MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2024:Overall -2Safety -6Reliability -4Efficiency & Range +5Cost of Ownership 0Technology +3
Mazda logo
Compact SUV

2025 Mazda CX-50

MainstreamGasHybrid
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
2.30C+GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
2.79B-
Safety
2.99B-
EfficiencyGas
2.42C+
28 MPG combined · 445 mi range · $2,200/yr energy
Comfort
1.17D
Value
3.46B+
Ownership Cost
2.19C
Technology
2.43C+
Driving Experience
3.10B

The verdict

A mixed-report compact suv, strong on value and held back by performance.

Overall 2.30 (C+) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is value & market position at 3.46 (B+), its weakest performance & powertrain at 0.50 (F). 8 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Value & Market Position
  • Driving Experience
  • Safety

What holds it back

  • Performance & Powertrain
  • Space & Comfort
  • Cost of Ownership

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Mazda CX-50

Production history

2023present · 4 years · 1 generations
Gen 12023now2023In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — gradedProduction began 2023

How it's evolved

4 scored model years · 20232026

025507510020232024202520262023 · Overall: 652024 · Overall: 66 (+1 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 64 (−2 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 65 (+1 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023

Compare two years

vs
Performance38
42+4
Efficiency61
55-6
Safety78
77-1
Space44
49+4
Cost56
64+7
Reliability76
77+1
Tech62
65+3
Use-case66
62-4
Driving73
71-1
Value80
71-8

Best fit & conditions

FamilyB75/100
AdventureB-73/100
Winter / inclementB-73/100
CommuterC+68/100
Work / TowD54/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Trims & configurations

5 trims

Scores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:

S Select · baseS PreferredS PremiumTurbo Premium PlusMeridian Edition

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe CX-50's lowest-graded category.0.50F
Horsepower
187 hp (2.5 S); up to 256 hp (2.5 Turbo on 93 octane)
9/100
#52 of 60 in classCompare all →

The representative 2.5 S Preferred uses the naturally aspirated engine's 187-hp rating; the gas range also offers a substantially stronger turbo.

Torque
185 lb-ft (2.5 S); up to 320 lb-ft (2.5 Turbo on 93 octane)
15/100
#55 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume naturally aspirated engine's output is adequate but modest for a modern compact SUV; turbo models provide much more torque.

0–60 mph time
9.3 s (naturally aspirated 2.5 S); approximately 6.4 s (2.5 Turbo)
3/100
#60 of 60 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports' instrumented result for the standard 187-hp powertrain is slow for the class, although the optional turbo is considerably quicker.

Powertrain refinement55
#50 of 60 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated four-cylinder is predictable and responsive enough in ordinary driving, but its merely adequate output makes it work hard and keeps it from feeling polished or effortless under load.

Transmission behavior52
#56 of 60 in classCompare all →

The six-speed automatic downshifts promptly, but documented roughness on both upshifts and downshifts prevents an above-average refinement score.

Max towing capacity
3,500 lbs maximum (2.5 Turbo); 2,000 lbs for 2.5 S
36/100
#32 of 60 in classCompare all →

The category calls for the model-range maximum: properly accessorized turbo models tow 3,500 pounds, while the representative naturally aspirated trim is limited to 2,000 pounds.

AWD/4WD availability88
#12 of 60 in classCompare all →

AWD is standard on every gas and hybrid package, and Mi-Drive adds dedicated Sport and Off-Road calibrations. It lacks a low range or locking differential, so it stops short of the most sophisticated off-road systems.

Off-road capability62
#17 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD, Off-Road mode, 8.3 inches of clearance on 17-inch gas trims, and a Meridian Edition with all-terrain tires make it credible for trails and poor weather. Modest approach angles and no locker, low range, or crawl control keep it in light-duty territory.

Powertrain lineup breadth85
#3 of 60 in classCompare all →

Three meaningfully distinct choices cover value, performance, and efficiency: naturally aspirated gas, turbo gas, and a newly introduced hybrid. There is no plug-in or full-EV choice, but breadth is excellent for a mainstream compact SUV.

2Efficiency & RangeMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.42C+
3SafetyOne of the CX-50's strongest categories.2.99B-
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall (5 frontal, 5 side, 4 rollover)
100/100
#1 of 60 in classCompare all →

The gas AWD 2025 CX-50 earned NHTSA's maximum five-star overall score, with five stars in frontal and side testing and four stars for rollover resistance.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness94
#5 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 CX-50 is an IIHS Top Safety Pick+ with Good ratings in both small-overlap tests, the updated moderate-overlap test, and the updated side test. Its Poor whiplash-prevention rating is the notable blemish and keeps it below the very top of the band.

Standard ADAS suite breadth72
#48 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume gas 2.5 S Preferred includes AEB with pedestrian detection, lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, driver-attention alert, vehicle-exit warning, and rear-seat alert. Adaptive cruise is the key omission: for 2025 Mazda adds MRCC with Stop & Go only from the 2.5 S Premium upward.

Automatic emergency braking performance88
#4 of 60 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the revised 2025 standard system Good for pedestrian prevention, including nighttime scenarios, and Acceptable in the tougher vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0 test. It avoided every passenger-car collision but only reduced speed in most motorcycle-target runs, preventing a higher score.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage79
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and the newly added vehicle-exit warning are standard even on the volume Preferred. These are alert-oriented systems on this trim; active Blind Spot Assist and rear automatic braking require the gas Turbo Premium Plus, so the score stays just below the active-intervention band.

Lane keeping & centering58
#45 of 60 in classCompare all →

Lane-departure warning and lane-keep assist are standard, but the volume Preferred only provides corrective lane intervention rather than continuous centering. Mazda's highway-speed Cruising & Traffic Support centering is restricted to the much more expensive Turbo Premium and Turbo Premium Plus.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist30
#60 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.5 S Preferred has conventional cruise rather than adaptive cruise. Full-speed MRCC with Stop & Go starts on the 2.5 S Premium, while combined highway-speed centering and adaptive cruise requires a Turbo Premium model, making capable highway assistance available but substantially paywalled.

Hands-free driving availability0
#57 of 60 in classCompare all →

No hands-free driving system is offered on any 2025 CX-50. Even the top Cruising & Traffic Support system is explicitly a hands-on assistance feature.

Headlight performance68
#26 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume Preferred's LED projectors earn an IIHS Acceptable rating and include automatic high beams. Good-rated curve-adaptive headlights are limited to the three turbo trims, matching the rubric's Good-upper-trims/Acceptable-volume-trims band.

Outward visibility64
#44 of 60 in classCompare all →

The CX-50's low, wide stance and rear-quarter bodywork create ordinary compact-SUV blind zones, though standard blind-spot monitoring helps. The volume Preferred has only a reversing camera; meaningful camera compensation via a 360-degree See-Through View monitor is confined to Turbo Premium Plus.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability93
#2 of 60 in classCompare all →

IIHS awards the CX-50 its top Good+ LATCH rating: the two complete outboard positions have accessible anchors, and the center position can borrow lower anchors and has its own tether. That extra usable position supports multiple-seat flexibility, though borrowed anchors cannot be used simultaneously by the adjacent seat.

4Space & ComfortOne of the CX-50's weakest categories.1.17D
Seating capacity
5 passengers (2 rows)
25/100
#20 of 60 in classCompare all →

The CX-50 is exclusively a five-seat, two-row SUV.

Front headroom
39.1 in (2.5 S Preferred without moonroof)
42/100
#49 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume Preferred trim lacks the Premium trim's panoramic moonroof, so the no-moonroof measurement applies.

Front legroom
41.7 in
38/100
#27 of 60 in classCompare all →

Front legroom is adequate but not unusually generous for a compact SUV.

Rear headroom
38.6 in (2.5 S Preferred without moonroof)
65/100
#37 of 60 in classCompare all →

The upright portion of the roof preserves useful rear head clearance on the no-moonroof Preferred.

Rear legroom
39.8 in
82/100
#12 of 60 in classCompare all →

The published number is competitive, though reviewers find the rear seat less spacious in practice than segment leaders.

Third-row usability0
#57 of 60 in classCompare all →

No CX-50 trim offers a third row.

Cargo/trunk volume
31.4 cu ft behind the second row
12/100
#29 of 60 in classCompare all →

Useful for everyday luggage, but modest among compact SUVs.

Max cargo volume
56.3 cu ft with second row folded
3/100
#46 of 60 in classCompare all →

The low roof and styling constrain maximum volume relative to boxier compact SUVs.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions62
#25 of 60 in classCompare all →

Door pockets, console storage, split-folding rear seats and a low cargo floor cover daily needs, but there is no standout storage innovation or household outlet on the volume trim.

Seat comfort72
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

Supportive front seats, power lumbar and heating suit long drives, while the rear bench and below-average perceived room keep it short of benchmark status.

Ride quality64
#42 of 60 in classCompare all →

The Preferred's 17-inch wheels soften impacts, but the chassis remains firmer than most rivals over broken pavement.

Cabin quietness66
#40 of 60 in classCompare all →

Noise is acceptably controlled at cruise, though the naturally aspirated engine becomes audible under acceleration and the cabin is not a segment quietness leader.

Climate & comfort features68
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

The Preferred includes dual-zone climate, rear vents and heated front seats; ventilation, heated rear seats and a heated wheel require higher gas trims.

5Cost of OwnershipOne of the CX-50's weakest categories.2.19C
Base MSRP
$31,995 (2.5 S Select AWD including $1,495 destination)
83/100
#10 of 60 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.5 S Select is the least expensive 2025 CX-50 and includes AWD as standard.

Volume-Trim Price
$33,345 (2.5 S Preferred AWD including $1,495 destination)
85/100
#6 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2.5 S Preferred is the representative high-volume gas trim: it sits one step above base and adds heated seats, a power driver's seat, power liftgate, heated mirrors/wipers and wireless charging without the Premium's larger price jump.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
$6,081 projected over 5 years ($5,284 maintenance + $797 repairs)
53/100
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

Edmunds provides a trim-specific five-year projection for the scored 2.5 S Preferred AWD, making it the closest available estimate to this configuration.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
63% projected retained value after 5 years
77/100
#8 of 60 in classCompare all →

The CX-50's projected 37% five-year depreciation is better than the compact-SUV norm and benefits from Mazda's improving demand, although the nameplate has only a short used-market history.

Basic warranty
3 years / 36,000 miles
0/100
#29 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda's new-vehicle limited warranty is the mainstream segment minimum rather than an ownership-cost advantage.

Powertrain warranty
5 years / 60,000 miles
0/100
#24 of 60 in classCompare all →

The powertrain term is conventional for a mainstream compact SUV and trails the 10-year coverage offered by Hyundai and Kia.

Complimentary maintenance & perks36
#55 of 60 in classCompare all →

There is no factory-included scheduled-maintenance plan. Mazda does include roadside assistance for the 3-year/36,000-mile basic-warranty period and one complimentary year of Connected Services, so the package offers modest perks but remains in the no-complimentary-maintenance band.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$18,419 (≈$12,338 depreciation + $6,081 maintenance)
81/100
#5 of 60 in classCompare all →

$33,345 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (63% retained, or about $21,007) leaves about $12,338 in depreciation. Add the projected $6,081 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $18,419 in total.

6Reliability & QualityGrades above the middle of the scale.2.79B-
Predicted reliability65
#26 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 CX-50 earns an average model-specific result rather than a top-tier one: J.D. Power scores Quality & Reliability at 71/100, while Consumer Reports recommends the model but places its predicted reliability in the middle band. Its short history since the 2023 model year limits confidence in long-term outcomes.

Brand reliability track record82
#12 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda has a strong recent multi-source record: it ranked sixth in Consumer Reports' 2024 reliability survey and second among mass-market brands in the 2025 J.D. Power VDS. That supports a high score, though the record is not consistently top-five across every study.

Recall & TSB history52
#37 of 60 in classCompare all →

Four safety campaigns cover subsets of gas 2025 CX-50s, including forward-camera/ADAS failure, loose trailer-hitch bolts, incorrectly configured airbag software, and improperly tightened front-suspension bolts. Most populations were small and remedies straightforward, but ADAS impairment and possible wheel or suspension separation are serious enough to prevent an average-or-better score.

Powertrain durability reputation85
#5 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume gas trim's naturally aspirated 2.5-liter Skyactiv-G four-cylinder and conventional six-speed automatic are mature, widely used Mazda components with a long service history and no broad failure pattern. This is substantially less complex and better proven than many newer turbo, hybrid, or CVT alternatives, though the CX-50 application itself dates only to 2023.

Interior material quality83
#14 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.5 S Preferred has leatherette seating, a leather-wrapped wheel and shifter, and generous pleasant-touch surfaces; reviewers consistently judge the cabin richer than mainstream norms. Some hard plastic remains on rear doors and lower-touch areas, keeping it just short of unequivocally class-leading.

Fit & finish65
#32 of 60 in classCompare all →

Professional reviews generally find the Alabama-built CX-50 solid and well assembled, but owner reports repeatedly mention panoramic-roof, dash, and trim rattles plus easily marked interior plastics. The evidence supports generally sound assembly with scattered consistency issues rather than exceptional fit and finish.

Dealer & service network66
#41 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda's 543 independently owned U.S. dealerships provide adequate national support, particularly in metropolitan areas, but the footprint is materially thinner than high-volume Toyota, Ford, or Chevrolet networks and can leave rural buyers with longer trips. Mazda reports substantial investment in modernized showrooms and digital service processes.

Parts availability & repair cost72
#22 of 60 in classCompare all →

The conventional 2.5-liter gas powertrain shares mature components across Mazda's lineup, supporting normal parts supply and independent-shop serviceability, while U.S. assembly and a mainstream dealer network help routine availability. Costs are not bargain-basement and CX-50-specific body or trim parts have a smaller aftermarket than major segment leaders.

7Technology & InfotainmentMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.43C+
Touchscreen size
10.25 in (standard on every 2025 trim)
38/100
#38 of 60 in classCompare all →

The larger display became standard fleet-wide for 2025, replacing the prior base 8.8-inch screen.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness69
#42 of 60 in classCompare all →

The crisp, quick system and physical commander minimize distraction, but limited touch operation and menu learning divide reviewers.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto92
#7 of 60 in classCompare all →

Both wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard on all gas trims.

Voice control & native navigation78
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard Alexa Built-in materially improves natural-language control, but Mazda Online Navigation is confined to select upper trims and most owners will use phone maps.

Audio system quality68
#43 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume trim's eight-speaker system is adequate; the well-regarded 12-speaker Bose upgrade begins at Premium.

Digital instrument cluster58
#44 of 60 in classCompare all →

A standard 7-inch TFT supplies useful information but remains a partial digital cluster with limited configurability.

OTA update capability55
#44 of 60 in classCompare all →

Connected-service and navigation online updates exist, but Mazda does not advertise feature-adding whole-vehicle OTA updates.

Companion app & remote functions65
#39 of 60 in classCompare all →

MyMazda supplies core remote start, lock, locate and status functions, but lacks a digital key and connected services become subscription-gated after the trial.

Charging ports & device power78
#16 of 60 in classCompare all →

Four standard USB-C ports and Preferred-standard wireless charging are strong for the class, though no household outlet is provided.

Keyless & remote access75
#31 of 60 in classCompare all →

Advanced keyless entry, push-button start, app remote start and a programmable power liftgate are standard on the Preferred, but phone-as-key and hands-free liftgate are absent.

Camera & parking aids45
#57 of 60 in classCompare all →

The volume trim has only the federally required rear camera; surround view and parking sensors are restricted to Turbo Premium Plus.

Head-up display availability45
#35 of 60 in classCompare all →

A full-color windshield HUD is offered, but only on Premium Plus and upper turbo trims rather than the volume Preferred.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.58C+
Kid & car-seat practicality72
#27 of 60 in classCompare all →

Wide-opening rear doors, easy LATCH anchors and 31.4 cu ft of cargo work well for a small family, though rear space is not class-leading.

Family safety package90
#4 of 60 in classCompare all →

Top Safety Pick+ crash performance combines with broad standard ADAS and new-for-2025 rear-seat alert and exit warning.

Family road-trip comfort66
#32 of 60 in classCompare all →

Supportive heated fronts, rear vents and useful luggage room serve four occupants, but firm ride and middling rear spaciousness limit long-trip ease.

Daily driving ease67
#46 of 60 in classCompare all →

Good visibility, tidy controls, supportive seating and a conventional automatic help, though the base engine is slow and stop-and-go adaptive cruise begins one trim higher.

Commuting cost efficiency67
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

The gas Preferred's 28-mpg combined rating is respectable for standard AWD but trails the most efficient compact-SUV gas and hybrid choices.

Parking & maneuverability70
#21 of 60 in classCompare all →

A 36-foot turning circle is agile for an SUV, but the long hood and lack of parking sensors or surround camera on Preferred require care.

Work capability58
#18 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD, roof rails and 2,000-lb towing handle light utility tasks, but this is not a heavy-duty work vehicle.

Durability for work duty57
#14 of 60 in classCompare all →

A conventional naturally aspirated engine and six-speed automatic are relatively simple, but the young nameplate lacks a long fleet-duty record and its upscale cabin is not abuse-focused.

Jobsite & upfit practicality45
#21 of 60 in classCompare all →

Roof rails, cargo tie-downs and a dealer hitch provide basics, but there is no onboard AC power, washable work cabin or broad commercial upfit ecosystem.

Long-distance comfort & range70
#34 of 60 in classCompare all →

Supportive seats, a roughly 445-mile combined theoretical range and stable highway manners make a good tourer, offset by firm ride and basic lane support on Preferred.

Outdoor & adventure capability82
#10 of 60 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD, 8.3-inch clearance, Off-Road mode, roof rails and 2,000-lb towing make it unusually adventure-ready for a mainstream compact crossover.

Gear & luggage flexibility70
#28 of 60 in classCompare all →

A broad cargo floor, 60/40 folding seat, roof rails and hitch support bikes and camping gear, but 56.3 cu ft maximum volume is modest.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the CX-50's strongest categories.3.10B
10Value & Market PositionThe CX-50's best-graded category.3.46B+
Standard equipment generosity78
#14 of 60 in classCompare all →

Even the Select includes standard AWD, a 10.25-inch display, wireless phone integration, leatherette upholstery, dual-zone climate control and a broad safety suite. The volume Preferred adds the comfort features most buyers seek, though adaptive cruise with stop-and-go waits until Premium.

Feature value per dollar76
#8 of 60 in classCompare all →

At $33,345 delivered, the Preferred combines standard AWD, useful comfort equipment, upscale cabin presentation and above-average driving dynamics at a competitive compact-SUV price. Its 187-hp engine is merely adequate, and desirable Premium features raise the price, keeping it shy of standout-bargain status.

Trim & configuration breadth90
#3 of 60 in classCompare all →

Ten packages span naturally aspirated gas, turbo gas and hybrid powertrains, all with AWD, with sensible steps from Select through Premium Plus and adventure-oriented Meridian. The absence of FWD is a minor limitation, but the overall choice is unusually broad.

Sales popularity & market acceptance82
#10 of 60 in classCompare all →

The CX-50 is not a CR-V/RAV4-scale segment leader, but it became a fast-rising, meaningful seller: December 2024 set a record and full-year 2025 volume rose strongly again. That trajectory demonstrates excellent acceptance for a young nameplate.

Brand desirability & image75
#23 of 60 in classCompare all →

Mazda has a loyal enthusiast following and a near-premium design-and-driving image that strengthens the CX-50's appeal and resale. It remains a smaller mainstream marque without the mass awareness of Toyota or Honda or the status of a luxury badge.

Deals & incentive availability80
#19 of 60 in classCompare all →

During its model-year sales window the 2025 CX-50 was commonly supported with low promotional APR offers and customer cash, providing real buyer savings without the fire-sale pattern of a rejected model. Programs varied by month and region and generally could not be combined.

Model freshness84
#23 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 model is only the third model year of the generation that began for 2023. It also received a new hybrid choice, internal efficiency updates to the 2.5 S engine, expanded safety technology and Alexa Built-in, making it fresher than a simple carry-over without constituting a full redesign.

Critical reception & awards82
#7 of 60 in classCompare all →

The 2025 CX-50 earned Car and Driver Editors' Choice and ranked third of 14 compact SUVs in MotorTrend's ranking, reflecting broad praise for handling, styling and safety. It is strongly regarded but not a dominant comparison-test winner or 10Best/NACTOY champion.