MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2017:Overall 0Safety 0Reliability +1Efficiency & Range 0Cost of Ownership -8Technology +5Driving Experience +2
Alfa Romeo logo
Compact Luxury Sedan

2018 Alfa Romeo Giulia

LuxuryGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
1.97C-GPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.20D
Safety
1.81C-
EfficiencyGas
0.48F
27 MPG combined · 413 mi range · $2,550/yr energy
Comfort
2.21C
Value
3.40B+
Ownership Cost
0.85F
Technology
0.62F
Driving Experience
3.62A-

The verdict

A struggling compact luxury sedan, strong on driving and held back by efficiency.

Overall 1.97 (C-) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is driving experience at 3.62 (A-), its weakest efficiency & range at 0.48 (F). 5 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Driving Experience
  • Value & Market Position
  • Space & Comfort

What holds it back

  • Efficiency & Range
  • Technology & Infotainment
  • Cost of Ownership

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Alfa Romeo Giulia

Production history

2017present · 10 years · 1 generations
Gen 12017now2017In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 2017

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 592018 · Overall: 592019 · Overall: 62 (+3 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 61 (−1 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 62 (+1 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 64 (+2 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 642024 · Overall: 642025 · Overall: 63 (−1 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 61 (−2 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance58
59+1
Efficiency37
32-6
Safety57
66+10
Space66
57-9
Cost51
25-26
Reliability47
49+3
Tech34
58+24
Use-case53
44-9
Driving81
78-3
Value84
66-18

Best fit & conditions

CommuterB-72/100
Winter / inclementC+66/100
FamilyC-57/100
AdventureC-57/100
Work / TowF16/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.80C-
Horsepower
280 hp (2.0L turbo volume powertrain); 505 hp Quadrifoglio
38/100
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

The mainstream Giulia and Giulia Ti use the 280-hp turbocharged four-cylinder; the specialized Quadrifoglio raises the model-range maximum to 505 hp.

Torque
306 lb-ft at 2,000-4,800 rpm
56/100
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.0-liter turbo delivers a broad 306-lb-ft plateau from 2,000 through 4,800 rpm.

0-60 mph time
5.7 s (2.0T RWD, instrumented); 5.3 s for tested Q4 AWD
58/100
#3 of 10 in classCompare all →

Car and Driver instrumented the representative rear-drive 2.0T at 5.7 seconds; Edmunds measured the same engine with Q4 AWD at 5.3 seconds.

Powertrain refinement65
#9 of 10 in classCompare all →

The turbo four is punchy, responsive through its broad midrange and characterful, but it is less smooth and less eager to rev than the best German turbo fours. That places it solidly in the middle band rather than among the most seamless engines.

Transmission behavior65
#8 of 10 in classCompare all →

The ZF eight-speed is responsive and its large metal paddles make manual control satisfying, but harsh shifts in Dynamic mode keep it below the top tier.

AWD/4WD availability72
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

Q4 all-wheel drive was broadly optional on the mainstream 2.0T range, while rear-wheel drive remained standard and the Quadrifoglio was RWD-only. It is useful and widely available but lacks terrain modes or the Quadrifoglio's torque-vectoring hardware.

Powertrain lineup breadth58
#5 of 10 in classCompare all →

Two genuinely distinct gas powertrains cover the mainstream and extreme-performance ends: the 280-hp 2.0T four and 505-hp Quadrifoglio V6. There was no hybrid, plug-in, EV, diesel, or manual option in the U.S. lineup.

2Efficiency & RangeThe Giulia's lowest-graded category.0.48F
3SafetyMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.81C-
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated by NHTSA (4-star estimate)
50/100
#8 of 10 in classCompare all →

NHTSA did not publish an Overall Vehicle Score for the 2018 Giulia. The required numeric value is a conservative estimate, not a claimed NCAP result.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness88
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

The 2018 Giulia earned Top Safety Pick when equipped with optional front crash prevention and specific headlights. IIHS rated every published crashworthiness test Good, though the conditional award and absence of a passenger-side small-overlap result keep it below the top band ceiling.

Standard ADAS suite breadth38
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

The volume Giulia/Ti did not include the rubric's complete suite as standard: blind-spot/rear cross-path monitoring and the Dynamic Plus features were packaged options. Even equipped, the 2018 system supplied lane-departure warning rather than lane keeping.

Automatic emergency braking performance76
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

Optional Forward Collision Warning Plus performed very well in IIHS vehicle-to-vehicle testing, avoiding the 12-mph collision and nearly eliminating speed in the 25-mph test. It loses points because the system was optional and IIHS did not publish modern day/night pedestrian results for this model year.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage55
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-path detection were available together on mainstream trims, but only through the Static package. They warn through mirror/audible indications and do not provide active steering, rear braking, or safe-exit assistance.

Lane keeping & centering28
#9 of 10 in classCompare all →

The 2018 Giulia offered lane-departure warning, but not steering-based lane keeping or lane centering. It could alert a drifting driver but could not actively hold a lane.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist64
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

Optional adaptive cruise provided useful stop-and-go capability, strong for 2018, but it was package-gated and had no lane-centering highway-assist partner. That makes it capable conventional ACC rather than an integrated highway system.

Hands-free driving availability0
#10 of 10 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway-driving system was offered for the 2018 Giulia.

Headlight performance55
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

IIHS results ranged from Good to Poor by configuration. The Good curve-adaptive bi-xenons with high-beam assist required specific equipment, so the volume configuration did not receive across-the-range Good performance.

Outward visibility72
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

Forward visibility is notably good thanks to an upright driving position and nearby windshield, while mirrors can obstruct the front-quarter view and the low sedan shape creates ordinary rear-quarter blind zones. A standard reversing camera helps behind, with parking sensors available depending on trim/package.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability58
#8 of 10 in classCompare all →

The two outboard lower-anchor sets are easy to find under hinged covers, but IIHS rated overall LATCH usability Marginal and the compact rear quarters constrain larger rear-facing seats. Two seats fit; three-across is not an easy proposition.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Giulia's strongest categories.2.21C
Seating capacity
5 seats
100/100
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

The Giulia is a five-seat compact luxury sedan.

Front headroom
38.6 in
65/100
#7 of 10 in classCompare all →

The published volume-trim measurement is competitive for a low-roof sport sedan.

Front legroom
42.4 in
60/100
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

Front legroom is solidly competitive for the class.

Rear headroom
37.6 in
65/100
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

Published rear headroom is respectable despite the sloping roof.

Rear legroom
35.1 in
31/100
#8 of 10 in classCompare all →

The number is modest and reviewers found the rear seat cramped for adults.

Cargo/trunk volume
13.4 cu ft
34/100
#5 of 10 in classCompare all →

The trunk is near the low end of the sedan normalization band, though the rear seat folds.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions35
#10 of 10 in classCompare all →

Small, shallow cubbies and narrow door-pocket openings make everyday storage a clear weakness; there is no standout solution.

Seat comfort78
#3 of 10 in classCompare all →

The heated 10-way power leather seats in the Ti are firm, supportive and strongly praised, but rear-seat space limits four-adult comfort.

Ride quality76
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

The Giulia combines supple compliance with excellent control, although run-flat tires add a firm edge on broken pavement.

Cabin quietness62
#8 of 10 in classCompare all →

Acoustic windshield and front-door glass control road noise, but wind noise, squeaks and creaks keep it from luxury-class quietness.

Climate & comfort features72
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

The volume Ti includes heated front seats, heated wheel, dual-zone climate and rear vents, while ventilation and heated rear seats are absent.

5Cost of OwnershipOne of the Giulia's weakest categories.0.85F
Base MSRP
$39,490 (Giulia RWD, including destination)
47/100
#7 of 10 in classCompare all →

The entry 280-hp Giulia RWD opened just under $40,000 including destination for 2018.

Volume-Trim Price
$41,490 (Giulia Ti RWD, including destination)
49/100
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

The Ti is used as the representative volume trim because it adds the larger display, heated seats and upgraded trim while retaining the mainstream 2.0-liter powertrain.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
Approximately $5,500 over 5 years
54/100
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

A model-year-specific industry estimate places five-year maintenance and repairs near $5,500; the figure is plausible for the 2.0-liter car but is less authoritative than manufacturer warranty data.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
38.5% of MSRP retained after 5 years
12/100
#9 of 10 in classCompare all →

The turbo-four Giulia is projected to lose substantially more value than the average sedan, materially increasing ownership cost.

Basic warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi
50/100
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

Four years and 50,000 miles is competitive with the standard luxury-brand warranty norm.

Powertrain warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi (covered under the new-vehicle limited warranty)
0/100
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

Unlike brands that add a longer separate powertrain term, Alfa Romeo's powertrain coverage ends with its 4-year/50,000-mile basic warranty.

Complimentary maintenance & perks55
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

The first scheduled service was included for one year/10,000 miles, and roadside assistance accompanied warranty coverage. That is useful but much shorter than the multi-year maintenance plans then offered by BMW and Genesis.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$31,016 (≈$25,516 depreciation + $5,500 maintenance)
44/100
#7 of 10 in classCompare all →

$41,490 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (38.5% retained, or about $15,974) leaves about $25,516 in depreciation. Add the projected $5,500 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $31,016 in total.

6Reliability & QualityGrades below the middle of the scale.1.20D
Predicted reliability48
#10 of 10 in classCompare all →

The 2018 Giulia has a below-average reliability record, with Consumer Reports flagging the model and Car and Driver describing a checkered history. MotorTrend's relatively trouble-free 20,000-mile 2.0T test keeps this above the very bottom band.

Brand reliability track record42
#9 of 10 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo was a bottom-tier brand when this car was new and remains associated with below-average predicted reliability. The brand's small U.S. sample has also often prevented inclusion in dependability rankings, limiting contrary long-term evidence.

Recall & TSB history36
#10 of 10 in classCompare all →

Nine safety recalls are excessive for one model year, and several are consequential rather than cosmetic: fuel-pump failure can remove drive power, while an AWD brake-fluid-line defect can cause an engine-compartment fire. Other campaigns include catalytic-converter overheating and adaptive-cruise-control software.

Powertrain durability reputation60
#9 of 10 in classCompare all →

The volume 280-hp 2.0L turbo and ZF eight-speed have proven less troublesome than the Quadrifoglio powertrain, and the transmission itself has broad industry use. Early 2.0T cars nevertheless have fuel-system, catalyst-software, battery-voltage, and electronic-throttle/limp-mode concerns, so the combination is only mixed rather than proven durable.

Interior material quality62
#9 of 10 in classCompare all →

The cabin has attractive Italian design, leather, and excellent metal shift paddles, but inconsistent plastics and dated multimedia controls fall short of compact-luxury leaders. Reviewers explicitly identified cheap interior bits and materials that did not justify the luxury price.

Fit & finish54
#10 of 10 in classCompare all →

Basic assembly can look solid, but early cars generated scattered electronic warnings, connector faults, and inconsistent cabin-quality reports. That is below the segment norm even though not every volume-trim long-term car reproduced the severe problems of the Quadrifoglio test fleet.

Dealer & service network44
#10 of 10 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo's U.S. dealer network is sparse compared with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, or even Acura, making qualified service inconvenient outside major metro areas. Contemporary reviewers specifically warned buyers about the small network.

Parts availability & repair cost43
#9 of 10 in classCompare all →

Low U.S. volume, specialized diagnostics, and a thin independent aftermarket make parts and labor costlier and less convenient than mainstream cars or established luxury rivals. Routine maintenance can also be expensive, although the volume four-cylinder is less costly to support than the Quadrifoglio.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Giulia's weakest categories.0.62F
Touchscreen size
No touchscreen; Ti has an 8.8-in non-touch display
0/100
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

The center screen is controlled by a console rotary controller and is not touch-capable.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness58
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

Physical climate controls and the rotary controller help, but simple infotainment tasks take several clicks and a long-term car occasionally rebooted.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto62
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

Both phone-projection systems arrived for 2018 and use a wired USB connection; wireless projection was not offered.

Voice control & native navigation55
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

Command-based voice recognition is standard and 3-D navigation is optional on Ti, but neither was class-leading even when new.

Audio system quality65
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

The standard eight-speaker system is ordinary, but a substantial 14-speaker, 900-watt Harman Kardon upgrade was available.

Digital instrument cluster25
#10 of 10 in classCompare all →

Conventional analog gauges flank only a small information display; no full-digital configurable cluster was offered.

OTA update capability10
#7 of 10 in classCompare all →

There was no advertised whole-vehicle or feature-adding over-the-air update capability for the 2018 system.

Companion app & remote functions25
#8 of 10 in classCompare all →

Remote start came from the key fob, but the 2018 Giulia lacked the rich connected-app controls and digital key expected today.

Charging ports & device power45
#3 of 10 in classCompare all →

Three USB-A ports, including one rear charge-only port, were useful in 2018 but there is no USB-C, wireless charging or AC outlet.

Keyless & remote access70
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

Passive entry, push-button start and remote engine start cover the core conveniences, but there is no phone key or hands-free trunk.

Camera & parking aids48
#5 of 10 in classCompare all →

A rear camera and rear sensors cover basics; front sensors were package-linked, with no surround-view camera or automated parking.

Head-up display availability0
#9 of 10 in classCompare all →

No head-up display was offered on the 2018 Giulia lineup.

8Use-Case FitGrades below the middle of the scale.1.40D
Kid & car-seat practicality50
#7 of 10 in classCompare all →

Accessible LATCH anchors help, but the small rear door openings, 35.1 inches of legroom and modest trunk complicate rear-facing seats and stroller duty.

Family safety package68
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

Strong crashworthiness earned a 2018 IIHS Top Safety Pick, but the award required optional front crash prevention and specific headlights rather than volume-trim standard equipment.

Family road-trip comfort58
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

Excellent front seats, rear vents and a controlled ride suit two adults, but cramped rear seating and 13.4 cu ft of luggage room weaken four-person touring.

Daily driving ease76
#3 of 10 in classCompare all →

Compact dimensions, an excellent driving position, strong low-end torque and a quick automatic make commuting engaging and manageable; abrupt Dynamic-mode shifts and optional-only adaptive cruise add friction.

Commuting cost efficiency60
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

The RWD 2.0T's 27-mpg combined rating is efficient for a 280-hp 2018 luxury sport sedan, though premium fuel and luxury-car upkeep prevent a high score.

Parking & maneuverability78
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

At 182.6 inches long with an exceptionally tight 35.5-ft turning diameter, it fits cities well; obstructed rear-quarter sightlines and no 360 camera temper the advantage.

Work capability15
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

No U.S. tow rating, bed or meaningful payload proposition makes this luxury sedan unsuitable for real work beyond carrying small tools.

Durability for work duty25
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

The luxury-oriented cabin, run-flat tires and early-build electronic/trim complaints are poorly suited to repeated work abuse, with no fleet-duty reputation.

Jobsite & upfit practicality10
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

There is no onboard AC power, cargo bed, factory upfit ecosystem or washable work interior.

Long-distance comfort & range70
#5 of 10 in classCompare all →

Supportive front seats, controlled ride, acoustic glass and roughly 413 miles of combined-rated range make it a good two-person tourer; rear comfort and optional-only adaptive cruise limit it.

Outdoor & adventure capability48
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

Optional Q4 AWD helps in poor weather and folding rear seats accept skis, but low clearance, no tow rating and sedan packaging keep it pavement-focused.

Gear & luggage flexibility48
#3 of 10 in classCompare all →

A split-folding rear seat and optional trunk hooks/net help, but the 13.4-cu-ft trunk, small opening and sparse cabin storage constrain bulky gear.

9Driving ExperienceThe Giulia's best-graded category.3.62A-
Handling & agility92
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

Near-ideal weight distribution, quick responses and excellent body control put the volume Giulia at the top of its contemporary class.

Steering feel94
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

Exceptionally quick, accurate steering with natural Dynamic-mode weighting and useful feedback is the car's defining strength.

Braking confidence78
#3 of 10 in classCompare all →

Four-piston Brembo front calipers deliver strong, linear braking and a short instrumented stop, though brake-by-wire feedback can diminish in panic stops.

Powertrain smoothness & response78
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

The 280-hp turbo four has abundant torque and the ZF eight-speed shifts quickly, but Dynamic mode can produce harsh changes and low-speed calibration is not flawless.

Drivetrain noise & vibration72
#3 of 10 in classCompare all →

The turbo four is quiet at idle and has an appealing hard-use character, though it is less smooth than the best German four-cylinders.

Turning circle
35.5 ft curb-to-curb
75/100
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

This is notably tight for a compact luxury sedan and supports excellent low-speed agility.

Driving position & ergonomics78
#5 of 10 in classCompare all →

A connected, confidence-inspiring seating position and well-placed physical controls are major positives; tedious infotainment menus and some limited base-seat adjustment hold it back.

Fun-to-drive factor94
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

Even the volume 2.0T is a genuine enthusiast recommendation, combining character, speed, steering and chassis balance in a way few rivals match.

10Value & Market PositionOne of the Giulia's strongest categories.3.40B+
Standard equipment generosity74
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

Even the base car included leather, power front seats, dual-zone climate control, xenon lamps, Brembo brakes, rear parking sensors and a camera; Apple CarPlay and Android Auto became standard for 2018. Heated seats and most active safety aids still required a higher trim or packages.

Feature value per dollar78
#3 of 10 in classCompare all →

At $41,490 for the Ti, the Giulia delivered 280 hp, an eight-speed automatic, premium cabin content and class-leading steering character for ordinary compact-luxury-sedan money. Optional driver-assistance and infotainment hardware keep it just below standout bargain territory.

Trim & configuration breadth82
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

Six trims covered base, Sport, Ti, Ti Sport, Ti Lusso and the radically quicker Quadrifoglio, while every 2.0-liter trim offered rear- or all-wheel drive and multiple option packages. The absence of a manual, hybrid or intermediate engine limits an otherwise broad range.

Sales popularity & market acceptance63
#4 of 10 in classCompare all →

U.S. volume rose strongly in its second full year to 11,519 cars, demonstrating growing acceptance, but remained well below established German compact-luxury leaders and fell again in 2019.

Brand desirability & image78
#6 of 10 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo's Italian design and motorsport heritage gave the Giulia unusual enthusiast appeal, reinforced by the Quadrifoglio halo. Thin U.S. awareness and a longstanding reliability reputation restrained mainstream prestige and resale.

Deals & incentive availability68
#7 of 10 in classCompare all →

The growing but low-volume model received modest factory support and was generally negotiable, benefiting buyers without reaching fire-sale levels during the model year.

Model freshness90
#1 of 10 in classCompare all →

The 2018 Giulia was only the second U.S. model year of the rear-drive 952 generation. It was not a redesign, but the lineup expanded with distinct Sport, Ti Sport and Ti Lusso models, standard smartphone integration and minor equipment changes.

Critical reception & awards94
#2 of 10 in classCompare all →

Reviewers treated the Giulia as a class-shaping driver's car despite quality and interior-detail caveats. Its 2018 Car and Driver 10Best win is major, year-specific recognition shared by the volume 2.0-liter and Quadrifoglio range.