on the SE and SEL, with no branded premium system offered anywhere in the 2026 range — the nine-speaker 710-watt Rockford Fosgate setup that used to headline the top trim is gone from current listings. A four-speaker base system is below where even budget rivals start.

Digital instrument cluster25
#144 of 148 in classCompare all →

Analog dials with a small multi-information display between them, unchanged in concept since 2011 — no configurable digital cluster is available on any trim, not even the $29,695 SEL. This is one of the few remaining 2026 vehicles with no digital gauge option at all, where the class norm is at least a partial TFT.

OTA update capability12
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Outlander Sport carries no telematics control unit, so there is no over-the-air path of any kind — not vehicle software, not infotainment, not maps (there are no maps). Any update means a dealer visit. This is a hardware absence rather than a policy choice, and it is the single biggest gap between this car and everything else in the segment.

Companion app & remote functions15
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

The My Mitsubishi Connect app does not support the Outlander Sport, so there is no remote start, lock/unlock, vehicle locator, digital key or status check from a phone — the functions the rest of the class treats as table stakes simply do not exist here. Owners are limited to key-fob range, and the fob-based remote start is only fitted on upper trims.

Charging ports & device power26
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

The base S and ES give you exactly one front USB-A port; rear USB ports are new for 2026 but only from LE upward. There is no USB-C anywhere in the vehicle, no wireless charging pad on any trim, and no household outlet — a USB-A-only car in 2026 is a genuine daily annoyance for anyone with a modern phone.

Keyless & remote access44
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

FAST-Key proximity entry with push-button start arrives only at the SE trim, leaving the volume S, ES and LE on a conventional key — where most of the class now makes push-button start standard. There is no power or hands-free liftgate and no phone-as-key, and with no telematics unit the remote functions that do exist are fob-only.

Camera & parking aids33
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

A federally mandated rear camera is the whole of it — the image is low-resolution by current standards, no 360-degree Multi-View system is offered on any trim (that stays exclusive to the larger Outlander), and front/rear parking sensors and any parking automation are absent from the 2026 range.

Head-up display availability10
#144 of 148 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered on the 2026 Outlander Sport on any trim or in any package. Mitsubishi does sell a HUD, but only on the larger Outlander, where it is optional on the SEL and standard on the top two trims.

8Use-Case FitGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.64F
Kid & car-seat practicality48
#144 of 148 in classCompare all →

The hardware basics are there — two full sets of outboard lower anchors plus three tether points, IIHS-rated Acceptable, an upright roofline and wide-opening rear doors on a low-sill body — but the logistics around them are poor. The 105.1-in wheelbase means a rear-facing seat pushes the front occupants forward, three-across is impractical, and 21.7 cu ft behind the bench is one of the smallest holds in the SUV dataset, so a stroller plus a grocery run is already a squeeze. There is no power liftgate, no underfloor bin, and rear USB ports only from LE upward.

Family safety package33
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is the weakest family-safety proposition among 2026 subcompact SUVs. NHTSA gives 4 stars overall rather than 5, IIHS has never awarded the model a Top Safety Pick, and the trims families actually buy — S, ES and LE — get only forward collision mitigation, lane departure warning and auto high beams. Blind-spot warning and rear cross-traffic alert require stepping up to SE or SEL, adaptive cruise and lane-keeping assist are unavailable at any price, and there is no rear-occupant reminder.

Family road-trip comfort32
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

Second-row space is the one bright spot — 36.3 in of legroom and 37.9 in of headroom are competitive for the class — but everything around it undermines a multi-hour trip with a full car. Reviewers single out a very noisy cabin and a ride that is choppy over sharp bumps yet wanders on the highway, the seats are described as hard on longer drives, and there are no rear climate vents, no second-row zone, no rear entertainment and no rear USB below LE. With four aboard, 21.7 cu ft leaves little room for a family's luggage.

Daily driving ease48
#145 of 148 in classCompare all →

Light controls, a compact footprint, a high seating position and a CVT that U.S. News calls 'pretty smooth and relatively unobtrusive' make the low-speed crawl undemanding. What costs it is fatigue rather than clumsiness: 148 hp through a CVT makes merging and on-ramps a noisy, strained event, the cabin is among the loudest in the segment, the ride is choppy, and there is no adaptive cruise anywhere in the range to take the edge off stop-and-go. Push-button start does not appear until SE.

Commuting cost efficiency52
#98 of 148 in classCompare all →

Fuel is the weak half and consumables are the strong half. At 23/29/26 MPG the Outlander Sport is near the bottom of the subcompact class — roughly $2,350 a year at EPA assumptions, $150–$400 more than the thriftiest non-hybrid rivals and about double a Corolla Cross Hybrid — but it drinks regular 87-octane, RepairPal puts annual repair and maintenance at $498 against a $521 segment average, and Mitsubishi covers the first two years/30,000 miles of scheduled service. Net result is an average-cost commuter, not a cheap one.

Parking & maneuverability62
#87 of 148 in classCompare all →

The best use case the car has. At 171.9 in long and 71.3 in wide with a 34.8-ft turning circle it slots into city spaces easily, and the upright glasshouse plus high hip point gives good forward and three-quarter sightlines. It falls short of the top band because the view aft is genuinely restricted by thick oblong rear pillars and a small rear window, and the camera help stops at a low-resolution federally mandated backup camera — no 360-degree Multi-View, no front or rear parking sensors, and no parking automation on any 2026 trim.

Work capability18
#146 of 148 in classCompare all →

Effectively no work capability. Mitsubishi publishes no US tow rating for the Outlander Sport and offers no factory hitch — the CVT is not rated for trailer duty — while its stablemates the Outlander (2,000 lbs) and Eclipse Cross (1,500 lbs) both are. Cargo is 21.7 cu ft behind the bench and 49.5 cu ft folded, below the SUV normalization floor at both measures, and 148 hp through a CVT is already strained unloaded. Standard AWD and 8.5 in of clearance mean it can reach an unpaved jobsite; it cannot carry or pull anything once there.

Durability for work duty45
#90 of 148 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.0L MIVEC four is a simple, long-proven design with a good high-mileage record, fifteen unbroken model years have wrung the assembly variability out of the body, cheap hard-plastic-and-cloth interiors tolerate abuse, and the 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty backs it. The CVT is what holds the score down: 288 of the model's 862 NHTSA complaints are transmission-related, covering shudder, hesitation, overheating and outright failure — exactly the failure mode hard duty provokes. There is no fleet or commercial track record to point to.

Jobsite & upfit practicality25
#139 of 148 in classCompare all →

Provisions are close to nonexistent. Onboard power is a single 12V outlet and USB-A ports — no USB-C, no wireless charging, no household outlet on any trim — and there is no factory hitch, no bed or upfit ecosystem, no washable-floor option and nothing beyond basic cargo-area hooks for tie-downs. What keeps it off the floor is the factory roof rails, which take Mitsubishi accessory crossbars and a roof box or ladder rack, plus dealer cargo mats.

Long-distance comfort & range30
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

Range is the one asset — a 15.8-gallon tank at 29 MPG highway gives roughly 458 miles between stops, better than several thriftier rivals with smaller tanks. Everything else about the interstate is poor: the cabin is among the loudest in the segment from engine, wind and tire noise, the chassis wanders on the highway and over rough surfaces, the seats are described as hard and inflexible over distance, and with no adaptive cruise, no lane centering and no hands-free system there is nothing to reduce driver load over a long day.

Outdoor & adventure capability58
#98 of 148 in classCompare all →

The genuine story for 2026 is that All-Wheel Control became standard on all seven trims, making this the cheapest standard-AWD SUV on sale, and the driver-selectable 2WD / 4WD Auto / 4WD Lock system paired with 8.5 in of ground clearance handles snow, gravel and forest-service roads better than most subcompact crossovers. It stops there: no low range, no locking differential, no skid plates, no all-terrain tires, no tow rating for a trailer or teardrop, and no 120V outlet for camping. The Trail Edition is a cosmetic package — black wheels, black lower body and mirrors, a hood decal — with no added hardware.

Gear & luggage flexibility34
#147 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 60/40 split-folding bench and factory roof rails that accept crossbars, a roof box or a bike carrier cover the basics, but the hold itself is the smallest in the SUV dataset — 21.7 cu ft behind the seats and 49.5 cu ft folded, both under the segment normalization floors and behind even the HR-V (55.1) and Crosstrek (54.7) that already bottom out. There is no underfloor bin, no adjustable cargo floor, no fold-flat front passenger seat, no power liftgate, and with no tow rating or factory hitch a hitch-mounted cargo tray or bike rack is an aftermarket workaround rather than a supported option.

9Driving ExperienceGrades below the middle of the scale.1.08D
Handling & agility38
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 car still rides on the GS platform architecture Mitsubishi launched in 2011, and no chassis work accompanied this year's standard-AWD and 8-inch-screen updates. Reviewers describe stiff damping that makes it skittish over bumpy corners without controlling body roll, and poor composure in emergency maneuvers — clearly behind newer subcompacts like the Trailblazer and Kona, and behind Mitsubishi's own Eclipse Cross.

Steering feel35
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

The electric rack is light and vague with almost no on-center definition, so the car wanders and needs constant small corrections at highway speed. This is the single weakest dynamic trait and sits in the 0–49 'vague, inconsistent, overly light' band.

Braking confidence42
#147 of 148 in classCompare all →

Stopping power is adequate for a 3,120-lb crossover, but the pedal is soft and long-travel and the chassis is unsettled under hard braking, with heavy nosedive and lateral wiggle. No instrumented 60–0 figure is published for the current car; the qualitative record is consistent across model years.

Powertrain smoothness & response45
#146 of 148 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.0-liter/CVT combination is smooth and unobtrusive at light throttle — there is no lag, shudder or rough stop/start to fault — but with 148 hp the calibration defaults to holding high revs the moment more than gentle throttle is asked for, and response to a demand for passing power is poor. Consistent with the 38/45 already recorded for cat1 powertrain refinement and transmission behavior.

Drivetrain noise & vibration35
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

The old 2.0-liter four is coarse and loud whenever it is loaded, and CVT calibration parks it at high revs, producing sustained drone; there is little sound deadening to absorb it. Matches the 38 recorded for cabin quietness in cat4.

Turning circle
34.8 ft curb-to-curb (17.4 ft radius)
90/100
#6 of 148 in classCompare all →

At 34.8 ft curb-to-curb on a 105.1-inch wheelbase, the Outlander Sport sits essentially at the bottom of the SUV band and is genuinely easy to park and U-turn — the clearest strength in this category and the one thing the old, small platform gives back.

Driving position & ergonomics68
#111 of 148 in classCompare all →

The upright body gives a commanding seating position with good outward sightlines, and the physical climate and audio controls are straightforward — the new-for-2026 8-inch touchscreen does not bury basic functions. Adjustment range is the limit: the volume trims get a manual driver's seat without power lumbar, and front legroom is only average despite the 41.6-inch figure.

Fun-to-drive factor30
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

A ~10.4-second 0–60, numb steering, droning CVT and no chassis reward add up to pure appliance duty; the Ralliart trim added for 2026 is a trim-and-badge package with no powertrain or suspension changes, so none of the rally heritage it invokes reaches the driving experience.

10Value & Market PositionGrades below the middle of the scale.1.55D
Standard equipment generosity61
#140 of 148 in classCompare all →

The headline inclusion is All-Wheel Control on every trim including the $24,995 S — no other new SUV in America includes AWD at that price — and 2026 finally makes the 8-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto standard on S and ES, closing the car's most-criticized base-spec gap. Against that, the base car still ships with 16-inch steel wheels and covers, a four-speaker stereo, one front USB-A port, manual seat adjustment, and a driver-assist suite limited to forward collision mitigation and lane departure warning (no blind-spot monitoring or adaptive cruise until higher trims), so content outside the drivetrain is thin. Net: genuinely generous on the one thing rivals charge for, merely competitive elsewhere.

Feature value per dollar71
#66 of 148 in classCompare all →

Purely on dollars, this is the car's strongest argument: the cheapest standard-AWD SUV on sale, a whole seven-trim range that tops out under $30,000 before destination, a 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain and 5-year/60,000-mile basic warranty matched only by Hyundai and Kia, and two years/30,000 miles of included maintenance — consistent with the 96/92/100/100 already recorded in cat5 for base price, volume-trim price, and both warranties. It falls short of the 80+ band because what the dollars buy is dated: 148 hp, 26 mpg combined that trails every modern rival, a cat7 technology score of 29, and a 5-year residual scored 37 that hands back much of the up-front saving at trade-in.

Trim & configuration breadth62
#115 of 148 in classCompare all →

Seven trims — S, ES, LE, SE, Ralliart, Trail Edition, SEL — is an above-average count for a subcompact SUV and gives buyers plenty of price steps. The breadth is shallower than the count suggests, though: the whole range spans just $4,450, there is one transmission and one drivetrain (AWD only, so no cheaper FWD entry point), Ralliart and Trail Edition are essentially appearance packages over the same mechanicals, and the only powertrain choice in the lineup is the 2.4-liter locked to the single top trim. No hybrid or electrified option at all.

Sales popularity & market acceptance64
#82 of 148 in classCompare all →

Trajectory is the story: 20,508 units in the first half of 2026 already beat the entire 2025 calendar year (20,479), with Q2 up 69.7% year over year, making this 15-year-old design Mitsubishi's second-best seller and a major prop under the brand's US volume. Absolute strength is only mid-pack, however — an annualized ~41,000 units leaves it well behind subcompact leaders like the Trax, HR-V, Corolla Cross and Crosstrek, and the surge reads as a cheap-AWD demand spike in a rising-price market rather than broad market preference for the product.

Brand desirability & image40
#143 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mitsubishi is the smallest mainstream brand in the US with a correspondingly thin dealer and service footprint (scored 55 in cat6), and carries no image halo that helps this car — the Ralliart badge is a nameplate borrowed from a performance era two decades gone. The clearest market verdict is residual value, which sits at the bottom of the segment and is the direct financial cost of weak brand pull. The brand is not toxic — the class-leading warranty gives buyers a rational reason to take the risk — but it drags rather than lifts, consistent with the 38 recorded for the Outlander.

Deals & incentive availability80
#42 of 148 in classCompare all →

Buyers do well here. Mitsubishi supports the car with 0% APR for 60 months, stackable $750 loyalty and $500 military cash, advertised 4.99% APR alternatives, and lease programs seen as low as $249-262/month for 39 months — real, ongoing support rather than one-off clearance pricing, and dealers negotiate freely with no market-adjustment premium. Scored for buyer benefit as the item directs; the one restraint on a higher score is that the 2026 sales surge has firmed up transaction prices somewhat versus the deep discounting of prior years.

Model freshness14
#148 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is the worst freshness case in the entire catalog. The current GS-platform generation launched as a 2011 model and is still here 15 model years later — among the oldest designs on sale in the US — with only facelifts in 2016 and 2020 and a single 2026 change of consequence, the now-standard 8-inch touchscreen. Replacement is confirmed rather than speculative: Automotive News reports Mitsubishi will replace it for 2027 with a model derived from the Xforce, so a 2026 buyer is purchasing the final year of a design that will be two generations behind almost immediately.

Critical reception & awards29
#146 of 148 in classCompare all →

The professional verdict is close to unanimous and unfavorable: KBB places it dead last in its subcompact SUV ranking, U.S. News scores it 6.5/10 for 17th in class, and Edmunds' summary is that every rival is newer, more refined and better to drive. There are no comparison-test wins, no NACTOY or 10Best recognition, and no IIHS Top Safety Pick to point to (cat3 crashworthiness scored 52). It sits in the bottom-of-comparisons band, lifted slightly off the floor only because owner ratings are middling rather than damning and reviewers consistently credit the price and warranty.