MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2018:Overall +3Safety +4Reliability +9Efficiency & Range -6Cost of Ownership +9Technology +4Driving Experience +1
Alfa Romeo logo
Compact Luxury Sedan

2019 Alfa Romeo Giulia

LuxuryGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
2.17CGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.80C-
Safety
2.11C
EfficiencyGas
0.08F
27 MPG combined · 413 mi range · $2,800/yr energy
Comfort
2.21C
Value
3.27B+
Ownership Cost
1.46D
Technology
0.88F
Driving Experience
3.71A

The verdict

A mixed-report compact luxury sedan, strong on driving and held back by efficiency.

Overall 2.17 (C) across 10 graded subjects. Its strongest is driving experience at 3.71 (A), its weakest efficiency & range at 0.08 (F). 6 of 10 subjects grade at C− or better.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Driving Experience
  • Value & Market Position
  • Space & Comfort

What holds it back

  • Efficiency & Range
  • Technology & Infotainment
  • Use-Case Fit

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Alfa Romeo Giulia

Production history

2017present · 10 years · 1 generations
Gen 12017now2017In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 2017

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 592018 · Overall: 592019 · Overall: 62 (+3 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 61 (−1 vs 2019)2021 · Overall: 62 (+1 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 64 (+2 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 642024 · Overall: 642025 · Overall: 63 (−1 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 61 (−2 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance58
59+1
Efficiency37
32-6
Safety57
66+10
Space66
57-9
Cost51
25-26
Reliability47
49+3
Tech34
58+24
Use-case53
44-9
Driving81
78-3
Value84
66-18

Best fit & conditions

CommuterB-72/100
Winter / inclementC-58/100
AdventureC-58/100
FamilyC-57/100
Work / TowF18/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.82C-
Horsepower
280 hp (2.0L turbo); 505 hp (Quadrifoglio)
38/100
#3 of 12 in classCompare all →

The volume Giulia and Giulia Ti use the 280-hp turbo four; the separate Quadrifoglio performance model raises the range maximum to 505 hp.

Torque
306 lb-ft (2.0L turbo); 443 lb-ft (Quadrifoglio)
56/100
#3 of 12 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.0-liter turbo delivers a strong 306 lb-ft across a broad 2,000-4,800 rpm plateau.

0–60 mph time
5.7 s (2.0T RWD tested); 5.5 s with Q4 AWD
58/100
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

The rear-drive volume configuration reached 60 mph in 5.7 seconds in instrumented testing, with the additional traction of Q4 AWD trimming two tenths.

Powertrain refinement70
#10 of 12 in classCompare all →

The turbo four is responsive, muscular, and characterful with abundant midrange torque, but it is less smooth and less eager to rev than the best German turbo fours.

Transmission behavior68
#10 of 12 in classCompare all →

The ZF-derived eight-speed generally shifts quickly and suits the engine well, though reviewers identify rough shifts in Dynamic mode and imperfect low-speed polish.

AWD/4WD availability70
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

Q4 AWD was broadly optional on the four-cylinder Giulia and Ti family, while RWD remained standard and the Quadrifoglio was RWD-only. It improves all-weather traction but lacks terrain modes or the Quadrifoglio's torque-vectoring rear differential.

Powertrain lineup breadth55
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

Two meaningfully distinct engines span a strong mainstream turbo four and an extreme twin-turbo V6, but there was no hybrid, plug-in, EV, or manual-transmission alternative in the 2019 US lineup.

2Efficiency & RangeThe Giulia's lowest-graded category.0.08F
3SafetyMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.11C
NHTSA overall rating
Not rated by NHTSA (estimated 5 stars)
100/100
#1 of 12 in classCompare all →

NHTSA did not select the 2019 Giulia for NCAP testing, so no official overall star rating exists. The required numeric value is a proxy based on its five-star Euro NCAP result and Good ratings in every published IIHS crashworthiness test, not an NHTSA result.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness75
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

The Giulia earned Good results in all five published crashworthiness categories, but it was absent from IIHS's 2019 Top Safety Pick lists and lacked a published passenger-side small-overlap result on the official 2019 rating page. Its structure belongs to the post-May-2017 improved build covered by these results.

Standard ADAS suite breadth35
#11 of 12 in classCompare all →

The volume 2.0-liter Giulia did not include the core modern suite as standard: AEB/forward-collision warning, adaptive cruise, and lane-departure warning required the Driver Assist Dynamic Plus package, while blind-spot and rear cross-path detection required a separate Static package. It offered no lane-keep assist.

Automatic emergency braking performance78
#5 of 12 in classCompare all →

The optional system delivered excellent vehicle-to-vehicle performance for its era, avoiding the 12-mph collision and cutting 24 mph from the 25-mph test. IIHS did not publish pedestrian day/night testing for this model, keeping it below today's top band.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage58
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

Blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-path detection were available together on the volume trim, but only through an extra-cost package. The system supplied warnings rather than active steering or rear braking and had no safe-exit function.

Lane keeping & centering30
#11 of 12 in classCompare all →

The 2019 system only warned the driver with a rumble-strip-style alert and could neither steer the car back nor center it. The warning was optional and Consumer Reports found it startling.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist62
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

Optional Adaptive Cruise Control Plus could follow traffic to a full stop and was judged well sorted, a useful capability for 2019. Because there was no lane centering, it could not form a true combined highway-assist system.

Hands-free driving availability5
#8 of 12 in classCompare all →

No hands-free driving system was available in 2019. The car lacked even lane centering, and all steering remained the driver's responsibility.

Headlight performance35
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

The base and volume Ti trims' regular bi-xenon projectors rated Poor, with excessive low-beam glare and weak curve illumination. A costly adaptive bi-xenon configuration rated Good, but it was not standard on the volume trim.

Outward visibility65
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

Forward visibility is excellent thanks to the upright driving position, close windshield, and relatively narrow front pillars. Side pillars create notable over-the-shoulder blind zones, and no surround-view camera was offered to compensate.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability55
#12 of 12 in classCompare all →

There are two complete outboard LATCH positions and the anchors can be reached without much force, but IIHS rates overall usability Marginal because some anchors are recessed or lack open access. Tight rear legroom and small door openings make larger rear-facing seats awkward.

4Space & ComfortOne of the Giulia's strongest categories.2.21C
Seating capacity
5 seats
100/100
#1 of 12 in classCompare all →

The volume Giulia RWD has two rows and seating for five.

Front headroom
38.6 in
65/100
#8 of 12 in classCompare all →

Front headroom is competitive for a compact luxury sedan.

Front legroom
42.4 in
60/100
#2 of 12 in classCompare all →

The front compartment provides generous legroom.

Rear headroom
37.6 in
65/100
#3 of 12 in classCompare all →

Rear headroom is adequate despite the sloping roofline.

Rear legroom
35.1 in
31/100
#10 of 12 in classCompare all →

Rear legroom is notably tighter than the front and trails roomier rivals.

Cargo/trunk volume
13.4 cu ft
34/100
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

The trunk is modest but the split-folding rear seat improves usefulness.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions40
#12 of 12 in classCompare all →

Cabin storage is sparse and there are no standout storage innovations.

Seat comfort78
#5 of 12 in classCompare all →

Supportive, well-bolstered front seats suit long drives, though rear space limits comfort for taller passengers.

Ride quality75
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

The ride is controlled and absorbs bumps well, but retains a firm sporting edge.

Cabin quietness68
#10 of 12 in classCompare all →

Noise isolation is suitable for the class but not repeatedly identified as a segment-leading strength.

Climate & comfort features64
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

Dual-zone climate is standard, while heated front seats/wheel require Ti or the Cold Weather Package and heated rears were newly optional for 2019.

5Cost of OwnershipGrades below the middle of the scale.1.46D
Base MSRP
$39,840 (Giulia RWD, including destination)
46/100
#8 of 12 in classCompare all →

The entry 2019 Giulia used the 280-hp 2.0-liter turbo and eight-speed automatic; this is the delivered base price rather than the destination-excluded sticker.

Volume-Trim Price
$42,040 (Giulia Ti RWD, including destination)
47/100
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

The Ti is the representative volume trim, adding the larger infotainment display, heated front seats and steering wheel, front parking sensors, and 18-inch wheels while retaining the standard 280-hp four-cylinder.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
$2,362 projected over 5 years
100/100
#1 of 12 in classCompare all →

The available Giulia five-year ownership estimate is low partly because most defects in the early years fall under Alfa's comprehensive 4-year/50,000-mile warranty; it should not be read as a prediction for an already-aged 2019 example's next five years.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
About 42% of MSRP retained after 5 years
23/100
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

Giulia depreciation is substantially steeper than the sedan average, reflecting limited market acceptance and reliability concerns, so retention is placed near the bottom of the compact-luxury class.

Basic warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
50/100
#1 of 12 in classCompare all →

Coverage matched the four-year luxury-brand norm and exceeded mainstream 3-year/36,000-mile warranties.

Powertrain warranty
4 yr / 50,000 mi (covered under the Basic Limited Warranty; no longer separate powertrain term)
0/100
#1 of 12 in classCompare all →

FCA did not provide the Giulia a longer separate powertrain warranty, leaving engine and transmission coverage shorter than the usual 5- or 6-year powertrain term.

Complimentary maintenance & perks62
#5 of 12 in classCompare all →

One scheduled service at 1 year/10,000 miles is useful but brief; four years of unlimited-mile roadside assistance and a 12-month SiriusXM trial add meaningful basic perks.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$26,745 (≈$24,383 depreciation + $2,362 maintenance)
55/100
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

$42,040 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (42% retained, or about $17,657) leaves about $24,383 in depreciation. Add the projected $2,362 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $26,745 in total.

6Reliability & QualityMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.80C-
Predicted reliability62
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

The evidence is incomplete rather than reassuring: Consumer Reports has no detailed reliability rating for the 2019 Giulia, and J.D. Power leaves Quality & Reliability unrated. Its 77/100 overall owner score is respectable, but period reviewers explicitly questioned the first-generation car's long-term reliability.

Brand reliability track record50
#10 of 12 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo lacks the consistent multi-year U.S. survey record expected of a mid-pack luxury brand and has often been omitted from rankings for insufficient sample size. Its historically mixed quality reputation and low U.S. volume warrant the bottom edge of the average band, not an inferred top-tier result.

Recall & TSB history48
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

Seven NHTSA campaigns are a heavy record for this model year, and several are safety-significant rather than cosmetic. The affected systems include fuel delivery/drive-power loss, brake-pedal detachment or rotor fracture, adaptive-cruise unintended acceleration, incorrect fuel-level indication, and front-airbag deployment.

Powertrain durability reputation65
#8 of 12 in classCompare all →

The volume Giulia's 280-hp 2.0-liter turbo four and ZF-based eight-speed automatic have avoided the especially poor service history associated with early Quadrifoglio test cars, and the transmission is broadly proven. Still, the engine family was relatively new in 2019, while the later fuel-pump recall and scattered electronic/limp-mode reports prevent an above-average durability score.

Interior material quality70
#10 of 12 in classCompare all →

The cabin is attractively designed and uses soft-touch plastics, leather, and real wood or metallic trim, appropriate for a compact luxury sedan. Cheap plastic around the shifter and less-convincing leather and switchgear keep it behind the best German and Japanese rivals.

Fit & finish55
#12 of 12 in classCompare all →

Assembly quality is visibly and audibly inconsistent. Period testing found prevalent squeaks and creaks, including at the pillars, while MotorTrend directly criticized inconsistent fit and finish; that is below class expectations even though other reviewers called the car decently assembled.

Dealer & service network48
#12 of 12 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo's U.S. dealer network is sparse compared with mainstream brands and established luxury competitors, making qualified service inconvenient outside major metros. Shared Stellantis ownership does not mean every Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep-Ram store can perform Alfa warranty or specialized work.

Parts availability & repair cost50
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

Routine upkeep is priced like a European luxury car, while the small installed base and specialist-service needs constrain aftermarket choice and can delay uncommon parts. Some shared suppliers and the widely used transmission help, but ownership costs and access are materially worse than mainstream sedans.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Giulia's weakest categories.0.88F
Touchscreen size
6.5-in display (8.8-in available); non-touch
0/100
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

The volume trim uses the small 6.5-inch controller-operated display; the 8.8-inch unit was optional.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness65
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

The rotary interface is reasonably responsive and simple, but small graphics and the lack of touch date it.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto55
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

Both projection systems are standard but require a cable; wireless projection was not offered.

Voice control & native navigation52
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

Basic voice control is standard and factory navigation is optional, but phone projection is the better mapping experience.

Audio system quality68
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

An adequate eight-speaker base system can be upgraded to branded Harman Kardon audio.

Digital instrument cluster60
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

A useful 7-inch TFT sits between traditional analog gauges, but this is not a full digital cluster.

OTA update capability15
#10 of 12 in classCompare all →

The 2019 architecture has no documented meaningful over-the-air feature or whole-vehicle update capability.

Companion app & remote functions10
#12 of 12 in classCompare all →

The 2019 model predates Alfa Connect remote app services, so remote start is key-fob based.

Charging ports & device power55
#4 of 12 in classCompare all →

Four USB-A outlets and a 12-volt socket are useful, but there is no USB-C, wireless pad, or AC outlet.

Keyless & remote access75
#2 of 12 in classCompare all →

Passive entry, push-button start, remote start and remote trunk release are standard, though phone-as-key is absent.

Camera & parking aids55
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

A backup camera and rear sensors are standard and front sensors optional, but no surround-view or automated parking system is offered.

Head-up display availability5
#11 of 12 in classCompare all →

No head-up display was offered on the 2019 Giulia.

8Use-Case FitOne of the Giulia's weakest categories.1.43D
Kid & car-seat practicality50
#9 of 12 in classCompare all →

Two complete LATCH positions and folding seats help, but tight rear room and difficult-to-reach lower anchors complicate family duty.

Family safety package68
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

Crashworthiness is strong, but automatic braking, adaptive cruise, blind-spot monitoring and lane warning reside in optional packages.

Family road-trip comfort56
#8 of 12 in classCompare all →

Supportive front seats and a good ride help, but the tight rear bench, modest trunk and limited rear amenities constrain four-person trips.

Daily driving ease76
#4 of 12 in classCompare all →

Compact dimensions, supportive seats, a strong automatic transmission and composed ride make daily use easy, despite imperfect stop/start and mode calibration.

Commuting cost efficiency62
#4 of 12 in classCompare all →

Fuel economy is competitive for a 280-hp luxury sedan, though premium fuel, run-flat tires and luxury-car upkeep prevent low running costs.

Parking & maneuverability76
#4 of 12 in classCompare all →

A compact footprint, excellent 35.5-foot turning circle, standard rear sensors and backup camera suit urban use.

Work capability18
#2 of 12 in classCompare all →

This luxury sport sedan has no published US tow rating, bed, or useful payload-oriented configuration.

Durability for work duty25
#5 of 12 in classCompare all →

Luxury materials, low-profile run-flat tires and a poor historic reliability reputation are ill-suited to sustained work abuse.

Jobsite & upfit practicality10
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

There are no jobsite-focused tie-downs, onboard power systems, washable surfaces, or upfit ecosystem.

Long-distance comfort & range68
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

Supportive seats, good highway economy and controlled ride make it a capable tourer, but rear space and optional-only adaptive cruise limit it.

Outdoor & adventure capability42
#3 of 12 in classCompare all →

Available Q4 AWD can handle poor weather and maintained gravel, but low clearance and no US tow rating keep it pavement-oriented.

Gear & luggage flexibility58
#4 of 12 in classCompare all →

The 40/20/40 flat-folding rear seat and pass-through add flexibility, but the 13.4-cubic-foot trunk and narrow sedan opening limit bulky gear.

9Driving ExperienceThe Giulia's best-graded category.3.71A
10Value & Market PositionOne of the Giulia's strongest categories.3.27B+
Standard equipment generosity68
#5 of 12 in classCompare all →

The base car included leather 10-way power front seats, bi-xenon lamps, a 7-inch cluster display, rear camera, parking sensors, and phone integration, while Ti added heated amenities and the 8.8-inch display. Key active-safety features such as full-speed forward-collision warning and blind-spot monitoring still required packages on volume trims.

Feature value per dollar78
#4 of 12 in classCompare all →

A $42,040 Ti delivered 280 hp, an eight-speed automatic, genuine wood, leather, and unusually sophisticated chassis hardware, with available AWD for $2,000. Cabin finish and the need to option driver assists keep it short of a class-leading bargain.

Trim & configuration breadth82
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

The lineup ranged from Giulia through Ti, Ti Sport, Ti Lusso and Ti Sport Carbon to the 505-hp Quadrifoglio, with RWD or Q4 AWD on every four-cylinder flavor and numerous appearance, luxury, performance and assistance packages. The range was broad even though it offered no alternate volume engine or electrified option.

Sales popularity & market acceptance38
#11 of 12 in classCompare all →

US demand fell roughly 24% from the model's 2018 peak and remained only a fraction of the German compact-luxury leaders. The Giulia had enthusiast recognition but was a slow, weakening mainstream luxury-market seller.

Brand desirability & image80
#6 of 12 in classCompare all →

Alfa Romeo's Italian design, racing history and scarce-on-the-road character gave the Giulia unusually strong enthusiast cachet. Reliability doubts and a thin US dealer footprint constrained the brand's broader luxury appeal and resale strength.

Deals & incentive availability90
#1 of 12 in classCompare all →

Large discounts and lease support were readily available, making the car exceptionally negotiable for buyers, though the depth of discount also reflected weak demand and poor residuals.

Model freshness86
#7 of 12 in classCompare all →

The 2019 car was only the third US model year of the rear-drive 952 generation and remained platform-fresh. It was a minor-change year adding Nero Edizione and carbon-themed configurations rather than the substantial interior, touchscreen and Level 2 driver-assistance facelift that followed for 2020.

Critical reception & awards92
#3 of 12 in classCompare all →

The Giulia was one of the era's most acclaimed driver's sedans: a 2018 Car and Driver 10Best winner, 2018 MotorTrend Car of the Year, and a 2019 Car and Driver Editors' Choice. Reviewers consistently treated its steering and chassis as class benchmarks despite reliability and cabin-quality criticism.