MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2018:Overall +3Safety +14Reliability +1Efficiency & Range +3Cost of Ownership -2Technology +4Driving Experience -1
Ford logo
Full-Size Van

2019 Ford Transit

MainstreamGasEV
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
1.31DGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.80C-
Safety
0.71F
EfficiencyGas
0.80F
16 MPG combined · 400 mi range · $2,450/yr energy
Comfort
1.59D
Value
2.26C
Ownership Cost
1.47D
Technology
0.18F
Driving Experience
1.61D

The verdict

A struggling full-size van, strong on value and held back by technology.

Overall 1.31 (D) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is value & market position at 2.26 (C), its weakest technology & infotainment at 0.18 (F). 3 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Value & Market Position
  • Use-Case Fit
  • Reliability & Quality

What holds it back

  • Technology & Infotainment
  • Safety
  • Efficiency & Range

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Ford Transit

Production history

2015present · 12 years · 1 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 12015now2015In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 2015

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 472018 · Overall: 46 (−1 vs 2017)2019 · Overall: 49 (+3 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 53 (+4 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 54 (+1 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 51 (−3 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 53 (+2 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 54 (+1 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 56 (+2 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 57 (+1 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance46
50+5
Efficiency42
28-14
Safety25
56+31
Space54
57+2
Cost52
40-12
Reliability58
51-7
Tech29
67+38
Use-case53
64+11
Driving60
64+4
Value61
65+4

Best fit & conditions

Work / TowB+77/100
AdventureC63/100
FamilyD50/100
CommuterD48/100
Winter / inclementF34/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainGrades below the middle of the scale.1.07D
Horsepower
275 hp (3.7L Ti-VCT V6, base/volume engine); 310 hp with optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6; 185 hp with optional 3.2L Power Stroke I5 diesel
31/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

For 2019 — the final model year before the 2020 refresh — the standard, volume engine across Cargo Van, Passenger Wagon, Cutaway and Chassis Cab is the carryover 3.7L Ti-VCT V6; the EcoBoost V6 and Power Stroke diesel are both paid upgrades.

Torque
260 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm (3.7L Ti-VCT V6, base); 400 lb-ft with optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6; 350 lb-ft with optional 3.2L Power Stroke diesel
35/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Peak torque of the standard, volume 3.7L Ti-VCT V6 carried over unchanged for 2019; the optional EcoBoost twin-turbo V6 and Power Stroke diesel both deliver meaningfully more torque but are not the base powertrain.

0–60 mph time
~7.5 s (base 3.7L V6, compiled estimate); EcoBoost-equipped Transits reported under 7 s
33/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford does not publish 0-60 times for a commercial van; aggregated third-party performance data lists roughly 7.5 s for the base 3.7L V6 and sub-7-second runs for EcoBoost-equipped configurations, consistent with the same-generation 2020 Transit's turbocharged instrumented tests.

Powertrain refinement63
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The naturally aspirated base V6 delivers smooth, predictable power with no turbo lag; the optional twin-turbo EcoBoost V6 adds strong mid-range pull but with some boost lag under load, and the optional diesel I5 brings characteristic diesel clatter and turbo lag at low RPM — none of the three benefit from the auto start-stop system added with the 2020 refresh.

Transmission behavior58
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The standard 6-speed SelectShift automatic — carried over for 2019, its last year before the 10-speed replaced it in the 2020 refresh — shifts adequately across all three engine options but with wider gear spacing and less refined behavior than the 10-speed that followed.

Max towing capacity
7,500 lbs max (3.5L EcoBoost V6, properly equipped)
93/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Maximum conventional towing rating across the 2019 Transit lineup, achieved with the EcoBoost V6 and factory tow package; actual rating varies widely by series (150/250/350), body length, roof height, axle ratio and drivetrain, with base V6 configurations rated closer to 5,000-6,000 lbs.

AWD/4WD availability12
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

All-wheel drive was not offered on the Transit until the 2020 model-year refresh; for 2019 the lineup is exclusively FWD (Transit 150) or RWD (Transit 150/250/350) with no AWD or 4WD option at any trim or engine.

Off-road capability10
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit has no AWD option (added for 2020), no Adventure Prep Package (added for 2021) and no Trail-badged off-road trim (US MY2023); it is a pavement-oriented, RWD/FWD commercial van with no raised suspension, skid plating or all-terrain tire package.

Powertrain lineup breadth60
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

For 2019 — its final year on sale before discontinuation — the Transit offers three distinct powertrains: the base 3.7L Ti-VCT V6, the optional 3.5L EcoBoost twin-turbo V6, and the optional 3.2L Power Stroke I5 turbodiesel, giving buyers a genuine gas-vs-diesel choice not available in the following two model years.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Transit's weakest categories.0.80F
Combined fuel economy
~16 MPG combined (RWD 3.5L V6 gas)
33/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The volume cargo-van configuration exceeds 8,500 lbs GVWR and is exempt from EPA fuel-economy testing, so no official cargo-van rating exists for MY2019; the closest official government figure is the EPA rating for the lighter-GVWR T150 Wagon with the same 3.5L V6/6-speed automatic drivetrain carried over unchanged from prior years, used here as the best available proxy for the gas cargo van.

City fuel economy
~15 MPG city (RWD)
36/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Same GVWR-exemption caveat as combined MPG; the T150 Wagon's EPA city figure is the closest official proxy for the gas cargo van's city economy in MY2019.

Highway fuel economy
~19 MPG highway (RWD)
33/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Same GVWR-exemption caveat; the T150 Wagon's EPA highway figure is the closest official proxy for the gas cargo van's highway economy in MY2019. AWD models trail slightly.

Driving range
~400 mi (25-gal standard tank); up to ~495 mi with optional 31-gal extended tank
38/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford's 2019 Transit order guide lists a 25-gallon standard fuel tank with an optional 31-gallon extended-range tank for the 3.5L V6 (and EcoBoost twin-turbo V6); combined with the ~16 mpg proxy combined figure this yields roughly 400-495 miles of range depending on tank choice.

Estimated annual fuel cost
~$2,450/yr (15k mi/yr @ ~16 mpg combined proxy)
48/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

At the standard 15,000 mi/yr assumption and the ~16 mpg EPA-proxy combined figure, the gas Transit burns roughly 940 gallons/year; at the 2019 average regular-gas price of roughly $2.60/gal this lands near the top of (worse than) the van cost band, reflecting the segment's weak fuel economy relative to the diesel Sprinter and gas ProMaster.

Fuel requirements85
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 3.5L PFDi and twin-turbo EcoBoost V6 both run on regular 87-octane unleaded with no premium requirement, and the optional 3.2L Power Stroke diesel uses standard diesel fuel; there is no electrified variant to complicate energy needs for this model year.

3SafetyOne of the Transit's weakest categories.0.71F
NHTSA overall rating
4 stars overall (frontal 4, side 5, rollover 3) — NHTSA, unchanged generation carried through model year 2019
50/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit shares its unchanged body structure with the 2015-2019 generation, which NHTSA rated 4 stars overall — frontal 4 stars (driver 4, passenger 3), side 5 stars, and rollover 3 stars (26.7% risk) reflecting the tall van's higher rollover exposure. Ford did not update the platform again until the 2020 model-year refresh, so this figure carries forward for 2019.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness38
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

IIHS did not evaluate commercial/full-size vans in 2019 — its first commercial-van program covering the Transit did not launch until 2026 — so no Top Safety Pick award or crashworthiness ratings exist for this generation; scored below segment midpoint to reflect the absence of independent verification rather than a confirmed deficiency.

Standard ADAS suite breadth42
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Forward Collision Warning with Automatic Emergency Braking and pedestrian detection is standard across the 2019 Transit lineup, but this predates the Co-Pilot360 bundling Ford applied to the Transit starting with the 2020 refresh — Blind Spot Information System, Adaptive Cruise Control, and the Lane-Keeping System are all unbundled options rather than standard equipment on any trim, including XLT.

Automatic emergency braking performance48
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Forward Collision Warning with AEB and pedestrian detection is standard on every 2019 Transit trim, but IIHS had not yet begun testing commercial vans, so there is no independent day/night or pedestrian AEB performance data to verify real-world effectiveness.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage34
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Blind Spot Information System with trailer coverage is available on the 2019 Transit but is optional on every trim rather than standard anywhere in the lineup, giving alert-only coverage that a buyer must specifically add — a step behind the following generation's XLT-standard fitment.

Lane keeping & centering38
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

A Lane-Keeping System (departure warning plus a corrective steering nudge) is available on the 2019 Transit but only as an option, not standard equipment, and lane-centering capability was not introduced to the Transit until a later Co-Pilot360 update well after this model year.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist36
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Adaptive Cruise Control with Forward Collision Warning and Brake Support is offered on the 2019 Transit strictly as an option, and owner/forum discussion of this generation's ACC describes basic radar-based speed matching without stop-and-go operation or any integrated highway-assist behavior.

Hands-free driving availability3
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford BlueCruise did not launch until 2021, on the Mustang Mach-E — no hands-free highway driving option exists on any 2019 Ford, including the Transit.

Headlight performance36
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit's volume trims use halogen headlamps rather than the LED units with auto high-beam that later Co-Pilot360-equipped model years standardized, and IIHS had no headlight-rating program covering the Transit or other commercial vans at this time, so no Good/Acceptable/Marginal standing exists to confirm either way.

Outward visibility55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Owners describe good forward sightlines from the tall, upright driving position and adequate lane-change coverage once the standard dual side mirrors (top flat plus convex lower) are properly adjusted, but cargo-body trims with no side windows create a real blind spot that mirrors alone don't fully solve, and Blind Spot Information System is optional rather than standard on this model year.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability54
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

LATCH lower anchors are fitted at only 2 positions on the 12-passenger configuration (rising to 4 on the 15-passenger build), with tether anchors covering the double and triple bench seats — workable but requiring careful seat selection to fit more than one or two car seats.

4Space & ComfortGrades below the middle of the scale.1.59D
Seating capacity
Up to 15 seats (Transit-350 Passenger Wagon, Extended Length/High Roof); 8/10/12-passenger configurations on Low/Medium Roof; Cargo Van seats 2 (driver + passenger)
100/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

2019 is the final model year of the first-generation (2015-2019) US Transit before the MY2020 refresh, but the passenger-capacity lineup is unchanged: the Passenger Wagon volume configuration seats up to 12 on Low/Medium Roof and up to 15 on Extended Length/High Roof, far above the van norm band ceiling.

Front headroom
52.0 in (Medium Roof); ~40.8 in on Low Roof; up to 56.6 in on Extended Length High Roof
100/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit carries the same cab/body architecture used since the 2015 US launch of this generation, so the Medium Roof Passenger Wagon's front headroom clears the van norm band ceiling by a wide margin thanks to the Transit's tall, upright cab, while Low Roof builds sit much lower.

Front legroom
41.3 in (consistent across roof heights)
29/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Front legroom is unchanged by roof height and sits in the lower half of the van norm band — the flat-fronted cab keeps the driver closer to the wheel wells than a car-like footwell; unchanged across the first-generation Transit's full 2015-2019 US run.

Rear headroom
~49 in (second row, Medium Roof; estimated from continuous cabin roofline)
70/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford does not publish a per-row headroom spec for the Medium Roof Passenger Wagon, but the cargo box has a continuous flat roofline front to rear, so second-row headroom sits close to (slightly under) the front-row figure and clears the van band ceiling comfortably.

Rear legroom
33.7 in (second-row bench, multi-row passenger layout)
31/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Second-row legroom sits mid-band; the multi-row passenger layout (up to 15-passenger on Extended Length) packs rows tighter than lower-capacity rivals configured with fewer, more spread-out rows — unchanged across this generation's 2015-2019 run.

Third-row usability75
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Rear rows of the Passenger Wagon offer genuine adult headroom and walk-in access through the tall sliding door on Medium/High Roof builds, though the tighter per-row bench spacing (built for up to 15 occupants) trails the segment-leading legroom of lower-capacity rivals like the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Passenger Van.

Cargo/trunk volume
~70-100 cu ft behind the installed rear seat bank (varies by roof/wheelbase and passenger count)
8/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

With all seats installed, remaining cargo space behind the last row is well above the van norm band even at the low end of the published range; no single official figure was found for the exact Medium Roof/LWB trim for the 2019 model year specifically.

Max cargo volume
357.1 cu ft (Transit-250 Cargo Van, Medium Roof/LWB); up to 487.3 cu ft on Extended Length High Roof
31/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Even the mid-size Cargo Van configuration dwarfs the van norm band ceiling; the largest Extended Length High Roof build tops out near 487 cu ft — these figures were unchanged across the entire 2015-2019 first-generation US Transit run.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions54
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford's upfitter ecosystem (shelving, ladder racks, factory upfit-friendly wiring) is class-competitive for commercial buyers, but the final-year 2019 cab keeps door pockets, console bins, and overhead storage fairly conventional rather than a standout design — the larger center console and upfit-control screen upgrades arrived only with the later 2024 refresh.

Seat comfort55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The driver's seat is consistently rated supportive and comfortable over long stints despite a slightly awkward driving position, but rear bench seating is flatter and less contoured — acceptable for a heavy-duty van but behind car-like or premium-van competitors; unchanged from this generation's launch-year hardware through its final 2019 model year.

Ride quality60
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Reviewers note a surprisingly composed ride even loaded near capacity, soaking up most bumps with only the sharpest impacts intruding; unladen and on rough pavement some busier secondary motions typical of a commercial-van chassis remain, consistent across the unchanged 2015-2019 chassis tuning.

Cabin quietness46
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Road and wind noise are noticeable given the tall, boxy body — average for the segment rather than class-leading — and owner discussion of this generation flags noticeable drone/vibration at highway speeds, pulling the score to the lower half of the average band; the optional 3.2L Power Stroke diesel (its last year offered for 2019) adds characteristic diesel clatter versus the gas V6s.

Climate & comfort features50
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Manual air conditioning and a cooling system rated for the cavernous cabin are standard, and heated front seats are available as an option package, but they are not standard even on the XLT trim, and dual-zone/rear climate control is limited — comfort equipment remains an optional add-on rather than broad-based for the final 2019 model year of this generation.

5Cost of OwnershipGrades below the middle of the scale.1.47D
Base MSRP
$35,555 (Transit-150 Cargo Van, low roof, RWD, base)
74/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Entry Transit-150 low-roof cargo van base MSRP for the 2019 model year, before options.

Volume-Trim Price
$36,265 (Transit-250 Cargo Van, medium roof, LWB, RWD — most popular commercial configuration)
77/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Transit-250 medium-roof, long-wheelbase cargo van with sliding side door is Edmunds' "most popular" 2019 configuration and the typical commercial order.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$4,860 over 5 years
71/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit's gas V6/I4 lineup uses conventional, dealer-network-wide service with no diesel emissions hardware, keeping projected costs mid-pack for the segment.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~42% of MSRP retained after 5 years
7/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Full-size cargo vans depreciate steeply outside the fleet/commercial resale channel; KBB shows the 2019 Transit-250 Van retaining ~49% of value at the 3-year mark (relative to today), extrapolated to ~42% at 5 years using typical full-size-van depreciation curves.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi
0/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Standard Ford New Vehicle Limited Warranty, unchanged for commercial vans; at the low end of the segment band since rivals like the ID. Buzz offer longer coverage.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi
0/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Standard Ford Powertrain Limited Warranty, matching the industry-standard floor for the segment.

Complimentary maintenance & perks55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford bundles 5-year/60,000-mile roadside assistance with the powertrain warranty on all Transit vans, but there is no complimentary scheduled-maintenance plan on retail purchases, unlike some rivals that include a maintenance period.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$25,894 (≈$21,034 depreciation + $4,860 maintenance)
62/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

$36,265 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (42% retained, or about $15,231) leaves about $21,034 in depreciation. Add the projected $4,860 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $25,894 in total.

6Reliability & QualityOne of the Transit's strongest categories.1.80C-
Predicted reliability55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Consumer Reports does not publish full predicted-reliability data for full-size commercial vans, and J.D. Power's dependability scoring for the first-generation Transit nameplate is thin for this specific model year, leaving mixed, indirect signals rather than a clear top-tier or bottom-tier verdict.

Brand reliability track record44
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

In Consumer Reports' 2019 brand reliability rankings, domestic manufacturers including Ford fell to the bottom half of all 29 ranked brands, a low point for the brand relative to its more recent mid-pack standing.

Recall & TSB history54
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The first-generation Transit (2015-2019) carries a moderate recall load — a rearview camera image-distortion campaign spanning 2015-2019 units and a driveshaft torsional-damper/parking-brake-cable campaign spanning 2015-2020 units — typical-to-slightly-elevated activity for the generation but nothing systemic or safety-catastrophic.

Powertrain durability reputation58
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The volume 3.7L Cyclone V6 paired with the 6-speed automatic is a carryover, well-proven fleet-duty combination with a long high-mileage track record; the optional turbocharged 3.5L EcoBoost V6, however, was still subject to a documented cam-phaser rattle issue on 2017-2019 production before Ford's revised phaser design arrived on later units, and the 3.2L Power Stroke diesel option has known glow-plug and turbo wear complaints.

Interior material quality55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

As a commercial-first cargo/passenger van, the cabin favors durable, easy-to-clean hard plastics over soft-touch materials; reviewers called it a step up from the outgoing E-Series but still utilitarian, appropriate for its price and work-van brief rather than upscale.

Fit & finish52
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Test vehicles showed generally solid, rattle-free assembly, but owner reports cite highway-speed vibrations/drone and side doors prone to misalignment over time causing visible body dents — enough scattered complaints to sit mid-band rather than top-tier.

Dealer & service network82
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford operates one of the largest dealer networks in the US along with a dedicated commercial-fleet service program (Ford Business Preferred Network), giving Transit owners dense nationwide coverage and fleet-oriented service support well ahead of most van rivals.

Parts availability & repair cost68
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Parts for the high-volume base V6/6-speed drivetrain are widely available and reasonably priced given the Transit's commercial fleet ubiquity and shared componentry with other Ford trucks/vans, though EcoBoost turbo and diesel-specific parts and labor run higher than the gas base powertrain.

7Technology & InfotainmentThe Transit's lowest-graded category.0.18F
Touchscreen size
4.2-in non-touch center display standard; 6.5-in SYNC 3 touchscreen optional (commonly ordered on volume XLT commercial configurations)
0/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit is the last model year of the pre-refresh first US generation; the base setup pairs a small non-touch 4.2-in multi-function display with SYNC, while the volume commercial trim is commonly ordered with the optional SYNC 3 6.5-in touchscreen, used here as the representative value — corrected down from a prior 8-in estimate, since the 8-in/12-in SYNC 4 screens did not arrive until the 2020 refresh.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

SYNC 3, when optioned, is reasonably quick and logically laid out, but the standard base SYNC system on entry cargo trims is dated and menu-driven, and the overall setup reads as commercial-grade rather than modern even by 2019 standards.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto50
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are available on SYNC 3-equipped 2019 Transits, but are not standard on the base SYNC system, and Ford offered no wireless projection on any 2019 Transit trim.

Voice control & native navigation45
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Base SYNC voice control is limited, SYNC 3 (when optioned) handles basic commands adequately, and Ford Navigation is an available add-on, but most commercial/fleet buyers rely on phone-based navigation instead of the factory system.

Audio system quality30
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The full-size Transit's audio remains a basic commercial-grade speaker setup with no branded premium audio option (unlike the smaller Transit Connect, which offered Sony audio) — weak even on upper trims.

Digital instrument cluster22
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit uses analog gauges with a small monochrome multi-information display rather than a configurable full-digital cluster — that upgrade did not arrive until the later SYNC 4-era refresh.

OTA update capability25
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit predates FordPass Connect's embedded-modem rollout on the nameplate (standard only from the 2020 refresh onward); software/map updates on this pre-refresh SYNC/SYNC 3 system are handled via USB rather than any cellular OTA capability.

Companion app & remote functions25
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Without a standard embedded modem (FordPass Connect arrives with the 2020 refresh), the 2019 Transit lacks the FordPass app's remote lock/unlock, locate, and status features that later model years offer; owners are limited to standard remote keyless entry via the key fob.

Charging ports & device power35
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit offers a modest pair of USB-A ports on the instrument panel with no USB-C or wireless charging pad; optional upfitter power packages (120V inverter) are available for work use but are not standard convenience charging.

Keyless & remote access25
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Commercial/cargo trims retain a traditional keyed ignition; remote keyless entry (lock/unlock fob) is available, but proximity push-button start and phone-as-key are not offered on the full-size Transit.

Camera & parking aids55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

A rearview camera is standard, and the lineup offers BLIS blind-spot monitoring with trailer coverage, front/rear parking sensors, and an optional 360-degree camera system on higher trims, though these were newer additions to the range at this point in the generation.

Head-up display availability3
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford does not offer a head-up display on any 2019 Transit trim.

8Use-Case FitOne of the Transit's strongest categories.2.00C
Kid & car-seat practicality55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The tall stand-up cabin and wide sliding side door make loading kids and gear physically easy, but LATCH lower anchors cover only 2 positions on the 12-passenger configuration (4 on the 15-passenger build), so fitting more than one or two car seats requires careful seat selection — this is a shuttle/fleet passenger van repurposed for family duty, not a purpose-built family hauler.

Family safety package44
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

NHTSA's 4-star overall rating (frontal 4 stars, side 5 stars, rollover 3 stars) is middling on the rollover sub-score, and forward collision warning/AEB is the only ADAS feature standard across the lineup for this pre-refresh model year — blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise, and lane-keeping are all unbundled options on every trim including the volume configuration, a step behind the following generation's XLT-standard fitment.

Family road-trip comfort48
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Stand-up headroom and cavernous cargo space behind the seats are genuine road-trip strengths, but the base SYNC system is a small non-touch display with no rear entertainment, USB is limited to two USB-A ports with no wireless charging, and this pre-refresh generation carries known highway-speed vibration and drone — multi-hour comfort trails a proper family hauler despite the space advantage.

Daily driving ease49
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The standard naturally-aspirated 3.7L Ti-VCT V6 is smooth and free of turbo lag at low speed, but a roughly 9-10 ft tall, up-to-276-in-long commercial van is never genuinely relaxing in stop-and-go traffic or tight lots regardless of drivetrain refinement, and this model year predates any driver-assist features that ease daily fatigue.

Commuting cost efficiency51
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

A comparatively affordable $36,265 volume-trim price, modest ~$2,150/yr insurance, and RepairPal-projected ~$972/yr maintenance help the ledger, but ~16 mpg combined (EPA-proxy) fuel economy is well below any car or crossover, keeping per-mile running costs mediocre for a dedicated commuter role.

Parking & maneuverability44
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Low Roof/regular-wheelbase Cargo Vans are the most tractable full-size van body style on the market, but the Medium/High Roof and Extended Length configurations run well beyond any SUV footprint and clear many parking garages; a standard backup camera helps, but a factory 360-degree camera is optional on higher trims only and there is no self-park feature for 2019.

Work capability78
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Up to 7,500 lbs of tow capacity with the 3.5L EcoBoost V6, payload ratings that run to roughly 4,650 lbs on 350 HD dual-rear-wheel configurations, and cargo volume up to 487.3 cu ft make the 2019 Transit a genuinely serious commercial work tool, with tow capacity that edges the diesel-equipped rivals of the era.

Durability for work duty75
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The Transit had already become the best-selling full-size van in the US since its 2015 launch by this model year, with the 3.7L V6/6-speed drivetrain proven across contractor, delivery, and rental fleets and RepairPal's below-segment-average projected repair costs supporting the fleet-durability case; the optional EcoBoost V6 and Power Stroke diesel (its final model year) have less of a long-term track record than the base engine.

Jobsite & upfit practicality78
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford's QVM (Qualified Vehicle Modifier) program backed a deep third-party upfit ecosystem (Adrian Steel, Knapheide, Ranger Design, Masterack) already by 2019, covering shelving, ladder racks, and walk-in van bodies, with multiple roof/wheelbase/GVWR combinations to spec around the job — a mature, high-volume upfit network even in this pre-refresh model year.

Long-distance comfort & range50
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

A 25-gal standard tank (31-gal optional) yields roughly 400-495 highway-capable miles between fill-ups, but adaptive cruise control is optional rather than standard on every trim, there is no lane-centering feature for this model year, and this pre-refresh generation shows more highway-speed vibration/drone than the later facelift — a competent but not class-leading mile-eater.

Outdoor & adventure capability60
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The Transit is already a popular camper-conversion platform by 2019 thanks to its size and payload, but the 2019 model year is exclusively FWD (T150) or RWD (T150/250/350) with no AWD option at any trim — that traction upgrade did not arrive until the 2020 refresh — and there is no factory off-road package or raised suspension, leaving this generation pavement-oriented for anything beyond mild gravel roads.

Gear & luggage flexibility84
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Up to 487.3 cu ft of cargo volume, removable/foldable Passenger Wagon seating, a wide sliding side door, and the same mature upfit ecosystem that serves tradespeople let this van swallow bikes, luggage, or a full camping load with ease, regardless of the drivetrain limitations that hold back its outdoor-capability score.

9Driving ExperienceGrades below the middle of the scale.1.61D
Handling & agility64
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

For a full-size cargo/passenger van the 2019 Transit is well-mannered, with a comparatively tight turning circle and composed body control unladen, though electronic stability control intervenes early to guard against rollover, blunting confidence when pushed.

Steering feel60
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Power steering is described as sharp and responsive for the segment, giving decent directional confidence at low and highway speed, though it remains light and largely feedback-free like every van of this era.

Braking confidence54
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Unladen 70-0 mph stops of 171 ft are unremarkable for the class and lengthen further under load, and owners report rear pad wear as a recurring complaint, though everyday pedal feel is reliable.

Powertrain smoothness & response66
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The standard 3.7L Ti-VCT V6 (275 hp/260 lb-ft) and optional 3.5L twin-turbo EcoBoost V6 (310 hp/400 lb-ft @ 2,500 rpm) both pair with a 6-speed SelectShift automatic that shifts cleanly around town, though it lacks the extra ratios and refinement of the 10-speed introduced with the 2020 refresh.

Drivetrain noise & vibration60
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Owner feedback describes the engines as surprisingly quiet for a work van under normal driving, though no instrumented cabin-noise figures were found for this specific model year; expect typical commercial-van wind/road noise at highway speed.

Turning circle
42.9 ft curb-to-curb (130" wheelbase, low-roof — base/volume cargo config); wider, up to roughly 48 ft, on extended 148" wheelbase configurations
0/100
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The short-wheelbase (130") configuration, the most common cargo/passenger volume build for this generation, has a curb-to-curb turning diameter of roughly 42-43 ft; the longer 148" wheelbase configurations need substantially more room to turn around. Wheelbase and turning geometry are unchanged from the later 2021 model, which carries the same pre-2020-refresh chassis dimensions.

Driving position & ergonomics54
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Big windows and a low step-in height give strong outward visibility and easy ingress/egress, but the upright, high-set 'bus driver' seating position is a genuine adjustment for car drivers, and owners commonly report a long reach to the steering wheel and console/cup holders once the seat is set for adequate legroom.

Fun-to-drive factor50
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The optional EcoBoost V6's strong low-end torque and the van's tight turning circle add some character, but the bus-like driving position and work-tool mission keep it firmly in appliance territory rather than genuinely engaging.

10Value & Market PositionThe Transit's best-graded category.2.26C
Standard equipment generosity55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The 2019 Transit is a work-first commercial van at heart — vinyl flooring, manual windows/locks on lower trims, and a basic driver seat — with Ford's Co-Pilot360 driver-assist suite still optional rather than standard (it only becomes standard across the range with the MY2020 refresh). Minor 2019 additions (standard rear recovery eye hook, optional laminated side glass, wider-opening rear doors on long-wheelbase models) are incremental, not a generosity leap.

Feature value per dollar58
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Transit cargo vans price thousands below comparable Mercedes-Benz Sprinter configurations (commonly cited $5,000–$15,000 less for similar capability) while offering a stronger dealer/service network, giving solid capability-per-dollar; it lacks the AWD option, 10-speed automatic, and updated turbodiesel that arrive with the following year's refresh, so it isn't a standout bargain versus its own near-future self.

Trim & configuration breadth78
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Wide-for-the-segment lineup: XL/XLT trims, Cargo Van, Passenger Wagon, Cutaway, and Chassis Cab body styles, three roof heights (low/medium/high), and multiple wheelbase/overall-length combinations, plus three engine choices (base 3.7L V6, optional 3.5L EcoBoost V6, optional 3.2L Power Stroke inline-5 diesel). Still 2WD-only — AWD doesn't arrive until MY2020 — and the 5-passenger Crew Van doesn't exist yet, so the range is a step behind where the nameplate lands a year later.

Sales popularity & market acceptance90
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

2019 was a record year for Transit in the US — 153,868 units sold — cementing its position as the best-selling full-size van in America, outselling the next-best competitor (Chevrolet Express) by more than 2-to-1 and Mercedes-Benz Sprinter by roughly 5-to-1 the prior year. Unambiguous segment leader.

Brand desirability & image60
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Ford's commercial-vehicle credibility — F-Series work-truck heritage and the largest dealer/service network among full-size van makers — drives strong fleet trust and resale confidence, though the brand carries none of Mercedes-Benz's aspirational halo and sits roughly on par with Ram in general market perception.

Deals & incentive availability58
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

2019 predates both the COVID-era production pauses and the semiconductor shortage that would squeeze full-size van inventory starting in 2021, so retail and fleet discounting sat at a normal cadence — Ford's standard commercial fleet financing, bonus cash, and upfit incentive programs — without the desperation pricing of later shortage years, but also without unusual generosity.

Model freshness55
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

The third-generation Transit launched in the US for MY2015, and 2019 is the last model year before the substantial MY2020 mid-cycle refresh (new fascia, 10-speed automatic, new 2.0L diesel, first-time AWD, standard Co-Pilot360). 2019's changes are minor housekeeping items (new colors, added passenger-wagon seating options, wider LWB rear doors), leaving the platform feeling mid-cycle and a step behind rivals' latest tech heading into its fifth model year.

Critical reception & awards63
too few vans scored for 2019 to rankCompare all →

Contemporary reviews (Cars.com, Edmunds, KBB) rate the 2019 Transit favorably for configurability, driving manners, and value versus Sprinter and ProMaster, and it's a frequent Vincentric Best Fleet Value in America honoree for commercial vans; it doesn't chase mainstream 10Best-style awards since commercial vans sit outside that circuit, and comparison tests generally treat it as a strong all-rounder rather than an outright class winner on any single axis.