MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2025:Overall -1Safety -4Reliability +6Efficiency & Range +2Cost of Ownership -5Technology +2Driving Experience -2
Rivian logo
Full-Size Truck

2026 Rivian R1T

LuxuryEV
Manufacturer site ↗
2.44C+GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.06D
Safety
3.29B+
EfficiencyEV
2.66C+
85 MPGe combined · 329 mi range · $900/yr energy
Comfort
1.57D
Value
2.83B-
Ownership Cost
0.00F
Technology
2.97B-
Driving Experience
3.73A

The verdict

A mixed-report full-size truck, strong on driving and held back by ownership.

The 2026 Rivian R1T is the best-driving, best-finished pickup you can buy, and the least practical full-size truck to actually own. Standard air suspension, a 352-mile range on the volume Dual-Motor Large Pack, an 11,000-lb tow rating and a lockable 11.6 cu-ft gear tunnel make it a brilliant adventure vehicle with a cabin that shames trucks costing more. But the bed is just 4 ft 6 in, rear legroom is 35.5 in — mid-size-truck territory — and the ownership math is brutal: roughly $79,700 for a typically-equipped example, ~$3,300/yr insurance, an estimated 40% resale after five years, and a service network of about 100 company-owned centers nationwide. Buy it because you love it, not because it pencils out.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Drives better than any other pickup, full stop
  • Storage nobody else offers
  • Cheap to fuel, by truck standards

What holds it back

  • The ownership math is the worst in the segment
  • Full-size price, mid-size cab and bed
  • Reliability record is still below average

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Rivian R1T

Production history

2022present · 5 years · 2 generations
Gen 1202220242022Gen 22025now2025In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — gradedProduction began 2022

How it's evolved

5 scored model years · 20222026

0255075100202220232024202520262022 · Overall: 672023 · Overall: 68 (+1 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 65 (−3 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 67 (+2 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 66 (−1 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022

Compare two years

vs
Performance77
67-10
Efficiency64
69+5
Safety85
78-7
Space54
530
Cost27
22-5
Reliability38
46+8
Tech70
73+4
Use-case79
74-5
Driving85
84-1
Value78
71-6

Best fit & conditions

AdventureA+86/100
Winter / inclementA+86/100
CommuterB+79/100
FamilyB-73/100
Work / TowC-59/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.52C+
Horsepower
533 hp (Dual-Motor, volume trim); 665 hp (Dual-Motor Performance), 850 hp (Tri-Motor), 1,025 hp (Quad-Motor)
57/100
#6 of 20 in classCompare all →

Scored on the Dual-Motor, the entry configuration and the volume seller across the second-generation R1T range. 533 hp comfortably clears every gas half-ton but sits below the Cybertruck AWD (600 hp) and Silverado EV LT (625 hp) at the volume-trim level, even though the Quad-Motor halo above it is the most powerful pickup in the segment.

Torque
610 lb-ft (Dual-Motor, volume trim); 829 lb-ft (Dual-Motor Performance), 1,103 lb-ft (Tri-Motor), 1,198 lb-ft (Quad-Motor)
67/100
#6 of 20 in classCompare all →

Instant full-torque delivery from Rivian's in-house dual drive units, roughly 60% above a 5.3L V8 Silverado 1500's 383 lb-ft. Mid-pack among electric trucks at the volume trim — the Silverado EV LT (775 lb-ft) leads it — but the Tri- and Quad-Motor variants are the segment's outright torque leaders.

0–60 mph time
4.5 s (Dual-Motor, volume trim); 3.4 s (Performance), 2.9 s (Tri-Motor), 2.5 s (Quad-Motor)
69/100
#5 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rivian's claim for the Dual-Motor R1T — a few tenths behind the Cybertruck AWD (4.1 s claimed) but comfortably ahead of the Silverado EV LT (~5.7 s) and every gas half-ton. The Quad-Motor's 2.5 s is the quickest figure in the segment and effectively pins the top of the truck band.

Powertrain refinement93
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Single-speed BEV delivery with no lag, no shift interruption and no combustion coarseness, and Rivian's torque calibration is widely regarded as the most natural and progressive among electric trucks — the second-generation in-house drive units also cut motor whine relative to the first-generation supplied hardware. Scored just above the Silverado EV and Cybertruck (92 each) and level with the Hummer EV (93).

Transmission behavior93
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

Single-speed reduction gear at each axle — nothing to hunt for and no shift shock. One-pedal driving and selectable regen are well calibrated and stay predictable under load, though Rivian's low-speed regen blending is a touch less polished than Tesla's class-reference calibration, placing it level with the Silverado EV (93) and just under the Cybertruck (94) and Hummer EV (95).

Max towing capacity
11,000 lbs (all motor configurations, properly equipped)
75/100
#9 of 20 in classCompare all →

11,000 lbs matches the Cybertruck exactly and beats the Hummer EV (7,500 lbs), but trails the Silverado EV LT (12,500 lbs) and the Ram 1500 REV's 14,000 lb target. The rating holds across every motor configuration rather than being gated behind a towing package. As with every BEV truck, range collapses far harder under load than on a gas or diesel rival — a penalty captured in cat2, not here.

Max payload
~1,760 lbs (properly equipped)
25/100
#11 of 20 in classCompare all →

The battery pack consumes most of the GVWR headroom, so payload lands well under a comparably equipped gas half-ton and far under the Cybertruck (2,500 lbs), whose lighter structure is its one clear capability advantage over the R1T. It also trails the Silverado EV (~1,800 lbs), sitting above only the Hummer EV (~1,300 lbs) among electric trucks. This is the R1T's weakest capability metric by a wide margin. The prior placeholder value of 2,985.5 lbs was not physically plausible for this truck.

Towing tech & aids74
#10 of 20 in classCompare all →

Factory hitch with an integrated trailer brake controller, a Tow Mode that retunes the air suspension and stability control, trailer-aware range estimation and charge-stop routing in the navigation, and useful camera coverage. Held well below the Silverado EV (86) and Ram 1500 REV (82) by the absence of trailer backup steering assist, transparent-trailer view, onboard scales and a trailer profile library; lands essentially level with the Cybertruck (73) and just under the Hummer EV (75).

AWD/4WD availability90
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

Electric AWD is standard on every trim with no FWD/RWD rung in the lineup, and the Quad-Motor configuration gives one motor per wheel — genuine independent per-wheel torque control that functions as a software-defined locking differential and out-resolves any mechanical locker in the class. Adaptive air suspension supports it across the range. Only the absence of a true two-speed low range keeps it below the Hummer EV (94); it sits above the Cybertruck (85) and Silverado EV (84).

Off-road capability85
#7 of 20 in classCompare all →

The most credible off-road electric pickup short of the Hummer EV: adaptive air suspension raising ground clearance to roughly 14.9 in, standard underbody armor over the battery pack, strong approach and departure angles, dedicated Rock Crawl, Rally, Drift and Soft Sand drive modes, and Quad-Motor per-wheel torque control that substitutes convincingly for mechanical lockers. Well clear of the Cybertruck (74), Ram 1500 REV (66) and Silverado EV (65); the lack of a low range and roughly 7,000 lbs of curb weight hold it just under the gas Ram 1500 (87) and well under the Hummer EV (95).

Powertrain lineup breadth48
#9 of 20 in classCompare all →

One powertrain type only — a single-speed BEV drivetrain — with no gas, hybrid, PHEV or range-extended option offered or announced, which caps this item below 50 the same way it does for every rival electric truck. Scored a couple of points above the Cybertruck (46), Hummer EV (45) and Silverado EV (44) because the four distinct motor configurations and three battery packs give buyers a genuinely wider spread of capability and price than any competitor's two-tier range.

2Efficiency & RangeMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.66C+
Combined fuel economy
85 MPGe combined (Dual Large, 22-in); 79 MPGe on 20-in, 82 MPGe Large Plus, 76 MPGe All-Terrain, 87 MPGe Dual Max, 76 MPGe Tri Max, 67–76 MPGe Quad Max
100/100
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The Gen 2 Enduro dual-motor drivetrain makes the R1T the most efficient full-size electric pickup in the set by a wide margin — 85 MPGe combined against 68 for the Silverado EV and 66 for the Cybertruck — and it tops the 45–80 MPGe EV-truck band outright.

City fuel economy
94 MPGe city (Dual Large, 22-in); 85 MPGe on 20-in, 89 MPGe Large Plus, 82 MPGe All-Terrain, 93 MPGe Dual Max
100/100
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

City MPGe runs well above combined thanks to regenerative braking, and 94 MPGe clears the top of the 48–90 MPGe EV-truck city band — no electric pickup in the set is close in stop-and-go use.

Highway fuel economy
77 MPGe highway (Dual Large, 22-in); 72 MPGe on 20-in, 75 MPGe Large Plus, 70 MPGe All-Terrain, 80 MPGe Dual Max
100/100
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

A 0.30 drag coefficient is low for a pickup, so the highway penalty is modest and 77 MPGe still tops the 42–75 MPGe EV-truck highway band; towing or the 20-in All-Terrain tires cut it sharply in practice.

Driving range
329 mi (Dual Large, 22-in); 300 mi on 20-in, 330 mi Large Plus, 289 mi All-Terrain, up to 420 mi Dual Max, 371 mi Tri Max, 374 mi Quad Max
12/100
#18 of 20 in classCompare all →

The volume Dual Large pack is EPA-rated at 329 miles — mid-pack against the 230–430 mi EV-truck band and behind the Silverado EV's extended-range 410 mi, though the 420-mile Max pack is available for a step up in price.

DC fast-charge peak rate
215 kW peak DC (400V architecture, Large pack); ~200 kW Standard pack, ~220 kW Max pack
46/100
#4 of 5 in classCompare all →

Rivian's 400-volt Gen 2 architecture peaks at 215 kW on the Large pack after the 2025.18 software update — respectable and well-sustained, but roughly 60% of the 350 kW an 800-volt Ultium truck like the Silverado EV can take, which is what the 100–350 kW truck band measures against.

10–80% fast-charge time
~35 min 10–80% (Large pack); ~41 min Standard pack, ~30 min Max pack
57/100
#2 of 5 in classCompare all →

About 35 minutes for the volume Large pack — better than the Silverado EV's ~40 minutes because there is less energy to move, but the 400V ceiling keeps it off the pace of 800V rivals.

Estimated annual fuel cost
$900/yr (EPA, 15,000 mi at national-average residential electricity rates); $850 Dual Max, $950–$1,150 for 20-in, All-Terrain, Tri and Quad configurations
100/100
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

EPA puts annual energy cost at $900 for the Dual Large — the cheapest of any electric pickup in the set and roughly a third of what a gas full-size truck burns — though the figure assumes home charging and public DC fast charging at $0.40–0.55/kWh would multiply it.

Fuel requirements90
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

No fuel grade to think about, 11.5 kW overnight AC charging, and for 2026 a native NACS port replaces the CCS1 socket — over 21,500 Tesla Superchargers now work plug-and-play, which is the single biggest practical improvement to the truck this model year, and a complimentary CCS1 adapter covers the legacy networks. Held short of the top because the 400V peak is mid-pack, Rivian no longer bundles a home wall charger, and a Max-pack road trip is still a long stop.

3SafetyOne of the R1T's strongest categories.3.29B+
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated by NHTSA (scored at segment-neutral 4 stars)
50/100
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

NHTSA has published no NCAP overall star rating for the Rivian R1T in any model year; carried at the dataset's 4.0-star convention for untested vehicles. Replaces a placeholder 4.9-star figure that was never a real NHTSA result.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness80
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T is the rare electric pickup with a real IIHS crashworthiness record — Good across the tests it has taken, and a Top Safety Pick+ award — but that award was earned under the 2023 criteria and current-criteria standing for the Gen 2 (2025+) truck is unverified.

Standard ADAS suite breadth91
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The Rivian Autonomy Platform is standard on every R1T trim — nothing safety-relevant is paywalled behind a higher trim, which is the specific thing this item measures. Gen 2's 11-camera / 5-radar array on NVIDIA Orin is the broadest standard sensor set in the truck segment.

Automatic emergency braking performance83
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T holds Superior IIHS front crash prevention ratings including nighttime pedestrian detection, which is what the top band asks for — held back from higher because those results were recorded on the Gen 1 sensor suite and the Gen 2 truck sold for 2026 uses entirely different hardware.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage82
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic warning are standard on every trim with good camera-and-radar coverage, but Rivian offers no trailer-aware blind-spot extension — a real gap on a truck rated to tow 11,000 lbs.

Lane keeping & centering82
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

Gen 2's Orin compute and reworked camera set turned lane centering from a Gen 1 weak point into a strength; reviewers describe confident, largely ping-pong-free centering on divided highways, though it is still not held up as the polish benchmark that Super Cruise is.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist83
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

Full-speed-range adaptive cruise with stop-and-go is standard and well integrated with Highway Assist, so the two behave as one system rather than as bolted-together features.

Hands-free driving availability83
#7 of 20 in classCompare all →

Genuine hands-free highway driving is available via Enhanced Highway Assist, but it is a paid add-on rather than standard and its mapped-road network is a fraction of Super Cruise's — a capable system that is still the newest and narrowest of the truck hands-free options.

Headlight performance86
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

IIHS rated the R1T's headlights Good, and because the lighting hardware does not vary by trim that rating applies across the entire range — the exact condition the top band describes.

Outward visibility72
#4 of 20 in classCompare all →

A standard 360-degree camera and a lower cowl than most full-size trucks help, but the R1T still carries thick A-pillars, a tall hood and a shallow rear window with the tonneau in place, so the cameras are compensating rather than the sightlines being genuinely good.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability78
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The crew-cab body gives wide-opening rear doors and the skateboard platform gives a flat rear floor with generous legroom, which makes seat installation and access easy; the anchors themselves are set in the seat bight and take some digging.

4Space & ComfortOne of the R1T's weakest categories.1.57D
Seating capacity
5 seats (2 front + 3-across rear bench) — one crew-cab body, identical across Explore and Adventure and across Dual-, Tri- and Quad-Motor
75/100
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T is sold only as a five-passenger crew cab; there is no single-cab, extended-cab or front-bench configuration, so seating is fixed across the 2026 lineup. That matches every full-size electric rival (Cybertruck, Silverado EV, Hummer EV) and trails the six-seat front-bench configurations still offered on gas F-150, Silverado 1500 and Ram 1500.

Front headroom
40.9 in (fixed panoramic glass roof is standard on every trim; there is no steel-roof or sunroof-delete option)
58/100
#8 of 20 in classCompare all →

Front headroom is mid-pack for a full-size truck: the R1T stands 78.2 in tall, but the skateboard battery raises the floor and the standard fixed glass roof eats into the headliner, so occupants sit high in a cabin that is not as airy as the exterior bulk suggests. Comfortable for six-footers without being class-leading.

Front legroom
42.3 in
32/100
#12 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T's 135.8 in wheelbase is spent on the bed and gear tunnel rather than the cab, and the front footwell is correspondingly shorter than the domestic half-tons — roughly 1.5–2 in behind an F-150 SuperCrew (43.9 in) or Silverado 1500 (44.5 in). Adequate rather than generous, and the clearest early sign that this is a full-size truck wrapped around a mid-size cabin.

Rear headroom
38.6 in (roof tapers rearward toward the gear tunnel; glass roof standard)
20/100
#14 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rear headroom lands near the bottom of the full-size truck band. The roofline falls away behind row one and the battery floor sits high, so second-row passengers ride knees-up with limited air above the head — adequate for average adults, tight for anyone over six feet. This item is high-leverage because the truck normalization band is only 38–41 in wide.

Rear legroom
35.5 in (crew cab — the only configuration)
21/100
#15 of 20 in classCompare all →

This is the R1T's defining packaging compromise. To fit the gear tunnel between cab and bed, Rivian gave the R1T a cab sized like a mid-size truck: rear legroom sits between a Ranger SuperCrew (34.5 in) and a Ridgeline (36.7 in), and gives up roughly eight inches to an F-150 SuperCrew (43.6 in) or Silverado EV (44.3 in). Reviewers consistently describe the back seat as usable for adults on short hops but cramped next to any conventional half-ton crew cab.

Bed length
54.1 in (4 ft 6 in — the only bed offered; no 5.5 ft, 6.5 ft or 8 ft option, and no midgate to extend the load floor into the cabin)
0/100
#19 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T has the shortest bed of any pickup in this dataset — shorter than a Toyota Tacoma's 5-ft short box and 18 in shorter than a Cybertruck's, landing at the absolute floor of the 54–98 in truck band. A 4x8 sheet of plywood cannot lie flat even with the tailgate down. The gear tunnel and frunk recover a lot of the lost utility, but they are scored separately under 4.2.5; as a bed, this is the least capable full-size truck sold.

Bed volume
29.2 cu ft of bed volume (~50 in between the wheel wells); a powered tonneau is available, and separate frunk, gear tunnel and under-bed compartments add roughly another 28 cu ft of lockable storage that this item does not count
0/100
#19 of 20 in classCompare all →

Bed volume falls below the bottom of the 30–80 cu ft truck band and clamps to zero — a direct consequence of the 4.5-ft box. This is the honest reading of the R1T purely as a load-hauler: it carries less in the bed than any conventional pickup here, including compact entries like the Maverick. Buyers get that space back as lockable, weatherproof storage elsewhere in the vehicle, which 4.2.5 credits heavily.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions95
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The most inventive storage package of any pickup on sale, and the item where the R1T's short bed is repaid. The gear tunnel — a lockable, weatherproof ~11.6 cu ft pass-through between cab and bed, with doors that drop to form a seat/step and an optional slide-out camp kitchen — has no equivalent anywhere in the segment. Add an 11.1 cu ft lockable frunk, an under-bed bin sized for the spare or wet gear, an available powered tonneau that turns the bed into a vault, a deep center console, fold-flat rear seats, and 110V outlets plus an onboard air compressor in the bed and tunnel. Scored above the Cybertruck and Silverado EV because the gear tunnel adds a genuinely new class of secure storage rather than a better version of an existing one.

Seat comfort78
#6 of 20 in classCompare all →

Front buckets are well shaped and well padded with heating and ventilation, and reviewers rate them comfortable over long stints — better resolved than the flat cushions in a Cybertruck. The rear bench is the limiter: with 35.5 in of legroom and a low, short cushion over the battery floor, adults sit knees-up and second-row occupants notice it inside an hour. Front-seat comfort alone would score in the mid-80s; the rear seat pulls the item down.

Ride quality88
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T's strongest comfort attribute and the best ride in this dataset's truck set. Standard adaptive air suspension with hydraulic cross-linked roll control gives it independent rear suspension manners no leaf-sprung pickup can match — critically, it never suffers the unladen rear-axle patter and head toss that afflicts an empty F-150 or Silverado, and the second-generation chassis tuning tightened body control without adding harshness. Marked below a perfect score only because 20-in all-terrain tires introduce some impact noise and the near-7,000 lb mass can feel float-prone over long swells.

Cabin quietness86
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

No engine, transmission or exhaust noise, acoustic laminated glass and a comparatively slippery shape for a pickup keep the cabin hushed at highway speed — quiet enough that reviewers reach for luxury-SUV comparisons rather than truck ones. Held back from the top of the band by road roar from the available all-terrain tires and some wind rustle around the large door mirrors and glass roof.

Climate & comfort features90
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

Comfort equipment is rich and mostly standard rather than optional: heated and ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, heated steering wheel, heated wiper park, a fixed panoramic glass roof, app-based remote pre-conditioning, and Camp and Pet Comfort modes that hold cabin temperature with the vehicle parked. The second row gets its own vents and controls. Marked below the Cybertruck and Hummer EV only because the entry Explore trim drops front ventilation and some upholstery upgrades, so the full set arrives with Adventure.

5Cost of OwnershipThe R1T's lowest-graded category.0.00F
Base MSRP
~$71,700 (Dual-Motor Standard Pack, $69,900 + $1,800 destination); range runs to ~$117,700 for the Quad-Motor
15/100
#18 of 20 in classCompare all →

The Dual-Motor Standard Pack is the entry point of the second-generation R1T ladder, and even that cheapest configuration lands in the top fifth of the full-size truck price band — roughly $30,000 above a base F-150 or Silverado 1500. Replaces a placeholder estimate of $77,250, so the score moves up modestly, but the R1T remains a luxury-priced truck by any reading.

Volume-Trim Price
~$79,700 (Dual-Motor Large Pack, ~$77,700 delivered plus ~$2,000 of typical paint/wheel options); Standard Pack from ~$71,700, Quad-Motor ~$117,700
9/100
#18 of 20 in classCompare all →

Volume sits on the Dual-Motor Large Pack — the configuration the rest of this scorecard is scored on — and a typically-optioned example lands near $80,000, close to the ceiling of the full-size truck band. This and the resale item are what put the R1T's ownership case near the bottom of the segment: the truck is good, but the buy-in is luxury-SUV money. Replaces a placeholder estimate of $82,150.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$6,200 over 5 years (est.) — no oil, plugs, transmission or exhaust service, but expensive tires and a thin service network
64/100
#12 of 20 in classCompare all →

The one genuinely strong line in this category, for the usual EV reasons: Rivian's schedule is essentially cabin filters, brake fluid, tire rotation and an annual inspection, and one-pedal regen leaves friction pads largely untouched. It scores below the GM and Tesla electric trucks rather than above them because Rivian's service economics are worse — a thin company-owned service network with long waits, high labour rates, and 20–22-inch tires on a ~7,100 lb truck that wear fast and cost roughly $1,500–$2,200 a set. Replaces a placeholder estimate of $9,441, which was implausibly high for an EV, so the score rises steeply.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~40% of MSRP retained after 5 years (est.) — below the 50% floor of the full-size truck band
0/100
#15 of 20 in classCompare all →

The single heaviest-weighted item in the category and the R1T's worst. Electric pickups are the fastest-depreciating mainstream segment in the US, and the R1T carries an extra discount on top: the federal clean-vehicle credit lapsed on 2025-09-30, resetting used EV prices downward while new MSRPs stayed high, and residual-setters continue to price in single-manufacturer risk on parts, software and service for a company that is not yet consistently profitable. Replaces a placeholder estimate of 70.5%, which was wildly optimistic — that one number was carrying most of the old category score.

Basic warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi comprehensive (new-vehicle) warranty
100/100
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rivian's five-year/60,000-mile comprehensive term tops the truck band outright and is the best bumper-to-bumper coverage of any pickup in this dataset — two years longer than the 3-year/36,000-mile terms Ford, GM and Ram still offer, and a year past Tesla's. Replaces a placeholder estimate of 4.9 years, a small correction upward to the real figure.

Powertrain warranty
8 yr / 175,000 mi battery pack and drivetrain on Large/Max Pack (8 yr / 120,000 mi on the Standard Pack), 70% capacity retention guaranteed
60/100
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

Eight years is the term essentially every EV sold in the US carries, so the duration is competitive rather than distinguishing — but the mileage cap is the segment's most generous at 175,000 miles on the Large and Max packs, 75,000 more than GM's EV trucks and 25,000 more than a Cybertruck. Because the normalization band reads years only, none of that mileage advantage reaches the score. Replaces a placeholder estimate of 9.4 years, so the score drops materially even though the real coverage is class-leading on the axis that matters.

Complimentary maintenance & perks65
#4 of 20 in classCompare all →

Scored in the middle of the band, and the placeholder 95 was far too generous: Rivian bundles no complimentary scheduled maintenance at all, so it cannot reach the 80-plus tier that included-maintenance programs earn. What it does offer is better than the GM and Tesla trucks — 24/7 roadside assistance running with the full five-year comprehensive term rather than three, and mobile service that performs a large share of routine and warranty work at the owner's home or workplace, which has real cash and time value where the fixed-service network is thin. Add the Rivian Adventure Network with a NACS adapter for Supercharger access, a Connect+ connectivity trial before the subscription, and standard Gear Guard and Camp Mode software features.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$54,020 (≈$47,820 depreciation + $6,200 maintenance)
0/100
#18 of 20 in classCompare all →

$79,700 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (40% retained, or about $31,880) leaves about $47,820 in depreciation. Add the projected $6,200 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $54,020 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the R1T's weakest categories.1.06D
Predicted reliability42
#17 of 20 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports has held the R1T below average in predicted reliability every year it has had enough survey data, with owner-reported problems concentrated in in-car electronics, power equipment (door, frunk and tonneau actuators), 12V system and climate control rather than in the high-voltage drivetrain. The second-generation re-engineering that arrived for 2025 directly targets that failure profile — the zonal electrical architecture cut the ECU count from seventeen to seven and removed roughly 1.6 miles of wiring — and 2026 is its second model year, so the worst of the launch software churn is behind it. But no R1T model year has yet posted an average-or-better owner-survey result, and the redesign is too recent to have generated the survey history that would confirm the fix. Scored below the Silverado EV, whose problems are similar in kind but which benefits from a longer settled-production run.

Brand reliability track record32
#20 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rivian has ranked at or near the bottom of Consumer Reports' brand reliability standings in every year it has been ranked, and J.D. Power's Vehicle Dependability Study measures three-year-old vehicles — a window Rivian has only just entered, and entered on the strength of its most problematic early build years. The countervailing signal is real but measures something else: Rivian scores strongly in J.D. Power's APEAL study, which rates how much owners love the vehicle, not how often it breaks. A brand consistently in the bottom third on dependability is squarely the 0–49 band, and with only two nameplates and five years of production there is no deep track record to argue against it.

Recall & TSB history42
#17 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T has accumulated NHTSA campaigns at a high rate relative to its production volume across its five model years, and the record includes genuinely mechanical items alongside the software ones — most notably a 2022 campaign covering roughly 13,000 vehicles for an inadequately torqued front upper control arm fastener that could degrade steering control, and multiple seat-belt anchorage campaigns. That is worse than routine. Two things keep it out of the failing band: a large and growing share of Rivian remedies ship over the air rather than through a service visit, and there is no known systemic fire, pack or drive-unit defect on the second-generation build that carries into 2026. Frequency is the problem here, not severity.

Powertrain durability reputation54
#17 of 20 in classCompare all →

This is the least-proven part of the 2026 truck. The second-generation R1T replaced the Bosch-supplied dual-motor hardware with Rivian's own in-house-designed drive units across the dual, tri and quad-motor lineup, and the Max pack moved to large-format 4695 cells — so the two most expensive components in the vehicle are effectively two model years old with no high-mileage record behind them. Against that, an EV drivetrain carries a fraction of the wear items of the V8s and turbo sixes in this segment, Rivian's high-voltage packs have not produced a systemic thermal or capacity-loss event of the kind that has hit other EV makers, and the 8-year/175,000-mile battery and drivetrain warranty on the larger packs covers the catastrophic case. Unproven rather than known-bad, which is the bottom of the mid band — level with GM's Ultium hardware, which is newer to nobody but has a Bolt-shaped shadow over it.

Interior material quality85
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The clear high point of the vehicle and one of the best cabins in any pickup at any price. Reviewers consistently single out the open-pore ash and walnut trim, the genuinely convincing vegan leather, the machined metal speaker grilles and the near-total absence of parts-bin switchgear — there is no corporate switch cluster to give it away, because Rivian has no corporate parts bin. Hard plastics are confined to low-touch areas below the knee. It reads more expensive than the Silverado EV and Hummer EV cabins that cost similar money, and materially richer than the Cybertruck's deliberately austere interior. Held below the 90s only because the minimal-switchgear approach pushes climate and mirror adjustment into the touchscreen, which several reviewers count against perceived quality of interaction even while praising the materials themselves.

Fit & finish60
#16 of 20 in classCompare all →

Sheetmetal assembly out of Normal, Illinois is competitive — panel gaps and body fit draw far less criticism than the Cybertruck's, and the second-generation build tightened things further. The drag is the long tail: owner reports across generations cite interior rattles and trim squeaks, powered-actuator faults on the gear tunnel doors, frunk and tonneau, occasional water intrusion around seals, and infotainment and connectivity glitches. J.D. Power's Initial Quality Study counts all of those as defects, and the software and power-equipment categories are exactly where Rivian's owner-reported problem counts concentrate. Solid structure, inconsistent details — which lands it just below the Silverado EV rather than above it, despite the far better materials.

Dealer & service network45
#19 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rivian sells direct, so there is no franchised network at all — service runs through roughly a hundred-odd company-owned service centers nationwide, against Chevrolet's ~2,900 dealers. In truck country that gap is not academic: owners in several states drive hundreds of miles to reach a service center, and body and collision work routes to an even smaller certified network with reported waits running into months. The genuine offset is Rivian's mobile service fleet, which resolves a large share of jobs at the owner's home or workplace and rates well in owner satisfaction — for software, 12V and accessory faults, which is most of what goes wrong, it is a better experience than a dealer visit. Scored above the failing band on the strength of mobile service, but well below every franchised rival in this segment.

Parts availability & repair cost25
#19 of 20 in classCompare all →

The worst-scoring item in the category and a well-documented weak point of Rivian ownership. Body panels and structural components are dealer-only with no second source, backorders measured in months are routine, and the certified collision network is small enough to be the binding constraint even when parts are in stock. The downstream effect shows up in insurance: R1T premiums run high specifically because repair severity and total-loss rates are elevated, and modest damage near the pack or the cast structure can write the truck off. Independent aftermarket support for high-voltage components is effectively nonexistent. Routine maintenance is genuinely cheap — no oil, long brake life from regen — but that is measured in category 5, not here. Scored below the Silverado EV, which at least shares body and interior parts with a mainstream high-volume truck line.

7Technology & InfotainmentGrades above the middle of the scale.2.97B-
Touchscreen size
15.6 in standard on every trim, plus a standard 12.3 in driver display
72/100
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T's 15.6-inch landscape center display is standard across Dual-, Tri- and Quad-Motor trims and carried over unchanged into the second-generation truck. The previous placeholder value of 16.6 in was wrong.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness86
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rivian's in-house software is routinely called the best-looking and most coherent non-Tesla system in the segment, and the Gen 2 zonal architecture with new compute made it materially quicker than the launch trucks. It loses points for pushing mirror adjustment, vent direction and steering-column setup into screen menus with almost no physical controls.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto20
#17 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rivian does not offer Apple CarPlay or Android Auto in any form on the R1T — an absence by design, not a lower-trim omission, so it lands in the bottom band. Rivian substitutes native Apple Music, Spotify and Google Cast integration, which covers media but not phone projection.

Voice control & native navigation78
#8 of 20 in classCompare all →

Native navigation is a genuine strength — Google Maps map data with EV trip planning, charger routing and battery preconditioning, and Gen 2 added NACS/Supercharger routing. The voice assistant is the weak half: command coverage has historically been narrow and reviewers report owners falling back to the screen.

Audio system quality88
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rivian Elevation Audio with Dolby Atmos is among the best factory systems in any truck, and even the standard Dual-Motor setup is well-regarded. The premium system's speaker count and output are competitive with branded upgrades from Meridian or Bose in this class.

Digital instrument cluster86
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

A 12.3-inch full-digital driver display is standard on every trim, crisp and clearly laid out, with drive-mode and driver-assist visualisations in the forward sightline. It is somewhat less user-configurable than the best legacy-OEM clusters, which keeps it out of the top band.

OTA update capability92
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

Rivian is second only to Tesla here: frequent whole-vehicle over-the-air releases have added drive modes, changed powertrain calibration and range behaviour, and expanded driver assistance since launch rather than just refreshing maps.

Companion app & remote functions90
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

The Rivian app is polished and covers the full set — phone-as-key as the primary key, remote climate and preconditioning, lock/unlock, locate, charge scheduling and limits, and Gear Guard camera review — with no subscription gating the core functions.

Charging ports & device power93
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

Very strong: high-wattage USB-C at both rows, wireless phone charging up front, 120V outlets in the bed and gear tunnel, plus the built-in air compressor. It trails the best only because the bed power is 120V, with no 240V NEMA 14-50 outlet, and home backup depends on Rivian's own charger hardware.

Keyless & remote access88
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

Phone-as-key is the standard primary key with walk-up unlock, backed by a key fob and a wearable key band, and the power tailgate, power frunk and available powered tonneau are all app- or screen-operable. Deduction for reported Bluetooth phone-key connection delays.

Camera & parking aids92
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

The Gen 2 Autonomy Platform brought a substantially expanded camera and radar suite with new compute, feeding a high-resolution surround view plus dedicated off-road and trail views that are genuinely useful on a truck this wide. Ultrasonic parking sensors are retained, so low-speed proximity accuracy does not depend on vision alone.

Head-up display availability15
#13 of 20 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered on the R1T at any trim or as an option, placing it at the floor of this item. It scores marginally above the Cybertruck because the standard 12.3-inch instrument cluster still puts core information in the driver's forward sightline.

8Use-Case FitOne of the R1T's strongest categories.3.04B
Kid & car-seat practicality66
#13 of 20 in classCompare all →

Crew-cab-only body with full-size rear doors, a flat skateboard floor, three top tethers and a kneel mode that drops the air suspension for loading kids, plus an 11.6 cu ft lockable gear tunnel that swallows strollers at waist height. Held back by 35.5 in of rear legroom — the tightest of any full-size truck by a wide margin, which makes rear-facing seats a real negotiation with the front seats.

Family safety package82
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

The Rivian Autonomy Platform is standard on every 2026 configuration — AEB with pedestrian detection, blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic warning, full-speed adaptive cruise and Highway Assist — so families buying the entry Dual-Motor get the same safety content as a Quad-Motor buyer, with no ADAS paywall on the basics. Capped by the absence of any NHTSA NCAP rating and an IIHS Top Safety Pick+ earned under the older 2023 criteria rather than the harder current tests.

Family road-trip comfort76
#5 of 20 in classCompare all →

Segment-leading ride and quietness, heated rear seats and rear vents, a standard panoramic glass roof and roughly 62 cu ft of storage across bed, frunk, gear tunnel and under-bed bin mean gear is never the constraint on a family trip. The rear bench's knees-up posture over the battery pack and the absence of rear entertainment keep it short of the class benchmark, and a full car plus gear meaningfully shortens the interval between charging stops.

Daily driving ease84
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The most car-like truck in the segment to live with day to day: silent single-speed drive, one-pedal driving, standard stop-and-go adaptive cruise with Highway Assist lane centering, and adaptive air suspension that reviewers single out as the segment's best-controlled. The tax is a ~7,000 lb curb weight and Rivian's touchscreen-only handling of mirrors, vents and the steering column, which is a genuine daily-use annoyance.

Commuting cost efficiency78
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

Energy cost per commuting mile is genuinely low — roughly $0.07/mi on home charging, about a third of what a gas full-size truck burns — and there is no oil, plug, transmission or exhaust service to fund. Consumables are the offset: 20- and 21-inch tires carrying seven thousand pounds wear fast and are expensive, insurance runs high, and a commuter dependent on DC fast charging loses most of the advantage.

Parking & maneuverability72
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

At about 217 in long the R1T is roughly a foot and a half shorter than an F-150 or Silverado crew cab — closer to a mid-size double cab — because the 4 ft 6 in bed and skateboard packaging buy back length, and a standard 360-degree camera with parking sensors plus a suspension that lowers make tight spots manageable. It is still a ~79 in wide, seven-thousand-pound truck with a wide turning circle, so it beats its full-size rivals rather than being genuinely easy in a city.

Work capability62
#15 of 20 in classCompare all →

The numbers that matter for towing are competitive — 11,000 lbs across every motor configuration, ~1,760 lbs of payload, and instant torque that makes the truck utterly unbothered under load, with a factory trailer brake controller and Tow Mode. What limits it as a work tool is geometry and endurance: a single 4 ft 6 in bed with no 6.5 or 8 ft option and no midgate, no gooseneck or fifth-wheel provision, and a real-world range that roughly halves under a heavy trailer, leaving well under 150 miles between charges.

Durability for work duty45
#19 of 20 in classCompare all →

This is the R1T's weakest mission by a distance. The structure itself is robust and has proven itself in hard off-road use, but there is no fleet track record, no work-oriented trim with vinyl floors or wipe-down surfaces, and the cabin's open-pore wood and vegan leather are aimed squarely at private buyers. The ownership data is what pushes it into the low band: below-average predicted reliability, a brand at the bottom of the reliability rankings, recurring power-accessory and fit-and-finish complaints, and single-source parts that strand vehicles for months.

Jobsite & upfit practicality68
#16 of 20 in classCompare all →

Onboard provisions are genuinely good — 120V outlets in the bed and gear tunnel, a built-in air compressor, bed tie-downs and lighting, a lockable gear tunnel that works as a toolbox, an available powered tonneau, and bidirectional home backup with Rivian charging hardware. The ecosystem around it is aimed at recreation rather than trades: crossbars, bed racks and tents rather than ladder racks or service bodies, no upfitter switches or chassis-cab variant, modest outlet power next to the F-150's Pro Power Onboard, and no wipe-down work interior.

Long-distance comfort & range82
#4 of 20 in classCompare all →

A superb mile-eater on the metrics that fatigue a driver: the segment's most compliant ride, a quiet cabin, front seats reviewers praise for long-haul support, and hands-free Enhanced Highway Assist on mapped divided highways layered over standard lane centering. Range of about 352 miles on the volume Dual-Motor Large Pack is strong for an electric truck but still means planned 20–40 minute stops, and the rear bench is a poorer place to spend a long day than the front.

Outdoor & adventure capability88
#4 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T's signature mission and the segment benchmark: up to about 14.9 in of ground clearance from the adaptive air suspension, standard skid plates and underbody battery protection, Rock Crawl and Soft Sand modes, per-wheel torque vectoring on the Quad-Motor, an onboard air compressor for airing tires back up, Camp Mode leveling, 120V outlets and 11,000 lbs of tow rating for boats and toys. The one real limit is infrastructure — the backcountry has no chargers, and towing a trailer to a trailhead cuts usable range roughly in half.

Gear & luggage flexibility90
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Nothing in the segment splits gear into useful, lockable spaces as well as the R1T: an 11.1 cu ft frunk, an 11.6 cu ft pass-through gear tunnel between cab and bed, a 4.9 cu ft under-bed bin and a 29.2 cu ft bed under an available powered tonneau, roughly 62 cu ft in total with most of it secure. Roof crossbars and bed racks are catalogued, the tow hitch doubles as a rack mount, and the rear seat bottoms flip up for in-cabin loads; only the short bed keeps it from a perfect score.

9Driving ExperienceThe R1T's best-graded category.3.73A
Handling & agility88
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Scored on the Dual-Motor Adventure, the volume configuration, with standard adaptive air suspension and Rivian's hydraulic cross-linked roll control in place of conventional anti-roll bars — the R1T is the consensus benchmark for pickup body control, holding flat through corners in a way no ladder-frame half-ton manages. It is still a ~7,000 lb truck with a high center of gravity and its limit grip is set by all-terrain rubber, so it is not a sports sedan; the second-generation (2025-on) chassis retune sharpened body control further and 2026 carries it over unchanged.

Steering feel78
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Quick, accurate and naturally weighted for the segment, with consistent build-up off center and selectable weighting by drive mode — reviewers routinely call it car-like relative to any ladder-frame rival. Genuine road feel is still muted by the electric rack, which keeps it out of the 80-plus band.

Braking confidence80
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Instrumented 70-0 mph stops around 170 ft are strong for a truck of this mass, and the regen-to-friction handoff is among the best-blended in any EV — one-pedal driving is smooth and predictable with no grabby transition at the changeover. Pedal feel is firm and consistent; repeated hard stops from speed show some heat-related softening, which is what keeps it below the 90s.

Powertrain smoothness & response95
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Single-speed dual-motor drive with instant torque, no shifts, no lash and no stop/start behavior to calibrate — tip-in is progressive rather than the abrupt on/off some EVs exhibit, and torque distribution between axles is seamless. The second-generation in-house drive units (new for 2025, carried into 2026) are quieter and smoother than the launch units they replaced.

Drivetrain noise & vibration88
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

Effectively silent under load — no engine note, and the second-generation motors reduced the whine that was audible under hard acceleration in early cars. Nothing reaches the controls as vibration. The remaining noise is tire roar from the 20-in all-terrains fitted to most Adventure trucks, which is road noise rather than a powertrain fault.

Turning circle
44.7 ft curb-to-curb (one crew-cab body; no rear-wheel steering offered)
66/100
#12 of 20 in classCompare all →

A 135.8-in wheelbase and no rear-axle steering put the R1T mid-pack for the segment — tighter than an F-150 SuperCrew (47.8 ft) or Ram 1500 (46.2 ft), but well off the rear-steer Hummer EV (37.1 ft) and Cybertruck (43.5 ft). The Quad-Motor's Kick Turn is an off-road pivot trick, not a road-going turning-circle aid, so it does not change this figure.

Driving position & ergonomics76
#7 of 20 in classCompare all →

Commanding sightlines over a short hood, wide power seat and column adjustment, and adjustable air-suspension ride height that eases ingress at the lowest setting. The score is held back by Rivian's all-touchscreen philosophy: mirror adjustment, steering-column adjustment, vent direction and most HVAC functions live in menus with almost no physical switchgear, and step-in is high on trucks without the optional running boards.

Fun-to-drive factor92
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

The one pickup enthusiasts recommend on driving merit rather than novelty — quick, flat-cornering and genuinely rewarding on a back road, with real off-road ability layered on top. The Quad-Motor halo (1,025 hp, 2.5 s to 60, Kick Turn pivots and the RAD Tuner dynamics adjuster) adds theater the volume Dual-Motor does not have, but even the base truck is entertaining rather than appliance-like. Not a 100 only because silent EV thrust lacks the aural character some buyers want.

10Value & Market PositionGrades above the middle of the scale.2.83B-
Standard equipment generosity80
#3 of 20 in classCompare all →

Genuinely generous for the money in the ways that are hardest to buy elsewhere: adaptive air suspension with hydraulic cross-linked roll control is standard on every trim — an F-150 cannot be optioned with it at any price and a Silverado EV does not offer it — alongside a standard 15.6-in center display and 12.3-in digital cluster, glass roof, gear tunnel, onboard air compressor, 120V bed outlets, phone-as-key and the full Autonomy Platform camera/radar hardware. Held out of the high band because the $71,700 entry configuration is the short-range Standard Pack, the powered tonneau is a four-figure option rather than standard equipment, and two ordinary conveniences are absent at any price — no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto and no head-up display.

Feature value per dollar58
#14 of 20 in classCompare all →

The content is real — best cabin in any pickup, the best-driving truck in the segment, 11,000 lb towing, 352 mi of range and a 5-year/60,000-mile warranty no rival matches — but it is priced as the luxury good it is, and value is a ratio. A typically-optioned Dual-Motor Large Pack lands near $79,700, roughly $30,000 above a comparably useful F-150, and the ownership side compounds it: ~1,760 lb payload, ~$3,300/yr insurance, worst-in-band five-year resale and a service network that is the binding constraint on a repair. The prior placeholder of 97 implied a bargain; this truck is the opposite of a bargain, and the honest reading is fair-value-for-what-it-is rather than bang-for-buck.

Trim & configuration breadth58
#14 of 20 in classCompare all →

Broad where it is electric, narrow where it is a truck. The powertrain ladder is the widest in the electric-pickup field — three battery packs (Standard, Large, Max), four motor configurations (Dual, Dual Performance, Tri, Quad) and a price span from roughly $71,700 to $117,700 — but the body is take-it-or-leave-it: one crew cab, one short bed, one wheelbase, no regular or extended cab, no long-bed or work-spec variant. That is the axis full-size truck buyers actually shop, which is why this cannot approach the F-150's 93 despite the pack-and-motor breadth putting it well clear of the Cybertruck's two-trim lineup.

Sales popularity & market acceptance38
#16 of 20 in classCompare all →

Acceptance is high, volume is not. Rivian's total annual deliveries run on the order of 50,000 units across R1T, R1S and the commercial van, and the R1S outsells the R1T by roughly two to one — so the pickup is a low-five-figure nameplate against the F-150's several hundred thousand, and the trajectory softened through 2025-26 as the federal clean-vehicle credit lapsed and Rivian's attention and capital shifted to the R2 launch. It scores above the Hummer EV and Ram 1500 REV and roughly level with where the Cybertruck has settled, but this is a niche seller by any full-size-truck measure and the placeholder 87 was reading owner enthusiasm as market share.

Brand desirability & image78
#5 of 20 in classCompare all →

This is Rivian's strongest market-position card and the one place the placeholder was directionally right. The brand carries a genuinely aspirational outdoors image, an unusually engaged owner community, and owner-satisfaction results that have repeatedly placed it at or near the top of the industry — buyers who want an R1T rarely cross-shop it down. What keeps it out of the 80s is that this item is explicitly tied to resale as well as satisfaction, and resale is the truck's single worst line: five-year retention near 40%, plus a reliability reputation at the bottom of the brand standings and lingering buyer doubt about the service footprint and the company's long-run footing.

Deals & incentive availability70
#12 of 20 in classCompare all →

Scored on buyer benefit. Rivian sells direct at a fixed, published price, so there is no negotiation and no dealer to play against — but slow demand for a $70-120K electric pickup has kept real promotional levers in play, chiefly subsidized APR, charging credits and periodic discounts on inventory and demo units. The material change for a 2026 buyer is that the $7,500 federal clean-vehicle credit expired on 2025-09-30, including the leasing pathway that had been Rivian's most effective price lever; that loss hits every EV truck here equally and does not separate the R1T from its rivals. Sits below the Cybertruck and the heavily-incentivized domestics, well above the Ram 1500 REV.

Model freshness88
#1 of 20 in classCompare all →

2026 is the second model year of a second generation that arrived for MY2025, and that redesign was far more than a facelift: a zonal electrical architecture that stripped out the great majority of the wiring harness and ECU count, Rivian's own in-house drive units replacing the Bosch-supplied hardware, new 4695 cells in the Max pack, and a new Autonomy Platform with a substantially expanded sensor set and new compute. Mechanically it is the freshest truck in the full-size field and redesign risk for a 2026 buyer is minimal. Held below the low 90s only because the bodywork is near-indistinguishable from the first-generation truck, so the update does not read as new on the street, and Rivian's development focus has visibly moved to the R2.

Critical reception & awards88
#2 of 20 in classCompare all →

The R1T is the critical benchmark of the electric-pickup class and the item where its placeholder was closest to fair. It took MotorTrend Truck of the Year at launch and has appeared on Car and Driver's 10Best, and in the years since it has been the default winner of electric-truck comparison tests against the F-150 Lightning, Silverado EV, Hummer EV and Cybertruck — reviewers converge on the chassis, the interior, the gear tunnel and the off-road ability. The reservation that keeps it out of the low 90s is that the headline awards belong to the first-generation launch rather than to the 2025-26 truck, and that Consumer Reports withholds a recommendation on reliability grounds, which shows up in the buying-advice tier of the coverage even where the driving reviews are glowing.