MotorGPA
Find My Match
Model year:2026+9 not yet gradedHistory & evolution ↓
Land Rover logo
Full-Size Luxury SUV

2026 Land Rover Range Rover

LuxuryGasPHEV
Manufacturer site ↗
2.45C+GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
0.76F
Safety
2.51C+
EfficiencyGas
0.67F
21 MPG combined · 500 mi range · $2,950/yr energy
Comfort
2.28C
Value
2.72B-
Ownership Cost
0.00F
Technology
3.66A-
Driving Experience
3.13B

The verdict

A mixed-report full-size luxury suv, strong on technology and held back by ownership.

The 2026 Range Rover is the most convincing luxury object in the full-size SUV class and one of the most expensive things you can own after you buy it. Nothing else rides this quietly, looks this assured, or pairs a 7,716-lb tow rating with a low-range transfer case and 35.4 in of wading depth. But the volume SE opens near $111,000, returns 21 MPG combined on premium, seats only five in standard-wheelbase form, and comes from the brand that finishes at or near the bottom of every US dependability study — with a 4-year/50,000-mile powertrain warranty and no free scheduled maintenance to soften the landing. Buy it because you want this specific car, and lease it or budget hard for the years after warranty.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • The quietest, smoothest ride in the class — by a clear margin
  • Genuine off-road hardware and 7,716 lbs of towing
  • The best interior in the segment, full stop

What holds it back

  • Owning it is brutally expensive after the sticker
  • Land Rover's reliability record is the worst in the segment
  • A four-year powertrain warranty and a thin dealer network

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Land Rover Range Rover

Production history

1987present · 40 years · 5 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1198719941987Gen 2199520021995Gen 3200320122003Gen 4201320212013Gen 52022now2022In production2026 — graded2025 — not yet graded2024 — not yet graded2023 — not yet graded2022 — not yet graded2021 — not yet graded2020 — not yet graded2019 — not yet graded2018 — not yet graded2017 — not yet gradedProduction began 1987
202666+9 not yet graded

Best fit & conditions

AdventureA+88/100
Winter / inclementA-83/100
FamilyB+80/100
CommuterC+67/100
Work / TowC-57/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainOne of the Range Rover's strongest categories.3.36B+
Horsepower
395 hp (P400 I6 MHEV, volume SE trim); 542 hp P550e PHEV, up to 606 hp P615 V8
61/100
#23 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume 2026 Range Rover SE runs the P400 3.0L turbocharged Ingenium inline-six with 48V mild-hybrid assist, rated 395 hp; the range tops out with the 606-hp P615 4.4L twin-turbo V8 on Autobiography/SV. Replaces a placeholder value.

Torque
406 lb-ft (P400 I6 MHEV); 590 lb-ft P550e PHEV, 553 lb-ft P615 V8
75/100
#35 of 148 in classCompare all →

P400 inline-six peaks at 406 lb-ft on a broad plateau from roughly 2,000 rpm, strong for a full-size luxury SUV's base engine; the PHEV's combined 590 lb-ft is the lineup high. Replaces a placeholder value.

0–60 mph time
5.8 s (P400 SWB, manufacturer); 4.9 s P550e PHEV, ~4.4 s P615 V8
62/100
#37 of 148 in classCompare all →

Land Rover quotes 5.8 s to 60 mph for the P400 short-wheelbase volume configuration — brisk for a 5,700-lb SUV but well behind the V8 and PHEV variants and behind quicker rivals like the X7 M60i. Replaces a placeholder value.

Powertrain refinement85
#26 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Ingenium inline-six is inherently balanced and the 48V system smooths stop-start and low-speed torque fill, giving the near-silent delivery that defines the car; reviewers consistently rate the Range Rover among the quietest, most seamless powertrains in the class. Held short of the 90s because the six can sound slightly strained at full throttle and there is mild off-the-line lag before boost builds.

Transmission behavior85
#32 of 148 in classCompare all →

ZF 8HP eight-speed automatic tuned for smoothness — imperceptible upshifts and sensible ratio choice in normal driving, the benchmark torque-converter automatic. Not higher because it prioritizes calm over decisiveness and can be slow to kick down when asked for a sudden overtake.

Max towing capacity
7,716 lbs (3,500 kg) properly equipped
96/100
#17 of 148 in classCompare all →

Rated at the 3,500 kg / 7,716 lb European maximum, near the top of the SUV normalization band and matched by few luxury SUVs; Advanced Tow Assist with trailer-reverse guidance is available. Replaces a placeholder value.

AWD/4WD availability95
#2 of 148 in classCompare all →

Sophisticated full-time all-wheel drive is standard on every trim, with a two-speed transfer case with genuine low range, an electronically locking rear differential, torque vectoring by braking, and all-wheel steering — the top of the scoring band with no trim-level caveats.

Off-road capability85
#9 of 148 in classCompare all →

Hardware is genuinely elite for a luxury SUV: air suspension lifting to roughly 11.6 in of ground clearance, about 35.4 in wading depth, low range, rear locker, Terrain Response 2 and Wade Sensing. Short of the 90s because there is no dedicated off-road trim and volume cars ride on 22–23 in road tires that limit what the chassis can actually use.

Powertrain lineup breadth82
#14 of 148 in classCompare all →

Three distinct US powertrains including a substantial electrified option — P400 mild-hybrid inline-six, P550e plug-in hybrid with roughly 48–51 miles of EPA electric range, and the P615 twin-turbo V8 — covering efficiency, output, and everything between. Not higher because the fully electric Range Rover has slipped past 2026 availability, leaving no BEV in the lineup.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Range Rover's weakest categories.0.67F
Combined fuel economy
21 MPG combined (P400 SE, 3.0L I6 MHEV AWD) · P530 4.4 V8 ~17 · P550e PHEV ~50 MPGe combined / ~21 MPG on gas alone
29/100
#113 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume configuration is the P400 SE with the 395-hp 3.0L Ingenium turbo inline-six and 48V mild-hybrid assist, EPA-rated about 21 MPG combined — respectable for a 5,800-lb full-size luxury SUV but near the bottom of the SUV normalization band, which spans everything up to efficient hybrids and EVs.

City fuel economy
18 MPG city (P400 SE) · P530 V8 ~15 · P550e PHEV runs city miles on electricity within its ~51-mi EPA range
25/100
#129 of 148 in classCompare all →

City is the P400's weakest cycle — the 48V system restarts the engine and smooths stop-start but cannot move the vehicle on its own, so nearly 6,000 lb of luxury SUV is accelerated on gasoline every time. This is the single strongest argument for the P550e if the buyer's miles are urban.

Highway fuel economy
25 MPG highway (P400 SE) · P530 V8 ~21
31/100
#111 of 148 in classCompare all →

Highway is the P400's best case: tall 8-speed top gears and a comparatively slippery shape for the class let it reach roughly 25 MPG, a clear step ahead of the V8-powered full-size luxury rivals it is cross-shopped against.

Driving range
~500 mi (23.8-gal tank × 21 MPG combined, P400 SWB) · P550e adds ~51 mi EPA electric range before the engine starts
69/100
#10 of 148 in classCompare all →

A large fuel tank offsets mediocre economy — roughly 500 miles between fills is genuinely strong for the segment and is the clearest efficiency-adjacent strength the Range Rover has, matching its long-distance touring brief.

Estimated annual fuel cost
~$2,950/yr (P400, 15k mi at EPA assumptions, premium fuel) · P550e materially lower if charged nightly
27/100
#122 of 148 in classCompare all →

About 715 gallons of premium a year at EPA's standard 15,000-mile assumption puts running costs near the top of the SUV band — expensive in absolute terms, though a rounding error against the vehicle's six-figure purchase price and depreciation.

Fuel requirements38
#123 of 148 in classCompare all →

Premium fuel is required across the entire 2026 range, including the P550e's inline-six, and there is no regular-fuel, E85, or diesel escape hatch in the US lineup. The PHEV's home charging genuinely offsets this for short-trip owners, which lifts the score off the floor of the band, but the volume P400 has no such relief.

3SafetyMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.51C+
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated by NHTSA (est. 4 stars)
50/100
#91 of 148 in classCompare all →

NHTSA has published no 5-Star Safety Ratings for the fifth-generation (L460) Range Rover in any US model year, and the 2026 car is an unchanged carryover of that generation. Low-volume six-figure SUVs are routinely skipped by NCAP, so the estimate is a segment-norm placeholder anchored on the L460's bonded-aluminium MLA-Flex monocoque and ~5,700 lb curb weight rather than on any published US result.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness55
#111 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Range Rover holds no IIHS Top Safety Pick or TSP+ award and has no published IIHS crashworthiness results for the L460 generation, so it cannot reach the award band. Unlike the Defender, which at least carries a five-star Euro NCAP result to lean on, the flagship Range Rover has no published crash result from any major program — it sits at the bottom of the 'no award' band on absence of evidence, not on evidence of weakness.

Standard ADAS suite breadth84
#83 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Range Rover is the one JLR model that does not make buyers pay extra for the core suite: the volume SE trim ships with Emergency Braking, Lane Keep Assist, Adaptive Cruise Control with Steering Assist, Blind Spot Assist, Rear Traffic Monitor, Clear Exit Monitor, Driver Condition Monitor, Traffic Sign Recognition and the 3D Surround Camera as standard. That is the full AEB/ACC/LKA/BSM/RCTA set on the base car — a decisively better position than the Defender, where adaptive cruise is locked in an option pack. It stops short of the Lexus LX and Escalade (88) because JLR's history of migrating assistance content into packs makes trim-by-trim standard fitment less dependable than Lexus Safety System+.

Automatic emergency braking performance70
#89 of 148 in classCompare all →

IIHS has run no front crash prevention test on the Range Rover, so there is no Superior/Advanced rating to cite for either the vehicle-to-vehicle or the pedestrian protocol. JLR's Emergency Braking includes pedestrian and cyclist detection and is a newer sensor set than the Defender's, but nothing in the public record verifies the night-time pedestrian performance that the current IIHS protocol rewards, which caps this in the adequate band.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage82
#43 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is a genuine strength. Blind Spot Assist intervenes with a corrective steering nudge rather than only lighting a mirror icon, and unlike the Defender both Rear Traffic Monitor and Clear Exit Monitor are standard rather than pack-bundled, so a volume-trim car as delivered has cross-traffic and door-opening protection. Trailer-aware coverage is handled through the towing packs rather than being inherent to the standard system, which keeps it just below the top of the band.

Lane keeping & centering72
#79 of 148 in classCompare all →

Lane Keep Assist is standard and, because Adaptive Cruise Control with Steering Assist is also standard here, the Range Rover gets true lane centering on the base car rather than departure-correction only. It lands mid-band because JLR's tuning draws consistent reviewer criticism for abrupt, nagging intervention, and the centering wanders more on curves than the best-in-class systems from BMW and Mercedes (80 and 78 respectively in this dataset).

Adaptive cruise & highway assist78
#68 of 148 in classCompare all →

Adaptive Cruise Control with Steering Assist is standard, full-speed-range with stop-and-go, and works well in the Range Rover's natural habitat — long, quiet highway miles, where the air suspension and sound isolation flatter it. The rough edges are in the software rather than the availability: reviewers note late braking on cut-ins and a slower, less decisive resume than the Mercedes GLS (88) or BMW X7 (85) systems.

Hands-free driving availability12
#85 of 148 in classCompare all →

JLR offers no hands-free highway driving system on any 2026 Range Rover trim, up to and including the six-figure SV. Steering Assist is a hands-on lane-centering aid with a torque-sensing wheel check, so the flagship has no answer to Super Cruise in the Escalade (92), BlueCruise in the Navigator, or the eyes-off systems arriving from German rivals.

Headlight performance78
#33 of 148 in classCompare all →

Pixel LED headlights with adaptive high beam are standard from the SE trim, with Digital LED units offering finer beam segmentation higher up the range — strong hardware by any standard, and the hidden-until-lit front lighting signature is a defining part of the L460's design. Without a published IIHS headlight rating for any L460 model year there is no verified Good result to justify the top band.

Outward visibility82
#14 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 'command driving position' is the nameplate's oldest engineering idea and it still works: an upright seating position, a flat hood with visible corners, a low cowl and deep front side glass give excellent forward and three-quarter sightlines for a vehicle this large. Rearward is the weak side — a high rear deck, thick D-pillars and, on the long-wheelbase car, a lot of sheet metal behind the driver — but that is thoroughly compensated by the standard 3D Surround Camera, ClearSight Ground View 'see-through hood' and the ClearSight digital rear-view mirror, plus standard all-wheel steering that shrinks the car in parking maneuvers.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability78
#49 of 148 in classCompare all →

The rear door aperture is enormous, the floor is flat and second-row legroom is generous even in the standard-wheelbase car, so hoisting a seat in and buckling a child is easier than in almost any rival — and the volume SE trim keeps a three-place bench with two outboard LATCH positions. It stops short of the top band because the lower anchors are buried behind thick leather seat-bight trim that takes real digging, IIHS publishes no LATCH ease-of-use rating for the model, and buyers who option the long-wheelbase Executive Class or SV Signature Suite rear seating lose the middle position entirely.

4Space & ComfortMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.28C
Seating capacity
5 seats (7-seat available on Long Wheelbase; 4-seat SV Signature Suite)
25/100
#52 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume configuration — Standard Wheelbase SE — is a strict five-seater; the third row is a Long Wheelbase-only option and the SV can be ordered as a four-seat Signature Suite. Against full-size rivals that seat seven or eight as standard (Escalade 8, X7/GLS/QX80/Navigator 7), five seats is the weakest capacity in the class.

Front headroom
39.5 in (panoramic roof standard)
50/100
#102 of 148 in classCompare all →

Mid-pack for a full-size SUV: the standard panoramic roof costs roughly an inch versus the boxier body-on-frame competition (Escalade 42.3, QX80 41.2, X7 41.9), though it clears the Lexus LX (38.4) and 2026 Navigator (38.3).

Front legroom
39.1 in
0/100
#139 of 148 in classCompare all →

Front legroom is short by the SAE measure and sits below the segment normalization floor (40 in) — the same result the BMW X7 (39.8 in) records. In practice the deep seat travel and adjustable pedals make the driving position roomy, but the published number is what the band scores.

Rear headroom
39.4 in
85/100
#41 of 148 in classCompare all →

A genuine strength — the upright, near-vertical roofline and stadium-style second-row cushion give more rear headroom than the front, beating the X7 (38.7), Escalade (38.9) and Navigator (37.9) and trailing only the GLS (40.2) and QX80 (40.4).

Rear legroom
39.6 in (SWB); Long Wheelbase adds roughly 6 in of rear legroom
80/100
#40 of 148 in classCompare all →

Second-row legroom in the volume SWB body is generous and beats the X7 (37.6) and 2025 Navigator (36.1), though it falls short of the GLS (41.9), QX80 (41.0) and Escalade (41.7). The Long Wheelbase — the body most rivals have no answer to — turns the rear cabin into a genuine limousine, but it is not the volume configuration.

Third-row usability42
#54 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume SWB Range Rover has no third row at all, and the seven-seat layout is restricted to the more expensive Long Wheelbase body — where it is a properly trimmed, power-folding row with its own climate vents and USB-C, better than the token benches in the Defender (35) or Lexus LX (48), but reachable only by paying up for a different body. Scored in the low band because the configuration most buyers take seats five.

Cargo/trunk volume
41.7 cu ft behind the second row (SWB, loaded to roof)
30/100
#40 of 148 in classCompare all →

Cargo behind the second row is modest for the size of the vehicle — the sloping tailgate glass and the split powered tailgate mechanism eat into a hold that is close to the GLS (42.7) and well behind the Escalade (72.9) or Discovery. Adequate for four people's luggage, not for full-size-SUV hauling.

Max cargo volume
83.5 cu ft with the second row folded (SWB)
63/100
#36 of 148 in classCompare all →

With the power-folding second row down the hold is competitive but not class-leading — comparable to the GLS (84.7) and below the X7 (90.4), QX80 (101) and Escalade (121). The flat load floor and the fold-out lower tailgate make the space easy to use.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions72
#34 of 148 in classCompare all →

Competitive rather than clever. The deep center console (refrigerated compartment on upper trims), hidden stowage under the front armrest, wireless charging and the genuinely useful split powered tailgate with its fold-out 'Tailgate Event Suite' seating are real assets, but the deliberately minimalist, button-free cabin trades small-item cubbies for visual calm and there is no underfloor storage or frunk.

Seat comfort93
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

A segment benchmark. Up to 24-way heated, ventilated and massaging front seats with winged headrests, and rear seats that recline meaningfully even in the SWB body — the LWB Executive Class rear seats with powered footrests are the most comfortable back seat sold in a US SUV. Rated above the GLS (90) and LX (86) on the strength of the rear cabin.

Ride quality95
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

The clearest reason to buy the car. Twin-valve adaptive air suspension with camera-fed road preview and 48V active anti-roll control isolates broken pavement more completely than anything else in the class, and the long wheelbase keeps it from floating. Placed just above the GLS with E-Active Body Control (92) and well clear of the LX (80).

Cabin quietness94
#2 of 148 in classCompare all →

Among the quietest cabins on sale at any price — double-glazed acoustic laminated glass, extensive sealing, and an Active Noise Cancellation system that uses cabin microphones plus headrest speakers to cancel road and powertrain noise seat-by-seat. Sits alongside the GLS (94) and above the LX (88) and X7 (86).

Climate & comfort features90
#7 of 148 in classCompare all →

Richly equipped from the entry SE trim: four-zone climate control, heated and ventilated front seats, heated steering wheel, heated rear seats, cabin air purification and remote pre-conditioning through the app (with true electric pre-conditioning on the P550e PHEV). Hot-stone massage, rear-seat entertainment and the Executive Class rear package are optional. Just below the GLS/Navigator tier only because several rear-cabin comforts remain paid options.

5Cost of OwnershipThe Range Rover's lowest-graded category.0.00F
Base MSRP
≈$111,000 (SE P400 SWB, incl. ~$1,600 destination); lineup runs past $250,000 for SV LWB
0/100
#121 of 148 in classCompare all →

The 2026 Range Rover (L460) opens with the SE P400 mild-hybrid I6 on the standard wheelbase at roughly $111,000 delivered, carrying over the 2025 structure with a modest year-over-year increase. That is roughly 70% above the top of the SUV pricing band, so the item clamps to zero.

Volume-Trim Price
≈$120,000 (SE P400 as typically equipped); Autobiography ≈$150,000, SV ≈$250,000
0/100
#116 of 148 in classCompare all →

The SE is the volume trim, but Range Rover buyers rarely take one stripped — a representative SE with the common option groups lands near $120,000, and the mix skews upward toward Autobiography. Far beyond the $27,000–$68,000 SUV band, so zero.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
≈$13,500 over 5 years (maintenance + repair, out of warranty from yr 5)
0/100
#139 of 148 in classCompare all →

Land Rover is consistently the most expensive mainstream-luxury brand to maintain and repair, and the Range Rover is the worst case within it — air suspension, active anti-roll, complex electronics and dealer-only service. Projected 5-year maintenance plus repair sits well above the $9,500 top of the SUV band.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
≈44% of MSRP retained at 5 years (source estimates span ~40–48%)
13/100
#97 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Range Rover depreciates hard in absolute dollars — a six-figure sticker meeting weak out-of-warranty demand driven by reliability reputation. Retention sits just above the bottom of the SUV band; source estimates disagree by several points, hence the range in displayValue.

Basic warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
50/100
#23 of 148 in classCompare all →

Land Rover's New Vehicle Limited Warranty runs 4 years/50,000 miles — mid-pack for luxury, better than the 4/50 German norm on mileage but short of Genesis or Jaguar-style coverage.

Powertrain warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi (no separate extended powertrain term; PHEV high-voltage battery 8 yr / 100,000 mi)
0/100
#72 of 148 in classCompare all →

Land Rover does not publish a longer powertrain term than its bumper-to-bumper coverage, so the engine and driveline are protected for only 4 years/50,000 miles — below the 5-year floor of the scoring band and a real weakness on a vehicle with this repair-cost profile. The PHEV traction battery is covered separately for 8 years/100,000 miles.

Complimentary maintenance & perks52
#88 of 148 in classCompare all →

Land Rover includes 24/7 roadside assistance for the 4-year warranty period and a Pivi Pro connected-services data trial, but no complimentary scheduled maintenance — service plans are a paid add-on. On a $110,000 vehicle with class-worst service costs, that is a conspicuous omission, so this sits at the very bottom of the roadside-only band.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$80,700 (≈$67,200 depreciation + $13,500 maintenance)
0/100
#125 of 148 in classCompare all →

$120,000 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (44% retained, or about $52,800) leaves about $67,200 in depreciation. Add the projected $13,500 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $80,700 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Range Rover's weakest categories.0.76F
Predicted reliability28
#147 of 148 in classCompare all →

The L460 Range Rover has drawn consistently bottom-tier predicted reliability, with owner complaints concentrated in electrical/software faults (Pivi Pro, 12V parasitic drain), air-suspension failures and driver-assistance sensor errors rather than hard mechanical breakage. 2026 is the L460's fifth model year, so the worst early-production teething is behind it, but the complaint pattern has persisted rather than resolved.

Brand reliability track record18
#146 of 148 in classCompare all →

Brand-level item, so the Range Rover inherits Land Rover's standing unchanged and matches the Land Rover Defender's mark in this dataset. Land Rover is the clearest bottom-dweller in US dependability studies, finishing last or near-last year after year in both major surveys — a durable multi-year pattern, not a single bad result.

Recall & TSB history35
#139 of 148 in classCompare all →

The L460 has accumulated a high recall count for a nameplate only five model years old, mixing safety-critical hardware campaigns with a steady stream of software remedies. TSB traffic on electrical, infotainment and air-suspension complaints is heavy throughout the generation.

Powertrain durability reputation53
#126 of 148 in classCompare all →

Better than the Land Rover average because the Range Rover never gets the problematic 2.0L Ingenium four. The volume P400 3.0L Ingenium I6 MHEV is clean so far but unproven past high mileage and carries a 48V electric-supercharger layer that adds failure points, while the P530's 4.4L twin-turbo V8 is BMW-derived and robust and the ZF 8HP eight-speed is one of the most proven automatics in the industry. The P550e PHEV adds a large battery and charging system with no long-term US track record.

Interior material quality94
#2 of 148 in classCompare all →

The clearest strength in the category and the best cabin in the segment. The L460's interior is the reference point luxury SUV rivals are measured against — semi-aniline and Windsor leather, Kvadrat and Ultrafabrics alternatives, genuine open-pore veneer and metal, and near-perfect switchgear damping, with SV adding ceramic controls and Moonlight Chrome detailing.

Fit & finish70
#80 of 148 in classCompare all →

A clear step up from the rest of the Land Rover range — the L460's body structure is notably stiffer and quieter than the L405 it replaced, and panel alignment and door closure are genuinely good. It still lands well short of the segment's best because JLR's initial-quality standing is below industry average and scattered reports of interior rattles and electronic gremlins persist across the generation.

Dealer & service network53
#127 of 148 in classCompare all →

The same thin network the Defender contends with — roughly 190 US Land Rover retailers leaves large gaps outside major metros — and service satisfaction is dragged down by long shop waits driven by the brand's own failure and parts-supply rates. Flagship buyers get better concierge and loaner treatment than the rest of the range, which is worth a point but does not change the coverage math.

Parts availability & repair cost26
#141 of 148 in classCompare all →

The worst case in an already worst-in-class brand. Land Rover is routinely ranked the most expensive marque in America to maintain, and the Range Rover sits at the top of that range — four-corner air suspension, air struts, rear-axle steering and dealer-only electronic modules produce repair bills that are punishing once the warranty lapses. There is effectively no cost-relieving aftermarket for its wear and electronic components.

7Technology & InfotainmentThe Range Rover's best-graded category.3.66A-
Touchscreen size
13.1 in (standard across the range, SE through SV)
72/100
#49 of 148 in classCompare all →

The fifth-generation L460 Range Rover runs Pivi Pro on a 13.1-inch curved floating glass touchscreen, standard on every trim including the volume SE — there is no smaller base unit and no larger option. That is a large panel in absolute terms and a big step over the 11.4-inch screen JLR fits to the Defender, but it trails the wall-of-glass approach GM and Lincoln now use in this class, which is what holds the item to the low 70s rather than the 80s.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness80
#43 of 148 in classCompare all →

Pivi Pro in the L460 is the best version of JLR's software — it boots almost instantly, the tile layout is shallow and legible, and the Range Rover keeps two multi-function rotary dials below the screen so climate and seat functions stay off the touch interface even though the dashboard is otherwise close to button-free. It stops at 80 because JLR software still draws steady reviewer and owner complaints about intermittent lag, screen freezes and Bluetooth dropouts, and the minimalist dash pushes more secondary functions into menus than the physical-control-rich Escalade or X7.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto90
#48 of 148 in classCompare all →

Wireless Apple CarPlay and wireless Android Auto are standard on every Range Rover trim through Pivi Pro, with no trim gating and no subscription attached, and a wireless charging pad is fitted alongside so the phone is not tethered to run projection.

Voice control & native navigation79
#69 of 148 in classCompare all →

Pivi Pro ships connected online navigation with live traffic and door-to-door routing as standard, and Amazon Alexa is built in, which handles natural-language media, climate and destination requests noticeably better than JLR's own legacy command-driven voice layer. It lands just below the 80s because the embedded assistant outside Alexa is still command-driven rather than conversational, and the connected data that powers live traffic runs on an included trial that eventually needs renewing.

Audio system quality92
#7 of 148 in classCompare all →

Audio is one of the Range Rover's genuine class-leading strengths. The Meridian ladder runs from a competent standard system through Meridian Surround to the Meridian Signature setup — a roughly 1,600-watt, 35-speaker installation with headrest speakers and active noise cancellation, fitted in one of the quietest cabins on sale. Very few vehicles at any price offer a better listening environment; it is held off the mid-90s only because the top system is confined to the upper trims.

Digital instrument cluster89
#24 of 148 in classCompare all →

A 13.7-inch fully digital Interactive Driver Display is standard across the Range Rover range — large, crisp and configurable, with full-width map, driver-assist and terrain views rather than a token digital skin over fixed dials. It is a clear strength and among the better clusters in the full-size luxury class.

OTA update capability80
#39 of 148 in classCompare all →

JLR's Software Over The Air system is one of the broader implementations outside the EV startups — it reaches dozens of vehicle modules rather than just the head unit and maps, so powertrain, chassis and driver-assist calibrations can improve without a dealer visit. It falls short of the top band because JLR ships feature-adding releases on an occasional cadence rather than the regular, publicized feature drops that define the 90s.

Companion app & remote functions70
#84 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Land Rover Remote app covers the expected core set — remote lock/unlock, remote start and cabin preconditioning, vehicle locate, status and journey history, plus charge scheduling and departure timers on the P550e plug-in hybrid. It is held to the low 70s by a persistently mediocre reputation for responsiveness and reliability, remote functions that lapse into a paid connected-services subscription after the included term, and the absence of a true phone-as-key of the sort BMW, Mercedes and Cadillac now offer in this class.

Charging ports & device power86
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

Device power is well handled: USB-C outlets are distributed across all rows, including the third row on the long-wheelbase seven-seat configuration, wireless phone charging is standard, and the rear console adds its own ports for the executive-seating packages. It sits below the 90s only because the Range Rover leans on USB-C and 12V rather than offering the household-style AC outlets that trucks and several rivals in this class include.

Keyless & remote access85
#33 of 148 in classCompare all →

Keyless entry with push-button start is standard, and the Range Rover adds convenience hardware most rivals do not match — flush deployable door handles, available powered and soft-close doors, a gesture-operated powered split tailgate, and the waterproof wearable Activity Key. The one clear gap versus the class leaders is the lack of a phone-as-key, which is what keeps it out of the 90s.

Camera & parking aids92
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is the strongest item in the category. The Range Rover pairs a high-resolution 3D Surround Camera and full-perimeter sensors with two features almost nobody else offers: ClearSight Ground View, which composites a see-through view of the ground under the nose for kerbs and trail obstacles, and the ClearSight interior rear-view mirror, which switches to a rear camera feed when the load bay or third row blocks the glass. Automated park assist rounds it out.

Head-up display availability82
#12 of 148 in classCompare all →

A large full-colour head-up display projecting speed, navigation and driver-assist status is offered on the Range Rover and is standard equipment further up the range, but on the volume SE trim it comes as part of an option pack rather than as standard fitment. Good display, one trim step away from the top band.

8Use-Case FitGrades above the middle of the scale.2.96B-
Kid & car-seat practicality75
#73 of 148 in classCompare all →

Wide, square rear door openings, air suspension that auto-lowers on exit to tame a very tall step-in, two outboard LATCH positions with upper tethers, and a huge 41.7 cu ft stroller bay behind row two make daily kid logistics easy — but the volume SWB is a fixed-bench five-seater with no sliding or tumble-forward second row, so it lacks the seat flexibility and third-row escape hatch that define the class benchmarks.

Family safety package76
#77 of 148 in classCompare all →

The ADAS half is strong and genuinely standard from the entry SE — adaptive cruise with steering assist, blind-spot assist with steering intervention, emergency braking with pedestrian/cyclist detection, lane keep, rear traffic monitor and clear exit monitor cost nothing extra. The crash-rating half is simply absent: neither NHTSA nor IIHS publishes any result for the L460 in any model year, so a family cannot verify the structure the way it can on an X7 or GLS.

Family road-trip comfort93
#1 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is the segment benchmark for multi-hour comfort: 20-way heated/ventilated/massaging front seats standard from SE, available Executive Class rear seats with recline, massage and powered footrests, four-zone climate with Cabin Air Purification Pro, acoustic laminated glazing plus active noise cancellation, and 41.7 cu ft of luggage room with all five seats occupied — more usable gear space on a family trip than three-row rivals offer behind their third rows.

Daily driving ease80
#44 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard all-wheel steering, air suspension with road-preview damping, a smooth 48V mild-hybrid inline-six paired to the ZF 8HP, and standard 3D surround cameras with ClearSight Ground View make a 5,700-lb SUV feel far smaller than it is in traffic. Held back by sheer mass, an occasionally lazy kickdown, and Land Rover's documented infotainment and electrical flakiness — a daily-use annoyance, not a one-off.

Commuting cost efficiency42
#122 of 148 in classCompare all →

Fuel economy matches its German rivals almost exactly, but everything downstream of the pump is worse: premium-only fuel, 22-23 in tires, insurance well above the luxury average, and Land Rover's position at the very top of the brand repair-cost tables make the per-mile cost of commuting materially higher than an X7 or GLS. The P550e PHEV's roughly 51 miles of electric range is a genuine escape hatch neither rival offers, but the volume trim is the P400.

Parking & maneuverability72
#43 of 148 in classCompare all →

The standout of the full-size luxury class on this measure: standard rear-axle steering shrinks the turning circle to roughly 36 ft, and the SWB is actually shorter than an X7 or GLS, while 3D surround cameras, ClearSight Ground View and ClearSight rear-view mirror are all standard. Still a 79-in-wide, 73-in-tall vehicle with thick pillars that won't fit every urban garage, and the LWB gives back most of the length advantage.

Work capability75
#11 of 148 in classCompare all →

Tows 7,716 lbs properly equipped — top of the full-size luxury class — and backs it with hardware the rivals lack: a two-speed transfer case with low range, an electronic rear locking differential, self-levelling air suspension with hitch-height adjustment, and Advanced Tow Assist for reversing a trailer. Payload is ordinary for the class and there is no bed, so it is a serious tow platform rather than a work truck.

Durability for work duty42
#105 of 148 in classCompare all →

The weakest use case by a wide margin. Land Rover sits at or near the bottom of both J.D. Power dependability and Consumer Reports brand reliability, and the Range Rover specifically stacks air suspension, 48V active anti-roll bars, an aluminium monocoque and dense electronics on top of a Nappa-leather-and-wood cabin with no wear-friendly work trim. The sparsest dealer network in the segment makes downtime worse when something does fail.

Jobsite & upfit practicality46
#53 of 148 in classCompare all →

Covers the basics and adds one genuinely useful feature — the powered split tailgate whose lower half drops to a load platform, with fold-out Tailgate Event Suite cushions — alongside roof rails, loadspace tie-downs, a rubber cargo mat and a deployable tow bar. But there is no household AC outlet in the loadspace, no auxiliary switch bank, no washable interior, no vehicle-to-load on the PHEV and no meaningful upfit ecosystem.

Long-distance comfort & range94
#2 of 148 in classCompare all →

About as good as a mile-eater gets: the best ride, seat and quietness scores in this dataset, roughly 500 miles of range from the 23.8-gal tank, acoustic laminated glazing with active noise cancellation through headrest speakers, and massaging 20-way seats standard from the entry trim. The single gap versus a Navigator is driver-assist sophistication — adaptive cruise with steering assist is standard, but there is no hands-free highway system on any trim.

Outdoor & adventure capability86
#9 of 148 in classCompare all →

Unmatched off-pavement hardware for a luxury flagship: a two-speed transfer case with genuine low range, an electronic rear locker, Terrain Response 2, roughly 11.6 in of maximum ground clearance on air springs and a 35.4 in wading depth that no German rival approaches, plus 7,716 lbs of towing for toys. Marked down because the volume SE rides on 22-in low-profile street tires with no factory all-terrain option, and $110k of aluminium bodywork discourages owners from using any of it.

Gear & luggage flexibility80
#27 of 148 in classCompare all →

A flat, wide load bay with a power-folding 40:20:40 second row, roof rails with crossbars, an available deployable tow bar and the split tailgate acting as a loading platform cover bulky gear well. Maximum volume of 83.5 cu ft trails the X7's 90.4 and the Navigator's 107, and the SWB's fixed second row limits how the space can be reshaped.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the Range Rover's strongest categories.3.13B
Handling & agility74
#38 of 148 in classCompare all →

The fifth-generation (L460) Range Rover carries standard air suspension with adaptive dampers, all-wheel steering, and 48V electronic active roll control (Dynamic Response Pro) on most US trims, so body control is far tighter than the ~5,800–6,300 lb curb weight suggests and it corners flatly and predictably. It is deliberately tuned for isolation over engagement, however, and does not change direction with the eagerness of a Range Rover Sport, X7 or Cayenne — secure and composed rather than genuinely agile.

Steering feel62
#75 of 148 in classCompare all →

Steering is accurate, consistently weighted and very light at parking speeds, and the rear-axle steering makes the nose feel keener than the vehicle's length implies — but feedback is filtered out almost entirely by design, in keeping with the car's isolation-first brief. Precise enough to place confidently, numb in the hands.

Braking confidence66
#94 of 148 in classCompare all →

Stopping hardware is sized for the mass and fade resistance in normal use is not an issue, but instrumented 70-0 mph results for the V8 L460 land in the low-170-ft range — long for the class — and the pedal has a soft, long-travel first inch that trades initial bite for smooth low-speed stops. The P550e PHEV's regenerative blending is well managed but adds another layer between pedal and rotor.

Powertrain smoothness & response86
#24 of 148 in classCompare all →

All US powertrains pair with the ZF 8-speed automatic, which shifts essentially imperceptibly; the 3.0L Ingenium inline-six mild hybrid uses its 48V belt-integrated starter-generator to make stop/start restarts almost undetectable, and the BMW-sourced 4.4L twin-turbo V8 is exceptionally smooth with strong, linear tip-in. The P550e PHEV's engine-start and EV-to-hybrid handoffs are well isolated, with only occasional hesitation under sudden throttle at low battery.

Drivetrain noise & vibration90
#10 of 148 in classCompare all →

Cabin isolation is a class benchmark: acoustic laminated glass, extensive sealing and active road-noise cancellation keep the inline-six a distant hum and give the V8 a muted, cultured note only under hard throttle. The PHEV's EV mode is near-silent, and there is no perceptible driveline vibration through the wheel or pedals.

Turning circle
36.1 ft (SWB); ~37.7 ft long-wheelbase
74/100
#18 of 148 in classCompare all →

Standard all-wheel steering (up to 7.3 degrees of rear steer) shrinks the L460's curb-to-curb turning circle to roughly 11.0 m / 36.1 ft in standard-wheelbase form — a figure Land Rover promoted as the tightest of any Land Rover, and remarkable for a vehicle of this length. The long-wheelbase body adds roughly 1.5 ft.

Driving position & ergonomics82
#16 of 148 in classCompare all →

The signature high 'command' driving position, deep glass and low beltline give outstanding forward sightlines, and the volume trims offer wide-range power seat and column adjustment that suits a broad range of drivers, with easy step-in via the air suspension's access height. Points come off for the minimalist Pivi Pro layout, which moves climate and drive-mode functions into the touchscreen, and for the sheer footprint, which makes tight urban parking a camera-dependent exercise despite the rear steer.

Fun-to-drive factor72
#35 of 148 in classCompare all →

This is not an SUV that rewards a back road, but it has genuine character of a different kind — the effortless wafting gait, the sense of occasion from the driving position, and a V8 that delivers real thrust make long drives a pleasure rather than a chore. Enthusiasts recommend it for what it is, not for how it corners, so it sits comfortably above appliance territory without reaching the segment's driver-focused top end.

10Value & Market PositionGrades above the middle of the scale.2.72B-
Standard equipment generosity72
#79 of 148 in classCompare all →

The volume SE trim arrives genuinely well-equipped for a flagship — four-corner air suspension, all-wheel steering, Terrain Response 2, 13.1-inch Pivi Pro touchscreen with 13.7-inch digital cluster, Meridian audio, heated/ventilated power front seats, four-zone climate with Cabin Air Purification Pro, panoramic roof and the full ADAS suite — but it opens roughly $20-25k above a GLS 450 or X7 xDrive40i, and Land Rover's famously long options list still charges for head-up display, massage seats, upgraded Meridian, and rear-seat entertainment. Generous in absolute terms, only competitive once price is held against it.

Feature value per dollar55
#132 of 148 in classCompare all →

The weakest link in the Range Rover case: it is the most expensive mainstream full-size luxury SUV, asking roughly $20-25k more than GLS/X7/Escalade for comparable equipment, and steep depreciation plus Land Rover's poor repair-cost record erode the money further. Buyers are paying a substantial premium for presence, design and genuine off-road hardware rather than for content-per-dollar — fair value only if the badge and the cabin are the point.

Trim & configuration breadth90
#4 of 148 in classCompare all →

Among the broadest configurators in the industry: standard and long wheelbase, four-, five- and seven-seat layouts, three powertrains (mild-hybrid inline-six, plug-in hybrid with roughly 50 miles of electric range, twin-turbo V8), and a trim ladder running SE to Autobiography to SV — the last available with the SV Signature Suite rear cabin and the SV Bespoke commissioning program. Price spread runs from ~$110k to well past $250k.

Sales popularity & market acceptance64
#82 of 148 in classCompare all →

Strong acceptance for something at this price — the Range Rover comfortably outsells Bentayga, Cullinan and Lexus LX and anchors JLR's US profit — but volume sits well below Escalade, GLS and X7, and the trajectory into 2026 was hurt by two supply shocks: JLR's spring 2025 pause on US shipments over tariffs and the autumn 2025 cyberattack that halted production for roughly five weeks. Mid-pack for the segment as the framework defines it.

Brand desirability & image82
#31 of 148 in classCompare all →

The Range Rover nameplate is one of the most aspirational in the SUV world — a genuine status object with a loyal, repeat-buying clientele, and now the anchor of JLR's house-of-brands strategy. Held back from the top band by the two things the item explicitly weighs: Land Rover's persistently poor reliability reputation dents owner satisfaction, and depreciation is among the steepest in luxury, so the halo does not translate into resale the way a Lexus or Porsche badge does.

Deals & incentive availability62
#116 of 148 in classCompare all →

Buyer leverage is limited. Land Rover Financial Services runs lease programs and occasional loyalty cash on SE and Autobiography, and the early-generation dealer markups have faded as supply normalized, but the Range Rover still transacts close to sticker and SV allocations effectively do not discount. Constrained 2025-2026 supply from the tariff pause and production stoppage further reduced any pressure to deal.

Model freshness66
#90 of 148 in classCompare all →

The fifth-generation L460 launched for the 2022 model year, so 2026 is its fifth season with no full mid-cycle facelift yet — a refresh is the natural next step. The minimalist exterior has aged unusually well and the MLA-Flex chassis remains current, but Pivi Pro is no longer a tech benchmark against newer rivals, and the repeatedly delayed Range Rover Electric leaves prospective buyers with a reason to wait. Solidly mid-cycle.

Critical reception & awards74
#47 of 148 in classCompare all →

Reviewers are close to unanimous on the appeal — the cabin, the isolation of the ride, the reductive design and the fact that it still genuinely goes off-road are all praised, and the L460 collected design and luxury-SUV honors around its launch. What keeps it out of comparison-test wins is consistent: the price premium, Pivi Pro's occasional glitchiness, and predicted-reliability scores that drag its aggregate rankings below the GLS, X7 and Escalade in US outlets.