MotorGPA
Find My Match
GuidesSubject deep dives

The Technology grade, explained

Screens, software, connectivity and convenience: twelve criteria, one of them measured. Why the grade rewards responsiveness and updates over screen size, and which classes lead.

By MotorGPAPublished September 5, 20267 min readFigures read live from the scoring data at build time

Technology is the subject that dates fastest, and the framework is written to grade the things that age well rather than the things that photograph well. Screen size is one criterion of twelve and the only measured one; responsiveness, phone integration, over-the-air updates and the quality of the companion app carry far more of the grade, because they are what decides whether a five-year-old car feels five years old.

What the criteria measure

Infotainment is touchscreen size (measured — a car with no central screen scores zero on it, honestly, rather than being skipped), infotainment UX and responsiveness (×2), wireless CarPlay and Android Auto (×2), voice control and native navigation, audio quality and the digital instrument cluster. Connectivity is over-the-air update capability (×2), the companion app and its remote functions, and charging ports and device power. Convenience is keyless and remote access, cameras and parking aids, and head-up display availability. The ×2 weights are deliberate: a laggy screen and a car that cannot be updated are the two complaints that outlast the novelty of everything else.

IdCriterionKindWeightApplies to
7.1.1Touchscreen sizeInfotainmentMeasured (in)×1All vehicles
7.1.2Infotainment UX & responsivenessInfotainmentJudged×2All vehicles
7.1.3Wireless CarPlay / Android AutoInfotainmentJudged×2All vehicles
7.1.4Voice control & native navigationInfotainmentJudged×1All vehicles
7.1.5Audio system qualityInfotainmentJudged×1All vehicles
7.1.6Digital instrument clusterInfotainmentJudged×1All vehicles
7.2.1OTA update capabilityConnectivityJudged×2All vehicles
7.2.2Companion app & remote functionsConnectivityJudged×1All vehicles
7.2.3Charging ports & device powerConnectivityJudged×1All vehicles
7.3.1Keyless & remote accessConvenienceJudged×1All vehicles
7.3.2Camera & parking aidsConvenienceJudged×1All vehicles
7.3.3Head-up display availabilityConvenienceJudged×1All vehicles
The 12 criteria in Technology & Infotainment, as published in the framework. Weights are relative within the category and renormalize over the criteria a vehicle actually carries. The full definitions, including the scoring guidance for each judged criterion, are on the report card.

How the fleet grades

Technology medians in the B− range and has moved up faster than any other subject over the model years on the site, because the criteria reward things that have gone from optional to standard in a few years — wireless phone projection most of all. The two criteria that still separate the fleet are over-the-air updates, which median 72 and are the domain of the newest platforms, and screen size, which medians 12.3 in across the fleet and matters less to the grade than it does in the showroom.

Technology across the 295 graded models, each at its latest scored year. Median 72.5 points (2.92, B-); the middle half of the fleet sits between 65.1 and 79.7 points, the extremes at 25.9 and 90.9.
CriterionModelsMedian valueMedian score
Touchscreen size 7.1.129512.3 in59
Infotainment UX & responsiveness 7.1.229576
Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto 7.1.329588
Voice control & native navigation 7.1.429576
Audio system quality 7.1.529578
Digital instrument cluster 7.1.629582
OTA update capability 7.2.129572
Companion app & remote functions 7.2.229572
Charging ports & device power 7.2.329574
Keyless & remote access 7.3.129578
Camera & parking aids 7.3.229576
Head-up display availability 7.3.329562
Median score on each Technology criterion across the models that carry it, latest scored year each. For measured criteria the median raw value is shown too.

Who leads, and why

EVs and luxury vehicles lead this subject, and for once the reason is the same: both are built on the newest platforms with the most software investment, and over-the-air capability and app quality follow from that. Trucks grade better than their showrooms suggest because the current half-tons carry large screens and full phone integration as standard.

Body typeModelsMedian (pts)Median GPA
SUVs16074.93.09B
Sedans5574.13.03B
Wagons473.12.96B-
Trucks2271.82.87B-
Convertibles770.92.81B-
Minivans569.32.70B-
Coupes2067.22.55C+
Vans466.42.49C+
Hatchbacks1864.92.39C+
Technology median by body type, latest scored year per model. Body types with fewer than three graded models are left out.
Powertrain classModelsMedian (pts)Median GPA
Electric5976.23.18B
Hybrid1771.62.86B-
Gas (and diesel)21670.92.81B-
Plug-in hybrid370.32.77B-
Technology median by the powertrain class each scorecard was graded as. A class with very few models is a small sample and reads that way.
Price classModelsMedian (pts)Median GPA
Luxury13778.73.35B+
Premium6970.92.81B-
Mainstream8064.62.37C+
Economy952.31.51D
Technology median by the registry’s price class.
VehicleSegmentTechnology
2026 Cadillac CelestiqFull-Size Luxury Sedan4.00A+
2026 Mercedes-Benz EQS SedanFull-Size Luxury Sedan4.00A+
2026 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUVFull-Size Luxury SUV4.00A+
2026 BMW X7Full-Size Luxury SUV4.00A+
2026 BMW i7Full-Size Luxury Sedan4.00A+
Highest Technology grades in the current model year.
VehicleSegmentTechnology
2026 Mitsubishi Outlander SportSubcompact SUV0.00F
2026 Nissan VersaSubcompact Sedan0.67F
2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossSubcompact SUV0.79F
2026 Honda HR-VSubcompact SUV0.83F
2026 Subaru BRZSports Car1.10D
Lowest Technology grades in the current model year.
VehicleOverallTechnologyGap
2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque1.473.08B+1.60
2026 Land Rover Discovery Sport1.603.10B+1.50
2026 Land Rover Range Rover Velar1.713.21B++1.50
2026 Polestar Polestar 32.323.85A++1.50
2026 Buick Envision2.153.55A-+1.40
Current-year vehicles whose Technology grade most exceeds their overall GPA — the ones this subject flatters.

How to read the grade

A Technology grade is a statement about the platform more than about the trim. Screen size and audio are trim-dependent; responsiveness, updates and the app are not, and they carry the grade. If the car you are looking at is on the last year of a long cycle, read the over-the-air criterion first — it tells you whether the software will stay current or whether what you see is what you will have in five years.