MotorGPA
Find My Match
Alfa Romeo logo
Compact Luxury SUV

2018 Alfa Romeo Stelvio

LuxuryGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
1.42DGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
0.83F
Safety
0.83F
EfficiencyGas
0.69F
24 MPG combined · 410 mi range · $2,900/yr energy
Comfort
0.60F
Value
3.56A-
Ownership Cost
0.85F
Technology
0.35F
Driving Experience
3.47B+

The verdict

A struggling compact luxury suv, strong on value and held back by technology.

Overall 1.42 (D) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is value & market position at 3.56 (A-), its weakest technology & infotainment at 0.35 (F). 4 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Value & Market Position
  • Driving Experience
  • Use-Case Fit

What holds it back

  • Technology & Infotainment
  • Space & Comfort
  • Efficiency & Range

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Alfa Romeo Stelvio

Production history

2018present · 9 years · 1 generations
Gen 12018now2018In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — gradedProduction began 2018

How it's evolved

9 scored model years · 20182026

02550751002018201920202021202220232024202520262018 · Overall: 512019 · Overall: 49 (−2 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 56 (+7 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 55 (−1 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 60 (+5 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 57 (−3 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 55 (−2 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 57 (+2 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 54 (−3 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018

Compare two years

vs
Performance55
50-5
Efficiency41
45+5
Safety43
59+16
Space39
37-2
Cost43
24-19
Reliability43
44+1
Tech36
64+29
Use-case56
61+5
Driving80
79-2
Value82
61-21

Best fit & conditions

Winter / inclementC+67/100
AdventureC+65/100
CommuterC63/100
FamilyD55/100
Work / TowF41/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.72C-
Horsepower
280 hp (2.0T volume trims); 505 hp in Quadrifoglio
33/100
#11 of 24 in classCompare all →

The volume Stelvio and Stelvio Ti use the 280-hp turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder; the low-volume Quadrifoglio raises the model-range maximum to 505 hp.

Torque
306 lb-ft at 2,000 rpm
48/100
#4 of 24 in classCompare all →

The standard 2.0-liter turbo makes a strong 306 lb-ft from just 2,000 rpm.

0–60 mph time
5.4 s (2.0T AWD); as quick as 3.3 s in tested Quadrifoglio
68/100
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.0T is exceptionally quick for a four-cylinder compact luxury SUV, matching Alfa's claim in independent testing.

Powertrain refinement82
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

The turbo four delivers strong, smooth response with very little lag and a subdued growl. Its unusually low redline can interrupt manual-mode acceleration, keeping it short of flawless.

Transmission behavior88
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

The ZF eight-speed is quick, smooth, and intelligently programmed, with excellent manual response when paddles are fitted.

Max towing capacity
3,000 lbs maximum; 300-lb tongue weight
29/100
#18 of 24 in classCompare all →

The factory rating is useful for a small trailer but modest within the SUV class.

AWD/4WD availability88
#2 of 24 in classCompare all →

Q4 all-wheel drive is standard throughout the 2018 U.S. lineup and actively varies front-axle torque, though it lacks low range or dedicated terrain programs.

Off-road capability42
#10 of 24 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD and 8.1 inches of clearance support snow and mild dirt-road use, but the Stelvio is pavement-focused with no low range, locker, skid-plate package, or off-road trim.

Powertrain lineup breadth55
#5 of 24 in classCompare all →

The U.S. range offered two distinctly tuned gas engines: the mainstream 280-hp 2.0T and the 505-hp 2.9-liter twin-turbo Quadrifoglio V6. There was no hybrid, diesel, or alternative drivetrain in the U.S. lineup.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Stelvio's weakest categories.0.69F
3SafetyGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.83F
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated by NHTSA (estimated 4 stars)
50/100
#19 of 24 in classCompare all →

NHTSA did not publish an Overall Vehicle Score for the 2018 Stelvio, nor is a tested U.S. model year available from this generation. The required numeric value is therefore a conservative estimate, not a claimed crash-test result.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness40
#20 of 24 in classCompare all →

IIHS did not crash-test the 2018 Stelvio, leaving it without a Top Safety Pick award or a U.S. crashworthiness rating slate. The score reflects missing verification rather than a demonstrated structural failure.

Standard ADAS suite breadth40
#7 of 24 in classCompare all →

The volume Stelvio Ti made all five rubric technologies optional through two driver-assistance packages; none formed a comprehensive standard suite. Buyers could add AEB, full-stop ACC, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-path detection, but the lane feature was warning-only rather than lane keeping.

Automatic emergency braking performance40
#17 of 24 in classCompare all →

Forward Collision Warning-Plus with automatic braking was optional on the volume trim and received no IIHS vehicle-to-vehicle or pedestrian evaluation. Contemporary reporting describes low-speed emergency braking, with no documented pedestrian or nighttime capability.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage45
#17 of 24 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring and Rear Cross Path detection were available together on the volume Ti but were not standard. Both were alert systems, without active steering intervention, rear automatic braking, safe-exit assistance or trailer-aware coverage.

Lane keeping & centering25
#19 of 24 in classCompare all →

The 2018 system only warned when the vehicle departed its lane; it provided neither steering-based lane keeping nor lane centering. Lane-departure warning was also optional on the volume trim.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist58
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

Optional Adaptive Cruise Control Plus could operate to a full stop, a useful stop-and-go capability for 2018. It was not standard, lacked lane centering for integrated highway assistance, and period owner reporting noted late braking.

Hands-free driving availability0
#20 of 24 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway-driving system was offered for the 2018 Stelvio. Even fully optioned vehicles lacked lane centering, so there was no basis for hands-free operation.

Headlight performance65
#2 of 24 in classCompare all →

Bi-xenon headlamps, automatic activation and adaptive forward lighting were standard, giving the volume trim stronger hardware than basic halogens. Automatic high beams cost extra, however, and IIHS did not publish a Stelvio headlight rating to verify illumination performance.

Outward visibility42
#21 of 24 in classCompare all →

The curving body, small rear window, rear pillars and sizable rear head restraints materially obstruct rearward sightlines. A standard backup camera and parking sensors help while reversing, but there was no 360-degree camera to compensate comprehensively.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability45
#19 of 24 in classCompare all →

Two child seats fit, but oddly positioned lower anchors and the space consumed by a rear-facing infant seat reduce usability. The Stelvio could not accommodate three child seats across in Cars.com's standardized check.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Stelvio's weakest categories.0.60F
Seating capacity
5 seats
25/100
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

The two-row Stelvio seats five in every regular 2.0T configuration.

Front headroom
40.2 in
64/100
#11 of 24 in classCompare all →

Front headroom is generous for a compact luxury SUV.

Front legroom
36.6 in
0/100
#23 of 24 in classCompare all →

The manufacturer's published SAE-style figure is unusually low relative to compact-SUV norms.

Rear headroom
38.9 in
72/100
#15 of 24 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom is competitive despite the tapered roof.

Rear legroom
31.9 in
16/100
#23 of 24 in classCompare all →

Rear knee room is tight and near the bottom of the SUV normalization range.

Third-row usability5
#23 of 24 in classCompare all →

There is no third row; this is strictly a five-seat SUV.

Cargo/trunk volume
18.5 cu ft behind second row
0/100
#22 of 24 in classCompare all →

The stylish rear body leaves substantially less occupied-seat cargo room than most compact SUVs.

Max cargo volume
56.5 cu ft maximum
3/100
#22 of 24 in classCompare all →

Maximum space just clears the bottom of the SUV normalization band.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions55
#11 of 24 in classCompare all →

Everyday bins are adequate rather than inventive; an adjustable cargo rail, net and 115V outlet required the Convenience package.

Seat comfort68
#12 of 24 in classCompare all →

Standard power leather seats are supportive, but the optional Sport bolsters can feel narrow and the tight rear bench limits long-haul comfort.

Ride quality78
#2 of 24 in classCompare all →

The aluminum-intensive suspension combines pleasing compliance with unusually disciplined body control, though 20-inch Sport wheels add firmness.

Cabin quietness66
#15 of 24 in classCompare all →

Cruising refinement is respectable, but road noise and the four-cylinder's subdued growl keep it from the luxury-class quietness leaders.

Climate & comfort features67
#10 of 24 in classCompare all →

Dual-zone climate and leather are standard, while heated seats, heated wheel and richer seat choices arrive on Ti or in packages; ventilation was not offered.

5Cost of OwnershipGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.85F
Base MSRP
$42,990 (Stelvio AWD, including $995 destination)
55/100
#17 of 24 in classCompare all →

The all-new 2018 Stelvio started at $41,995 before its mandatory $995 destination charge. This is the entry 280-hp 2.0T/Q4 AWD model, not the low-volume Quadrifoglio.

Volume-Trim Price
$47,490 (Ti Sport AWD, including destination)
50/100
#15 of 24 in classCompare all →

Edmunds identifies the Ti with Sport package as its recommended 2018 configuration; it combines the mainstream 280-hp gas engine with the larger display, heated features, sport seats, 20-inch wheels and paddle shifters. Official launch pricing was $43,995 for Ti plus $995 destination and $2,500 for the Ti Sport package.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$7,500 over 5 years / 75,000 miles (maintenance + repairs)
31/100
#22 of 24 in classCompare all →

No archived trim-specific Edmunds TCO table remains accessible for the 2018 Stelvio, so this is a conservative industry-estimate synthesis for the 2.0T Q4 volume trim. Premium consumables, dealer labor and first-year-model repair exposure put it toward the expensive end of the SUV band, partly offset by the included first service.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~45.1% of MSRP retained after 5 years
17/100
#15 of 24 in classCompare all →

The Stelvio is projected to lose 54.9% in five years, leaving 45.1% retained, below the luxury-compact-SUV norm. KBB's current used values also confirm unusually heavy long-run depreciation for the 2018 launch-year vehicle.

Basic warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
50/100
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

Four years is mid-band coverage and matched the established luxury-brand norm for 2018.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 100,000 mi powertrain
0/100
#7 of 24 in classCompare all →

The unusually generous 100,000-mile cap helps high-mileage owners, but the rubric normalizes the five-year duration at the bottom of its 5-to-10-year band.

Complimentary maintenance & perks60
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

Alfa included the inaugural scheduled-maintenance visit during the first year/10,000 miles plus roadside assistance during warranty coverage. That is useful but brief, placing it in the lower half of the rubric's short-maintenance/basic-perks band rather than alongside multi-year luxury programs.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$33,572 (≈$26,072 depreciation + $7,500 maintenance)
43/100
#19 of 24 in classCompare all →

$47,490 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (45.1% retained, or about $21,418) leaves about $26,072 in depreciation. Add the projected $7,500 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $33,572 in total.

6Reliability & QualityGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.83F
Predicted reliability43
#18 of 24 in classCompare all →

Consumer Reports lacks enough owner-survey responses to publish a detailed reliability result for the 2018 Stelvio, but the launch-year model's extensive recall record and recurring electrical, fuel-system, and drivability concerns put the available evidence below average. The absence of a numeric CR result prevents a more definitive bottom-band score.

Brand reliability track record42
#18 of 24 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo had a bottom-tier U.S. brand standing when this first-year Stelvio was sold, rather than the established multi-year dependability record of leading luxury makes. Its small U.S. fleet also frequently left it unranked in reliability studies, limiting favorable contrary evidence.

Recall & TSB history25
#23 of 24 in classCompare all →

Eleven recalls are exceptionally heavy for one model year, and multiple campaigns address serious loss-of-power, fire, braking, and driver-assistance risks. The TSB record also includes recurring no-start, battery-drain, oil leak/consumption, and electronic-throttle concerns, indicating broad launch-year teething problems.

Powertrain durability reputation56
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

The volume 280-hp 2.0-liter turbo and eight-speed automatic have aged better than the high-strung Quadrifoglio hardware, and the ZF-based transmission has broad industry use. However, this first-year application has documented fuel-pump, catalyst-overheating, no-start, battery-voltage, and electronic-throttle issues, leaving only a mixed durability record.

Interior material quality55
#19 of 24 in classCompare all →

Standard leather and aluminum accents provide genuine upscale touches, but the launch-year cabin uses conspicuously cheap-looking plastics and falls behind richer compact-luxury rivals. This is the pre-2020 interior, before Alfa revised the console, controls, and perceived quality.

Fit & finish40
#23 of 24 in classCompare all →

Contemporary testing found tangible assembly defects rather than merely subjective styling complaints. A trembling power seat and loose rear-seat cushion are unusually poor fit-and-finish findings for a new luxury SUV and support a well-below-average launch-year score.

Dealer & service network44
#24 of 24 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo maintains an authorized U.S. network, but its coverage is sparse compared with established luxury competitors, especially outside large metropolitan areas. That matters more for a launch-year vehicle needing brand-specific diagnostics and recall work.

Parts availability & repair cost40
#22 of 24 in classCompare all →

Routine wear parts are obtainable, but low U.S. volume, specialized diagnostics, and Alfa-specific body and electronic components make repairs costlier and less convenient than for mainstream or higher-volume luxury SUVs. The volume four-cylinder is less expensive to support than the Quadrifoglio, but it still has a thin aftermarket.

7Technology & InfotainmentThe Stelvio's lowest-graded category.0.35F
Touchscreen size
6.5-in base display; 8.8-in available (non-touch)
0/100
#13 of 24 in classCompare all →

The volume base trim uses a 6.5-inch display operated by the console controller, not a touchscreen; Ti upgrades to 8.8 inches.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness43
#21 of 24 in classCompare all →

The rotary controller preserves physical interaction, but the small, non-touch, early-generation interface has plain graphics and cumbersome menus.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto25
#19 of 24 in classCompare all →

Wireless projection was unavailable. Wired CarPlay/Android Auto appeared on later-build 2018 hardware, while early production cars lacked compatible hardware, so it was not consistent across the model year.

Voice control & native navigation47
#18 of 24 in classCompare all →

Voice command and optional native navigation cover basics, but neither had natural-language sophistication and navigation was not standard on the base system.

Audio system quality72
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

The standard eight-speaker system is adequate and an optional 14-speaker Harman Kardon system provides a credible premium upgrade.

Digital instrument cluster54
#7 of 24 in classCompare all →

Analog tachometer and speedometer flank a useful 7-inch color TFT, but it is not a full-digital configurable cluster.

OTA update capability10
#21 of 24 in classCompare all →

The 2018 architecture offers no documented whole-vehicle OTA feature updates; software and map servicing relied on dealer or manual media updates.

Companion app & remote functions30
#21 of 24 in classCompare all →

The model predates Alfa Connect's modern rich app ecosystem, with no phone-as-key and little documented app-based vehicle control.

Charging ports & device power57
#4 of 24 in classCompare all →

Four USB ports, including two rear charge-only ports, were good for 2018; all are legacy USB-A, and wireless charging was absent, though a 115V outlet was optional.

Keyless & remote access64
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

Push-button start, remote start and a power liftgate are standard; passive entry and hands-free liftgate depend on optional equipment, with no phone key.

Camera & parking aids55
#14 of 24 in classCompare all →

A rear camera and rear sensors are standard and front sensors are included on Ti, but no surround-view camera or automated parking was offered.

Head-up display availability0
#23 of 24 in classCompare all →

No head-up display was offered for the 2018 Stelvio.

8Use-Case FitOne of the Stelvio's strongest categories.1.75C-
Kid & car-seat practicality55
#18 of 24 in classCompare all →

Two-row seating and LATCH anchors handle a small family, but 31.9-inch rear legroom and only 18.5 cubic feet behind the bench make rear-facing seats and strollers a squeeze.

Family safety package54
#10 of 24 in classCompare all →

Euro NCAP awarded five stars and IIHS crashworthiness results were strong where tested, but U.S. 2018 family trims made blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise, AEB and lane warning package-dependent and lacked lane centering.

Family road-trip comfort55
#18 of 24 in classCompare all →

Good front seats and controlled ride suit four-person trips, but tight rear legroom, modest luggage space and limited rear amenities reduce family endurance.

Daily driving ease69
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

Compact dimensions, a smooth quick-shifting automatic and standard AWD make daily driving easy, though the brake-by-wire system and early infotainment require acclimation.

Commuting cost efficiency48
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

EPA economy is reasonable for a 280-hp AWD luxury SUV, but premium fuel, luxury tires and Alfa service costs prevent low per-mile running costs.

Parking & maneuverability68
#5 of 24 in classCompare all →

A 184.6-inch body, 38.55-foot turning circle, standard rear camera and sensors are manageable in cities; thick rear quarters and lack of surround view demand care.

Work capability53
#7 of 24 in classCompare all →

The 280-hp AWD drivetrain and 3,000-pound tow rating handle light trailers, but small cargo capacity and luxury-focused packaging limit serious work use.

Durability for work duty34
#18 of 24 in classCompare all →

A complex first-year Italian luxury crossover with delicate cabin finishes and no fleet-duty reputation is poorly suited to sustained abuse.

Jobsite & upfit practicality29
#20 of 24 in classCompare all →

There is no bed, onboard power system or meaningful commercial upfit ecosystem; even the cargo rail and 115V outlet require the Convenience package.

Long-distance comfort & range66
#11 of 24 in classCompare all →

Compliant ride, supportive seats, a 16.9-gallon tank and 28-mpg EPA highway rating support roughly 470 theoretical highway miles, but tight rear space and optional adaptive cruise cap the score.

Outdoor & adventure capability70
#6 of 24 in classCompare all →

Standard Q4 AWD, 8.1 inches of clearance, roof-rail availability and 3,000-pound towing make it capable on gravel and for light outdoor toys, though it lacks low range and trail protection.

Gear & luggage flexibility57
#18 of 24 in classCompare all →

A folding rear bench, roof rails, hitch capability and 56.5-cubic-foot maximum provide basic flexibility, but 18.5 cubic feet with seats up is restrictive.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the Stelvio's strongest categories.3.47B+
Handling & agility91
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

The rear-biased Giorgio platform, low mass for the class, quick responses and excellent body control make the regular Stelvio one of the compact luxury SUV handling benchmarks.

Steering feel88
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

Very quick, precise steering gives the Stelvio unusually eager turn-in and genuine driver involvement, though some drivers may find it nervous at first.

Braking confidence82
#2 of 24 in classCompare all →

The integrated brake-by-wire system produces strong stops, and the Stelvio calibration has a firm, linear, easily modulated pedal.

Powertrain smoothness & response84
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

The 280-hp turbo four has strong low-midrange torque and minimal lag, while the ZF eight-speed shifts smoothly and quickly with intelligent programming.

Drivetrain noise & vibration70
#8 of 24 in classCompare all →

The turbo four's subdued growl adds some character and vibration isolation is respectable, but it is less cultured under load than the class's six-cylinder options.

Turning circle
38.55 ft curb-to-curb
43/100
#9 of 24 in classCompare all →

The turning diameter is mid-pack for an SUV and acceptable for its compact footprint.

Driving position & ergonomics77
#5 of 24 in classCompare all →

A supportive power seat, excellent steering-wheel relationship, tall sightline and physical controller create a driver-centered cockpit; the awkward electronic shifter and limited rear visibility detract.

Fun-to-drive factor92
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

Even the volume 2.0T combines brisk acceleration, rear-biased AWD, vivid steering and an unusually playful chassis; it is an enthusiast recommendation without requiring Quadrifoglio power.

10Value & Market PositionThe Stelvio's best-graded category.3.56A-
Standard equipment generosity86
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

The $42,990 base vehicle included 280 hp, Q4 AWD, leather, bi-xenon lamps, 18-inch wheels, power liftgate, remote start, keyless entry, power seats, a backup camera and rear parking sensors. That was unusually complete for a launch-year compact luxury SUV, although active safety and the larger infotainment screen remained optional or trim-dependent.

Feature value per dollar83
#2 of 24 in classCompare all →

The Stelvio paired near-$43,000 pricing with class-leading standard power, standard AWD and sports-car-like dynamics; Ti Sport added meaningful chassis and cabin upgrades without crossing $50,000. Cabin-material, infotainment and cargo compromises prevent an elite score, but its performance-per-dollar was a launch-year standout.

Trim & configuration breadth80
#3 of 24 in classCompare all →

Five mainstream configurations—base, Sport, Ti, Ti Sport and Ti Lusso—covered roughly $43,000-$48,000, followed by the 505-hp Quadrifoglio halo model. AWD was standard and the regular range had only one engine, but buyers could choose distinctly luxury- or sport-oriented packages.

Sales popularity & market acceptance60
#19 of 24 in classCompare all →

The Stelvio quickly became Alfa Romeo's best-selling model and reached 12,043 U.S. sales in 2018, a credible launch for a returning niche brand. It was still well outside the volume leaders in the established compact-luxury-SUV class.

Brand desirability & image75
#11 of 24 in classCompare all →

Italian styling, racing heritage, rarity and the Quadrifoglio/Nürburgring halo made the Stelvio highly aspirational to enthusiasts. Alfa's weak U.S. footprint and longstanding reliability concerns limited broader prestige and hurt resale relative to German rivals.

Deals & incentive availability88
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

Meaningful subvented leases and dealer discounting were readily available during 2018, making the Stelvio substantially more attainable than sticker price suggested. The depth of discount also reflected weak inventory turn, so the buyer benefit is excellent even if the market signal was less flattering.

Model freshness98
#1 of 24 in classCompare all →

This was the first U.S. model year of the first-generation Stelvio and therefore a genuinely all-new vehicle, not a carry-over or refresh. Its Giorgio architecture, powertrains and cabin were current, with only normal first-year execution risk tempering a perfect score.

Critical reception & awards80
#8 of 24 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently regarded the Stelvio as the driver's choice, with strong ratings and comparison praise, while the Quadrifoglio won a MotorTrend performance-SUV comparison. It was not the all-around class winner—space, interior quality, infotainment and early electrical issues kept it from dominating broader comparisons.