MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2018:Overall +2Safety +1Reliability +5Cost of Ownership -1Technology +6Driving Experience +2
Jeep logo
Compact SUV

2019 Jeep Compass

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2026 model shown
0.78FGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
1.03D
Safety
0.66F
EfficiencyGas
1.10D
25 MPG combined · 338 mi range · $2,450/yr energy
Comfort
0.88F
Value
1.52D
Ownership Cost
2.17C
Technology
0.88F
Driving Experience
1.14D

The verdict

A struggling compact suv, strong on ownership and held back by performance.

The 2019 Jeep Compass is the rare compact SUV that will actually go off the pavement — every trim could be ordered with a disconnecting 4x4 system, and the Trail Rated Trailhawk brings 8.5 inches of ground clearance, a 30.3-degree approach angle and a 20:1 crawl ratio that no CR-V or RAV4 can answer. The price of that is a genuinely slow, thirsty and noisy drivetrain: one 180-hp 2.4L engine for the whole range, roughly 9.4 seconds to 60 mph, 25 MPG combined and a nine-speed automatic that reviewers panned for hunting and hesitating. It is also short on the basics — 27.2 cu ft of cargo behind the rear seat versus 37.6 in a 2019 RAV4, no standard automatic emergency braking on any trim, and IIHS-rated Marginal-to-Poor headlights that cost it a Top Safety Pick. Buy one used for the Jeep hardware and the deep discounts; skip it if you just want a reliable, efficient family crossover.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Real off-road ability in a class that mostly fakes it
  • Low entry price and heavy discounts on the used market
  • Uconnect 4 is still one of the better infotainment systems of its era

What holds it back

  • The engine and nine-speed are the worst part of the car
  • No standard driver-assist tech, and headlights IIHS called Poor
  • Cargo space is the smallest thing about it

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Jeep Compass

Production history

2007present · 20 years · 2 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1200720162007Gen 22017now2017In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 2007

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 412018 · Overall: 40 (−1 vs 2017)2019 · Overall: 42 (+2 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 422021 · Overall: 422022 · Overall: 46 (+4 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 50 (+4 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 502025 · Overall: 502026 · Overall: 48 (−2 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance26
35+8
Efficiency47
51+5
Safety39
51+12
Space40
39-1
Cost62
59-3
Reliability47
51+3
Tech44
61+18
Use-case45
49+4
Driving44
54+10
Value55
53-1

Best fit & conditions

AdventureC-55/100
CommuterD54/100
Winter / inclementD53/100
FamilyD49/100
Work / TowF30/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe Compass's lowest-graded category.0.00F
Horsepower
180 hp @ 6,400 rpm (2.4L Tigershark MultiAir2 — the only engine, standard on every trim)
8/100
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

A single naturally aspirated 2.4L covers the entire 2019 US range from Sport to Trailhawk, and 180 hp sits essentially at the floor of the 150–550 hp SUV band. Unchanged from 2018 and carried through 2021 before being re-rated to 177 hp for 2022.

Torque
175 lb-ft @ 3,900 rpm
12/100
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Peak torque arrives high at 3,900 rpm on a naturally aspirated curve with little underneath it, which is why the 3,327-lb 4x4 feels flat pulling away. The turbocharged compact-SUV rivals of 2019 deliver more torque from roughly 1,750 rpm.

0–60 mph time
≈9.4 sec (2.4L 4x4 nine-speed, volume trim); instrumented 4x4 runs span 9.3–10.1 sec by trim weight
2/100
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

No instrumented 2019-specific test is published, but 2019 is a mechanical carry-over and the volume Latitude 4x4 shares the 3,327-lb curb weight of the C/D-tested Sport 4x4, placing it at the quick end of the 9.3–10.1 sec 4x4 span. Either way it falls at or below the bottom of the 3.5–9.5 sec SUV band — the weakest figure in this category and the complaint every review of this generation led with. Confidence is MEDIUM because the figure is transferred from an identical adjacent model year rather than measured on a 2019 car.

Powertrain refinement42
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Tigershark is unresponsive rather than laggy — no turbo to wait on, just an engine that has to be wrung out toward its 6,400-rpm power peak and turns coarse and loud doing it. 2019 rates marginally above the 2020 car only because stop-start was not yet universal, removing one roughness complaint on many volume examples. Clearly in the lower half of the band.

Transmission behavior40
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

The nine-speed is the most-criticized component of this generation — it upshifts early, resists kickdown and shifts without much polish, compounding an engine already short of torque. The 4x2's Aisin six-speed is smoother but narrower in spread, and the C635 manual is the one gearbox that lets a driver keep the engine on the boil.

Max towing capacity
2,000 lbs (4x4, properly equipped; towing not recommended on 4x2)
14/100
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

Standard unibody compact-crossover capability, unchanged across this generation, but 2,000 lbs sits near the bottom of an SUV band running to 8,000 lbs — and the front-drive versions that make up much of the volume are not rated to tow at all.

AWD/4WD availability78
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

Four-wheel drive is available on every 2019 trim with Selec-Terrain modes and a genuine 20:1 crawl ratio on Trailhawk — sophisticated for a compact crossover — but it remains a cost option rather than standard equipment, with front-drive Sport, Latitude, Altitude and Limited versions sold alongside. Standard 4x4 does not arrive until the 2023 model year.

Off-road capability65
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Trail Rated Trailhawk remains the most genuinely capable thing in the compact-crossover class — a 30.3° approach angle, 8.5 in of clearance and a low-range crawl ratio are real hardware rather than a badge — but it is a unibody crossover with no locking differential and no two-speed transfer case. Upper half of the capable-light-duty band; non-Trailhawk 4x4 trims, at 16.8° approach and 8.2 in, are far more modest.

Powertrain lineup breadth32
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

One engine for the entire range with no turbo upgrade, hybrid, PHEV or EV anywhere in the US lineup — take-it-or-leave-it on what this item actually measures. The four certified drivetrain combinations, including a manual that survives to 2020 and then disappears, give some configuration choice but not a second powertrain.

2Efficiency & RangeGrades below the middle of the scale.1.10D
Combined fuel economy
25 MPG combined (2.4L 4x4 nine-speed automatic); 25 MPG for the 4x2 automatic, 26 MPG for the 4x2 manual
53/100
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

25 MPG combined for the volume 4x4 automatic — mid-pack among 2019 gas compact SUVs and unchanged across the pre-facelift generation. Two points shy of the 27 MPG the later turbocharged eight-speed Compass manages, so the less powerful car is also the less efficient one.

City fuel economy
22 MPG city (4x4 automatic; 22 MPG for the 4x2 automatic, 23 MPG for the 4x2 manual)
50/100
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

A disconnecting 4x4 system and optional stop-start hold city economy at the class average, but a naturally aspirated 2.4L hauling 3,327 lbs has no efficiency trick in reserve — the hybrid compact SUVs already on sale in 2019 beat this outright.

Highway fuel economy
30 MPG highway (4x4 automatic); 31 MPG for the 4x2 automatic, 32 MPG for the 4x2 manual
63/100
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 9HP48 nine-speed's tall overdrive gearing (0.48:1 ninth, 9.81 ratio spread) makes steady-state cruising the Compass's efficiency high point, and it is the one economy figure here that holds up against the segment.

Driving range
≈338 mi (13.5-gal tank × 25 MPG combined, 4x4 automatic)
18/100
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

A small 13.5-gallon tank paired with only average economy puts total range near the bottom of the 280–600 mi SUV band. Frequent fuel stops are the practical consequence, and it is the weakest figure in this category.

Estimated annual fuel cost
$2,450/yr (EPA, 15,000 mi/yr on regular unleaded); $2,350 for the 26-MPG 4x2 manual
48/100
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

Running costs land near the middle of the SUV band — no premium-fuel penalty, but 25 MPG combined on a regular-gas four-cylinder gives the Compass no cost advantage over larger, more powerful rivals that match its economy.

Fuel requirements90
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

87-octane regular on a naturally aspirated multiport-injected engine, with no premium recommendation, no additive requirement and nothing to plug in — the cheapest and simplest fueling situation available.

3SafetyOne of the Compass's weakest categories.0.66F
NHTSA overall rating
4 stars overall (4-star frontal, 5-star side, 3-star rollover)
50/100
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

NHTSA rated the 2019 Compass 4 stars overall, identical for FWD and AWD; the frontal-crash 4 stars and a 3-star rollover result (20.2% rollover probability) hold it back from a 5-star overall.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness58
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

Good in every legacy IIHS crashworthiness test — small overlap front driver and passenger, moderate overlap front, original side, roof strength, head restraints — but the Compass earns no 2019 Top Safety Pick because its best-available headlights rate only Marginal, and it later scored Marginal on the updated (2021-protocol) side test.

Standard ADAS suite breadth18
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Nothing beyond the federally mandated backup camera is standard on any 2019 Compass: forward collision warning with automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise, LaneSense lane keeping, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-path detection are all extra-cost, bundled into the Advanced Safety Group, and the base Sport trim cannot be optioned with them at all.

Automatic emergency braking performance50
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

When ordered with the Advanced Safety Group the full-speed forward collision warning with active braking earns IIHS Superior for vehicle-to-vehicle avoidance — genuinely strong hardware — but it is optional rather than standard and there is no pedestrian-detection capability, day or night.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage55
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

Radar-based Blind Spot Monitoring with Rear Cross Path Detection is available across the range except the base Sport, but it is alert-only — no steering or braking intervention, and no safe-exit warning.

Lane keeping & centering40
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

LaneSense Lane Departure Warning with Lane Keep Assist is optional and provides only corrective nudges back toward the lane when drift is detected; there is no continuous lane centering, and NHTSA does not credit the Compass with even standard lane departure warning.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist48
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Adaptive cruise control became available on the Compass for the first time in 2019, packaged as an option on upper trims, but it is a standalone convenience feature with no integrated highway-assist mode pairing it to lane centering.

Hands-free driving availability5
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway driving system was offered on the 2019 Compass or anywhere in the FCA lineup that model year; Stellantis did not field a comparable system until well after this generation's mid-cycle refresh.

Headlight performance15
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Every 2019 Compass headlight configuration IIHS tested rated below Acceptable: the standard halogens and the Premium Lighting Group on its own are both Poor, and the best available setup — Premium Lighting Group with Advanced Safety Group high-beam assist — reaches only Marginal. This is the single failing that cost the Compass its Top Safety Pick.

Outward visibility42
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

The second-generation Compass's chunky styling costs it sightlines — thick pillars and a heavy rear C-pillar create sizable blind spots that reviewers and owners both flag, and there is no surround-view camera offered to compensate, only a mandated backup camera plus optional rear park sensors.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability30
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the Compass's LATCH hardware Poor — the two rear outboard positions have complete anchor sets and there is a middle tether, but the lower anchors are buried too deep in the seat bight and are hard to maneuver around, and the compact rear bench makes three-across a non-starter.

4Space & ComfortGrades near the bottom of the scale.0.88F
Seating capacity
5 seats (2 front / 3 rear) — single two-row layout on every 2019 trim
25/100
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

Five seats is the compact-SUV norm and sits near the floor of the 4–8 SUV band. No 2019 trim from Sport to Trailhawk offered anything else.

Front headroom
39.2 in without sunroof (38.6 in with the available dual-pane panoramic sunroof)
44/100
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Compass's upright, boxy Jeep roofline gives mid-pack front headroom for a compact SUV — comfortably clear of the 37 in band floor but well short of the 42 in ceiling set by taller mid- and full-size SUVs.

Front legroom
41.8 in (8.7 in of fore/aft seat travel; manual or power driver's seat by trim)
40/100
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

41.8 in is a genuinely average front measurement — the Compass rides on the small-wide (Renegade-derived) platform with a 103.8 in wheelbase, so front occupants get compact-SUV space rather than the 43-plus inches larger crossovers manage.

Rear headroom
38.5 in second-row headroom
63/100
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

The near-vertical rear glass and flat roof pay off here — 38.5 in is above the middle of the 36–40 in SUV band and one of the Compass's better interior numbers, keeping adult rear headroom genuinely usable.

Rear legroom
38.3 in second-row legroom
69/100
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

38.3 in is a strong figure for a 173-inch-long compact SUV and the single best space number on the car — the second-generation Compass gave rear legroom priority over cargo depth, and it shows in both directions.

Third-row usability15
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

Strictly two rows — scored in the low band as a missing capability rather than omitted, per the item's SUV rule. Normal and expected for the compact segment, but it is a real capacity limit against three-row rivals.

Cargo/trunk volume
27.2 cu ft behind the second row (SAE); 42.1 in maximum liftgate opening width, 31.1 in liftover height
4/100
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

27.2 cu ft is barely above the 25 cu ft floor of the SUV band and is the Compass's weakest practical measurement — a 2019 RAV4 (37.6) or Escape offers roughly a third more behind the rear seat. The space traded away to that generous rear legroom comes out of the cargo hold.

Max cargo volume
59.8 cu ft with the 60/40-split rear seat folded
11/100
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

Seats-folded volume sits just above the 55 cu ft band floor, again near the bottom of the SUV field. It swallows a normal weekend's luggage but is a genuine constraint for furniture, bikes upright, or a full cargo run.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions52
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

Competent and unremarkable: everything a compact SUV is expected to have, nothing invented. The reversible cargo panel and fold-flat passenger seat are the only clever touches, and there is no household outlet or deep underfloor bin — squarely mid-band.

Seat comfort58
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

Firm, flat-ish cushions that reviewers rate adequate rather than praise — fine for a commute, less convincing for a full day. Limited adjustability on the volume trim keeps it from the upper band, but generous rear legroom means back-seat passengers are not the compromise.

Ride quality68
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

Ride is the strongest part of the Compass's road manners and the deliberate trade behind its poor body control: soft springs and tall-sidewall 16–17 in tires on the volume trims absorb broken pavement well. Above the segment median, held out of the top band by float over big undulations and by the 19-inch wheels on optioned Limiteds.

Cabin quietness48
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

Wind and road noise are merely average, but the coarse engine — which has to be revved hard because of its 180 hp and 3,327 lb curb weight — dominates the noise impression at any real throttle. Below the segment median, and audibly behind the class quiet leaders.

Climate & comfort features58
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

The winter kit families and northern buyers care about is all present and reasonably priced on the volume Latitude, and standard dual-zone auto climate is above par for a 2019 mainstream compact. Nothing for rear passengers and no cooled seats at any price keep it mid-band.

5Cost of OwnershipThe Compass's best-graded category.2.17C
Base MSRP
$23,590 (Sport FWD with the 6-speed manual, incl. $1,495 destination; $25,090 Sport 4x4)
100/100
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 Compass opened at $22,095 plus a $1,495 destination charge for a front-drive Sport, one of the lowest entry prices in the compact-SUV class — but that figure buys a manual-transmission car with no active safety equipment, and the Sport 4x4 most Jeep buyers actually wanted cost $1,500 more.

Volume-Trim Price
~$29,000 (Latitude 4x4 as typically equipped; $28,340 stripped, rising past $30,000 with the Advanced Safety and Sun/Sound groups)
95/100
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Latitude is the volume Compass and Jeep buyers skew heavily toward four-wheel drive, so the representative 2019 car is a Latitude 4x4 at $28,340 delivered ($25,345 + $1,500 4x4 + $1,495 destination), which in practice left the lot with an option package fitted — roughly $29,000 as typically equipped.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$6,400 over 5 yrs (scheduled maintenance plus unscheduled repair; above the compact-SUV norm)
48/100
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

CarEdge projects roughly $10,821 of maintenance and repair across ten years for the nameplate, front-loaded well under half of that in the first five, while RepairPal adds about $526 a year of unscheduled repair — meaningfully worse than the $429 it estimates for a RAV4 or $407 for a CR-V — so the 2.4L Tigershark/nine-speed Compass lands above the segment average rather than at it.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~54% of MSRP retained at 5 yrs (~$15,300 on a $28,340 Latitude 4x4 in 2024)
47/100
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 cars passed the five-year mark in 2024, while the used market was still firm, and retained a little more than the 2020 and 2021 Compasses did — but 54% is still short of the roughly 58% a compact SUV averages, and KBB rates Compass resale only 'average' for the class.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper
0/100
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Jeep's 3-year/36,000-mile basic coverage is the industry floor and two years short of the 5-year/60,000-mile basic warranties Hyundai, Kia and Mitsubishi gave buyers of directly competing 2019 compact SUVs.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain
0/100
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

Five years/60,000 miles sits at the bottom of the SUV normalization band and is half the 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain coverage Hyundai and Kia offered 2019 buyers — a real exposure on a model with a below-average predicted-reliability record and a nine-speed automatic reviewers repeatedly criticized.

Complimentary maintenance & perks48
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

A 2019 Compass came with no complimentary scheduled maintenance whatsoever — Jeep Wave was restricted to select higher trims of the Wrangler, Grand Cherokee and Gladiator in 2019 and did not become automatic across the whole Jeep range until the 2021 model year, so a Compass buyer paid for the first oil change. What is included is 24/7 roadside assistance for the full 5-year/60,000-mile powertrain period plus the usual SiriusXM and Uconnect trials — respectable roadside cover, but nothing beside ToyotaCare's 2-year/25,000-mile scheduled maintenance on the all-new 2019 RAV4 or Hyundai's 3-year/36,000-mile complimentary maintenance on the Tucson this car was cross-shopped against.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$19,740 (≈$13,340 depreciation + $6,400 maintenance)
78/100
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

$29,000 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (54% retained, or about $15,660) leaves about $13,340 in depreciation. Add the projected $6,400 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $19,740 in total.

6Reliability & QualityGrades below the middle of the scale.1.03D
Predicted reliability44
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 is the worst predictor year of this generation and both raters say so in the same direction: Consumer Reports drops the verdict a full step below the 2020 car, calling it less reliable than other cars from the same model year rather than about average, and the reported J.D. Power score sits in the Average band instead of the Great band 2020 earns. The federal complaint file is the hardest number here — 327 filings for this single model year against 138 for 2020 and roughly 70 for 2021 — and it clusters on engine and electrical faults rather than on trim.

Brand reliability track record35
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

Jeep was near the floor of the brand table in the survey contemporaneous with this model year — 26th of 30 in Consumer Reports' 2019 rankings, having fallen three more places — which is a worse standing than the 19th of 26 it recovered to for 2020. The dependability study that follows these cars to three years old reinforces it: the 2022 VDS surveyed 2019-model-year owners against a 192 PP100 industry average with the Korean brands well clear and the Stellantis marques trailing. Bottom-third is the fair read, and 2019 sits at the low end of it.

Recall & TSB history42
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

Two federal recall campaigns, and unlike 2020's single wiper-nut fix one of them is a genuine braking defect — insufficient caliper piston coating forming gas pockets and reducing rear brake performance. The heavier mark is the federal defect investigation opened specifically on 2019–2020 Compasses for false-overheat engine shutdowns across an estimated 229,000 vehicles; it closed with no manufacturer action, so no remedy ever reached owners, and the service-side volume behind it is severe — 327 complaints for the model year with 74 mentioning stalling, 62 infotainment failures and 44 battery drain, alongside 13 crash-flagged filings.

Powertrain durability reputation34
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 car carries exactly the drivetrain with the worst paper trail in this generation — the 2.4L Tigershark MultiAir2 at the centre of the FCA oil-consumption class action, paired with the 948TE nine-speed on 4x4 trims. The certified class stops at the 2018 Compass, one model year short of this one, but that is a litigation boundary rather than an engineering one: the federal file for 2019 still carries 24 oil-related and 74 stall-related complaints, and the loss-of-power investigation NHTSA opened names this model year by name. Stellantis replaced the whole drivetrain for 2023.

Interior material quality45
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

This is the same pre-refresh cabin the 2020 car uses, and the criticism is the same: hard plastic across the dash top and door uppers, workaday materials and low-rent switchgear, with Consumer Reports going as far as sharp, unfinished edges. Reviewers do credit soft-touch material at the main contact points, so it is not a bottom-of-class cabin — but Jeep redesigning the interior wholesale for 2022 is the plainest available verdict on the piece.

Fit & finish48
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Physical assembly is the part reviewers actually praise — no creaks or rattles even over rough ground, panel fit called out as good — so the mechanical build is mid-pack rather than poor. The deduction is electronic, and for 2019 it is large: Uconnect and module faults are the biggest single complaint theme of the model year at 62 filings, with 44 more for batteries draining or failing outright, and a dead screen or a car that will not wake up reaches an owner as a finish defect exactly the way a rattle would.

Dealer & service network68
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

Coverage is the strong half and it is not year-dependent — Jeep runs one of the densest franchise networks in the US at roughly 2,400 rooftops, so warranty and parts access is straightforward almost anywhere, including rural markets where import brands thin out. Service satisfaction is the ordinary half: Jeep sits mid-pack among mass-market brands in J.D. Power's customer-service measurement rather than near the top.

Parts availability & repair cost76
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

A high-volume nameplate on the widely shared Stellantis small-wide platform means abundant Mopar and aftermarket supply, and independent shops service it without dealer-only tooling. Measured repair spend backs that up — RepairPal puts annual cost below the compact-SUV average with fewer unscheduled shop visits per year — which remains the one place the Compass outperforms its reliability reputation, even in its worst model year.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the Compass's weakest categories.0.88F
Touchscreen size
7.0 in Uconnect 4 standard on Sport, Latitude and Altitude (the volume trims); 8.4 in Uconnect 4C/4C NAV available on Limited and Trailhawk
0/100
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

7.0 in sits exactly on the floor of the 7–15.5 in SUV band, so the spec scores zero even though the 2019 car was an upgrade on 2018. The screen was competitive for a 2019 mainstream compact but is small against the fleet the band is calibrated to.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness72
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

This is the strongest part of the 2019 Compass's technology case. Uconnect 4 was genuinely one of the best systems of its year — quick, uncluttered, and unusually good about keeping climate and volume on hardware controls. Held below 80 only because the volume trim's 7-inch panel is small and its graphics were already dated by 2019.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto60
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

Wired projection standard on all trims, wireless not offered on any — the textbook middle band. Making CarPlay/Android Auto standard on the base Sport was ahead of several 2019 rivals that still charged for it.

Voice control & native navigation45
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume trim simply cannot be ordered with built-in maps, and the voice system is the rigid keyword variety most owners abandon in favor of CarPlay. Below the segment median; the Uconnect voice implementation is at least reliable within its narrow vocabulary, which keeps it out of the bottom band.

Audio system quality62
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

A conventional six-speaker base system with a real, amplified nine-speaker branded upgrade available — competitive rather than notable. BeatsAudio is bass-forward and was not rated by reviewers as an audiophile system, so it does not lift this into the top band.

Digital instrument cluster52
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

Partial digital, with the good 7-inch color display reserved for upper trims — the definition of the middle band. The 7-inch unit is crisp and well-organized when fitted, but the volume Latitude buyer does not get it as standard.

OTA update capability10
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

No meaningful OTA capability of any kind — not even maps. Firmly bottom band, and one of the clearest ways this 2019 car shows its age against the modern fleet the calibration is drawn from.

Companion app & remote functions42
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

Core remote functions exist but sit behind both an upper-trim hardware requirement and a paid subscription, and the app of this generation was widely reported as slow to wake the vehicle. Below the segment median, above bottom band because the functions themselves work.

Charging ports & device power48
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

Two USB-A ports up front is the 2019 baseline and nothing more — rear-seat power is optional, USB-C is absent everywhere, and there is no wireless charger at any price. Dated ports on the trims most people bought put this just below mid-band.

Keyless & remote access60
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

Proximity entry and push-button start on the volume trim and up, with remote start easy to option — the middle band exactly. No kick-activated liftgate and no digital key keeps it well short of the top band.

Camera & parking aids52
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

Rear camera standard plus optional sensors and even semi-automated parking — but the camera is a low-resolution unit of its era and there is no 360-degree view at any price. Solidly middle band and no better.

Head-up display availability5
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

Not offered on any trim — bottom band by definition. Unsurprising for a mainstream compact SUV at this price in 2019, but it is a straightforward absence.

8Use-Case FitGrades below the middle of the scale.1.13D
Kid & car-seat practicality55
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

Rear-seat space and door openings genuinely help with car seats, and the low load floor suits stroller lifting — but 27.2 cu ft is the constraint that shows up on every trip, and the LATCH anchors are awkward enough that IIHS flagged them. Handles family duty with real compromises.

Family safety package38
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

A 3-star rollover result and, more importantly, zero standard driver-assist content mean the trims a budget-conscious family actually buys — Sport and Latitude — leave the showroom without automatic emergency braking. That is a real safety gap at the family price point, not merely a features shortfall.

Family road-trip comfort50
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

Space and ride are adequate for four on a long day; amenities and luggage capacity are not. With the back seat full there is not enough room for four people's bags, which is the specific failure that matters on a family trip.

Daily driving ease50
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Low-effort and unintimidating around town — the ride, seating height and light steering all help in traffic. What tires the driver is merging and passing: the nine-speed hunts and hesitates and the engine has to be revved hard to do anything. Fine daily manners with one persistent annoyance.

Commuting cost efficiency48
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

25 MPG combined is 4–5 MPG behind the mainstream compact-SUV leaders of the same year, so the Compass costs meaningfully more per commuting mile than its direct rivals. Regular fuel and cheap conventional consumables keep it from the bottom band, but this is an expensive car in its class to drive daily.

Parking & maneuverability65
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

Short, narrow and tight-turning — 36.3 ft is well inside the SUV norm, and the boxy body makes the corners easy to place. Held out of the top band only because a 360-degree camera was never offered and the thick D-pillars pinch the over-shoulder view.

Work capability25
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

A 2,000 lb rating available only on 4x4 models covers a small utility trailer or a pair of jet skis and nothing beyond that, and the modest cargo hold rules out most trade use. Not meaningfully work-capable — this is a passenger crossover, and it does not pretend otherwise.

Durability for work duty38
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

The engine is durable but the transmission is the known weak point, and the nine-speed is exactly what suffers under repeated loaded or towing use. No fleet track record and no wear-friendly interior specification. Below the middle band.

Jobsite & upfit practicality30
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Roof rails, a hitch and tie-downs are the whole story — enough for a ladder rack or a small trailer, nothing more. There is no commercial upfit ecosystem behind this vehicle in the way there is for a van or truck.

Long-distance comfort & range50
#25 of 28 in classCompare all →

The ride flatters a highway cruise, but the pieces that make a good mile-eater are missing: a 338-mile tank means frequent stops, ADAS that would reduce fatigue is not on the volume trim, and the engine drones on grades. A capable tourer with clear endurance limits.

Outdoor & adventure capability70
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

This is the Compass's genuine differentiator and the reason to buy one. Even the volume Latitude 4x4 gets a real disconnecting AWD system with terrain modes and 8.2 in of clearance — well beyond gravel-road competence — and the Trailhawk is meaningfully off-road capable in a class where rivals are pavement-bound. Kept out of the top band by the modest tow rating and the fact that the 4x2 volume car gets none of it.

Gear & luggage flexibility48
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

The folding arrangements are flexible and roof rails let bulky gear go outside, but the underlying box is small — 59.8 cu ft folded is near the bottom of the SUV field, so anything genuinely bulky either goes on the roof or does not go. Fits normal luggage, squeezes on gear.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the Compass's strongest categories.1.14D
Handling & agility42
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Soft springs, tall tires and a high center of gravity produce exactly what reviewers describe — roll, early understeer and scrub. It is secure and predictable at legal speeds, but it is one of the less composed handlers in the compact-SUV class and sits well below the segment median.

Steering feel38
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Not merely numb but inconsistently weighted — the off-center lightness followed by an artificial build-up is the specific complaint, and it undermines confidence in exactly the situation (a highway lane change or a tightening bend) where the soft chassis already needs help. Low band.

Braking confidence55
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

Conventional hardware doing a conventional job — adequate stopping power with an unremarkable but consistent pedal. Solid rear rotors and a modest brake package keep it mid-band rather than higher; this is the least criticized part of how the Compass drives.

Powertrain smoothness & response35
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

The single worst aspect of driving a 2019 Compass. Nine closely stacked ratios over a naturally aspirated engine with only 175 lb-ft mean the transmission is constantly deciding, and the resulting hesitation between throttle input and forward motion is what every road test leads with. Clearly bottom band.

Drivetrain noise & vibration38
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Isolation at steady cruise is acceptable, but the Tigershark turns thrashy the moment it is asked for anything, and the gearing guarantees it is asked often. Intrusive rather than merely audible — low band.

Turning circle
36.3 ft curb-to-curb (4x2 and 4x4); 35.3 ft on Trailhawk 4x4
71/100
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

36.3 ft is comfortably inside the 34–42 ft SUV band and a real strength in parking lots and on tight trails — the short 103.8 in wheelbase and 173 in overall length do the work. The Trailhawk's 35.3 ft is tighter still.

Driving position & ergonomics68
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

A genuine bright spot — the tall Jeep seating position, easy step-in height and the retained hardware controls make it easy to get comfortable and easy to operate without looking. Held below the top band because a power driver's seat and lumbar adjustment are options rather than standard on the volume trim, and the thick rear pillars pinch the over-shoulder view.

Fun-to-drive factor38
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

On pavement it is an appliance with a slow, noisy powertrain and steering that discourages enthusiasm. What lifts it off the floor is that the Trailhawk is actually entertaining off the road in a class where almost nothing else is — but that is a niche trim, not the car most buyers get.

10Value & Market PositionOne of the Compass's strongest categories.1.52D
Standard equipment generosity46
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 brought a genuine gain — Jeep made the 7-inch Uconnect touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto standard on Sport and Latitude, replacing the 5-inch base unit — alongside 17-inch alloys, roof rails and 60/40 split-folding rear seats. But active safety is where the car falls down hardest: automatic emergency braking and lane-departure warning stayed inside the optional Advanced Safety Group (which newly gained adaptive cruise for 2019), and blind-spot monitoring was a separate extra, in the very model year Toyota fitted Safety Sense 2.0 to every all-new RAV4, Subaru made EyeSight standard on the Forester, and Nissan standardized AEB on the Rogue. The base Sport also still had a four-speaker stereo.

Feature value per dollar44
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

The mechanical package is the weakest part of the deal: a single 180-hp 2.4L Tigershark four paired with a six-speed manual or automatic on front-drive cars and a nine-speed on 4x4s, good for about 9.4 seconds to 60 mph and 25 MPG combined against 30 MPG for a CR-V, RAV4 or Escape — all of which also offered hybrids the Compass could not answer, and the RAV4 was brand new for 2019. The low $23,590 headline evaporates once you want an automatic and any driver assistance, at which point the car simply matches rivals rather than undercutting them. Trailhawk off-road hardware is the one genuinely good-value part of the range.

Trim & configuration breadth72
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

Configuration choice is a genuine strength: Sport, Upland, Latitude, Altitude, Latitude Sun/Wheel, Limited, High Altitude and Trailhawk spanning roughly $23,600 to $31,400 delivered, with front- or four-wheel drive, a six-speed manual on the base car, and a Trailhawk that is properly Trail Rated rather than an appearance grade. New for 2019 were the Upland special edition and a High Altitude Appearance Package with 19-inch wheels and navigation. The one real gap is powertrain — a single engine, no hybrid or diesel in the US range.

Sales popularity & market acceptance62
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

143,933 US deliveries in calendar 2019 is the nameplate's second-best year on record and a genuinely strong mid-pack result in a huge segment — but it is a 16% fall from the 171,167 peak of 2018, the first year of a decline that ran unbroken to 75,642 by 2021. It also remained far behind the RAV4 and CR-V, both of which cleared 380,000.

Brand desirability & image60
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

Jeep's off-road halo was strong in 2019 — the Wrangler carried the badge and the Gladiator arrived that year — and the Compass trades on it with available 4x4 and a Trail Rated Trailhawk no CR-V or RAV4 can answer. But the Compass sits at the soft end of that badge, and FCA's quality and appeal rankings were middling to poor over this period, so the brand lifts the car without carrying it.

Deals & incentive availability74
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

A slow-moving Compass in a pre-pandemic buyer's market was heavily discounted: FCA was among the industry's most aggressive spenders, stacking retail consumer cash of up to $1,500, seasonal Black Friday cash and Chrysler Capital lease allowances on top of large dealer discounts. Industry incentive spending hit a then-record monthly average near $4,599 per vehicle in December 2019, and a buyer who negotiated could take well over $4,000 off a Latitude — real money for the buyer, even though it signals weak demand.

Model freshness58
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 is the third year of the second-generation (MP/552) Compass launched for 2017, so the car was still comfortably mid-cycle with no successor in public view, and the year brought real content rather than a pure carry-over — standard 7-inch Uconnect on volume trims, adaptive cruise in the Advanced Safety Group, the Upland edition and a new High Altitude Appearance Package. It sits fresher than the 2020 and 2021 cars, but the underlying design and its single non-hybridized engine were already behind the all-new 2019 RAV4 and the 2019 Forester.

Critical reception & awards35
#28 of 28 in classCompare all →

Professional verdicts on the 2019 Compass sit near the bottom of a deep class: U.S. News ranked it 14th of 16 affordable compact SUVs at 7.0/10 and called it 'not a very good used compact SUV', and Consumer Reports criticized handling that 'lacks agility' and an interior of 'cheap plastics and sharp, unfinished edges'. It won no NACTOY, Car and Driver 10Best or MotorTrend award, and although it earned Good ratings in all six IIHS crash tests plus a Superior front-crash-prevention rating with the optional system, Marginal-to-Poor headlights kept it off the Top Safety Pick list — an award the refreshed 2022 car did go on to win.