The verdict
A struggling compact luxury sedan, strong on driving and held back by efficiency.
Overall 1.97 (C-) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is driving experience at 3.62 (A-), its weakest efficiency & range at 0.48 (F). 5 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.
Jump to scoresStrengths
- Driving Experience
- Value & Market Position
- Space & Comfort
What holds it back
- Efficiency & Range
- Technology & Infotainment
- Cost of Ownership
Top alternatives
Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Alfa Romeo Giulia
3.07B
BMW 3 SeriesCompact Luxury SedanThe 3 Series is the segment default with a broader powertrain lineup (330i, M340i, plug-in hybrid abroad), a much larger 14.9-inch curved display, a bigger ~17 cu ft trunk, and vastly better resale — but the Giulia is the more emotional, better-steering car and looks more distinctive at the curb.
Compare
2.86B-
Audi A4Compact Luxury SedanThe A4 quattro matches the Giulia's 27 MPG combined but adds tri-zone climate, roomier back seat comfort features, and Audi's more solid fit-and-finish reputation.
Compare
2.79B-
Mercedes-Benz C-ClassCompact Luxury SedanThe C-Class walks over the Giulia inside with an 11.9-inch portrait screen, MBUX voice control, softer ride, and quieter cabin — it feels a full generation newer.
CompareHow it's evolved
10 scored model years · 2017–2026
Subject scores by year
Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.
| Year | Performance | Efficiency | Safety | Space | Cost | Reliability | Tech | Use-case | Driving | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 59 | 32 | 66 | 57 | 25 | 49 | 58 | 44 | 78 | 66 |
| 2025 | 57 | 28 | 60 | 63 | 30 | 66 | 56 | 50 | 81 | 67 |
| 2024 | 58 | 35 | 62 | 62 | 27 | 60 | 56 | 52 | 83 | 72 |
| 2023 | 57 | 37 | 65 | 61 | 13 | 63 | 52 | 51 | 82 | 71 |
| 2022 | 58 | 38 | 67 | 62 | 30 | 60 | 56 | 53 | 81 | 71 |
| 2021 | 57 | 32 | 61 | 61 | 31 | 57 | 52 | 50 | 81 | 76 |
| 2020 | 56 | 34 | 57 | 62 | 48 | 57 | 53 | 48 | 84 | 74 |
| 2019 | 57 | 32 | 61 | 62 | 52 | 57 | 43 | 51 | 84 | 78 |
| 2018 | 56 | 38 | 57 | 62 | 43 | 48 | 40 | 51 | 83 | 79 |
| 2017 | 58 | 37 | 57 | 66 | 51 | 47 | 34 | 53 | 81 | 84 |
Compare two years
Best fit & conditions
Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →
Subject profile
Detailed scoring by subject
1Performance & PowertrainMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.80C-
The mainstream Giulia and Giulia Ti use the 280-hp turbocharged four-cylinder; the specialized Quadrifoglio raises the model-range maximum to 505 hp.
The volume 2.0-liter turbo delivers a broad 306-lb-ft plateau from 2,000 through 4,800 rpm.
Car and Driver instrumented the representative rear-drive 2.0T at 5.7 seconds; Edmunds measured the same engine with Q4 AWD at 5.3 seconds.
The turbo four is punchy, responsive through its broad midrange and characterful, but it is less smooth and less eager to rev than the best German turbo fours. That places it solidly in the middle band rather than among the most seamless engines.
The ZF eight-speed is responsive and its large metal paddles make manual control satisfying, but harsh shifts in Dynamic mode keep it below the top tier.
Q4 all-wheel drive was broadly optional on the mainstream 2.0T range, while rear-wheel drive remained standard and the Quadrifoglio was RWD-only. It is useful and widely available but lacks terrain modes or the Quadrifoglio's torque-vectoring hardware.
Two genuinely distinct gas powertrains cover the mainstream and extreme-performance ends: the 280-hp 2.0T four and 505-hp Quadrifoglio V6. There was no hybrid, plug-in, EV, diesel, or manual option in the U.S. lineup.
2Efficiency & RangeThe Giulia's lowest-graded category.0.48F
The rear-drive 2.0T volume configuration earns 27 MPG combined, with the available Q4 system reducing that by one MPG.
EPA city economy for the volume rear-drive 2.0T is 24 MPG; Q4 AWD costs one MPG.
The volume rear-drive 2.0T is rated at 33 MPG highway, versus 31 MPG with Q4 AWD.
The official 15.3-gallon tank and 27-MPG combined rating yield approximately 413 miles on a full tank for the representative RWD car.
The EPA-derived listing estimates $2,550 per year for 15,000 miles in the 27-MPG rear-drive 2.0T using premium-gasoline pricing.
Alfa recommends 91-octane premium for best consumption and performance, but the detailed U.S. owner's guide explicitly permits 87-octane regular. That flexibility avoids a hard premium requirement, though owners must use premium to obtain the advertised optimum.
3SafetyMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.81C-
NHTSA did not publish an Overall Vehicle Score for the 2018 Giulia. The required numeric value is a conservative estimate, not a claimed NCAP result.
The 2018 Giulia earned Top Safety Pick when equipped with optional front crash prevention and specific headlights. IIHS rated every published crashworthiness test Good, though the conditional award and absence of a passenger-side small-overlap result keep it below the top band ceiling.
The volume Giulia/Ti did not include the rubric's complete suite as standard: blind-spot/rear cross-path monitoring and the Dynamic Plus features were packaged options. Even equipped, the 2018 system supplied lane-departure warning rather than lane keeping.
Optional Forward Collision Warning Plus performed very well in IIHS vehicle-to-vehicle testing, avoiding the 12-mph collision and nearly eliminating speed in the 25-mph test. It loses points because the system was optional and IIHS did not publish modern day/night pedestrian results for this model year.
Blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-path detection were available together on mainstream trims, but only through the Static package. They warn through mirror/audible indications and do not provide active steering, rear braking, or safe-exit assistance.
The 2018 Giulia offered lane-departure warning, but not steering-based lane keeping or lane centering. It could alert a drifting driver but could not actively hold a lane.
Optional adaptive cruise provided useful stop-and-go capability, strong for 2018, but it was package-gated and had no lane-centering highway-assist partner. That makes it capable conventional ACC rather than an integrated highway system.
No hands-free highway-driving system was offered for the 2018 Giulia.
IIHS results ranged from Good to Poor by configuration. The Good curve-adaptive bi-xenons with high-beam assist required specific equipment, so the volume configuration did not receive across-the-range Good performance.
Forward visibility is notably good thanks to an upright driving position and nearby windshield, while mirrors can obstruct the front-quarter view and the low sedan shape creates ordinary rear-quarter blind zones. A standard reversing camera helps behind, with parking sensors available depending on trim/package.
The two outboard lower-anchor sets are easy to find under hinged covers, but IIHS rated overall LATCH usability Marginal and the compact rear quarters constrain larger rear-facing seats. Two seats fit; three-across is not an easy proposition.
4Space & ComfortOne of the Giulia's strongest categories.2.21C
The Giulia is a five-seat compact luxury sedan.
The published volume-trim measurement is competitive for a low-roof sport sedan.
Front legroom is solidly competitive for the class.
Published rear headroom is respectable despite the sloping roof.
The number is modest and reviewers found the rear seat cramped for adults.
The trunk is near the low end of the sedan normalization band, though the rear seat folds.
Small, shallow cubbies and narrow door-pocket openings make everyday storage a clear weakness; there is no standout solution.
The heated 10-way power leather seats in the Ti are firm, supportive and strongly praised, but rear-seat space limits four-adult comfort.
The Giulia combines supple compliance with excellent control, although run-flat tires add a firm edge on broken pavement.
Acoustic windshield and front-door glass control road noise, but wind noise, squeaks and creaks keep it from luxury-class quietness.
The volume Ti includes heated front seats, heated wheel, dual-zone climate and rear vents, while ventilation and heated rear seats are absent.
5Cost of OwnershipOne of the Giulia's weakest categories.0.85F
The entry 280-hp Giulia RWD opened just under $40,000 including destination for 2018.
The Ti is used as the representative volume trim because it adds the larger display, heated seats and upgraded trim while retaining the mainstream 2.0-liter powertrain.
A model-year-specific industry estimate places five-year maintenance and repairs near $5,500; the figure is plausible for the 2.0-liter car but is less authoritative than manufacturer warranty data.
The turbo-four Giulia is projected to lose substantially more value than the average sedan, materially increasing ownership cost.
Four years and 50,000 miles is competitive with the standard luxury-brand warranty norm.
Unlike brands that add a longer separate powertrain term, Alfa Romeo's powertrain coverage ends with its 4-year/50,000-mile basic warranty.
The first scheduled service was included for one year/10,000 miles, and roadside assistance accompanied warranty coverage. That is useful but much shorter than the multi-year maintenance plans then offered by BMW and Genesis.
$41,490 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (38.5% retained, or about $15,974) leaves about $25,516 in depreciation. Add the projected $5,500 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $31,016 in total.
6Reliability & QualityGrades below the middle of the scale.1.20D
The 2018 Giulia has a below-average reliability record, with Consumer Reports flagging the model and Car and Driver describing a checkered history. MotorTrend's relatively trouble-free 20,000-mile 2.0T test keeps this above the very bottom band.
Alfa Romeo was a bottom-tier brand when this car was new and remains associated with below-average predicted reliability. The brand's small U.S. sample has also often prevented inclusion in dependability rankings, limiting contrary long-term evidence.
Nine safety recalls are excessive for one model year, and several are consequential rather than cosmetic: fuel-pump failure can remove drive power, while an AWD brake-fluid-line defect can cause an engine-compartment fire. Other campaigns include catalytic-converter overheating and adaptive-cruise-control software.
The volume 280-hp 2.0L turbo and ZF eight-speed have proven less troublesome than the Quadrifoglio powertrain, and the transmission itself has broad industry use. Early 2.0T cars nevertheless have fuel-system, catalyst-software, battery-voltage, and electronic-throttle/limp-mode concerns, so the combination is only mixed rather than proven durable.
The cabin has attractive Italian design, leather, and excellent metal shift paddles, but inconsistent plastics and dated multimedia controls fall short of compact-luxury leaders. Reviewers explicitly identified cheap interior bits and materials that did not justify the luxury price.
Basic assembly can look solid, but early cars generated scattered electronic warnings, connector faults, and inconsistent cabin-quality reports. That is below the segment norm even though not every volume-trim long-term car reproduced the severe problems of the Quadrifoglio test fleet.
Alfa Romeo's U.S. dealer network is sparse compared with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, or even Acura, making qualified service inconvenient outside major metro areas. Contemporary reviewers specifically warned buyers about the small network.
Low U.S. volume, specialized diagnostics, and a thin independent aftermarket make parts and labor costlier and less convenient than mainstream cars or established luxury rivals. Routine maintenance can also be expensive, although the volume four-cylinder is less costly to support than the Quadrifoglio.
7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Giulia's weakest categories.0.62F
The center screen is controlled by a console rotary controller and is not touch-capable.
Physical climate controls and the rotary controller help, but simple infotainment tasks take several clicks and a long-term car occasionally rebooted.
Both phone-projection systems arrived for 2018 and use a wired USB connection; wireless projection was not offered.
Command-based voice recognition is standard and 3-D navigation is optional on Ti, but neither was class-leading even when new.
The standard eight-speaker system is ordinary, but a substantial 14-speaker, 900-watt Harman Kardon upgrade was available.
Conventional analog gauges flank only a small information display; no full-digital configurable cluster was offered.
There was no advertised whole-vehicle or feature-adding over-the-air update capability for the 2018 system.
Remote start came from the key fob, but the 2018 Giulia lacked the rich connected-app controls and digital key expected today.
Three USB-A ports, including one rear charge-only port, were useful in 2018 but there is no USB-C, wireless charging or AC outlet.
Passive entry, push-button start and remote engine start cover the core conveniences, but there is no phone key or hands-free trunk.
A rear camera and rear sensors cover basics; front sensors were package-linked, with no surround-view camera or automated parking.
No head-up display was offered on the 2018 Giulia lineup.
8Use-Case FitGrades below the middle of the scale.1.40D
Accessible LATCH anchors help, but the small rear door openings, 35.1 inches of legroom and modest trunk complicate rear-facing seats and stroller duty.
Strong crashworthiness earned a 2018 IIHS Top Safety Pick, but the award required optional front crash prevention and specific headlights rather than volume-trim standard equipment.
Excellent front seats, rear vents and a controlled ride suit two adults, but cramped rear seating and 13.4 cu ft of luggage room weaken four-person touring.
Compact dimensions, an excellent driving position, strong low-end torque and a quick automatic make commuting engaging and manageable; abrupt Dynamic-mode shifts and optional-only adaptive cruise add friction.
The RWD 2.0T's 27-mpg combined rating is efficient for a 280-hp 2018 luxury sport sedan, though premium fuel and luxury-car upkeep prevent a high score.
At 182.6 inches long with an exceptionally tight 35.5-ft turning diameter, it fits cities well; obstructed rear-quarter sightlines and no 360 camera temper the advantage.
No U.S. tow rating, bed or meaningful payload proposition makes this luxury sedan unsuitable for real work beyond carrying small tools.
The luxury-oriented cabin, run-flat tires and early-build electronic/trim complaints are poorly suited to repeated work abuse, with no fleet-duty reputation.
There is no onboard AC power, cargo bed, factory upfit ecosystem or washable work interior.
Supportive front seats, controlled ride, acoustic glass and roughly 413 miles of combined-rated range make it a good two-person tourer; rear comfort and optional-only adaptive cruise limit it.
Optional Q4 AWD helps in poor weather and folding rear seats accept skis, but low clearance, no tow rating and sedan packaging keep it pavement-focused.
A split-folding rear seat and optional trunk hooks/net help, but the 13.4-cu-ft trunk, small opening and sparse cabin storage constrain bulky gear.
9Driving ExperienceThe Giulia's best-graded category.3.62A-
Near-ideal weight distribution, quick responses and excellent body control put the volume Giulia at the top of its contemporary class.
Exceptionally quick, accurate steering with natural Dynamic-mode weighting and useful feedback is the car's defining strength.
Four-piston Brembo front calipers deliver strong, linear braking and a short instrumented stop, though brake-by-wire feedback can diminish in panic stops.
The 280-hp turbo four has abundant torque and the ZF eight-speed shifts quickly, but Dynamic mode can produce harsh changes and low-speed calibration is not flawless.
The turbo four is quiet at idle and has an appealing hard-use character, though it is less smooth than the best German four-cylinders.
This is notably tight for a compact luxury sedan and supports excellent low-speed agility.
A connected, confidence-inspiring seating position and well-placed physical controls are major positives; tedious infotainment menus and some limited base-seat adjustment hold it back.
Even the volume 2.0T is a genuine enthusiast recommendation, combining character, speed, steering and chassis balance in a way few rivals match.
10Value & Market PositionOne of the Giulia's strongest categories.3.40B+
Even the base car included leather, power front seats, dual-zone climate control, xenon lamps, Brembo brakes, rear parking sensors and a camera; Apple CarPlay and Android Auto became standard for 2018. Heated seats and most active safety aids still required a higher trim or packages.
At $41,490 for the Ti, the Giulia delivered 280 hp, an eight-speed automatic, premium cabin content and class-leading steering character for ordinary compact-luxury-sedan money. Optional driver-assistance and infotainment hardware keep it just below standout bargain territory.
Six trims covered base, Sport, Ti, Ti Sport, Ti Lusso and the radically quicker Quadrifoglio, while every 2.0-liter trim offered rear- or all-wheel drive and multiple option packages. The absence of a manual, hybrid or intermediate engine limits an otherwise broad range.
U.S. volume rose strongly in its second full year to 11,519 cars, demonstrating growing acceptance, but remained well below established German compact-luxury leaders and fell again in 2019.
Alfa Romeo's Italian design and motorsport heritage gave the Giulia unusual enthusiast appeal, reinforced by the Quadrifoglio halo. Thin U.S. awareness and a longstanding reliability reputation restrained mainstream prestige and resale.
The growing but low-volume model received modest factory support and was generally negotiable, benefiting buyers without reaching fire-sale levels during the model year.
The 2018 Giulia was only the second U.S. model year of the rear-drive 952 generation. It was not a redesign, but the lineup expanded with distinct Sport, Ti Sport and Ti Lusso models, standard smartphone integration and minor equipment changes.
Reviewers treated the Giulia as a class-shaping driver's car despite quality and interior-detail caveats. Its 2018 Car and Driver 10Best win is major, year-specific recognition shared by the volume 2.0-liter and Quadrifoglio range.
