MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2018:Overall -2Safety 0Reliability -2Efficiency & Range +3Cost of Ownership -11Technology +3Driving Experience -7
Alfa Romeo logo
Compact Luxury SUV

2019 Alfa Romeo Stelvio

LuxuryGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
1.28DGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
0.67F
Safety
0.79F
EfficiencyGas
0.91F
24 MPG combined · 406 mi range · $2,900/yr energy
Comfort
0.55F
Value
3.06B
Ownership Cost
0.10F
Technology
0.55F
Driving Experience
2.97B-

The verdict

A struggling compact luxury suv, strong on value and held back by ownership.

Overall 1.28 (D) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is value & market position at 3.06 (B), its weakest cost of ownership at 0.10 (F). 3 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Value & Market Position
  • Driving Experience
  • Use-Case Fit

What holds it back

  • Cost of Ownership
  • Technology & Infotainment
  • Space & Comfort

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Alfa Romeo Stelvio

Production history

2018present · 9 years · 1 generations
Gen 12018now2018In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — gradedProduction began 2018

How it's evolved

9 scored model years · 20182026

02550751002018201920202021202220232024202520262018 · Overall: 512019 · Overall: 49 (−2 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 56 (+7 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 55 (−1 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 60 (+5 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 57 (−3 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 55 (−2 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 57 (+2 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 54 (−3 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018

Compare two years

vs
Performance55
50-5
Efficiency41
45+5
Safety43
59+16
Space39
37-2
Cost43
24-19
Reliability43
44+1
Tech36
64+29
Use-case56
61+5
Driving80
79-2
Value82
61-21

Best fit & conditions

CommuterC+65/100
AdventureC+64/100
Winter / inclementC-58/100
FamilyC-55/100
Work / TowF39/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainGrades below the middle of the scale.1.67D
Horsepower
280 hp (2.0T); 505 hp in Quadrifoglio
33/100
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume Ti AWD uses the standard 2.0-liter turbo four with 280 hp; the range-topping Quadrifoglio has 505 hp.

Torque
306 lb-ft at 2,000-4,800 rpm
48/100
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume Ti AWD's 2.0-liter turbo four produces a strong 306 lb-ft across a broad plateau.

0–60 mph time
5.4 s (manufacturer figure; 5.7 s Edmunds test)
68/100
#2 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 280-hp Stelvio's quoted 5.4-second run is very quick for a standard compact luxury SUV powertrain, and Edmunds measured 5.7 seconds in an AWD test vehicle.

Powertrain refinement84
#2 of 28 in classCompare all →

Reviewers found the turbo four urgent, responsive and smooth, with strong everyday response and minimal lag. It combines unusually lively delivery with good civility for the class.

Transmission behavior88
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

The ZF eight-speed is quick, smooth and intelligently programmed, with responsive manual control rather than indecisive hunting.

Max towing capacity
3,000 lbs with a braked trailer
29/100
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

A 3,000-lb maximum is useful for a small trailer but modest among luxury SUVs.

AWD/4WD availability75
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

Q4 AWD was broadly available and fitted to the volume Ti AWD, while RWD remained available. The rear-biased system can transfer torque forward as needed, though there is no low range or dedicated terrain suite.

Off-road capability40
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

Its 8.1-inch clearance, AWD availability and hill-descent control support light-duty use, but the Stelvio is pavement-focused and lacks terrain modes, lockers, skid plates or a dedicated off-road trim.

Powertrain lineup breadth60
#2 of 28 in classCompare all →

The U.S. range offered two genuinely distinct gas engines: a 280-hp turbo four and the Quadrifoglio's 505-hp twin-turbo V6. There was no hybrid, diesel or other electrified U.S. option.

2Efficiency & RangeGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.91F
3SafetyGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.79F
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated by NHTSA (4-star neutral estimate)
50/100
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

NHTSA did not publish an overall rating for the 2019 Stelvio, so the required numeric value uses the dataset's neutral four-star convention rather than presenting an unearned test result.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness42
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 Stelvio received no IIHS award and has no IIHS crashworthiness results. With no demonstrated U.S. crash-test weakness but also no verified Good results, it remains below the rubric's mostly-Good band.

Standard ADAS suite breadth25
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.0-liter Stelvio did not include the rubric's five core ADAS features as standard: blind-spot/rear-cross-traffic equipment required the Static package, while AEB, lane-departure warning and adaptive cruise required the Dynamic Plus package. It offered lane warning only, not lane keeping.

Automatic emergency braking performance42
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

Optional Forward Collision Warning Plus could automatically brake and included pedestrian detection, but IIHS published no vehicle-to-vehicle, daytime-pedestrian or nighttime-pedestrian performance rating. Useful documented capability earns limited credit without test validation or standard fitment.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage45
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-path detection were available and reviewers found both effective, but they were alert-only options rather than standard active-intervention systems. No safe-exit or rear automatic-braking function was offered.

Lane keeping & centering25
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

The optional system only warned when the vehicle departed its lane; it could neither steer the Stelvio back nor center it. This is substantially below a functional lane-keeping system.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist65
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

When optioned, adaptive cruise operated down to a full stop and reviewers found it smooth. Its package-only availability and lack of lane centering prevent it from functioning as an integrated highway-assist system.

Hands-free driving availability0
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway-driving system was available for the 2019 Stelvio.

Headlight performance58
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

Bi-xenon headlights were standard and automatic high beams were available, but IIHS did not test their illumination or glare performance. The hardware is credible, though it cannot receive Good-rated credit without measured results.

Outward visibility45
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Thick pillars, a small rear window and an obstructed rear-quarter view create notable blind zones. Large mirrors and the standard reversing camera help, but the 2019 volume trim lacked comprehensive camera compensation.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability60
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

Two outboard LATCH positions use clearly marked plastic covers, but the anchors sit deep and high, and a rear-facing infant seat severely compromises front-passenger space. Two seats fit; three-across ease was not demonstrated.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Stelvio's weakest categories.0.55F
Seating capacity
5 seats
25/100
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 Stelvio is a two-row five-passenger SUV.

Front headroom
40.2 in
64/100
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

Front headroom is generous for a compact luxury SUV.

Front legroom
36.6 in
0/100
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

The published SAE-style figure is unusually low relative to the SUV normalization band.

Rear headroom
38.9 in
72/100
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom is competitive despite the sloping roofline.

Rear legroom
31.9 in
16/100
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

Rear legroom sits near the bottom of the SUV normalization range.

Third-row usability0
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

There is no third row; the Stelvio seats five in two rows.

Cargo/trunk volume
18.5 cu ft behind second row
0/100
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

Cargo room behind the second row is below the framework's 25-cu-ft SUV floor.

Max cargo volume
56.5 cu ft maximum
3/100
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

Maximum cargo volume barely clears the framework's SUV minimum.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions40
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

Cubbies are numerous but mostly small, while awkward cupholder placement can obstruct controls and a USB port.

Seat comfort72
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

Comfortable leather seats and a satisfying driving position suit long stints, though limited rear legroom constrains taller passengers.

Ride quality76
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

The ride is unusually compliant for such an agile SUV, although some surfaces can produce jitter.

Cabin quietness68
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

The cabin is generally muted, but wind noise is less controlled than in peers and the four-cylinder can drone.

Climate & comfort features68
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

Dual-zone climate control and leather are standard, while heated front/rear seats and a heated wheel are available rather than broadly standard.

5Cost of OwnershipThe Stelvio's lowest-graded category.0.10F
Base MSRP
$41,840 (base RWD, including destination)
58/100
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

A new rear-wheel-drive entry model lowered the Stelvio's starting price for 2019; this was a model-year change, not a figure carried from 2018.

Volume-Trim Price
$46,040 (Ti AWD including $1,295 destination)
54/100
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Ti AWD is the representative volume configuration: it adds the comfort and parking equipment expected in this class without stepping up to the low-volume Quadrifoglio. Edmunds likewise identifies Ti AWD, with the Sport package, as the range's sweet spot.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
$14,346 estimated over 5 years ($8,571 maintenance + $5,775 repairs)
0/100
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

The published Ti cost-of-ownership estimate is extremely high for the segment, reflecting both luxury-car servicing and repair exposure. It is consistent directionally with Edmunds' adjacent-year Ti AWD estimate, though the exact 2019 breakdown comes from a secondary cost database.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
45.1% projected 5-year retention (54.9% depreciation)
17/100
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

Stelvio depreciation is worse than the compact-luxury-SUV norm. A second industry model is still more pessimistic, so 45.1% is a defensible but not conservative residual estimate.

Basic warranty
4 years / 50,000 miles
50/100
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

Coverage matched the common premium-brand term and exceeded the three-year coverage offered by many mainstream makes.

Powertrain warranty
4 years / 50,000 miles
0/100
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo did not provide a longer separate powertrain term; the powertrain shared the 4-year/50,000-mile new-vehicle coverage, below the five-year SUV normalization floor.

Complimentary maintenance & perks58
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

One scheduled service in the first year is useful but brief compared with multi-year luxury programs; 24/7 roadside assistance adds a basic ownership perk. The 2019 model predates the Stelvio's Alfa Connect connected-services availability.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$39,622 (≈$25,276 depreciation + $14,346 maintenance)
28/100
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

$46,040 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (45.1% retained, or about $20,764) leaves about $25,276 in depreciation. Add the projected $14,346 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $39,622 in total.

6Reliability & QualityGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.67F
Predicted reliability40
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

The survey evidence and accumulated history place this early Stelvio below the compact-luxury-SUV norm. Consumer Reports records eight recalls, while period testing found cabin rattles and multiple electronic-system problems; J.D. Power does not provide a Quality & Reliability score for this model year.

Brand reliability track record30
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo lacked sufficient U.S. survey volume for several contemporary reliability rankings and did not establish a mid-pack multi-year dependability record. Later evidence around these early cars remained bottom-tier, supporting a score firmly in the rubric's lower band.

Recall & TSB history28
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Eight recalls are excessive for a low-volume model, and multiple campaigns involve consequential loss-of-control or crash hazards. The record includes adaptive cruise control that may resist cancellation, an inaccurate fuel gauge with stall risk, fuel-pump loss of drive power, airbag nondeployment, and possible brake-pedal detachment.

Powertrain durability reputation56
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume trim's 280-hp 2.0-liter turbo four and eight-speed automatic avoid the Quadrifoglio's highly stressed hardware, and the ZF-based transmission is broadly proven. The Alfa-specific engine was still relatively new, however, and fuel-pump, electronic-throttle, cooling, and limp-mode reports prevent an average-or-better durability assessment.

Interior material quality54
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

Standard leather and attractive aluminum accents give the base 2.0T some genuine luxury content, but material execution is only marginally competitive. Reviewers repeatedly criticized the cheap-looking shifter, plasticky switchgear, flexible door panels, and coarse dash covering.

Fit & finish42
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

Assembly consistency falls below luxury-class expectations. A satisfying door-close feel is offset by observed cabin creaks and rattles, flexible panels, and problems with several electronic systems in a contemporary test vehicle.

Dealer & service network40
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo has factory-authorized U.S. support, but its low-volume dedicated network is sparse beside BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, or mainstream Stellantis brands. Owners outside major metro areas can face long trips for Alfa-trained warranty and diagnostic work.

Parts availability & repair cost38
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Routine wear items have aftermarket choices, but the small installed base and specialist network constrain sourcing for Alfa-specific electronics, trim, and drivetrain components. Costs are above the all-car average, and uncommon repairs can require dealer-supplied parts.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Stelvio's weakest categories.0.55F
Touchscreen size
6.5 in standard; 8.8 in available (non-touch)
0/100
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume trim uses a 6.5-inch display controlled by a console rotary dial; neither 2019 display is touch-sensitive.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness45
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

The physical rotary controller is intuitive at first, but mediocre response, unclear icons and convoluted menus make the pre-refresh system frustrating.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto45
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

Both projection systems are standard for 2019 but require a USB cable; wireless projection was not offered.

Voice control & native navigation45
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

Voice activation is present and navigation is optional, but cumbersome destination entry and disruptive prompts make phone projection preferable.

Audio system quality75
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

The eight-speaker base setup is adequate and a powerful branded premium system is available.

Digital instrument cluster58
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

A useful 7-inch information display sits between analog gauges, so this is a partial-digital rather than full-digital cluster.

OTA update capability10
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

The pre-2020 infotainment platform has no documented meaningful OTA capability.

Companion app & remote functions10
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 model predates supported Alfa connected services, leaving no meaningful factory companion-app remote controls.

Charging ports & device power55
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

Three USB ports are useful for the period, but they are older USB-A connections with no factory wireless charging or AC outlet on the volume trim.

Keyless & remote access72
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

Keyless entry/start, remote start and a power liftgate provide strong conventional convenience, without phone-as-key.

Camera & parking aids58
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

A rear camera and rear sensors are standard, with front sensors available, but there is no surround-view camera and the displayed image is small.

Head-up display availability5
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

No head-up display was offered for the 2019 Stelvio.

8Use-Case FitOne of the Stelvio's strongest categories.1.75C-
Kid & car-seat practicality58
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

Two car seats fit and tether anchors are easy to use, but rear-facing infant seats consume front-seat travel and cargo space is narrow.

Family safety package48
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

Core airbags and a rear camera are standard, but most active safety—including AEB, blind-spot monitoring and adaptive cruise—costs extra, and no complete IIHS crash rating is available.

Family road-trip comfort58
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

Four occupants get comfortable seats and a compliant ride, but 31.9-inch rear legroom, thin rear amenities and 18.5 cu ft of luggage room limit family touring.

Daily driving ease70
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

Compact dimensions, responsive power and a smooth-shifting eight-speed generally make commuting pleasant, though stop-start and cold low-speed response can be abrupt.

Commuting cost efficiency55
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

The AWD volume configuration's 24-mpg combined rating is reasonable for its class, but premium fuel and luxury-car consumables raise per-mile cost.

Parking & maneuverability66
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

A compact 184.6-inch footprint and 38.55-ft turning circle are manageable, aided by standard rear sensors, but the small camera image is a drawback.

Work capability48
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 280-hp turbo engine and 3,000-lb tow rating handle light trailers, but limited cargo volume keeps it from serious work duty.

Durability for work duty35
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

A luxury-oriented cabin, tight utility space and an unproven contemporary reliability record make it poorly suited to repeated hard use.

Jobsite & upfit practicality30
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Available sliding cargo tie-downs and roof rails help, but there is no onboard power, washable work interior, or meaningful upfit ecosystem.

Long-distance comfort & range68
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

Comfortable seats, composed ride and roughly 473 miles of EPA highway range make a good tourer, but wind noise and optional-only adaptive cruise reduce fatigue control.

Outdoor & adventure capability68
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

Available Q4 AWD, 8.1-inch clearance, roof rails and 3,000-lb towing support gravel-road and light-adventure use, without low range or rugged underbody hardware.

Gear & luggage flexibility55
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

A split-fold rear seat, remote releases, roof rails and hitch availability add flexibility, but the 18.5-cu-ft cargo bay is narrow and only reaches 56.5 cu ft folded.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the Stelvio's strongest categories.2.97B-
10Value & Market PositionThe Stelvio's best-graded category.3.06B
Standard equipment generosity76
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

Even the base Stelvio included leather, xenon headlights, Brembo brakes, power front seats and liftgate, dual-zone climate control, rear parking sensors, and—newly standard for 2019—Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Most active-safety assists still required option packages, preventing a top-band score.

Feature value per dollar74
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

At $46,040 including destination, the Ti AWD paired rich comfort content with a class-strong 280-hp engine and genuinely standout handling. Its dated infotainment, mixed cabin materials, limited practicality, and optional driver-assistance tech kept it from being a segment bargain.

Trim & configuration breadth76
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

The lineup covered base, Sport, Ti, Ti Lusso, Ti Sport, Ti Sport Carbon and Quadrifoglio, with RWD newly offered on the lower models and Q4 AWD widely available. Numerous appearance and performance packages provided flexibility, although the regular range had only one engine-transmission combination.

Sales popularity & market acceptance40
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Stelvio remained Alfa Romeo's U.S. volume leader but was a niche compact-luxury-SUV seller, and 2019 volume fell sharply in only its second model year. That trajectory signals weak acceptance relative to established German and Japanese rivals.

Brand desirability & image75
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo supplied distinctive Italian styling, motorsport heritage and rarity that gave the Stelvio more emotional appeal than many peers. A thin U.S. dealer footprint, reliability concerns and exceptionally weak depreciation restrained that halo.

Deals & incentive availability84
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

Falling sales and plentiful inventory made 2019 Stelvios highly negotiable, with transaction examples showing roughly $8,000 off sticker. That was a substantial immediate buyer benefit, albeit one connected to weak demand and future resale.

Model freshness88
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 was only the second U.S. model year of the generation, and it added a lower-priced RWD configuration, standard smartphone integration, new packages and minor option/color changes. It retained the launch cabin and infotainment, with the substantive interior/technology update not arriving until model year 2020.

Critical reception & awards78
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently regarded the Stelvio as one of the segment's most engaging choices, and the Quadrifoglio won a major five-way performance-SUV comparison. The volume four-cylinder model was strongly reviewed but not an across-the-board class winner because technology, utility and quality lagged.