MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2023:Overall -2Safety -7Reliability -6Efficiency & Range +2Cost of Ownership -9Technology 0Driving Experience +1
Alfa Romeo logo
Compact Luxury SUV

2024 Alfa Romeo Stelvio

LuxuryGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
1.73C-GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.78C-
Safety
0.89F
EfficiencyGas
0.69F
24 MPG combined · 406 mi range · $2,850/yr energy
Comfort
0.78F
Value
2.97B-
Ownership Cost
0.00F
Technology
1.78C-
Driving Experience
3.52A-

The verdict

A struggling compact luxury suv, strong on driving and held back by ownership.

Overall 1.73 (C-) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is driving experience at 3.52 (A-), its weakest cost of ownership at 0.00 (F). 5 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Driving Experience
  • Value & Market Position
  • Use-Case Fit

What holds it back

  • Cost of Ownership
  • Efficiency & Range
  • Space & Comfort

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Alfa Romeo Stelvio

Production history

2018present · 9 years · 1 generations
Gen 12018now2018In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — gradedProduction began 2018

How it's evolved

9 scored model years · 20182026

02550751002018201920202021202220232024202520262018 · Overall: 512019 · Overall: 49 (−2 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 56 (+7 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 55 (−1 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 60 (+5 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 57 (−3 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 55 (−2 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 57 (+2 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 54 (−3 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018

Compare two years

vs
Performance55
50-5
Efficiency41
45+5
Safety43
59+16
Space39
37-2
Cost43
24-19
Reliability43
44+1
Tech36
64+29
Use-case56
61+5
Driving80
79-2
Value82
61-21

Best fit & conditions

Winter / inclementB-72/100
AdventureC+67/100
CommuterC+65/100
FamilyC61/100
Work / TowF42/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainGrades below the middle of the scale.1.63D
Horsepower
280 hp (2.0L turbo); 505 hp Quadrifoglio
33/100
#24 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.0-liter turbo engine produces a strong 280 hp; the low-volume Quadrifoglio raises the model-range maximum to 505 hp.

Torque
306 lb-ft at 2,000-4,800 rpm
48/100
#22 of 57 in classCompare all →

The standard turbo four's 306 lb-ft is healthy output for a compact luxury SUV and arrives across a broad low-rpm plateau.

0-60 mph time
5.4 sec (2.0L turbo AWD); 3.6 sec Quadrifoglio
68/100
#6 of 57 in classCompare all →

An instrumented 5.4-second run makes the mainstream Stelvio notably quick, while the Quadrifoglio is substantially faster.

Powertrain refinement82
#7 of 57 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently praise the turbo four's responsive throttle, smooth delivery and eager character, though isolated testing notes some low-speed hesitation.

Transmission behavior88
#4 of 57 in classCompare all →

The ZF eight-speed delivers quick, smooth and decisive shifts, with manual mode and available fixed aluminum paddles adding excellent driver control.

Max towing capacity
3,000 lbs when properly equipped
29/100
#37 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 3,000-lb ceiling is useful for a small trailer but modest by SUV standards.

AWD/4WD availability78
#30 of 57 in classCompare all →

Q4 AWD is optional on Sprint and standard on Ti, Veloce, Competizione and Quadrifoglio; its active transfer case preserves rear-drive character and can send up to half of torque forward.

Off-road capability38
#31 of 57 in classCompare all →

Q4 AWD, hill-descent control and roughly eight inches of clearance support snow and graded-road use, but there is no low range, locker, skid-plate package or dedicated trail trim.

Powertrain lineup breadth55
#20 of 57 in classCompare all →

Two genuinely distinct gas engines cover mainstream and extreme-performance buyers, but there is no hybrid, plug-in hybrid or EV Stelvio for 2024.

2Efficiency & RangeOne of the Stelvio's weakest categories.0.69F
3SafetyGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.89F
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated by NHTSA
0/100
#57 of 57 in classCompare all →

NHTSA did not publish an Overall Vehicle Score for the 2024 Stelvio, and no completed overall rating is available from an earlier model year of this generation. Zero is used as the required numeric sentinel for an unrated vehicle, not as a zero-star crash result.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness25
#57 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 Stelvio has no IIHS crashworthiness results and no Top Safety Pick award. Its old five-star Euro NCAP result is encouraging but cannot substitute for current U.S. IIHS tests.

Standard ADAS suite breadth68
#47 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume Ti includes AEB/full-speed forward-collision warning, adaptive cruise, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-path detection, and lane-departure warning as standard. True lane-keep assist is optional in Active Assist Plus, so the standard suite misses one key element of a comprehensive modern package.

Automatic emergency braking performance55
#48 of 57 in classCompare all →

Full-speed forward-collision warning with active braking and pedestrian detection is standard, but IIHS has published no vehicle-to-vehicle or pedestrian avoidance performance result for this Stelvio generation. Equipment breadth earns partial credit, while unverified nighttime pedestrian performance keeps it out of the upper bands.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage72
#34 of 57 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot warning and rear cross-path detection are standard, giving the volume trim useful alert coverage. Corrective-steering Active Blind-spot Assist is optional with Active Assist Plus, and rear automatic braking or safe-exit assistance is not documented.

Lane keeping & centering42
#53 of 57 in classCompare all →

Lane-departure warning is standard, but the volume Ti needs an option package for Lane Keep Assist, Traffic Jam Assist, and Highway Assist. The available system can center the vehicle when engaged, but the standard vehicle provides warnings rather than steering support.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist70
#34 of 57 in classCompare all →

Adaptive cruise provides full-speed following and is standard, a meaningful strength for the volume trim. Integrated Traffic Jam and Highway Assist are capable but require Active Assist Plus, preventing an upper-band score for the representative configuration.

Hands-free driving availability0
#54 of 57 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway-driving system was offered for the 2024 Stelvio. Highway Assist is a hands-on Level 2 support system, not an Alfa equivalent to Super Cruise or BlueCruise.

Headlight performance64
#32 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 facelift brings standard 3+3 full-LED adaptive-matrix-style lamps and automatic high beams, a substantial equipment upgrade. IIHS has not tested their real-world illumination, and U.S. cars do not use the full glare-free matrix functionality, so a Good-equivalent rating cannot be assumed.

Outward visibility62
#40 of 57 in classCompare all →

The elevated seating position and conventional two-box roofline provide generally usable forward views, but rear-quarter blind zones remain and the volume trim relies on blind-spot alerts and a rear camera rather than comprehensive standard surround-view coverage.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability55
#54 of 57 in classCompare all →

Two outboard lower-anchor positions and three top tethers are clearly marked under covers, but rear-facing seat fit can consume front-passenger space and the center lacks lower anchors. The unchanged cabin's dedicated car-seat check found awkward anchor placement and infant-seat space compromises.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Stelvio's weakest categories.0.78F
Seating capacity
5 seats
25/100
#18 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume Stelvio is a two-row, five-seat SUV.

Front headroom
40.2 in
64/100
#23 of 57 in classCompare all →

Front headroom is solid for a compact luxury SUV.

Front legroom
36.6 in
0/100
#54 of 57 in classCompare all →

The published SAE figure is unusually short, though reviewers find the driving position comfortable.

Rear headroom
38.9 in
72/100
#28 of 57 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom is competitive despite the sloping roof.

Rear legroom
31.9 in
16/100
#57 of 57 in classCompare all →

Rear legroom is tight for the segment and limits adult comfort.

Third-row usability10
#42 of 57 in classCompare all →

There is no third row.

Cargo/trunk volume
18.5 cu ft behind second row
0/100
#45 of 57 in classCompare all →

Cargo room behind the rear seat is well below compact-SUV norms.

Max cargo volume
56.5 cu ft maximum
3/100
#43 of 57 in classCompare all →

Maximum volume just clears the bottom of the SUV normalization band.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions58
#34 of 57 in classCompare all →

Everyday cubbies are average, but the phone slot, driver-side tray, removable console tray and flat cargo sill add utility.

Seat comfort82
#5 of 57 in classCompare all →

Front seats are exceptionally supportive, though tight rear legroom prevents a class-leading whole-cabin score.

Ride quality76
#10 of 57 in classCompare all →

The ride is firm and controlled yet filters most impacts, even on large wheels.

Cabin quietness63
#39 of 57 in classCompare all →

Noise isolation is acceptable rather than luxury-leading, with some road and engine sound entering the cabin.

Climate & comfort features86
#3 of 57 in classCompare all →

Heated front and rear seats, heated wheel, dual-zone climate and rear vents are unusually generous standard equipment; ventilation is not offered.

5Cost of OwnershipThe Stelvio's lowest-graded category.0.00F
Base MSRP
$47,545 (Sprint RWD, including $1,595 destination)
44/100
#37 of 57 in classCompare all →

The refreshed 2024 U.S. lineup opened with the rear-drive Sprint; this is the year-specific launch price including destination.

Volume-Trim Price
$54,445 (Veloce AWD, including destination)
33/100
#40 of 57 in classCompare all →

TrueCar identifies Veloce as the most popular trim, so its published all-in MSRP is used as the representative volume configuration.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
$11,472 projected over 5 years (Veloce: $5,874 maintenance + $5,598 repairs)
0/100
#57 of 57 in classCompare all →

Edmunds' trim-specific projection puts combined maintenance and repairs well above the SUV normalization band, reflecting luxury-car service and repair expense.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
32.9% projected 5-year retention
0/100
#50 of 57 in classCompare all →

CarEdge projects unusually steep five-year depreciation for a typically equipped Stelvio, consistent with the nameplate's weak used-market performance.

Basic warranty
4 years / 50,000 miles
50/100
#6 of 57 in classCompare all →

Alfa's basic coverage is typical for a luxury marque, exceeding mainstream 3/36 plans but not the longest premium coverage.

Powertrain warranty
4 years / 50,000 miles (covered within the basic limited warranty; no longer separate powertrain term)
0/100
#23 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 Stelvio has no separate powertrain warranty extending beyond Alfa's 4-year/50,000-mile comprehensive term, trailing the five-year SUV baseline.

Complimentary maintenance & perks42
#48 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 loses the prior one-year complimentary service plan, leaving roadside support and a one-year connected-services trial as useful but modest perks.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$48,005 (≈$36,533 depreciation + $11,472 maintenance)
6/100
#52 of 57 in classCompare all →

$54,445 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (32.9% retained, or about $17,912) leaves about $36,533 in depreciation. Add the projected $11,472 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $48,005 in total.

6Reliability & QualityMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.78C-
Predicted reliability68
#15 of 57 in classCompare all →

The mature Stelvio earned a strong J.D. Power result, but that result carries forward prior-year data and Consumer Reports lacks enough owner data for a prediction. A poor showing in another large owner survey prevents treating the J.D. Power score as conclusive.

Brand reliability track record40
#44 of 57 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo does not have the survey volume or consistent high placement needed for an average-or-better U.S. brand score, and its international survey performance is bottom-tier. The brand was omitted from Consumer Reports' 2024 ranking for insufficient data rather than receiving a favorable rank.

Recall & TSB history52
#33 of 57 in classCompare all →

Three recalls are more than ideal, including two defects that can materially reduce crash protection or visibility. The campaigns are broad supplier/electronics issues rather than evidence of repeated engine or transmission failures, while the tire-label campaign affects a narrower configuration.

Powertrain durability reputation66
#25 of 57 in classCompare all →

The volume 280-hp 2.0-liter turbo and ZF eight-speed had been in Stelvio service since the generation's launch, so 2024 is not an unproven powertrain year. The widely used ZF automatic is a strength, but the turbocharged MultiAir engine and Q4 hardware have a less reassuring long-term reputation than the segment's best proven drivetrains.

Interior material quality62
#35 of 57 in classCompare all →

Leather, attractive design, and excellent aluminum shift paddles provide genuine luxury touches, but reviewers repeatedly find hard or lower-grade plastics that trail compact-luxury rivals. The 12.3-inch digital cluster added for the U.S. 2024 refresh modernizes presentation without materially upgrading the underlying cabin materials.

Fit & finish68
#22 of 57 in classCompare all →

The 2024 model's strong segment-leading prior-year initial-quality result supports generally sound assembly, though reviews and owner feedback still cite inconsistent trim quality and occasional fit-and-finish complaints. It is respectable rather than class-leading for a luxury SUV.

Dealer & service network42
#52 of 57 in classCompare all →

Dealer experience scores around average, but national coverage is sparse and was contracting, making convenient warranty and specialist service difficult outside major markets. That is a substantial ownership disadvantage versus BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, and Acura.

Parts availability & repair cost38
#53 of 57 in classCompare all →

The low-volume imported model has limited aftermarket depth, costly specialist labor, and parts access tied closely to a small dealer network. Projected five-year repairs and maintenance are high even for the volume four-cylinder Veloce, so this is a clear weakness.

7Technology & InfotainmentMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.78C-
Touchscreen size
8.8 in (only size)
21/100
#43 of 57 in classCompare all →

The sole center screen is small for a 2024 luxury SUV.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness43
#56 of 57 in classCompare all →

The rotary controller helps, but slow responses and small icons make the aging Alfa Connect system frustrating.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto55
#50 of 57 in classCompare all →

Both projection platforms are standard, but multiple hands-on U.S. reviews identify the connection as wired rather than wireless.

Voice control & native navigation45
#54 of 57 in classCompare all →

Navigation is standard, but late prompts and poor voice recognition encourage owners to use phone projection.

Audio system quality69
#37 of 57 in classCompare all →

An adequate eight-speaker base system is standard and a 14-speaker Harman Kardon upgrade is available.

Digital instrument cluster88
#3 of 57 in classCompare all →

The refresh adds a crisp standard 12.3-inch full-digital cluster with three layouts.

OTA update capability58
#32 of 57 in classCompare all →

The connected infotainment platform supports software/map updates, but there is no evidence of feature-adding whole-vehicle OTA updates.

Companion app & remote functions70
#22 of 57 in classCompare all →

The app covers the important remote functions but lacks phone-as-key and relies on connected-service subscriptions/trials.

Charging ports & device power76
#12 of 57 in classCompare all →

Wireless charging, three front USB ports, two rear USB charging ports and an available 115V outlet are generous, though not all ports are fast USB-C.

Keyless & remote access82
#12 of 57 in classCompare all →

Passive entry, push-button start, remote start and a hands-free power liftgate are standard, though phone-as-key is absent.

Camera & parking aids60
#39 of 57 in classCompare all →

A rear camera and front/rear sensors are standard, but no surround-view camera or automated parking system is offered.

Head-up display availability20
#37 of 57 in classCompare all →

No head-up display is offered, even on the Quadrifoglio.

8Use-Case FitOne of the Stelvio's strongest categories.1.97C-
Kid & car-seat practicality60
#46 of 57 in classCompare all →

Standard LATCH, split-fold seating and a low cargo sill help, but 31.9-inch rear legroom and 18.5-cu-ft cargo space constrain bulky seats and strollers.

Family safety package65
#38 of 57 in classCompare all →

AEB, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and lane-departure warning are standard, but fuller lane-centering/traffic-jam assistance costs extra and no current U.S. crash score is established.

Family road-trip comfort60
#37 of 57 in classCompare all →

Excellent front seats, heated rear seats and a controlled ride help, but tight rear legroom and small luggage space are meaningful four-person-trip compromises.

Daily driving ease74
#22 of 57 in classCompare all →

Strong visibility, supportive seats, compact dimensions and responsive controls work well daily, though quick steering and occasional infotainment lag demand attention.

Commuting cost efficiency48
#36 of 57 in classCompare all →

The AWD volume trim returns only 24 mpg combined and requires premium fuel, making commuting relatively expensive.

Parking & maneuverability68
#19 of 57 in classCompare all →

Its compact 184.6-inch footprint, good forward visibility and standard parking sensors are helpful, but the lack of a surround camera limits tight-space ease.

Work capability52
#18 of 57 in classCompare all →

A 3,000-pound tow rating and strong 280-hp turbo engine permit light duty, but the small cargo hold is not suited to serious work.

Durability for work duty38
#44 of 57 in classCompare all →

The luxury-focused cabin and Alfa's limited fleet/work reputation make it a poor abuse-oriented tool despite a stout chassis.

Jobsite & upfit practicality32
#38 of 57 in classCompare all →

Roof rails and a 115V outlet offer modest utility, but there is no meaningful upfit ecosystem, washable cabin or work-focused cargo hardware.

Long-distance comfort & range70
#29 of 57 in classCompare all →

Supportive seats, composed ride and roughly 473 highway miles per tank make it a good driver-focused tourer, though road noise, tight rear space and optional advanced assists cap the score.

Outdoor & adventure capability70
#19 of 57 in classCompare all →

Standard AWD on the volume Veloce, 8.1-inch clearance, roof rails and a 3,000-pound tow rating suit gravel roads and light outdoor use, not technical trails.

Gear & luggage flexibility59
#38 of 57 in classCompare all →

A 40/20/40 folding rear seat, roof rails and hitch capability add flexibility, but 18.5/56.5-cu-ft cargo volumes are small.

9Driving ExperienceThe Stelvio's best-graded category.3.52A-
10Value & Market PositionOne of the Stelvio's strongest categories.2.97B-
Standard equipment generosity84
#3 of 57 in classCompare all →

The Sprint packs unusually broad luxury and safety equipment into the base trim, including leather, heated front and rear seats, navigation, wireless charging and major active-driver aids.

Feature value per dollar79
#4 of 57 in classCompare all →

A 280-hp base powertrain, excellent chassis and generous equipment make the Stelvio compelling near $48,000, though cramped packaging, dated 8.8-inch infotainment and weak resale blunt its long-run value.

Trim & configuration breadth76
#18 of 57 in classCompare all →

Sprint, Ti, Veloce, Competizione and Quadrifoglio provide a meaningful ladder from value to exotic performance, with RWD or optional AWD on Sprint and AWD above it, though option flexibility is less extensive than German rivals.

Sales popularity & market acceptance25
#54 of 57 in classCompare all →

U.S. acceptance deteriorated sharply: 2024 volume was barely one-quarter of the nameplate's 2018 level and the Stelvio fell behind Alfa's newer Tonale.

Brand desirability & image78
#15 of 57 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo supplies authentic Italian design and enthusiast cachet that makes the Stelvio feel special, but a small dealer footprint, uneven ownership reputation and poor resale keep it below the strongest luxury brands.

Deals & incentive availability88
#4 of 57 in classCompare all →

Low sales and lingering inventory made substantial discounts and negotiability common, delivering strong immediate buyer benefit even while signaling weak demand and contributing to depreciation.

Model freshness67
#22 of 57 in classCompare all →

The underlying 2018-generation vehicle was aging, but the U.S.-market 2024 facelift added contemporary lighting, revised fascia and a 12.3-inch digital cluster, making it current-looking without erasing redesign risk.

Critical reception & awards73
#16 of 57 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently celebrate its steering, chassis, powertrain and style, but rarely choose it as the complete class winner because practicality, cabin finish and technology trail newer competitors.