MotorGPA
Find My Match
Ford logo
Full-Size Van

2017 Ford Transit

MainstreamGasEV
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
1.11DGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.89C-
Safety
0.00F
EfficiencyGas
0.78F
16 MPG combined · 400 mi range · $2,270/yr energy
Comfort
1.66D
Value
2.13C
Ownership Cost
1.51D
Technology
0.00F
Driving Experience
2.03C

The verdict

A struggling full-size van, strong on value and held back by safety.

Overall 1.11 (D) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is value & market position at 2.13 (C), its weakest safety at 0.00 (F). 3 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Value & Market Position
  • Driving Experience
  • Reliability & Quality

What holds it back

  • Safety
  • Technology & Infotainment
  • Efficiency & Range

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Ford Transit

Production history

2015present · 12 years · 1 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 12015now2015In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 2015

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 472018 · Overall: 46 (−1 vs 2017)2019 · Overall: 49 (+3 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 53 (+4 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 54 (+1 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 51 (−3 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 53 (+2 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 54 (+1 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 56 (+2 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 57 (+1 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance46
50+5
Efficiency42
28-14
Safety25
56+31
Space54
57+2
Cost52
40-12
Reliability58
51-7
Tech29
67+38
Use-case53
64+11
Driving60
64+4
Value61
65+4

Best fit & conditions

Work / TowC+67/100
AdventureD55/100
CommuterD47/100
FamilyF44/100
Winter / inclementF34/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainGrades below the middle of the scale.1.03D
Horsepower
275 hp (3.7L Ti-VCT V6, standard on the volume Transit 250 cargo van); 185-310 hp across the 2017 engine range (3.2L Power Stroke diesel to 3.5L EcoBoost V6)
31/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

2017 is a carryover model year within the unchanged first-generation (2015-2019) US Transit; the standard, volume engine remains the naturally aspirated 3.7L Ti-VCT V6 rated at 275 hp, with the EcoBoost V6 and Power Stroke diesel as paid upgrades.

Torque
260 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm (standard 3.7L V6); 260-400 lb-ft across the range (diesel 350 lb-ft, EcoBoost 400 lb-ft)
35/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Peak torque of the standard, volume 3.7L V6 carried over unchanged for 2017; the optional EcoBoost twin-turbo V6 and Power Stroke diesel both deliver meaningfully more torque but are not the base powertrain.

0-60 mph time
~7.5s (3.7L V6 cargo van, compiled estimate); EcoBoost-equipped Transits reported under 7s
33/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford does not publish 0-60 times for a commercial van; aggregated third-party performance data for the unchanged first-generation Transit's base 3.7L V6 clusters around the mid-7-second range, typical for a full-size van of this output.

Powertrain refinement56
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The base 3.7L V6 delivers smooth, predictable power with no turbo lag but can feel strained when loaded; the optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6 is markedly stronger and smoother, and the optional Power Stroke diesel trades refinement for low-end torque and characteristic clatter.

Transmission behavior56
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The standard 6-speed SelectShift automatic — carried over unchanged for 2017, three years before the 10-speed replaced it in the MY2020 refresh — shifts adequately across all three engine options but with wider gear spacing and occasional hesitation under load.

Max towing capacity
Up to 7,500 lbs (350 HD/EcoBoost V6, properly equipped cargo van); 4,600-6,800 lbs typical across Transit 150/250/350 configurations
93/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Maximum conventional towing rating across the 2017 Transit lineup is achieved with the EcoBoost V6 and factory tow package on longer-wheelbase/HD configurations; the rating varies widely by series (150/250/350), body length, roof height and axle ratio, with base V6 and passenger-van configurations rated meaningfully lower (from 4,600 lbs).

AWD/4WD availability13
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

All-wheel drive was not offered on the Transit until the 2020 model-year refresh; the 2017 lineup is exclusively FWD (Transit 150 low-roof configurations) or RWD (most Transit 150/250/350 configurations), with no AWD or 4WD option at any trim or engine.

Off-road capability10
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

A pavement-oriented commercial van with no AWD option (added MY2020), no Adventure Prep Package (added MY2021), no Trail-badged off-road trim (US MY2023), no locking differentials, and no elevated ground clearance option in 2017.

Powertrain lineup breadth62
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

For 2017 the Transit offers three distinct powertrains — the standard 3.7L Ti-VCT V6, the optional 3.5L EcoBoost twin-turbo V6, and the optional 3.2L Power Stroke I5 turbodiesel — covering mainstream fleet needs with a genuine gas-vs-diesel choice, though no electrified powertrain existed yet.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Transit's weakest categories.0.78F
Combined fuel economy
16 MPG combined (3.7L V6, base cargo van)
33/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The standard 3.7L Ti-VCT V6 is the volume engine across T150/T250/T350 cargo configurations and carries an official EPA combined rating; the optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6 rates similarly and the 3.2L Power Stroke diesel is EPA-exempt at this GVWR class.

City fuel economy
14 MPG city (3.7L V6, RWD)
27/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Official EPA city rating for the base 3.7L V6 cargo van, the volume powertrain for MY2017.

Highway fuel economy
18 MPG highway (3.7L V6, RWD)
25/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Official EPA highway rating for the base 3.7L V6 cargo van, the volume powertrain for MY2017.

Driving range
~400 mi on the standard 25-gal fuel tank
38/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford specifies a 25-gallon fuel tank across T150/T250/T350 configurations for MY2017; combined with the 16 mpg EPA combined rating for the base V6 this yields roughly 400 miles of range.

Estimated annual fuel cost
~$2,270/yr (15k mi/yr @ 16 mpg combined, base V6)
55/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

At the standard 15,000 mi/yr assumption and the 16 mpg EPA combined rating, the base gas Transit burns roughly 940 gallons/year; at the 2017 national average regular-gasoline price (~$2.42/gal per EIA) that lands mid-pack in the van cost band, ahead of the thirstier RWD Sprinter and Mercedes/Ram gas competitors of the era but well behind diesel options. Commercial Transit configurations aren't assigned an official EPA annual-cost figure, so this is derived rather than quoted directly.

Fuel requirements85
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The standard 3.7L V6 and optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6 both run on regular 87-octane unleaded with no premium requirement; the optional 3.2L Power Stroke diesel needs diesel fuel but is not the volume configuration.

3SafetyThe Transit's lowest-graded category.0.00F
NHTSA overall rating
Not comprehensively rated by NHTSA — frontal 4-star (driver 4, passenger 3), side-pole 5-star; no rollover or combined overall rating published — est. 4 stars
50/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

NHTSA never published a single combined overall star rating for the 2017 Transit — as with most full-size vans in this weight class, it only received partial-test ratings (4-star frontal, 5-star side-pole) with rollover and a composite overall left unassigned, so the value here is an estimate anchored to the frontal score rather than an authoritative overall figure.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness36
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

IIHS did not evaluate commercial/full-size vans in 2017 — its first commercial-van program (driver-protection features, not full crashworthiness) only launched in 2026 and found the current Transit T250 cargo van fails to meet all criteria (missing an effective seat belt reminder) — so no Top Safety Pick award or independent crash results exist for the 2017 model year; scored below segment midpoint to reflect the absence of independent verification rather than a confirmed deficiency.

Standard ADAS suite breadth14
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 2017 Transit predates Ford Co-Pilot360 by several years; the standard safety baseline on both XL and XLT Passenger Wagon trims is limited to stability control, AdvanceTrac with side-wind stabilization, antilock brakes, and a rearview camera, with lane departure warning and rear parking sensors offered only as extra-cost options and no blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise, or automatic emergency braking available on this generation at this point.

Automatic emergency braking performance10
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Pre-Collision Assist with automatic emergency braking was not offered on the 2017 Transit in any trim — Ford's rollout of AEB across its lineup, including commercial vans, did not begin until the 2019 model year — and IIHS had not yet begun testing commercial vans, so there is no independent day/night or pedestrian AEB performance data and the feature was simply unavailable.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage8
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are absent from every 2017 Transit Passenger Wagon trim's options list — the van relies on its factory mirrors alone, and the sizeable aftermarket blind-spot-camera market that grew up around this generation underscores how large the driver's-side blind spot is without a factory system.

Lane keeping & centering12
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Lane departure warning is only an extra-cost option on the 2017 Transit and there is no lane-keeping assist or centering function offered at all this model year — active lane-centering did not arrive on the Transit until the later Co-Pilot360 update.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist4
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Adaptive cruise control does not appear as a standard or optional feature on any 2017 Transit trim — the feature did not reach the Transit lineup until later model years — so no highway-assist function of any kind is available on this van.

Hands-free driving availability2
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford's hands-free BlueCruise system did not exist until its 2021 Mustang Mach-E launch and has never been offered on the Transit, so no hands-free highway driving option exists on this 2017 van.

Headlight performance28
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 2017 Transit's standard lighting is conventional halogen with no auto high-beam or adaptive function offered this model year (those arrived with the later Co-Pilot360 package), and IIHS had no headlight-rating program covering commercial vans in 2017, so performance is inferred to be below segment midpoint on both hardware and lack of verification.

Outward visibility50
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Reviewers note strong forward sightlines from the Transit's tall, upright driving position and expansive windshield, but the thick B-pillar creates a real driver's-side blind spot that the 2017 model has no factory blind-spot monitoring to offset, leaving owners reliant on carefully adjusted mirrors or aftermarket camera kits.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability50
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

LATCH lower anchors are fitted at only 2-3 seating positions depending on passenger configuration, with anchors on the bench seats partially covered by a gap panel and requiring some digging to access — workable but not effortless, especially for fitting multiple car seats across trims.

4Space & ComfortGrades below the middle of the scale.1.66D
Seating capacity
Up to 15 seats (Transit-350 Passenger Wagon, Extended Length/High Roof); 8/10/12-passenger configurations on Low/Medium Roof; Cargo Van seats 2 (driver + passenger)
100/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The first-generation US Transit (launched MY2015, unchanged body through the 2020 refresh) offers the same modular passenger-count lineup in 2017 — up to 12 on Low/Medium Roof builds and up to 15 on Extended Length/High Roof — far above the van norm band ceiling; Cargo Van variants remain 2-seat commercial haulers.

Front headroom
52.0 in (Medium Roof); 40.8 in on Low Roof; up to 56.6 in on Extended Length High Roof
100/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

2017 is a carryover model year within the unchanged first-generation Transit body (walk-through center console and standard SYNC 3 on top trims were the only notable 2017 updates); the Medium Roof Passenger Wagon clears the van norm band ceiling by a wide margin thanks to the Transit's tall, upright cab.

Front legroom
39.7 in (consistent across roof heights and wheelbases)
0/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Front legroom is unchanged by roof height and falls just below the van norm band floor — the flat-fronted commercial cab keeps the driver closer to the wheel wells than a car-like footwell, and this generation's front seat travel is shorter than later refreshed model years.

Rear headroom
~51 in (second row, Medium Roof; third-party aggregation places the range 41.1-55.8 in across roof heights)
78/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford does not publish a per-row headroom spec for the Medium Roof Passenger Wagon; a continuous flat cargo-box roofline keeps second-row headroom close to the front-row figure, clearing the van band ceiling comfortably.

Rear legroom
33.7 in (second-row bench, multi-row passenger layout)
31/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Second-row legroom sits mid-band; the multi-row passenger layout (up to 15-passenger on Extended Length) packs rows tighter than lower-capacity rivals configured with fewer, more spread-out rows.

Third-row usability74
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Rear rows of the Passenger Wagon offer genuine adult headroom and walk-in access through the tall sliding door on Medium/High Roof builds, though the tighter per-row bench spacing (built for up to 15 occupants) trails the segment-leading legroom of lower-capacity rivals; 2017 predates the 2020 refresh's dual-sliding-door and crew-cab options that later improved rear-row access.

Cargo/trunk volume
~100+ cu ft behind the last row in 15-passenger configuration; more in lower-passenger-count builds (up to ~245+ cu ft with only front seats installed)
12/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Even in the tightest 15-passenger configuration, remaining cargo space behind the last row is well above the van norm band; fewer-passenger configurations of the same body free up considerably more room.

Max cargo volume
357.1 cu ft (Transit-250 Cargo Van, Medium Roof/148 in WB); range 246.7-487.2 cu ft across the 2017 Transit Van lineup
31/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Even the mid-size Medium Roof Cargo Van configuration dwarfs the van norm band ceiling; the largest Extended Length High Roof build tops out near 487 cu ft for the 2017 model year, matching this unchanged first-generation body's full lineup range.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions60
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

2017 is a notable mid-cycle update for cabin storage: Ford added a walk-through center console bridging the driver/passenger footwells (plus optional power running boards), a genuine practicality upgrade over the 2015-2016 launch cabin — though still short of a standout 'giga console' style innovation, and Ford's upfitter ecosystem (shelving, ladder racks) remains the main value-add for commercial buyers.

Seat comfort58
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Owner and consumer reviews report comfortable seating with more comfort options than expected in a commercial-based van, including heated seats and 10-way power front seats on higher trims, though the seats feel different/firmer than traditional van seating for some buyers.

Ride quality64
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Reviewers highlight car-like handling that no prior truck-based full-size van could match — light, responsive steering and a flat, composed ride through corners — a meaningful step up from the body-on-frame vans this Transit generation replaced, though still a commercial-van ride on rough pavement unladen.

Cabin quietness52
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Road and wind noise are described as well-managed and quieter than the full-size van norm, but the cavernous cargo bay amplifies noise from rain on the roof and there is no acoustic glass or active noise cancellation on this pre-refresh generation, keeping the score to the average band.

Climate & comfort features54
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Manual air conditioning sized for the cavernous cabin is standard, and heated front seats are available as an option package on XLT and above, but dual-zone and rear climate control remain limited and comfort equipment is largely add-on rather than broad-based for the 2017 model year.

5Cost of OwnershipGrades below the middle of the scale.1.51D
Base MSRP
~32,285 $ (Transit 150 Cargo Van, Low Roof, short wheelbase, 3.7L V6 — entry configuration incl. destination)
82/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Entry price for the cheapest 2017 Transit configuration, the 150 Cargo Van Low Roof on the standard wheelbase without the sliding side door option; carryover pricing within the unchanged first-generation (2015-2019) Transit.

Volume-Trim Price
~34,590 $ (Transit 250 Cargo Van, Medium Roof, LWB w/sliding side door — typical commercial spec)
81/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 250 Medium Roof LWB is Ford's most common commercial-spec configuration (stand-up cargo height plus higher payload/tow capability than the 150), used here as the volume trim.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~4,700 $ over 5 years (~940 $/yr, scheduled + unscheduled)
74/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Projected from RepairPal's per-model annual repair/maintenance cost figures for the Transit lineup, extended to a 5-year total; the unchanged, proven V6/6-speed drivetrain keeps parts and service inexpensive relative to the full-size van segment despite commercial-duty use.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~41% of MSRP after 5 years
3/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Current KBB listings (with the 2017 Transit now nine years old) show 56-58% depreciation from original MSRP across the 150/250/350 lineup; working back a typical full-size cargo van depreciation curve to the 5-year point puts retention in the low-40s percent, near the bottom of the van band and slightly below the same-generation 2018 model.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
0/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Standard Ford New Vehicle Limited Warranty term for the 2017 model year, at the bottom of the segment normalization band.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi retail (5 yr / 100,000 mi for commercial fleet accounts with a FIN code)
0/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Standard retail powertrain term sits at the low end of the band; commercial buyers with a Ford Fleet Identification Number get an extended 100,000-mile cap, but that is not the default retail term.

Complimentary maintenance & perks50
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

No complimentary scheduled maintenance was standard on the 2017 Transit; Ford included roadside assistance (tow, jump-start, lockout, fuel delivery) for 5 years/60,000 miles bundled with the New Vehicle Limited Warranty, which covers the basic-roadside-only band. Paid Ford service plans were available but not included at purchase.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$25,108 (≈$20,408 depreciation + $4,700 maintenance)
64/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

$34,590 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (41% retained, or about $14,182) leaves about $20,408 in depreciation. Add the projected $4,700 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $25,108 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Transit's strongest categories.1.89C-
Predicted reliability55
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Consumer Reports and J.D. Power data on the 2015-2017 Transit generation is mixed rather than strong; the model was still new to the US market (replacing the E-Series in 2015) and 2017 carried forward the driveshaft-coupling defect that spanned the first three model years.

Brand reliability track record58
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford sat mid-pack in CR/J.D. Power brand dependability studies through the mid-2010s — not a top-tier brand but not bottom-third either.

Recall & TSB history40
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 2015-2017 Transit (all but the longest wheelbase Chassis Cab/Cutaway) was subject to a safety-critical recall (NHTSA 17V-408, superseded by 19V-767, ~293,558 vehicles) for a flexible driveshaft coupling that could deteriorate and fail, risking brake/fuel line damage and vehicle rollaway if parked without the parking brake set — a systemic issue requiring an interim fix (coupling replacement every 40,000 miles) and later a permanent driveshaft redesign with a mechanical U-joint. A separate 2017 recall addressed water intrusion corroding the trailer tow module wiring, which could cause an electrical short or seatbelt pretensioner deployment.

Powertrain durability reputation52
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

2017 offered the 3.7L Duratec V6, optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6, and Ford's first light-van turbodiesel, the 3.2L Power Stroke I5 — all only 2-3 model years into US Transit service, so none had the long high-mileage track record of the outgoing E-Series' proven 4.6L/5.4L V8s. The EcoBoost carried a solid reputation from F-150 use, but the 3.2L diesel drew owner reports of DPF regeneration and glow-plug issues in early Transit model years, and owner forums separately flag transmission rough-shifting/delayed engagement on 2015-2017 models.

Interior material quality58
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Cabin materials are functional commercial-van fare — durable hard plastics and vinyl/cloth surfaces prioritized for cleanability and cost over cabin richness, in line with segment expectations rather than exceeding them.

Fit & finish64
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Assembly quality was generally solid with no widespread panel-gap or rattle complaints beyond what's typical for a body-on-frame-style commercial van; some owners describe the cabin as feeling flimsy in places, but no systemic fit/finish red flags emerged.

Dealer & service network88
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford runs one of the largest dealer and commercial/fleet service networks in the US, a clear edge over Mercedes-Benz's smaller Sprinter dealer footprint for nationwide fleet operators.

Parts availability & repair cost76
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

As one of the best-selling commercial vans in the world, gas-engine Transit parts are abundant and reasonably priced with strong aftermarket support; diesel-specific parts and service are somewhat more specialized and costlier, moderating the score slightly below best-in-class.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Transit's weakest categories.0.00F
Touchscreen size
4.2-in non-touch display standard on base cargo van; 6.5-in SYNC 3 touchscreen w/ navigation optional (representative for volume commercial configuration)
0/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 2017 Transit sits in the pre-2020-refresh first US generation; the base cargo van pairs a small 4.2-in non-touch display with the standard SYNC system, while the optional SYNC 3 upgrade — extended to the Transit for this generation — tops out at a 6.5-in touchscreen (the 8-in/12-in screens arrived only with the 2020 redesign).

Infotainment UX & responsiveness52
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

SYNC 3, when optioned, is a clear step up in speed and menu logic over Ford's older MyFord Touch/base SYNC, but the standard 4.2-in non-touch display on entry cargo trims is minimal and the overall setup reads as commercial-grade rather than modern even for 2017.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto45
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Apple CarPlay and Android Auto reach the Transit for the first time with the MY2017 SYNC 3 update, but only wired and only on the optional 6.5-in touchscreen — the standard 4.2-in non-touch display has no phone-projection capability at all, and Ford offers no wireless projection on this generation.

Voice control & native navigation46
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

SYNC 3 voice control handles basic commands adequately and Ford Navigation is bundled with the optional 6.5-in touchscreen, but most commercial/fleet buyers rely on phone-based navigation via CarPlay/Android Auto instead of the factory system.

Audio system quality27
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The full-size Transit has no factory premium/branded audio option (Alpine, Sony, B&O) for 2017 — only aftermarket upgrades exist — leaving a basic commercial-grade speaker setup even on upper trims; the base radio pairs with just two speakers.

Digital instrument cluster19
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 2017 Transit uses analog gauges with a small monochrome multi-information display rather than a configurable digital cluster; a fully reworked instrument panel didn't arrive until the 2020 refresh.

OTA update capability11
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 2017 Transit predates FordPass Connect, the embedded-modem telematics package Ford rolled out to the Transit only with the 2020 refresh; software/map updates on this generation are handled via USB or dealer visit with no meaningful OTA path.

Companion app & remote functions14
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Without FordPass Connect's embedded modem, the 2017 Transit has no factory smartphone-app remote lock/unlock, locate, or status functions — remote convenience is limited to a traditional keyless-entry fob (lock/unlock, panic) or aftermarket remote-start kits.

Charging ports & device power29
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 2017 Transit offers a modest one or two USB-A ports on the instrument panel with no USB-C (not yet mainstream) or wireless charging pad; optional upfitter 120V inverter packages exist for work use but aren't a standard convenience-charging feature.

Keyless & remote access23
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Volume cargo/commercial trims retain a traditional key-start ignition with an optional keyless-entry remote fob (lock/unlock/panic) and available accessory remote start; factory push-button start and proximity entry are not offered on the full-size Transit for this generation, consistent with its work-van positioning.

Camera & parking aids55
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

A rear-view camera is standard equipment across 2017 Transit Van and Passenger Wagon models (ahead of the May 2018 federal mandate), and a Reverse Sensing System (rear parking sensors) is available as an option; the 360-degree camera and blind-spot-with-trailer-coverage packages that later Transit years offer were not yet available on this pre-refresh generation.

Head-up display availability3
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford does not offer a head-up display on any 2017 Transit trim.

8Use-Case FitGrades below the middle of the scale.1.57D
Kid & car-seat practicality52
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The tall sliding side door, low step-in height and walk-through center console added for 2017 make loading kids and gear genuinely easy day to day, but LATCH lower anchors cover only 2-3 seating positions with the anchors partially hidden behind a gap panel that requires some digging to access — workable but not effortless when fitting more than one car seat.

Family safety package30
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

NHTSA's 4-star overall result (4 frontal / 5 side) is respectable, but 2017 predates Ford Co-Pilot360 entirely — there is no blind-spot monitoring, no adaptive cruise, no automatic emergency braking, and no lane-keeping assist at any trim — and the model year carries an active NHTSA driveshaft-coupling recall with rollaway risk, leaving families with a thin safety-tech floor and an added mechanical red flag specific to this year.

Family road-trip comfort46
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Stand-up headroom, a surprisingly car-like ride for a commercial-based van, and available heated/10-way power front seats are genuine strengths for multi-hour family trips, but heated seats are only an optional package (not standard even on XLT), dual-zone/rear climate control is limited, and cabin quietness is only average with noted rain-on-roof drumming in the cargo bay.

Daily driving ease46
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The standard 3.7L V6 is adequate but can feel strained under load, and the 6-speed SelectShift automatic has documented occasional clunky/hesitant shifting; a roughly 9-10 ft tall, up-to-276-in-long van with car-like steering is more manageable than older truck-based full-size vans but is never genuinely relaxing in stop-and-go traffic.

Commuting cost efficiency52
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

A relatively low ~$32,285 base MSRP and cheap ~$1,728/yr insurance help the ledger for a private/light-commercial buyer, offsetting mediocre 16 mpg combined fuel economy (~$2,270/yr at 15k mi/yr) and a documented driveshaft-coupling recall that adds real-world cost/inconvenience risk specific to owning this exact model year.

Parking & maneuverability42
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Low Roof/regular-wheelbase Cargo Vans are among the more tractable full-size van body styles, but Medium/High Roof and Extended Length configurations clear many parking garages and run a footprint well beyond any SUV; a factory rear camera is only optional (this predates the May 2018 federal backup-camera mandate) and no 360-degree camera exists for this pre-refresh generation.

Work capability76
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Up to 7,500 lbs of tow capacity when properly equipped with the EcoBoost V6 and cargo volume up to roughly 487 cu ft on Extended Length High Roof builds make the 2017 Transit a genuinely serious commercial work tool, backed by a three-engine lineup (V6, EcoBoost V6, Power Stroke diesel) to match the job.

Durability for work duty50
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The Transit was already a top-selling full-size van by 2017 and the base 3.7L V6 is a proven Ford unit, but this model year sits inside the 2015-2017 driveshaft-coupling recall window (rollaway risk, interim 40,000-mile replacement fix) and the still-new 3.2L Power Stroke diesel drew early owner reports of DPF regeneration and glow-plug issues — a meaningfully weaker durability picture than later, more mature Transit years for a work-duty buyer.

Jobsite & upfit practicality70
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford's upfitter channels already backed shelving, ladder-rack, and walk-in van-body conversions in 2017 with multiple roof/wheelbase/GVWR combinations to spec around the job, and the new-for-2017 walk-through console/power running boards add jobsite convenience, though the dedicated Ford Pro commercial-fleet organization and its broader upfit ecosystem did not yet exist.

Long-distance comfort & range40
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

A 25-gal standard tank yields roughly 400 highway-capable miles between fill-ups and the ride is composed for a commercial-based van, but adaptive cruise control and lane-centering are unavailable across every 2017 trim (not even optional) and cabin quietness is only average — a weaker mile-eater than the Co-Pilot360-equipped Transit years that followed.

Outdoor & adventure capability52
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The Transit chassis already anchored a growing camper-conversion aftermarket by 2017 (Winnebago, Coachmen, Sportsmobile and others building on the platform since its 2015 US launch), but 2017 is RWD-only across the entire lineup — Ford did not add an AWD option until the 2020 refresh — so this year lacks the improved-traction path later Transits offer for gravel roads or foul-weather camping, and no factory off-road package exists at all.

Gear & luggage flexibility80
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Up to roughly 487 cu ft of cargo volume, removable/foldable Passenger Wagon seating, and a wide sliding side door let this van swallow bikes, luggage, or a full camping load with ease, backed by the same commercial upfit ecosystem that serves tradespeople — just behind the largest Sprinter configurations at the very top end.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the Transit's strongest categories.2.03C
Handling & agility68
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The T6-platform Transit rides on a fully independent front suspension (unusual for a full-size van) and is widely regarded by reviewers as the most car-like and composed of the domestic full-size vans to drive, with good body control for its size and class.

Steering feel61
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Electric power-assisted steering is accurate and light enough for city maneuvering and parking, but like all full-size vans it is numb and offers little genuine road feedback.

Braking confidence63
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Standard four-wheel disc brakes with ABS and electronic brake distribution provide confident, fade-resistant stops for the class; owners moving from older vans report a large perceived improvement, though no instrumented 60-0 test results were found for the 2017 model year.

Powertrain smoothness & response75
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Both the standard 3.7L V6 and optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6 pair with a six-speed automatic that shifts smoothly and unobtrusively; the EcoBoost in particular delivers strong, linear response even under heavy load with minimal driveline shudder.

Drivetrain noise & vibration70
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Road and wind noise are better controlled than typical for the full-size van segment, keeping the V6 powertrains audible but not intrusive under normal driving; the large, unlined cargo box does amplify noise (e.g. rain) in cargo configurations.

Turning circle
43.5 ft curb-to-curb (130 in. wheelbase) – 48.5 ft (148 in. wheelbase)
0/100
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The short 130-inch-wheelbase configuration is the tightest-turning Transit variant; long-wheelbase (148 in.) configurations need roughly 5 additional feet to complete a U-turn.

Driving position & ergonomics60
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The elevated, car-like driving position and large glass area give commanding forward visibility, but the front bucket seats draw mixed reviews for long-haul comfort and the driver's seat must be slid back to access the cargo area from the cab, an ergonomic quirk versus rivals.

Fun-to-drive factor54
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The Transit is a work tool first, but the EcoBoost V6's strong pull and comparatively car-like manners make it more engaging than most full-size van rivals, even if it remains fundamentally appliance-like in character.

10Value & Market PositionThe Transit's best-graded category.2.13C
Standard equipment generosity53
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The 2017 Transit remains a work-first commercial van at heart — vinyl flooring, manual windows/locks, and a basic driver seat on base XL trim — with no Ford Co-Pilot360 driver-assist suite (that bundle doesn't arrive until the MY2020 refresh); a rearview camera is about the extent of standard driver-assist tech. 2017 does bring a modest bump over prior years: a redesigned center console for easier access to the rear cargo area, a standard 4-speaker audio system (up from 2), and a newly available power running board.

Feature value per dollar55
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

2017 Transit Cargo Van pricing (MSRP from roughly $31.6K) undercuts a comparably configured Mercedes-Benz Sprinter by a wide margin while matching Ram ProMaster on capability, and the optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6 (310 hp/400 lb-ft) delivers strong power-per-dollar versus the base 3.7L V6; the 3.2L Power Stroke diesel inline-5, in its second model year on Transit, adds a torque-and-efficiency option rivals in this price band can't match. Still runs a 6-speed automatic and lacks AWD (arrives MY2020), so it's solid but not a standout bargain.

Trim & configuration breadth73
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Wide-for-the-segment lineup carried over from the MY2015 launch: XL/XLT trims, Cargo Van/Passenger Wagon/Chassis Cab/Cutaway body styles, three roof heights (low/medium/high), two wheelbases, and 150/250/350 GVWR classes (350 offering an optional dual-rear-wheel setup), plus three engine choices (base 3.7L V6, optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6, optional 3.2L Power Stroke diesel inline-5). Passenger Wagon spans 8- to 15-passenger seating. Still 2WD-only — AWD doesn't arrive until MY2020 — and no Crew Van body style yet (added MY2021), so the range is a step behind where the nameplate lands a few years later.

Sales popularity & market acceptance82
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Transit has been the best-selling full-size van in the US every year since its MY2015 launch, and by 2017 — its third model year — it was firmly established as the segment leader, outselling Ram ProMaster and Mercedes-Benz Sprinter combined and continuing to eat into what remained of Chevrolet Express/GMC Savana volume. A clear, growing segment leader, though a step below the even larger volumes the nameplate would post a couple of years later.

Brand desirability & image60
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Ford's commercial-vehicle credibility — F-Series work-truck heritage and the largest dealer/service network among full-size van makers — drives strong fleet trust and resale confidence, though the brand carries none of Mercedes-Benz's aspirational halo and sits roughly on par with Ram in general market perception.

Deals & incentive availability55
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

2017 predates both the COVID-era production pauses and the semiconductor shortage that would squeeze full-size van inventory starting in 2021, so retail and fleet discounting sat at a normal cadence — Ford's standard commercial fleet financing, bonus cash, and upfit incentive programs — without desperation pricing but also without unusual generosity.

Model freshness63
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

The third-generation Transit launched in the US for MY2015, so 2017 sits early-mid cycle — two model years in, with the Power Stroke diesel and EcoBoost V6 already added and this year's own light touches (new center console, standard 4-speaker audio, available power running board). Three model years ahead of the substantial MY2020 mid-cycle refresh (new fascia, 10-speed automatic, standard Co-Pilot360, first-time AWD), so it reads as current and still being actively iterated rather than aging toward replacement.

Critical reception & awards62
too few vans scored for 2017 to rankCompare all →

Contemporary reviews (Cars.com, Edmunds, KBB) rate the 2017 Transit favorably for configurability, car-like driving manners versus the outgoing E-Series, and value against Sprinter and ProMaster; the nameplate had already finished runner-up to the Chevrolet Colorado for Motor Trend's 2015 Truck of the Year and continued to be a recurring Vincentric Best Fleet Value in America honoree. It doesn't chase mainstream 10Best-style awards since commercial vans sit outside that circuit, and comparison tests generally treat it as a strong all-rounder rather than an outright class winner on any single axis.