Screens, software, connectivity and convenience: twelve criteria, one of them measured. Why the grade rewards responsiveness and updates over screen size, and which classes lead.
By MotorGPAPublished September 5, 20267 min readFigures read live from the scoring data at build time
Technology is the subject that dates fastest, and the framework is written to grade the things that age well rather than the things that photograph well. Screen size is one criterion of twelve and the only measured one; responsiveness, phone integration, over-the-air updates and the quality of the companion app carry far more of the grade, because they are what decides whether a five-year-old car feels five years old.
What the criteria measure
Infotainment is touchscreen size (measured — a car with no central screen scores zero on it, honestly, rather than being skipped), infotainment UX and responsiveness (×2), wireless CarPlay and Android Auto (×2), voice control and native navigation, audio quality and the digital instrument cluster. Connectivity is over-the-air update capability (×2), the companion app and its remote functions, and charging ports and device power. Convenience is keyless and remote access, cameras and parking aids, and head-up display availability. The ×2 weights are deliberate: a laggy screen and a car that cannot be updated are the two complaints that outlast the novelty of everything else.
Id
Criterion
Kind
Weight
Applies to
7.1.1
Touchscreen size — Infotainment
Measured (in)
×1
All vehicles
7.1.2
Infotainment UX & responsiveness — Infotainment
Judged
×2
All vehicles
7.1.3
Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto — Infotainment
Judged
×2
All vehicles
7.1.4
Voice control & native navigation — Infotainment
Judged
×1
All vehicles
7.1.5
Audio system quality — Infotainment
Judged
×1
All vehicles
7.1.6
Digital instrument cluster — Infotainment
Judged
×1
All vehicles
7.2.1
OTA update capability — Connectivity
Judged
×2
All vehicles
7.2.2
Companion app & remote functions — Connectivity
Judged
×1
All vehicles
7.2.3
Charging ports & device power — Connectivity
Judged
×1
All vehicles
7.3.1
Keyless & remote access — Convenience
Judged
×1
All vehicles
7.3.2
Camera & parking aids — Convenience
Judged
×1
All vehicles
7.3.3
Head-up display availability — Convenience
Judged
×1
All vehicles
The 12 criteria in Technology & Infotainment, as published in the framework. Weights are relative within the category and renormalize over the criteria a vehicle actually carries. The full definitions, including the scoring guidance for each judged criterion, are on the report card.
How the fleet grades
Technology medians in the B− range and has moved up faster than any other subject over the model years on the site, because the criteria reward things that have gone from optional to standard in a few years — wireless phone projection most of all. The two criteria that still separate the fleet are over-the-air updates, which median 72 and are the domain of the newest platforms, and screen size, which medians 12.3 in across the fleet and matters less to the grade than it does in the showroom.
A 23%B 41%C 27%D 7%F 3%
Technology across the 295 graded models, each at its latest scored year. Median 72.5 points (2.92, B-); the middle half of the fleet sits between 65.1 and 79.7 points, the extremes at 25.9 and 90.9.
Criterion
Models
Median value
Median score
Touchscreen size 7.1.1
295
12.3 in
59
Infotainment UX & responsiveness 7.1.2
295
—
76
Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto 7.1.3
295
—
88
Voice control & native navigation 7.1.4
295
—
76
Audio system quality 7.1.5
295
—
78
Digital instrument cluster 7.1.6
295
—
82
OTA update capability 7.2.1
295
—
72
Companion app & remote functions 7.2.2
295
—
72
Charging ports & device power 7.2.3
295
—
74
Keyless & remote access 7.3.1
295
—
78
Camera & parking aids 7.3.2
295
—
76
Head-up display availability 7.3.3
295
—
62
Median score on each Technology criterion across the models that carry it, latest scored year each. For measured criteria the median raw value is shown too.
Who leads, and why
EVs and luxury vehicles lead this subject, and for once the reason is the same: both are built on the newest platforms with the most software investment, and over-the-air capability and app quality follow from that. Trucks grade better than their showrooms suggest because the current half-tons carry large screens and full phone integration as standard.
Body type
Models
Median (pts)
Median GPA
SUVs
160
74.9
3.09B
Sedans
55
74.1
3.03B
Wagons
4
73.1
2.96B-
Trucks
22
71.8
2.87B-
Convertibles
7
70.9
2.81B-
Minivans
5
69.3
2.70B-
Coupes
20
67.2
2.55C+
Vans
4
66.4
2.49C+
Hatchbacks
18
64.9
2.39C+
Technology median by body type, latest scored year per model. Body types with fewer than three graded models are left out.
Powertrain class
Models
Median (pts)
Median GPA
Electric
59
76.2
3.18B
Hybrid
17
71.6
2.86B-
Gas (and diesel)
216
70.9
2.81B-
Plug-in hybrid
3
70.3
2.77B-
Technology median by the powertrain class each scorecard was graded as. A class with very few models is a small sample and reads that way.
Current-year vehicles whose Technology grade most exceeds their overall GPA — the ones this subject flatters.
How to read the grade
A Technology grade is a statement about the platform more than about the trim. Screen size and audio are trim-dependent; responsiveness, updates and the app are not, and they carry the grade. If the car you are looking at is on the last year of a long cycle, read the over-the-air criterion first — it tells you whether the software will stay current or whether what you see is what you will have in five years.