MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2023:Overall +2Safety +2Reliability -1Efficiency & Range 0Cost of Ownership +6Technology +1Driving Experience +3
Mazda logo
Compact SUV

2024 Mazda CX-50

MainstreamGasHybrid
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
2.47C+GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
3.08B
Safety
3.40B+
EfficiencyGas
2.06C
27 MPG combined · 429 mi range · $2,300/yr energy
Comfort
1.22D
Value
3.69A-
Ownership Cost
2.21C
Technology
2.23C
Driving Experience
3.10B

The verdict

A mixed-report compact suv, strong on value and held back by performance.

Overall 2.47 (C+) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is value & market position at 3.69 (A-), its weakest performance & powertrain at 0.57 (F). 8 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Value & Market Position
  • Safety
  • Driving Experience

What holds it back

  • Performance & Powertrain
  • Space & Comfort
  • Efficiency & Range

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Mazda CX-50

Production history

2023present · 4 years · 1 generations
Gen 12023now2023In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — gradedProduction began 2023

How it's evolved

4 scored model years · 20232026

025507510020232024202520262023 · Overall: 652024 · Overall: 66 (+1 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 64 (−2 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 65 (+1 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023

Compare two years

vs
Performance38
42+4
Efficiency61
55-6
Safety78
77-1
Space44
49+4
Cost56
64+7
Reliability76
77+1
Tech62
65+3
Use-case66
62-4
Driving73
71-1
Value80
71-8

Best fit & conditions

FamilyB-73/100
Winter / inclementB-73/100
AdventureB-70/100
CommuterC+64/100
Work / TowD49/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Trims & configurations

5 trims

Scores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:

S Select · baseS PreferredS PremiumTurbo Premium PlusMeridian Edition

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe CX-50's lowest-graded category.0.57F
Horsepower
187 hp (2.5 S); up to 256 hp (2.5 Turbo on 93 octane)
9/100
#49 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.5 S uses Mazda's naturally aspirated 2.5-liter four-cylinder with 187 hp. The optional turbo makes 227 hp on regular fuel or 256 hp on 93 octane.

Torque
186 lb-ft (2.5 S); up to 320 lb-ft (2.5 Turbo on 93 octane)
15/100
#51 of 57 in classCompare all →

The representative naturally aspirated engine produces 186 lb-ft. Turbo trims offer substantially more torque but are not the volume configuration.

0–60 mph time
8.5 s (2.5 S, MotorTrend instrumented test); about 6.4–7.0 s for turbo tests
17/100
#50 of 57 in classCompare all →

MotorTrend's instrumented test of the standard-engine CX-50 recorded 8.5 seconds, slow for the class but preferable to using the much quicker optional turbo as the representative figure.

Powertrain refinement62
#34 of 57 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated engine provides predictable, linear response without turbo lag, but reviewers describe its acceleration as merely adequate and strained rather than effortless. It is acceptably smooth, not a class benchmark.

Transmission behavior55
#51 of 57 in classCompare all →

The conventional six-speed responds promptly with needed downshifts, but its limited ratio count and occasional rough upshifts and downshifts keep it in the lower half of the acceptable band.

Max towing capacity
3,500 lbs (Turbo with Mazda towing accessories); 2,000 lbs for 2.5 S
36/100
#28 of 57 in classCompare all →

The maximum applies to all turbo packages when properly equipped; the representative naturally aspirated trims are limited to 2,000 lb.

AWD/4WD availability88
#9 of 57 in classCompare all →

i-Activ AWD is standard on every 2024 trim, accompanied by Mi-Drive Sport and Off-Road modes. It lacks a low range or locking differentials, keeping it below true 4WD systems.

Off-road capability62
#15 of 57 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD, an Off-Road mode, 8.3–8.6 inches of clearance, and the Meridian Edition's all-terrain tires make it credible for rough roads and light trails. There is no low range, locker, crawl control, or serious underbody hardware.

Powertrain lineup breadth60
#15 of 57 in classCompare all →

For the exact 2024 model year, buyers could choose naturally aspirated or turbocharged 2.5-liter gas engines. That covers economy and performance needs, but there was no 2024 hybrid, PHEV, or EV; the CX-50 Hybrid arrived for 2025.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the CX-50's weakest categories.2.06C
3SafetyOne of the CX-50's strongest categories.3.40B+
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall
100/100
#1 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 CX-50 AWD earned NHTSA's maximum five-star overall rating; its frontal and side ratings are five stars and rollover is four stars.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness96
#3 of 57 in classCompare all →

Vehicles built after August 2023 earned 2024 Top Safety Pick+ with Good results in small overlap, both moderate-overlap tests, and the updated side test. Earlier 2024 builds retain an Acceptable updated-side result, so the score stops short of perfect.

Standard ADAS suite breadth92
#5 of 57 in classCompare all →

Every 2024 package includes all five rubric essentials: pedestrian-capable AEB, stop-and-go adaptive cruise, lane-departure prevention, blind-spot monitoring, and rear cross-traffic alert. Rear automatic braking remains optional on upper equipment, but the standard suite is unusually complete for a mainstream compact SUV.

Automatic emergency braking performance74
#22 of 57 in classCompare all →

Standard Smart Brake Support performed well in the daytime child test but was less decisive in the tougher nighttime adult scenarios, yielding an IIHS Acceptable rather than Good rating. This is capable AEB with verified night detection, but not top-tier performance.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage75
#26 of 57 in classCompare all →

Blind Spot Monitoring and Rear Cross Traffic Alert are standard throughout the range, providing excellent availability. They are primarily warning systems, however, while rear automatic braking is optional and there is no trailer-aware blind-zone or safe-exit function.

Lane keeping & centering45
#52 of 57 in classCompare all →

Lane-departure warning and corrective Lane Keep Assist are standard, but the 2024 system is departure mitigation rather than continuous lane centering. It can nudge the vehicle back near a boundary but does not deliver the smooth, sustained highway centering expected in the upper bands.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist72
#26 of 57 in classCompare all →

Mazda Radar Cruise Control includes Stop & Go and is standard, giving the volume trim useful full-range adaptive cruise. Its lack of continuous lane centering keeps it from functioning as a fully integrated highway-assist system.

Hands-free driving availability5
#39 of 57 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway-driving system was offered on any 2024 CX-50 trim. All available assistance remains hands-on and driver-supervised.

Headlight performance68
#21 of 57 in classCompare all →

The scored naturally aspirated volume trims have Acceptable LED projector headlights with automatic high beams; only turbo trims gain Good-rated curve-adaptive units. Illumination is solid on straights and right curves but weaker on left curves.

Outward visibility65
#36 of 57 in classCompare all →

Forward visibility is generally straightforward, but the CX-50's low roof, relatively small rear glass, and thick rear pillars create ordinary-to-below-average rear-quarter sightlines. Standard blind-spot monitoring helps, while the 360-degree View Monitor is confined to the Turbo Premium Plus rather than the volume gas trim.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability95
#1 of 57 in classCompare all →

IIHS gives the CX-50 its top G+ rating: both outboard positions have visible, open-access lower anchors, and the center can borrow anchors while retaining its own tether. Three-across use is constrained because borrowed center anchors make the outboard anchors unavailable, but day-to-day installation is exceptionally easy.

4Space & ComfortOne of the CX-50's weakest categories.1.22D
Seating capacity
5 seats
25/100
#18 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 CX-50 is a two-row, five-passenger compact SUV.

Front headroom
39.1 in
42/100
#48 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.5 S Preferred lacks the panoramic moonroof and uses the higher published headroom figure.

Front legroom
41.7 in
38/100
#25 of 57 in classCompare all →

Front legroom is adequate but not unusually generous for a compact SUV.

Rear headroom
38.6 in
65/100
#35 of 57 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom is competitive for the segment.

Rear legroom
39.8 in
82/100
#9 of 57 in classCompare all →

The published rear legroom is strong, though the low roof and cabin shape can make the space feel less expansive than leading rivals.

Third-row usability0
#53 of 57 in classCompare all →

There is no third row, so the CX-50 cannot accommodate more than five occupants.

Cargo/trunk volume
31.4 cu ft behind second row
12/100
#27 of 57 in classCompare all →

Cargo volume increased for 2024 but remains near the bottom of the compact-crossover class.

Max cargo volume
56.3 cu ft with rear seats folded
3/100
#43 of 57 in classCompare all →

Maximum volume is modest relative to the CX-50's long exterior footprint.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions67
#16 of 57 in classCompare all →

Everyday storage is well designed, but there is no standout underfloor, onboard-power, or other class-leading solution.

Seat comfort72
#26 of 57 in classCompare all →

Front seats have good padding and bolstering plus useful power lumbar adjustment on the Preferred, while the rear bench is flatter.

Ride quality65
#38 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 dampers improve comfort and the Preferred's 17-inch wheels help, but the chassis remains firmer than many rivals.

Cabin quietness72
#25 of 57 in classCompare all →

Highway wind and road noise are mild, though the naturally aspirated engine becomes conspicuous under full throttle.

Climate & comfort features66
#38 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume Preferred has dual-zone climate control, rear vents, and heated front seats; ventilation, heated rear seats, and heated steering wheel require much higher trims.

5Cost of OwnershipMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.21C
Base MSRP
$31,675 (2.5 S Select AWD, including $1,375 destination)
83/100
#11 of 57 in classCompare all →

Mazda dropped the prior 2.5 S entry trim for 2024, making the well-equipped AWD Select the least expensive version. The delivered price uses the destination charge in effect when the 2024 model launched.

Volume-Trim Price
$33,025 (2.5 S Preferred AWD, including $1,375 destination)
85/100
#8 of 57 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated Preferred is the representative volume gas trim; it adds the power driver's seat, heated front seats and power liftgate without moving into the expensive turbo range. Its launch MSRP plus destination is used consistently with the base-price figure.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
$7,415 over 5 years ($5,733 maintenance + $1,682 repairs)
32/100
#51 of 57 in classCompare all →

Edmunds projects fairly high scheduled-maintenance and wear-item spending at its 15,000-mile-per-year assumption, partly offset by modest repair expense during the warranty years. This is the exact sum of its two relevant ownership-cost categories for the volume gas trim.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
63% of MSRP retained after 5 years
77/100
#7 of 57 in classCompare all →

Projected retention is strong for a mainstream compact SUV, reflecting Mazda's solid used-market standing, though the young nameplate has less long-run history than a CR-V or RAV4. The figure is the inverse of CarEdge's published five-year depreciation estimate.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
0/100
#27 of 57 in classCompare all →

Mazda provides the mainstream-industry baseline, at the floor of the scoring band. It matches Toyota and Honda but trails Hyundai and Kia's five-year basic coverage.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain
0/100
#23 of 57 in classCompare all →

The powertrain term is the segment baseline and therefore the floor of the normalization band. This score concerns the requested gasoline CX-50, so no later hybrid-system coverage applies.

Complimentary maintenance & perks52
#33 of 57 in classCompare all →

Mazda includes roadside assistance and a useful three-year connected-services trial, but no nationwide complimentary scheduled maintenance. That earns the bottom of the basic-perks band and trails rivals with factory-paid service visits.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$19,634 (≈$12,219 depreciation + $7,415 maintenance)
78/100
#7 of 57 in classCompare all →

$33,025 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (63% retained, or about $20,806) leaves about $12,219 in depreciation. Add the projected $7,415 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $19,634 in total.

6Reliability & QualityGrades above the middle of the scale.3.08B
Predicted reliability68
#15 of 57 in classCompare all →

Owner-survey evidence is broadly average rather than exceptional. Consumer Reports calls the 2024 CX-50 about average, while J.D. Power's model-specific quality and reliability score is 72/100.

Brand reliability track record75
#21 of 57 in classCompare all →

Mazda's recent record is above average but not consistently top-five across studies. It placed sixth in Consumer Reports' 2024 reliability ranking, while J.D. Power's 2024 VDS put Mazda only slightly better than the industry average.

Recall & TSB history75
#9 of 57 in classCompare all →

The recall record is unusually light and the only campaign is a very small accessory-hitch torque issue, not a core vehicle-system defect. The score stops short of the top band because the young generation has accumulated numerous service communications, including a documented panoramic-roof rattle procedure.

Powertrain durability reputation86
#6 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume gas trim's naturally aspirated 2.5-liter Skyactiv-G and conventional six-speed automatic are mature, comparatively low-complexity components used across Mazda products for roughly a decade. This is a substantially more proven combination than many newer turbocharged or continuously variable rival powertrains.

Interior material quality88
#2 of 57 in classCompare all →

The CX-50's padded surfaces, high-quality switchgear, and sophisticated design are class-leading for mainstream-compact-SUV money. Less-visible hard plastic keeps it below true luxury-car quality, but reviewers consistently identify the cabin as a standout.

Fit & finish68
#22 of 57 in classCompare all →

Professional reviews generally praise assembly and detailing, but owner reports and Mazda's own service procedure show a recurring panoramic-roof rattle concern. That supports a solid but not exceptional score for the Alabama-built model.

Dealer & service network66
#44 of 57 in classCompare all →

About 543 U.S. stores provide adequate nationwide metropolitan coverage, but the network is materially thinner than Toyota, Honda, or Ford and can mean longer travel in rural areas. Mazda reported moderate 56.2% national service retention in late 2024.

Parts availability & repair cost74
#19 of 57 in classCompare all →

The mature engine and transmission, domestic assembly, and component sharing with high-volume Mazdas support normal mainstream parts pricing and availability. The model-specific aftermarket is younger and smaller than for a RAV4 or CR-V, so it does not merit the cheap-and-abundant top band.

7Technology & InfotainmentMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.23C
Touchscreen size
10.25 in
38/100
#29 of 57 in classCompare all →

For 2024, the 10.25-inch center display is standard from the Select upward, including the volume Preferred.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness60
#44 of 57 in classCompare all →

Physical controls and the rotary controller reduce distraction once learned, but reviewers repeatedly criticize the menu logic and limited touch behavior.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto95
#2 of 57 in classCompare all →

Both wireless Apple CarPlay and wireless Android Auto are standard across the 2024 lineup.

Voice control & native navigation60
#38 of 57 in classCompare all →

Voice commands and useful connected navigation functions exist, but built-in Mazda Navigation is restricted to the top Turbo Premium Plus and most buyers will use phone projection.

Audio system quality75
#23 of 57 in classCompare all →

The standard eight-speaker system is adequate, and an unusually good 12-speaker Bose upgrade begins on the Premium trim.

Digital instrument cluster55
#34 of 57 in classCompare all →

A 7-inch TFT display is standard, but it is only a partial-digital cluster rather than a large configurable full-digital panel.

OTA update capability55
#40 of 57 in classCompare all →

The connected platform supports OTA and online updates, but there is no evidence of broad feature-adding whole-vehicle updates.

Companion app & remote functions68
#28 of 57 in classCompare all →

MyMazda provides remote start, lock/unlock, vehicle status, locate, and send-to-car functions, but the included service lasts only three years and there is no phone-as-key.

Charging ports & device power62
#42 of 57 in classCompare all →

Four USB ports cover both rows, but they are older USB-A ports and wireless charging starts on Premium for 2024; no household outlet is offered.

Keyless & remote access75
#24 of 57 in classCompare all →

Advanced proximity keyless entry, push-button start, app-based remote start, and a power liftgate on Preferred provide strong everyday convenience, without phone-as-key or hands-free liftgate operation.

Camera & parking aids48
#51 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume trim has the mandatory rear camera but neither parking sensors nor surround view; both are confined to the top Turbo Premium Plus.

Head-up display availability40
#35 of 57 in classCompare all →

The windshield-projected Active Driving Display is available, but not on the volume Preferred and only reaches upper naturally aspirated and turbo trims.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.33C+
Kid & car-seat practicality70
#24 of 57 in classCompare all →

Wide-opening rear doors, accessible anchors, and useful rear legroom help, but rear-facing seats can squeeze tall front occupants and cargo volume trails family-focused rivals.

Family safety package86
#6 of 57 in classCompare all →

Strong IIHS crash performance combines with standard blind-spot monitoring, lane support, and adaptive cruise on the affordable Select and Preferred trims.

Family road-trip comfort65
#29 of 57 in classCompare all →

Four people get good legroom, rear vents, a quiet cabin, and four USB ports, but the firm ride, flat rear bench, and modest luggage space impose limits.

Daily driving ease70
#36 of 57 in classCompare all →

Good ergonomics, conventional controls, standard adaptive cruise, and 2024's lighter steering calibration make commuting easy, although the base engine is slow and the six-speed can shift less smoothly than modern rivals.

Commuting cost efficiency55
#26 of 57 in classCompare all →

Regular fuel and 27 mpg combined are acceptable, but efficiency is unremarkable for a compact SUV and there was no 2024 hybrid.

Parking & maneuverability65
#26 of 57 in classCompare all →

A 36-foot curb-to-curb turning diameter is manageable, but the long hood and 185.8-inch body require care and the volume trim lacks sensors or surround view.

Work capability48
#24 of 57 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD and a 2,000-pound tow rating handle light duty, but the naturally aspirated volume trim has modest power and cargo capacity and is not a serious work vehicle.

Durability for work duty55
#16 of 57 in classCompare all →

The conventional naturally aspirated engine and six-speed automatic are straightforward, but this relatively new crossover generation lacks a fleet-work record and its upscale cabin is not abuse-focused.

Jobsite & upfit practicality45
#17 of 57 in classCompare all →

Factory crossbars, roof-platform accessories, and a hitch are available, but there is no onboard AC power, washable cabin, or meaningful commercial-upfit ecosystem.

Long-distance comfort & range68
#32 of 57 in classCompare all →

Supportive front seats, low highway noise, adaptive cruise, and roughly 477 miles of EPA highway range make it a sound tourer, tempered by firm ride tuning and modest luggage room.

Outdoor & adventure capability78
#11 of 57 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD, Off-Road mode, 8.3 inches of clearance, a useful roof-accessory catalog, and 2,000-pound towing make it notably adventure-ready, though not a technical off-roader.

Gear & luggage flexibility64
#33 of 57 in classCompare all →

A low, long cargo floor, 60/40 folding seat, roof hardware, and hitch support outdoor gear, but 31.4/56.3 cubic feet is near the class floor.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the CX-50's strongest categories.3.10B
Handling & agility85
#5 of 57 in classCompare all →

The CX-50 has unusually disciplined body control and cornering composure for a mainstream compact SUV, further refined by 2024 damper revisions.

Steering feel82
#4 of 57 in classCompare all →

Accurate, quick, naturally substantial steering is a class strength, though it can still feel heavy at parking speeds.

Braking confidence72
#23 of 57 in classCompare all →

Large four-wheel discs, conventional hydraulic feel, ABS, and EBD provide reassuring, predictable braking without evidence that stopping performance leads the class.

Powertrain smoothness & response68
#29 of 57 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.5 and six-speed automatic deliver direct, predictable response, but 187 hp yields slow acceleration and some tests note bumpy shifts.

Drivetrain noise & vibration62
#33 of 57 in classCompare all →

The engine is unobtrusive in normal cruising but becomes loud when the modest-output base powertrain is worked hard.

Turning circle
36.0 ft curb-to-curb diameter
75/100
#6 of 57 in classCompare all →

Mazda publishes an 18-foot curb-to-curb radius, equivalent to the requested 36-foot diameter.

Driving position & ergonomics75
#17 of 57 in classCompare all →

The low, carlike driving position, excellent physical climate controls, and Preferred's power lumbar seat are driver-focused, though the long hood and rotary infotainment learning curve modestly reduce ease.

Fun-to-drive factor82
#6 of 57 in classCompare all →

Even with the slower base engine, the precise steering, taut chassis, conventional automatic, and standard AWD give this compact SUV genuine enthusiast appeal.

10Value & Market PositionThe CX-50's best-graded category.3.69A-
Standard equipment generosity78
#12 of 57 in classCompare all →

The $31,675 delivered Select includes AWD, a 10.25-inch display, wireless smartphone integration, dual-zone climate control, rain-sensing wipers and a broad active-safety suite. Heated seats and the power liftgate require the still-reasonable Preferred, keeping it just below loaded-at-base territory.

Feature value per dollar79
#4 of 57 in classCompare all →

The Preferred delivers standard AWD, an upscale cabin and engaging road manners for about $33,000 delivered, and reviewers found its pricing competitive with similarly equipped CR-V and RAV4 trims. Mediocre fuel economy and less cargo/rear-seat room than the leaders prevent standout bargain status.

Trim & configuration breadth86
#9 of 57 in classCompare all →

Eight trims span sensible naturally aspirated, turbo and adventure-themed choices from $30,300 to $43,300 before destination. Standard AWD and one transmission reduce drivetrain flexibility, and the hybrid did not join the U.S. range until model year 2025.

Sales popularity & market acceptance86
#6 of 57 in classCompare all →

The young nameplate nearly doubled U.S. sales in 2024 and repeatedly set monthly records, demonstrating unusually fast acceptance even though absolute volume remained below segment leaders. Its trajectory is firmly that of a fast riser.

Brand desirability & image75
#17 of 57 in classCompare all →

Mazda carries a strong enthusiast and premium-adjacent image built on design, cabins and driving dynamics, giving the CX-50 more emotional pull than many mainstream rivals. Its smaller footprint and weaker resale halo than Toyota or Honda cap the score below aspirational-brand territory.

Deals & incentive availability87
#8 of 57 in classCompare all →

Mazda repeatedly supported the 2024 CX-50 with 0% financing and later substantial customer cash as the model year cleared out. Those were meaningful, broadly useful buyer benefits, though the heavier late-year cash also reflected inventory pressure.

Model freshness90
#10 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 CX-50 was only the second model year of the generation that began for 2023, so platform and design freshness were excellent. It was not a pure carry-over: Mazda fitted new dampers, recalibrated steering and comfort/convenience updates, while the hybrid remained a 2025-model change.

Critical reception & awards91
#1 of 57 in classCompare all →

The CX-50 combined Editors' Choice recognition with an outright win in Car and Driver's eight-SUV comparison, unusually strong evidence in a crowded class. Edmunds also ranked it narrowly ahead of the CR-V, while space and economy criticisms keep it short of universal dominance.