MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2025:Overall 0Safety +2Reliability +1Efficiency & Range +2Cost of Ownership -12Technology -2Driving Experience +2
Subaru logo
Compact Hatchback

2026 Subaru Impreza

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2.14CGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
3.11B
Safety
2.91B-
EfficiencyGas
1.84C-
30 MPG combined · 498 mi range · $1,900/yr energy
Comfort
2.54C+
Value
2.14C
Ownership Cost
1.94C-
Technology
1.36D
Driving Experience
2.40C+

The verdict

A mixed-report compact hatchback, strong on reliability and held back by performance.

The 2026 Impreza is the cheapest way to get real all-wheel drive in a compact hatchback — every trim, from the $24,795 Base on up, comes with Subaru's Symmetrical AWD and the full EyeSight safety suite, and it earned a 5-star NHTSA overall rating. What you trade for that is pace and polish: 152 horsepower and a roughly 8.9-second 0–60 make it one of the slowest cars in its class, the CVT drones under throttle, and 30 MPG combined trails front-drive rivals that post 36–40. Buy it if bad-weather traction and standard safety kit top your list and you never intend to hurry; skip it if you want a quick, quiet, or efficient commuter, because a Civic Hatchback or Prius beats it on every one of those.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Standard all-wheel drive on every trim, at a front-drive price
  • Full safety suite standard, including on the cheapest trim
  • Easy to see out of and easy to park

What holds it back

  • Seriously underpowered — this is the slow car in the class
  • Only one transmission, one body, no hybrid
  • Noisy cabin — CVT drone plus road roar

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Subaru Impreza

Production history

1993present · 34 years · 6 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1199319991993Gen 2200020072000Gen 3200820112008Gen 4201220162012Gen 5201720232017Gen 62024now2024In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 1993

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 542018 · Overall: 51 (−3 vs 2017)2019 · Overall: 54 (+3 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 58 (+4 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 55 (−3 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 56 (+1 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 57 (+1 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 62 (+5 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 61 (−1 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 61

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance33
27-6
Efficiency53
57+5
Safety62
72+10
Space66
67+1
Cost72
59-13
Reliability50
75+25
Tech31
50+19
Use-case50
58+8
Driving64
65+2
Value75
61-14

Best fit & conditions

Winter / inclementC+69/100
CommuterC+68/100
AdventureC+67/100
FamilyC63/100
Work / TowF36/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe Impreza's lowest-graded category.0.00F
Horsepower
152 hp (RS: 182 hp)
6/100
#14 of 16 in classCompare all →

Volume Base/Sport trims run the 2.0L flat-4 rated at 152 hp; the RS steps up to a 2.5L flat-4 with 182 hp. Low for the compact-hatch band even at the top of the lineup.

Torque
145 lb-ft (RS: 178 lb-ft)
8/100
#14 of 16 in classCompare all →

2.0L makes 145 lb-ft at 4000 rpm on Base/Sport; RS's 2.5L makes 178 lb-ft at 3700 rpm. Peaks sit high in the rev range, characteristic of the naturally aspirated boxer.

0–60 mph time
~8.9 s (RS: ~7.4 s)
9/100
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

Independent tests of the 2.0L Impreza land around 8.7–9.0 s; the RS with the 2.5L cuts that to roughly 7.3–7.5 s. Slow for the compact-hatch segment even in RS form.

Powertrain refinement46
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated boxer needs revs to make its modest power and gets audibly coarse near the top of the tach; throttle response is linear but never eager, and there is no turbo to fill the low-rpm hole. RS's 2.5L is slightly stronger but shares the same buzz.

Transmission behavior48
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

Lineartronic CVT is among the better CVTs — RS adds eight simulated ratios and paddle shifters — but under acceleration it drones and the elastic feel remains. No manual is offered anywhere in the lineup after the 2024 refresh.

AWD/4WD availability84
#5 of 16 in classCompare all →

Symmetrical AWD is standard on every Impreza trim — a class-leading availability posture in a segment where Civic Hatchback and Corolla Hatchback offer FWD only and the Mazda3 Hatchback treats AWD as optional. Hardware itself is competent but basic: continuously variable transfer with active torque split, plus X-Mode with Hill Descent Control on Sport and RS. No low range or true torque vectoring.

Powertrain lineup breadth30
#9 of 16 in classCompare all →

Two naturally aspirated gas boxer engines (2.0L and 2.5L) and a single transmission (CVT). No hybrid, PHEV, EV, or turbo variant — a real gap versus the Corolla Hatchback (still gas-only but with a hybrid sibling on offer at Toyota) and versus segment neighbors like the Prius and Leaf. Adequate coverage of trims within one gas-only concept.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Impreza's weakest categories.1.84C-
3SafetyOne of the Impreza's strongest categories.2.91B-
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall (2024 generation, carryover for 2026)
100/100
#1 of 16 in classCompare all →

NHTSA awarded the sixth-generation Impreza (unchanged for 2026) a 5-star overall crash rating with 5-star side and 4-star frontal and rollover subratings.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness62
#9 of 16 in classCompare all →

Current generation earns Good ratings in small overlap front and side (updated) tests, but the 2024/2025 Impreza was NOT named a Top Safety Pick or TSP+ — largely due to headlight variance across trims and gaps in updated testing.

Standard ADAS suite breadth82
#10 of 16 in classCompare all →

EyeSight is standard across every trim including Base — bundling Pre-Collision Braking, full-speed Adaptive Cruise Control with lane centering, Lane Departure Warning, Lane Keep Assist and Emergency Steering. BSM/RCTA are standard on Sport and RS but remain optional on Base, which prevents a top-tier score.

Automatic emergency braking performance76
#6 of 16 in classCompare all →

EyeSight's stereo-camera AEB has historically earned Superior daytime front crash prevention ratings from IIHS, with adequate but not class-leading nighttime pedestrian performance.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage62
#13 of 16 in classCompare all →

Blind Spot Detection with Lane Change Assist and Rear Cross-Traffic Alert are alert-only (no active braking or steering intervention) and are optional on the Base trim, standard from Sport up.

Lane keeping & centering70
#10 of 16 in classCompare all →

EyeSight's lane centering is smooth on well-marked highways and is included with adaptive cruise, but reviewers still note occasional wander on faded lane markings and a firm-hand pull compared to the segment's best.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist76
#6 of 16 in classCompare all →

EyeSight adaptive cruise operates through the full speed range with stop-and-go, integrates lane centering, and is widely praised for smooth, natural braking and acceleration.

Hands-free driving availability5
#11 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru does not offer any hands-free highway driving system on the Impreza — EyeSight remains a hands-on lane-centering system.

Headlight performance68
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

LED headlights with steering-responsive high beam assist are standard, with IIHS rating the Sport and RS trims Good but the Base trim only Acceptable — a common reason the model missed TSP.

Outward visibility74
#3 of 16 in classCompare all →

The Impreza's low beltline, relatively thin A- and C-pillars, and tall greenhouse give strong natural sightlines for a compact hatch, complemented by a standard rear camera; no 360-degree option, however.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability60
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the Impreza's LATCH hardware as acceptable — anchors are workable but partially hidden by seat trim, and the compact rear bench limits fitting more than two seats side-by-side.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Impreza's strongest categories.2.54C+
Seating capacity
5 seats
100/100
#1 of 16 in classCompare all →

Standard 5-passenger seating (2 front, 3 rear) across all trims (Base, Sport, RS).

Front headroom
39.8 in (37.7 in with moonroof)
95/100
#3 of 16 in classCompare all →

Manufacturer-published front headroom for the current-generation Impreza hatchback without moonroof; Sport/RS with moonroof measure 37.7 in.

Front legroom
43.1 in
78/100
#2 of 16 in classCompare all →

Class-leading front legroom carried over unchanged since the 2024 redesign; consistent across trims.

Rear headroom
37.6 in (36.7 in with moonroof)
65/100
#3 of 16 in classCompare all →

Rear headroom without moonroof; sunroof-equipped trims lose ~0.9 in to the housing.

Rear legroom
36.5 in
45/100
#6 of 16 in classCompare all →

Middle-of-pack rear legroom for a compact hatchback; behind Civic Hatchback (37.4 in) but usable for adults on shorter trips.

Cargo/trunk volume
20.8 cu ft behind rear seats
64/100
#7 of 16 in classCompare all →

Hatchback body gives strong cargo volume behind the rear seats — one of the larger figures in the compact hatch segment, though trailing Civic Hatchback (24.5).

In-cabin storage & clever solutions55
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

Standard center console bin, door pockets, and shallow tray with wireless-charge pad on Sport/RS; nothing standout like a dual-lid console or configurable underfloor storage. Split-folding 60/40 rear seats add utility; no onboard AC outlet.

Seat comfort62
#11 of 16 in classCompare all →

Front buckets are supportive with decent bolstering (grippier fabric on Sport/RS); rear cushion is flat and thigh support drops off on longer trips. Manual driver adjustment on Base; 10-way power on RS.

Ride quality65
#8 of 16 in classCompare all →

Retuned suspension in the current generation improved compliance over the prior car — absorbs freeway expansion joints well and body control is composed. Sport/RS on 18-inch wheels ride noticeably firmer than the 17-inch Base.

Cabin quietness50
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

Persistent complaint across reviews: CVT drone under acceleration and pronounced road/tire noise on coarse pavement. Subaru added sound-deadening in the 2024 refresh but the cabin remains noisier than Civic or Prius.

Climate & comfort features58
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

Single-zone automatic climate control standard; heated front seats and heated steering wheel standard on Sport (volume trim) and RS but unavailable on Base. No ventilated seats, no rear vents; remote start via STARLINK subscription.

5Cost of OwnershipMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.94C-
Base MSRP
$24,795 (Base, incl. ~$1,175 destination)
92/100
#1 of 16 in classCompare all →

Entry Impreza Base trim carries a modest bump over 2025's ~$24,615 all-in; standard Symmetrical AWD keeps the entry price competitive versus FWD-only Civic/Corolla/Mazda3.

Volume-Trim Price
$26,395 (Sport, incl. destination)
93/100
#1 of 16 in classCompare all →

Sport is the best-selling Impreza trim (adds SI-Drive, sport suspension, 18" wheels, larger 11.6" infotainment); still under $27k with AWD standard, well below the hatchback band midpoint.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$5,200 over 5 years
58/100
#7 of 16 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD (rear diff service, extra CV joints) and boxer engine (harder-to-reach spark plugs) push maintenance modestly above FWD compact peers like Civic and Corolla.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~47% of MSRP after 5 years
40/100
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subarus generally retain value well thanks to loyal AWD-seeking buyers, but Impreza is the softest resale performer in the Subaru lineup — outshined by Crosstrek and Forester, which absorb the AWD-hatch demand.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
0/100
#9 of 16 in classCompare all →

Standard Subaru 3-year/36,000-mile basic coverage — segment minimum, well behind Hyundai/Kia/Mitsubishi 5-year benchmarks.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain
0/100
#5 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru's 5/60 powertrain warranty is the industry floor; Hyundai/Kia and Mitsubishi offer 10/100 in the same segment.

Complimentary maintenance & perks35
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru remains one of the few mainstream brands offering NO complimentary scheduled maintenance (Toyota gives 2yr/25k, Hyundai 3yr/36k). Only inclusions are 3-year/36k roadside assistance and a Starlink Safety Plus trial (typically 3 years) on new vehicles.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$19,189 (≈$13,989 depreciation + $5,200 maintenance)
76/100
#4 of 16 in classCompare all →

$26,395 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (47% retained, or about $12,406) leaves about $13,989 in depreciation. Add the projected $5,200 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $19,189 in total.

6Reliability & QualityThe Impreza's best-graded category.3.11B
Predicted reliability80
#3 of 16 in classCompare all →

Both major predictors now agree on the 2026 car: Consumer Reports rates predicted reliability 80/100 and expects it to be more reliable than the average new car (built on two years of 6th-gen 2024/2025 owner data plus Subaru's brand score), and J.D. Power gives it 83/100 for quality and dependability. That is a genuine upgrade over the previous run's mixed-signal read — the generation now has real survey data behind it rather than a platform inference, and it lands alongside the Civic and Mazda3 Hatchback, a step behind the Corolla Hatchback.

Brand reliability track record87
#1 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru's brand standing improved materially across all three major studies for 2026: CR's Brand Report Card puts it #1 overall for the second consecutive year and #2 in reliability behind Toyota, J.D. Power's VDS ranks it 6th of all brands at 181 PP100 against a 204 industry average, and IQS has it 5th among mass-market brands after a four-position gain. Consistently top-5-to-6 across studies puts it in the top band.

Recall & TSB history76
#6 of 16 in classCompare all →

The 6th generation's recalls are confined to its 2024 launch year — a front driveshaft outer race that can crack (23V754000) and an instrument panel harness that can chafe on the steering beam bracket (23V551000), both loss-of-drive-power risks and neither trivial. But nothing has followed: no campaigns are listed against the 2025 or 2026 model years, which is the pattern of a generation whose launch defects were caught and closed rather than a systemic problem. Corrects the previous run, which cited a seatbelt-anchor recall that does not exist on this model.

Powertrain durability reputation72
#10 of 16 in classCompare all →

The volume Sport runs the FB20 2.0L flat-four (152 hp) and the RS a revised FB25 2.5L (180 hp for 2026, two down from 2025 but retuned for low-end torque) — both mature FB-series units in production since 2010 with none of the head-gasket history of the older EJ boxers, paired with the TR580-series Lineartronic CVT. The CVT still caps this below Toyota hybrid territory, but Subaru's current VDS and CR reliability standing is evidence the current transmission is not repeating the 2012–2018 warranty-extension era.

Interior material quality57
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

This remains the model's weakest quality dimension — Edmunds says it feels cheap inside relative to other compact cars and U.S. News calls the materials low-rent, with hard plastics across the doors and lower dash; only the RS adds stitching and a leather-wrapped wheel. The small lift for 2026 is compositional rather than material: deleting the base trim makes the better-equipped Sport the volume car and the 11.6-inch touchscreen is now standard, so the representative cabin presents better even though the plastics are unchanged.

Fit & finish78
#9 of 16 in classCompare all →

US-market Imprezas are built at Subaru's Yajima plant in Gunma, Japan, and the assembly quality reads through in the studies: Subaru rose four positions to 5th among mass-market brands in the 2026 J.D. Power IQS, with the Ascent taking its segment outright. Consumer Reports describes the cabin as well constructed and durable, and there are no widespread squeak/rattle or panel-fit complaints against the 6th-gen car.

Dealer & service network72
#8 of 16 in classCompare all →

Coverage and service quality pull in opposite directions. Subaru's ~640 US retailers is roughly half Honda's or Toyota's footprint, and the network is still concentrated in the Northeast, Pacific Northwest and mountain states rather than the South and Plains. But the service experience is class-leading rather than merely above average: Subaru posted 887 in the 2026 J.D. Power CSI, the highest of any mass-market SUV/minivan brand and level with the top mass-market score overall.

Parts availability & repair cost60
#9 of 16 in classCompare all →

Model-specific data is weaker than the brand-level figure the previous run used. RepairPal puts the Impreza's average annual repair cost at $653 — dead level with the industry average, not below it — and ranks it 33rd of 36 compact cars on reliability, noting repairs are more severe than average though less frequent. Parts supply itself is fine: the Impreza shares engine, CVT and platform with the much higher-volume Crosstrek, but boxer and AWD driveline components price above a comparable FWD Civic or Corolla and the aftermarket is smaller.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Impreza's weakest categories.1.36D
Touchscreen size
11.6 in on Sport/RS (portrait Starlink); Base uses dual 7 in stacked screens
54/100
#6 of 16 in classCompare all →

Sport is the volume trim and uses the 11.6-inch portrait Starlink Multimedia unit shared with Outback/Forester; the Base trim drops to a dual 7-inch layout.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness55
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

The 11.6-inch Starlink system has a clean layout and retains physical volume/tuning knobs plus real climate hard-keys on Sport/RS, but reviewers consistently flag slow boot times and laggy touch response versus class leaders like Mazda Connect.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto65
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard on the 11.6-inch Sport and RS trims; the Base trim's dual 7-inch setup is wired-only, so the feature is not standard across the entire lineup.

Voice control & native navigation55
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

Built-in TomTom navigation is standard with the 11.6-inch screen and Starlink voice recognition handles basic commands, but the assistant is not conversational and most owners default to CarPlay/Android Auto for nav and voice.

Audio system quality58
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

Standard 6-speaker audio is unremarkable but adequate; the RS trim offers a 10-speaker Harman Kardon premium system that reviewers rate as a genuine step up and one of the better branded systems in the compact hatch class.

Digital instrument cluster30
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

The Impreza retains twin analog dials with a small 4.2-inch color multi-information display between them across all trims — no full-digital or reconfigurable cluster is offered.

OTA update capability45
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru's Starlink platform supports OTA updates for infotainment software and TomTom maps but does not push whole-vehicle feature updates like Tesla, Ford, or Hyundai's newer platforms.

Companion app & remote functions50
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

The MySubaru app plus Starlink Safety Plus/Security Plus subscriptions provide remote start, lock/unlock, and vehicle status, but the richer remote features require a paid subscription after the trial and there is no digital key.

Charging ports & device power55
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

Two front USB ports (one USB-A, one USB-C) are standard with two rear USB ports on higher trims; wireless phone charging is available on RS but there are no 120V outlets or high-wattage USB-C PD ports.

Keyless & remote access62
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

Keyless access with push-button start is standard on Sport and RS but the Base trim still uses a traditional key with twist-ignition, so full keyless convenience is not standard across the lineup and no phone-as-key is offered.

Camera & parking aids48
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

A rear-view camera is standard and RS adds a front-view camera, but no 360-degree surround view is offered on any Impreza trim and parking sensors are not standard.

Head-up display availability10
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered on any Impreza trim for 2026 — Subaru reserves HUD for higher models like the Legacy/Outback Touring and does not offer it here.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.93C-
Kid & car-seat practicality60
#7 of 16 in classCompare all →

Five-seat compact hatch with reasonably wide rear door openings and a 20.8 cu ft hatch that swallows a stroller easily, but 36.5 in rear legroom is only mid-pack and IIHS rates LATCH access Acceptable — anchors are workable but partially hidden by trim, and the rear bench is tight for three seats side-by-side.

Family safety package74
#10 of 16 in classCompare all →

Strong family safety proposition at the trims families buy: 5-star NHTSA overall, EyeSight (AEB, full-speed ACC, lane centering) standard on every trim including Base, and BSD/RCTA standard from Sport up. Held back from top-tier by missing 2024/2025 IIHS TSP due to Acceptable Base headlights.

Family road-trip comfort55
#10 of 16 in classCompare all →

Front seats comfortable for long stints and the hatchback holds real luggage, but reviewers consistently flag flat rear cushions with weak thigh support, no rear HVAC vents, and pronounced CVT drone plus road roar — a noisier, less relaxed 4-up tourer than a Civic Hatchback or Prius.

Daily driving ease68
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

Lineartronic CVT is smooth at low speeds, EyeSight ACC with stop-and-go and lane centering is standard on every trim, and the compact footprint plus excellent outward visibility make traffic work stress-free. Held back by CVT drone under any real throttle and a noisy cabin on coarse pavement.

Commuting cost efficiency58
#6 of 16 in classCompare all →

EPA-rated 30 MPG combined on the volume 2.0L trim and regular unleaded across the lineup, with ~$1,900/yr EPA fuel cost. Standard AWD taxes economy — the Civic (~36 combined) and Corolla Hatchback commute cheaper, and hybrid rivals like Prius roughly halve running costs.

Parking & maneuverability78
#5 of 16 in classCompare all →

Compact hatchback footprint, ~35 ft turning circle, low beltline with thin pillars and a tall greenhouse, and a standard rearview camera make it one of the easier cars in the segment to slot into tight urban spots. No 360-degree camera even on RS is the only real omission.

Work capability28
#2 of 16 in classCompare all →

No meaningful US tow rating (not published), no bed, and 20.8 cu ft cargo caps hauling to what will fit in a hatch. Standard AWD nudges it barely ahead of FWD compact hatches for muddy jobsite access, but this is not a work-capable vehicle by any real measure.

Durability for work duty52
#3 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru boxer/CVT/AWD hardware has a reasonable long-term reputation and the AWD system tolerates rough surfaces, but the Impreza is not a fleet vehicle — cloth/synthetic interior, painted bumpers, no washable cargo liner from the factory, and no work-truck durability heritage.

Jobsite & upfit practicality32
#3 of 16 in classCompare all →

Cargo area has tie-down hooks and a 12V outlet, and Subaru's accessory catalog offers roof rails, crossbars, and a small hitch, but there is no onboard AC inverter, no work-oriented upfit ecosystem, and the space is passenger-carpeted rather than washable.

Long-distance comfort & range62
#9 of 16 in classCompare all →

~498 mi range from a 16.6-gal tank and EyeSight's full-speed adaptive cruise plus lane centering make the miles pass easily; front seats are supportive on long stints. Cabin noise (CVT drone under load, road roar on coarse pavement) and flat rear seats keep it out of true tourer territory.

Outdoor & adventure capability72
#1 of 16 in classCompare all →

Standard Symmetrical AWD with X-Mode and Hill Descent Control on Sport/RS is a genuine class-leading advantage over FWD-only Civic/Corolla/Mazda3 hatchback rivals — it handles gravel, snow, and light off-pavement duty confidently. Held back only by standard ~5.1 in ground clearance (not raised like a Crosstrek) and no true off-road hardware.

Gear & luggage flexibility68
#10 of 16 in classCompare all →

Hatchback body gives 20.8 cu ft behind the rear seats and ~55.3 cu ft with them folded — well ahead of segment sedans — with 60/40 split-fold rear seats, available roof rails and crossbars, and an available small hitch for a bike/cargo rack. Not benchmark-flexible (no underfloor tricks, no fold-flat front passenger) but well above average for compact hatches.

9Driving ExperienceMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.40C+
Handling & agility66
#14 of 16 in classCompare all →

Standard symmetrical AWD, low-mounted boxer engine and revised chassis for the 6th-gen car give the Impreza notably composed cornering and strong wet/dry grip for a mainstream compact hatch, but body control and turn-in sharpness trail class benchmarks (Civic Hatchback, Mazda3). RS trim's stiffer tuning and 18-inch wheels tighten it up modestly.

Steering feel63
#14 of 16 in classCompare all →

Electric-assist rack is accurate and reasonably weighted with a quicker ratio than the previous gen, but feedback is muted — precise enough for daily use, not communicative in the Mazda3 sense.

Braking confidence66
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

Four-wheel discs with linear pedal feel; instrumented 60–0 stops in the mid-120-ft range on the 2.5L RS are competitive for the segment, and AWD helps in wet conditions. No fade concerns reported in reviews.

Powertrain smoothness & response58
#16 of 16 in classCompare all →

The Lineartronic CVT is the weak link: acceptable tip-in but persistent rubber-band feel under acceleration, and the base 152-hp 2.0L feels strained (0–60 ~9.5 s). The 2.5L RS (182 hp, 0–60 ~7.5 s) is more responsive but the CVT still dulls the connection.

Drivetrain noise & vibration55
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

Boxer engine takes on a coarse, thrashy tone above 4,000 rpm and the CVT holds revs high during passing, producing well-documented drone. Subaru added sound insulation for this gen but powertrain noise remains a chief refinement complaint.

Turning circle
34.8 ft (curb-to-curb)
87/100
#3 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru publishes a 34.8 ft curb-to-curb turning diameter for the 2026 Impreza — among the tightest in the compact hatchback class and a genuine urban-maneuverability strength.

Driving position & ergonomics72
#11 of 16 in classCompare all →

Excellent outward visibility (thin A-pillars, low beltline), a naturally upright seating position, and physical HVAC controls make daily use easy. Seat travel and telescoping range accommodate a wide range of drivers; only the low-set portrait touchscreen and reachy volume knob draw minor criticism.

Fun-to-drive factor58
#14 of 16 in classCompare all →

Competent and confidence-inspiring in bad weather, but the base 2.0L/CVT combo is joyless and even the sportier RS is more capable than exciting — no manual, muted soundtrack, and modest steering feedback keep it well shy of a Civic Si or GR Corolla in enthusiast appeal.

10Value & Market PositionMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.14C
Standard equipment generosity70
#11 of 16 in classCompare all →

Impreza's headline value pitch is standard symmetrical AWD across every trim plus EyeSight driver-assist (adaptive cruise, lane-centering, auto emergency braking) as standard — content Civic/Corolla hatchbacks either omit AWD entirely or charge extra for equivalent safety kit. Base trim is otherwise modest (dual 7-inch screens, cloth, halogen headlights, no heated seats); Sport and RS add the 11.6-inch portrait touchscreen, heated seats/mirrors, and blind-spot monitoring, matching or beating rivals at comparable prices.

Feature value per dollar70
#7 of 16 in classCompare all →

Priced roughly in Civic/Corolla Hatchback territory (~$25K base to ~$29K RS) while including standard AWD — a package a Civic buyer literally cannot buy at any price and a Corolla buyer must move up to a Corolla Cross or GR to approach. If AWD matters, Impreza is a segment-best bang-for-buck play; if it doesn't, Civic/Corolla out-content it on infotainment, engine refinement, and cabin materials for similar money.

Trim & configuration breadth50
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

Just three trims (Base, Sport, RS), one body (hatchback — sedan was dropped for 2024), one transmission (CVT; manual gone), and effectively two engines (2.0L on Base/Sport, 2.5L on RS only). No hybrid, no manual, no AWD-vs-FWD choice. Narrow versus Civic (multiple engines, sedan+hatch, Si, Type R) or Corolla (hatch/sedan, hybrid, GR).

Sales popularity & market acceptance42
#14 of 16 in classCompare all →

Impreza US sales have fallen sharply through the current generation as buyers move to Crosstrek (essentially a lifted Impreza) and Forester; annual volume runs well under Civic/Corolla Hatchback and continues to trend down. Subaru itself de-emphasizes the nameplate in marketing.

Brand desirability & image65
#14 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru enjoys strong brand loyalty and a well-defined image (safety, AWD, outdoorsy) that consistently ranks near the top of owner-loyalty studies. The Impreza itself doesn't carry a strong halo — the emotional pull sits with WRX, Outback, and Crosstrek — but the parent brand's positive perception lifts the model above neutral.

Deals & incentive availability62
#12 of 16 in classCompare all →

Subaru historically runs thin incentives, but Impreza's slow sales and softening compact-car demand mean modest cash/APR programs and negotiable transaction prices are commonly available — nothing sells over sticker. Not a screaming deal, but buyer-friendly relative to tighter Civic/Corolla inventory.

Model freshness65
#13 of 16 in classCompare all →

Sixth-generation Impreza launched for MY2024 on the Subaru Global Platform, so 2026 is year three of the generation — mid-cycle, still current but no longer new. Interior and infotainment feel contemporary; the CVT-only, non-hybrid powertrain lineup is starting to trail rivals adding electrification.

Critical reception & awards55
#15 of 16 in classCompare all →

Reviews of the current generation are lukewarm rather than glowing: praise for standard AWD, EyeSight, and predictable handling; consistent criticism of the underpowered 2.0L base engine, droney CVT, plain styling, and interior materials that trail Civic and Mazda3. Not a regular comparison-test winner and no marquee awards (no 10Best, no NACTOY), though IIHS safety picks are typical for the platform.