The verdict
A struggling sports car, strong on value and held back by use-case.
Overall 1.80 (C-) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is value & market position at 3.08 (B), its weakest use-case fit at 0.12 (F). 4 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.
Jump to scoresStrengths
- Value & Market Position
- Driving Experience
- Performance & Powertrain
What holds it back
- Use-Case Fit
- Technology & Infotainment
- Safety
Top alternatives
Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Ford Mustang
1.92C-
Nissan ZSports CarBetter at: AgilitySimilar money buys a twin-turbo V6 with a manual in a lighter, more compact package that's easier to live with on tight roads.
Compare
2.30C+
Toyota GR SupraSports CarBetter at: HandlingA sharper, more precise chassis for drivers who value handling balance over V8 torque and sound.
Compare
2.88B-
BMW 4 SeriesLuxury CoupeBetter at: All-weather usabilityAvailable all-wheel drive, a much nicer interior, and modern highway assist make it the better everyday car in any climate.
CompareHow it's evolved
10 scored model years · 2017–2026
Subject scores by year
Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.
| Year | Performance | Efficiency | Safety | Space | Cost | Reliability | Tech | Use-case | Driving | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 74 | 37 | 55 | 51 | 49 | 73 | 71 | 37 | 71 | 78 |
| 2025 | 73 | 37 | 55 | 51 | 50 | 72 | 71 | 37 | 70 | 79 |
| 2024 | 73 | 37 | 55 | 51 | 52 | 67 | 70 | 37 | 71 | 79 |
| 2023 | 73 | 33 | 52 | 50 | 51 | 70 | 57 | 37 | 71 | 69 |
| 2022 | 73 | 31 | 62 | 49 | 47 | 73 | 55 | 36 | 71 | 68 |
| 2021 | 73 | 34 | 54 | 51 | 53 | 73 | 52 | 37 | 71 | 71 |
| 2020 | 73 | 11 | 54 | 52 | 49 | 72 | 48 | 36 | 72 | 77 |
| 2019 | 73 | 37 | 48 | 50 | 56 | 72 | 51 | 35 | 73 | 76 |
| 2018 | 73 | 32 | 56 | 50 | 51 | 68 | 51 | 34 | 70 | 76 |
| 2017 | 68 | 38 | 38 | 50 | 51 | 66 | 37 | 32 | 68 | 75 |
Compare two years
Best fit & conditions
Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →
Subject profile
Trims & configurations
3 trimsScores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:
Detailed scoring by subject
1Performance & PowertrainOne of the Mustang's strongest categories.2.58C+
2017 GT's Gen-2 Coyote 5.0L V8 is rated 435 hp at 6,500 rpm (unchanged from 2015 launch spec; the 460-hp refresh with port+direct injection arrived for 2018). Lineup includes the 300-hp V6, 310-hp 2.3L EcoBoost, and the 526-hp flat-plane Shelby GT350/GT350R.
GT 5.0 Coyote delivers 400 lb-ft at 4,250 rpm; the 2.3L EcoBoost turbo four makes 320 lb-ft that arrives low in the rev range for surprising real-world grunt.
Independent instrumented tests put the 2017 Mustang GT at 4.3–4.5 s to 60 mph; Motor Trend logged 4.4 s for the 6-speed manual GT. EcoBoost lands in the mid-5s and the halo Shelby GT350 breaks 4 seconds.
The Gen-2 Coyote 5.0 is smooth, torquey, and rev-happy — reviewers uniformly praised its throttle response and V8 character, though it lags the 2018+ Gen-3 (port+DI, higher redline) in top-end urgency. The 2.3L EcoBoost delivers strong midrange but gets coarse and thrashy near redline, and the base 3.7 V6 is workmanlike rather than refined. Composite sits in the low-70s for the pre-refresh S550.
2017 was the final year of the 6-speed SelectShift automatic before Ford's 10-speed 10R80 replaced it for 2018 — the 6AT was competent but slower to react and less decisive than the class-leading ZF 8-speeds and the incoming 10AT. The MT82 6-speed manual has well-documented durability and shift-quality complaints (notchiness, occasional 3-2 grinding) that reviewers and owners flagged throughout the 2015–2017 window; the GT350's Tremec TR-3160 6-speed manual is a notable exception at the top of the lineup.
2017 Mustang was rear-wheel drive across the entire lineup — Ford has never offered AWD on the Mustang coupe, unlike Dodge Challenger, Nissan GT-R, or Porsche 911 Carrera 4. Scores at the low end of the guidance band for RWD-only.
Four distinct powertrains — 3.7 V6, 2.3T EcoBoost I4, 5.0 Coyote V8 GT, and 5.2 flat-plane Voodoo V8 in the Shelby GT350/GT350R — plus 6MT/6AT choices across most trims give the 2017 Mustang wider spread than most sports-car rivals. But there is zero electrification (no hybrid/PHEV/EV variant), which per the guidance keeps the score below the 80+ band that requires electrified options.
2Efficiency & RangeGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.51F
EPA combined fuel economy for the volume 2.3L EcoBoost 6-speed automatic is 25 MPG. The 3.7 V6 auto returns 22 combined, the 5.0 GT auto 19 combined, and the Shelby GT350 5.2L bottoms the lineup at 16 combined.
Volume EcoBoost auto returns 21 city MPG per EPA — barely into the coupe band that reaches up to 60 MPG for hybrid competitors. V8 trims fall to 15–16 city.
EcoBoost highway MPG (32) is the 2017 Mustang's efficiency high-water mark — respectable for a performance coupe but well behind hybrid-driven competitors clearing 50 MPG. V8 trims sit at 21–25 hwy.
15.5-gallon tank × EPA 25 MPG combined yields roughly 388 miles for the EcoBoost — middling for the coupe segment. V8 trims drop into the mid-200s to high-290s.
Per 2017 EPA labeling at 15,000 mi/yr and period-appropriate fuel prices (~$2.15/gal regular, ~$2.65/gal premium), the EcoBoost auto burns ~600 gal for ≈$1,650/yr. V8 trims run $2,250 (GT) to $2,650 (GT350) — the volume figure lands near the middle of the coupe cost band thanks to lower 2017 fuel prices.
The volume 2.3L EcoBoost and the 5.0L GT list 87 octane as the minimum but Ford recommends 91-octane premium for advertised horsepower/torque; the Shelby GT350's 5.2L Voodoo flat-plane V8 requires 93 octane premium. The 3.7L V6 is the exception — it runs happily on regular 87, which nudges the model-wide score slightly higher than the pure-premium 2026 lineup. No E85, no diesel, no home-charging option, and no hybrid to sidestep the premium cost on the enthusiast trims.
3SafetyOne of the Mustang's weakest categories.0.48F
The 2017 Mustang 2-door coupe (S550 generation) carried NHTSA's 5-star overall rating, with 4-star frontal driver, 5-star frontal passenger, 5-star side, and 4-star rollover. Ratings carried over from the 2015 launch since no structural changes were made for 2017.
The 2017 Mustang earned Good ratings in moderate-overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraints, but only Acceptable in the driver-side small-overlap test — a mid-band result. IIHS did not name the 2017 Mustang a Top Safety Pick, and the passenger-side small-overlap test (introduced 2018) was not applied to this year.
The 2017 Mustang predates Ford's Co-Pilot360 rollout (added with the 2018 refresh). Only rearview camera and MyKey were standard. AEB, adaptive cruise, and lane-keeping were not offered at any trim in 2017; BLIS with Cross-Traffic Alert was optional via the 200A/300A equipment groups. Bottom of the guidance band.
The 2017 Ford Mustang did not offer automatic emergency braking at any trim. Ford's Pre-Collision Assist with pedestrian detection first arrived on the Mustang with the 2018 mid-cycle refresh. Bottom of the guidance band — the feature simply is not available.
BLIS (Blind Spot Information System) with Cross-Traffic Alert was optional on the 2017 Mustang via the 200A (EcoBoost/V6) and 300A (GT) equipment groups — not standard on the base configuration. Alert-only with no active intervention. Places it in the middle of the guidance band.
The 2017 Mustang offered no lane departure warning, no lane keep assist, and no lane centering at any trim. Ford's Lane-Keeping System was added to the Mustang with the 2018 refresh. Bottom of the guidance band.
The 2017 Mustang was equipped only with conventional cruise control — no adaptive cruise, no stop-and-go, no integrated highway assist. Adaptive Cruise Control arrived on the Mustang with the 2018 refresh. Bottom of the guidance band.
No hands-free highway driving system existed on the 2017 Mustang. Ford's BlueCruise did not debut until 2021 (on F-150 and Mustang Mach-E) and has never been offered on the Mustang coupe. Bottom of the guidance band.
IIHS rated the 2017 Mustang's HID projector headlights as Marginal and rated the base halogen setup as Poor — a key reason the model missed Top Safety Pick recognition. LED signature lighting was not added until the 2018 refresh. Firmly in the lower guidance band.
The 2017 Mustang coupe suffers the same fastback sightline issues as later S550/S650 cars — thick B/C pillars, high beltline, and a shallow rear window that creates real blind zones. A standard rearview camera helps for reversing; no 360-degree camera was available in 2017. Below-average even against other coupes.
The 2017 Mustang coupe is a nominal 4-seater but rear-seat access requires folding a front seat, ducking under the low fastback roofline, and reaching into a cramped rear bench with limited headroom. LATCH anchors exist but are buried in the seat bight. Firmly in the difficult-anchors, tight-quarters band.
4Space & ComfortGrades below the middle of the scale.1.32D
Standard 2+2 fastback coupe configuration across V6, EcoBoost, GT, and Shelby GT350 trims; rear seats are token/child-size on the S550.
Ford-published front headroom for the 2017 Mustang fastback without moonroof; the S550 architecture sets the same interior dimensions as later sixth-gen years.
Class-leading front legroom for a coupe — the S550 driver's cell accommodates tall occupants easily.
The fastback's raked roofline crushes rear-seat headroom below the segment band; children and short teens only.
Rear legroom sits below the coupe band's 32 in floor — the back seat is emergency/child-only. Marginally more room than later S650 measurements suggest.
Above-average trunk for a 2+2 sports coupe — takes a set of golf clubs or a couple of carry-ons — but well short of a sedan.
Retro-modern S550 dash with a small covered console bin, shallow door pockets, and a compact glovebox. Folding rear seatbacks extend the trunk for longer items. No standout storage innovation — a couple of USB ports and a 12V outlet is about it.
Front seats are comfortable for long stints but flat-cushioned and short on lateral bolstering unless you spec the optional Recaros. Rear bench is punishing for anyone over 5'6" — a jump-seat, not a real second row.
The S550's independent rear suspension (a first for the Mustang in 2015) delivered a big compliance improvement over the outgoing live-axle car, but the 2015–2017 tune still leans firm on broken pavement, especially on GT with the 19" wheels. MagneRide is limited to the GT Performance Package Level 2, so most cars ride on passive dampers.
Loud by mainstream standards — noticeable road roar on coarse pavement, and the GT's active exhaust broadcasts intake/exhaust note at cruise. Less sound-deadening than the 2018 refresh added, so highway hush trails a Camry or 4 Series noticeably.
Dual-zone automatic climate, keyless entry, and push-button start on Premium trims; heated/ventilated front seats available on EcoBoost Premium and GT Premium. No heated steering wheel offered in 2017 (added in a later refresh) and no rear vents in the 2+2 cabin. Base V6/EcoBoost trims get single-zone manual A/C.
5Cost of OwnershipGrades below the middle of the scale.1.40D
2017 was the last year of the base 3.7L V6 Mustang. V6 Fastback opened at $24,145 base + $900 destination = $25,185 — well below the coupe normalization midpoint and the Mustang's traditional accessible-sports-car entry point (EcoBoost came in at $26,195, GT at $33,195).
EcoBoost Premium fastback — the popular mid-ladder daily-driver spec adding SYNC 3, leather-trimmed seats, aluminum interior trim, and Shaker Pro audio — landed at $29,795 + $900 destination = $30,695. Trim ladder ranges from V6 ($25,185) through GT Premium (~$37,195) and Shelby GT350 (~$55,195); the EcoBoost Premium was the volume configuration for buyers stepping up from base without moving to V8 GT.
RepairPal and CarEdge peg the S550 Mustang at ~$6,500–$7,500 over 5 years — sports-car brake and tire wear plus EcoBoost turbo service push above the coupe band midpoint. GT (5.0 V8) drives higher tire and brake replacement costs than EcoBoost; average across the range lands near $6,900.
Real-world 2017→2022 residual data (pandemic-inflated used prices for muscle/sports cars) landed the Mustang around 44–50% of original MSRP — near sports-car segment average. GT and Performance Package cars hold better than base V6/EcoBoost automatics; convertibles depreciate faster than fastbacks.
Ford's standard new-vehicle limited warranty for 2017 was 3 years / 36,000 miles — industry baseline and at the bottom of the coupe normalization band. Unchanged for years across the S550 generation.
Ford powertrain coverage in 2017 was 5 years / 60,000 miles — the industry floor, well behind Hyundai/Kia's 10-year plans. Bottom of the coupe normalization band.
No complimentary scheduled maintenance program (unlike BMW/Toyota/Jaguar in 2017). Ford did include 5-year/60,000-mile roadside assistance — above the industry norm — but no free oil changes, brake service, or connected-service trial (FordPass Connect embedded modem/telematics did not arrive on Mustang until the 2018 refresh).
$30,695 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (47% retained, or about $14,427) leaves about $16,268 in depreciation. Add the projected $6,900 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $23,168 in total.
6Reliability & QualityMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.49C+
With 9 years of ownership data, Consumer Reports gives the 2017 Mustang an average predicted-reliability score (around 3/5), and J.D. Power rated it near the segment mean. Real-world issues cluster around the MT82 6-speed manual (notchy shifts, some third-gear failures) and early 2.3L EcoBoost oil-dilution/coolant-intrusion concerns; V6 and V8 automatics fare better than the manual EcoBoost.
Ford ranked mid-to-lower pack in both Consumer Reports brand reliability and J.D. Power Vehicle Dependability Study throughout the mid-2010s — typically 15th–18th out of ~24 brands. Competent but not a dependability leader like Toyota/Lexus or Porsche.
The 2017 Mustang has accumulated a substantial recall list including Takata airbag inflators, clutch pressure plate rupture (manual transmission), brake fluid leaks, door latch, and multiple software/instrument-cluster campaigns. Not catastrophically bad but above segment average for recall activity.
The 5.0L Coyote V8 is now a 15-year proven high-mileage engine with countless 200k+ mile examples, and the 3.7L Cyclone V6 (2017 was its last Mustang year) is exceptionally reliable. The 2.3L EcoBoost had some early oil dilution/coolant-intrusion reports, and the Getrag MT82 6-speed manual carries a mixed reputation for shift quality and third-gear wear; the 6R80 automatic is a solid unit.
The S550 interior was a major step up from the prior S197 and got a mid-cycle materials refresh with SYNC 3 for 2017, but reviewers still noted hard plastics in low-touch areas and switchgear that trailed German competition. Premium trims with leather and aluminum inserts felt appropriately priced, but base V6/EcoBoost cabins showed cost.
Assembly at Ford's Flat Rock plant was generally solid on the pre-refresh S550 with panel gaps and door alignment competitive for the segment. Scattered rattle and squeak complaints appear in owner reports, and J.D. Power IQS placed Ford brand near industry average for the 2017 model year.
Ford operates one of the densest US dealer networks (~3,000 dealers), providing easy nationwide service access for Mustang owners. J.D. Power Customer Service Index for Ford tracks near mass-market average — dealer service quality is adequate but not a differentiator.
The S550 Mustang benefits from arguably the largest aftermarket of any modern American car — OEM and aftermarket parts are abundant, inexpensive, and available from countless suppliers (Ford Performance, Steeda, Roush, LMR, AmericanMuscle, Summit Racing). Nine years of production means used and remanufactured parts are plentiful; RepairPal ranks the Mustang's cost-to-own below sports-car segment average.
7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Mustang's weakest categories.0.44F
The 2017 Mustang's Premium trims (EcoBoost Premium, GT Premium) came standard with SYNC 3 and an 8.0-inch capacitive color touchscreen; base V6 and EcoBoost trims still used a 4.2-inch monochrome center display with physical buttons.
SYNC 3 in 2017 was widely praised as a major leap over the disliked MyFord Touch — quicker capacitive touch, clearer tiled layout, and retained rotary volume/tune knobs and physical HVAC controls. Fast for its era but graphics and menu depth feel dated in a 2026 comparison.
SYNC 3 added wired Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto for the 2017 model year (also retro-fitted to 2016 SYNC 3 cars). Only available on SYNC-3-equipped Premium trims, and neither system was available wirelessly on any 2017 Ford.
SYNC 3 offered a noticeably better voice recognition engine than MyFord Touch with reasonable natural-language handling for calls, media, and destinations. Voice-activated navigation was an optional add-on with clear graphics but slow POI search — most owners defaulted to CarPlay/Google Maps.
Base 6-speaker system is unremarkable; a 9-speaker Shaker Audio upgrade is available on Premium trims, and the top-tier Shaker Pro 12-speaker system with 1000W amp offers strong sound but stops short of the branded premium systems (B&O, Bose Panaray) found in newer rivals.
The 2017 Mustang uses traditional analog speedo/tach flanking a 4.2-inch center TFT productivity screen for trip, drive mode, and configurable data. The fully digital 12-inch reconfigurable cluster did not arrive until the 2018 mid-cycle refresh.
The 2017 Mustang has no meaningful over-the-air update capability — no embedded modem for vehicle software updates. SYNC 3 map and firmware updates were delivered via USB or, later, home Wi-Fi, but no whole-vehicle Ford Power-Up-style OTA existed in 2017.
FordPass launched in 2016 but the 2017 Mustang did not offer the SYNC Connect embedded modem required for remote start, lock/unlock, or vehicle status from the phone; those features arrived with the 2018 refresh. The app on a 2017 Mustang was limited to fuel tracking, service reminders, and manual VIN-based info.
Standard equipment is a single front USB-A port with a 12V outlet in the center console and a 12V power point; no USB-C, no wireless charging pad, no household outlet. Rear-seat occupants have no dedicated charging port.
Intelligent Access proximity entry with push-button start is standard on Premium trims (EcoBoost Premium, GT Premium) and unavailable on base V6/EcoBoost. Remote start is available only as a dealer-installed key-fob accessory — no phone-based remote start (no SYNC Connect) and no phone-as-key.
A rear-view camera is standard on every 2017 Mustang, and rear parking sensors are available in the Enhanced Security Package. Blind spot monitoring with cross-traffic alert is optional on Premium trims. No front sensors, no 360-degree camera, no parking automation — a real gap for a wide, low-visibility coupe.
Ford did not offer a head-up display on the 2017 Mustang on any trim, including the Shelby GT350. A clear capability gap versus contemporary Camaro (which offered HUD) and virtually all German coupe rivals.
8Use-Case FitThe Mustang's lowest-graded category.0.12F
Two-door fastback with just 30.6 in of rear legroom and 34.8 in of rear headroom; LATCH anchors are present at the outboard rear positions but installing a rear-facing seat means sliding the front passenger seat far forward, ducking under the sloping fastback roofline, and threading a child past a long, heavy door. Regularly frustrating for daily family logistics.
Pre-2018-refresh S550 with no standard Pre-Collision Assist / AEB — every driver-assist safety feature (BLIS with cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise, forward collision warning) is optional inside the Enhanced Security Package on Premium trims. NHTSA 5-star overall, but IIHS 2017 flagged small-overlap driver Marginal and passenger Poor with Marginal headlights — clearly a step behind the 2018 refresh which added standard AEB. Real safety gaps at family-friendly price points.
Front seats work over long hauls but the 30.6 in rear legroom and low fastback roof render the back seat emergency/child-only for anything past a short hop. No rear HVAC vents, no rear USB ports at all, no rear-seat entertainment, and 13.5 cu ft of trunk that swallows a couple of soft duffels but not a family of four's long-weekend gear.
Volume EcoBoost 2.3T paired with the 6-speed SelectShift automatic is smooth in stop-and-go and the coupe rides comfortably on standard 18-in wheels; forward visibility over the long hood is fine. But thick B/C pillars and a small backlight create real over-shoulder blind zones, adaptive cruise is not standard, there's no lane-keeping aid available, and no auto stop-start on any 2017 trim.
The volume EcoBoost 2.3T + 6AT posts EPA 21/31/25 MPG — decent for a rear-drive coupe but nothing exceptional — and Ford recommends 91-octane premium for full-power output on the EcoBoost and 5.0 GT. Estimated fuel cost of roughly $2,300/yr on the EcoBoost climbs past $2,900 on the GT (15/25/19). Performance-oriented tires, brakes, and specialty-coupe service push per-mile costs above mainstream commuters, though the still-available 3.7L V6 was the budget commuter option in 2017 (its final year).
At 188.3 in long, 75.4 in wide, with a ~40 ft turning circle and long, heavy doors, the S550 is bulky in urban lots and city intersections. Rear-view camera is standard, reverse sensing is optional in the Enhanced Security Package — but no front sensors, no 360-degree camera, and no automated parking are offered on any 2017 trim, and thick C-pillars/small backlight hurt over-shoulder checks.
Ford does not publish a factory tow capacity for the US-market 2017 Mustang, and there is no factory bed, no payload rating, and only 13.5 cu ft of trunk with a shallow aperture. Aftermarket hitches are bike-rack duty only. Essentially no work capability of any kind.
The Coyote 5.0L V8 and 2.3L EcoBoost are proven, mass-produced Ford drivetrains and dealer support is broad, but the Mustang is engineered as a performance coupe — leather/ActiveX seats, low-profile tires, no wash-out surfaces, no fleet-work reputation. Ford has never marketed it for hard-use duty.
No factory 120V outlet, no factory tow hitch, no roof-rack system, no bed or bed-substitute, and only a handful of small trunk hooks for tie-down. The Mustang's aftermarket is deep for performance, essentially nonexistent for work upfit.
Front sport seats are comfortable over multi-hour drives (Recaros optional via the Performance Package), but the 6-speed auto lacks the tall 10th gear that arrived in 2018 — cruise RPMs sit higher and the cabin is louder than the refreshed car. The 15.5-gal tank gives ~480 mi highway range on the EcoBoost and ~388 mi on the GT; MagneRide dampers were not yet offered in 2017, adaptive cruise is optional rather than standard, and there is no lane-centering — so multi-hour fatigue reduction is limited.
Rear-wheel drive only across the entire lineup — no AWD offered at any price — with roughly 5 in of ground clearance, summer/all-season performance tires, no factory roof rails, and no factory hitch. Snow performance depends entirely on aftermarket winter tires, and any gravel road with real texture scrapes the front splitter. Pavement-bound with almost no outdoor utility.
13.5 cu ft coupe trunk is above average for a sports coupe and the fold-down rear seatback opens a modest pass-through for skis or a golf bag. But there is no hatchback flexibility, no roof rails, no factory hitch, and a shallow trunk-lid opening limits bulky items — a squeeze for anything beyond duffels and grocery loads.
9Driving ExperienceOne of the Mustang's strongest categories.2.63C+
S550 (2015–2017) introduced the Mustang's first independent rear suspension — a transformational change for cornering composure vs. the solid-axle S197. GT with Performance Package Level 2 (2016+, manual-only; wider 19x9/9.5 wheels, Michelin Pilot Super Sport, larger front sway bar, MagneRide-less but retuned dampers) posted 0.97 g on Car and Driver's skidpad; base GT ~0.90 g. Composed and capable in its era but shy of the sharper 2024+ S650 refresh (76) and clearly below mid-engine Cayman (69.5 reflects Porsche's poise; Mustang lacks its balance). Places above Camaro's 70.6 for chassis feel and near Nissan Z territory in this specific window.
Electric power steering with three selectable modes (Comfort, Normal, Sport) — accurate and quick off-center, particularly in Sport, but reviewers found the wheel largely numb through the rim compared to hydraulic-era pony cars or the Porsche/BMW benchmarks. A modest step behind the 2024+ S650 (72) which sharpened weighting further.
Base GT runs 13.9-in front rotors with four-piston Brembo calipers; Performance Package Level 2 adds 15.0-in front rotors with 6-piston Brembos and Michelin Pilot Super Sport rubber. C&D measured 158 ft from 70 mph on a 2017 GT PP2 — competitive with contemporary Cayman and 370Z. Pedal is firm and repeatable; base V6/EcoBoost stops are longer with more nose-dive.
Gen-2 Coyote 5.0L V8 is smooth, tractable, and free-revving with immediate throttle response. But 2017 was the final year of the older 6-speed SelectShift automatic (10R80 10AT arrived for 2018) — competent but reactive rather than proactive vs. the class-leading ZF 8-speed. The MT82 6-speed manual has well-documented notchy shifter feel and occasional 3-2 balk complaints. GT350's Tremec TR-3160 is a bright spot. EcoBoost 2.3T shows some turbo lag off idle.
The 5.0 Coyote's V8 growl is characterful and celebrated, and GT350's flat-plane 5.2 Voodoo shrieks to 8,250 rpm — an all-time engine note. However, 2017 predates the standard Active Valve Performance Exhaust (introduced with the 2018 refresh), so drone at highway cruise is more noticeable on GTs, and buyers had to add the Ford Performance active exhaust or aftermarket to tame/toggle it. EcoBoost is coarser under load and the 3.7 V6 is uninspiring aurally.
Ford's published curb-to-curb turning diameter for the 2015–2017 S550 Mustang is 38.1 ft. Toward the wide end of the coupe band, reflecting the long 107.1-in wheelbase and front-engine layout, but tighter than the 40.0 ft figure for the 2024+ S650 refresh.
S550 pre-refresh interior is a major upgrade over S197 — dual-cowl retro dash with clear analog gauges, flat-bottom wheel, and standard 6-way manual sport buckets (optional Recaros); driving position is low and hip-forward with good pedal placement. Coupe sightlines are typical for the class — narrow rear glass and thick C-pillars limit rearward visibility. Interior materials are competent but some hard plastics remain; center-stack Sync 3 (introduced late 2015 model year) is a step forward over the panned MyFord Touch.
The 2015–2017 S550 is one of the most beloved modern Mustangs — rear-wheel drive, an available manual, a torquey Coyote V8, the transformative IRS, and the halo Shelby GT350/GT350R that C&D and MotorTrend praised as one of the best driver's cars at any price. The 'take-the-long-way-home' quality is defining. Only track-focused mid-engine rivals (Cayman) and the Corvette rate meaningfully higher on pure engagement in this window; against muscle-car peers (Camaro 70.6, Challenger) the Mustang delivers similar or better joy for the money.
10Value & Market PositionThe Mustang's best-graded category.3.08B
Base V6 and EcoBoost trims are fairly sparse by modern measures — cloth seats, single-zone climate, and a small 4.2" center screen (SYNC 3 with 8" screen required Premium trim or option pack). Backup camera and MyKey standard; no blind-spot monitoring, no adaptive cruise, and no LED headlights on base — driver-assist tech well behind rivals. Competitive for its 2017 era but noticeably less generous than the refreshed 2018.
Peak muscle-car value: GT delivered a 435-hp 5.0L Coyote V8 with 6-speed manual for ~$33K — nothing near that price matched V8 RWD coupe performance. V6 at ~$25K provided cheap entry-level sports coupe access, EcoBoost turbo I4 at ~$26K undercut BMW/Audi competitors, and the Shelby GT350 delivered 526-hp flat-plane 5.2L Voodoo V8 with track-tuned chassis for ~$55K — Porsche 911 GT3 performance at a fraction of the cost.
One of the broadest lineups in any sports car for the era: V6, EcoBoost, EcoBoost Premium, GT, GT Premium, Shelby GT350, and Shelby GT350R — plus coupe (fastback) and convertible body styles on the mainstream trims. Manual or 6-speed automatic on V6/EcoBoost/GT; GT350 was manual-only. Performance Package on GT added Brembo brakes, 3.73 Torsen diff, and unique aero. Broader than the 2018+ lineup that dropped the V6.
Sports-coupe sales leader — 81,866 US units in 2017, well ahead of Chevrolet Camaro (~67K) and Dodge Challenger (~64K). Volume was down from the 2015 launch peak (~122K) but still healthy and consistently outsold rivals. Also the best-selling sports coupe globally.
Mustang carries 50+ years of pop-culture heritage and one of the strongest enthusiast followings in the industry — the pony badge itself is a halo. Ford as a whole lacks the aspirational prestige of Porsche/BMW/Mercedes in the premium sports coupe tier, capping brand pull for luxury shoppers, but among mainstream buyers Mustang commands strong loyalty and cross-shopping.
Year three of the S550 generation with incentives readily available on V6, EcoBoost, and GT trims — Ford Credit offered subvented APR (0.9–2.9%) and $500–$2,000 cash-back through much of 2017. GT350 remained tight and often transacted at MSRP; GT350R was allocation-limited and could carry markups. No widespread desperation pricing on mainstream Mustangs.
S550 sixth-generation Mustang launched for 2015 MY, making 2017 the third year of the platform and squarely mid-cycle. Ford had already telegraphed a 2018 mid-cycle refresh (revealed January 2017) with digital dash, 10-speed auto, LED lights, and the V6 being dropped — so 2017 buyers knew a fresher model was around the corner. Current but not cutting-edge.
The Shelby GT350 was named to Car and Driver's 10Best in both 2016 and 2017 — a rare double honor for a performance car — and Road & Track called it one of the greatest driver's cars of the decade. GT and EcoBoost were consistently praised in comparison tests against Camaro SS/Challenger R/T, with Motor Trend and Car and Driver typically ranking Mustang first or second in muscle-car comparos. The V6 base drew criticism for feeling underpowered relative to competitors, dragging some average review scores.
