MotorGPA
Find My Match
vs 2018:Overall +3Safety +2Reliability +1Efficiency & Range 0Cost of Ownership -1Technology +7Driving Experience 0
Mazda logo
Compact SUV

2019 Mazda CX-5

MainstreamGas
Manufacturer site ↗
2025 model shown
2.03CGPA / 4.0
Overall GPA
Reliability
2.28C
Safety
3.16B
EfficiencyGas
1.72C-
26 MPG combined · 398 mi range · $2,350/yr energy
Comfort
1.22D
Value
3.27B+
Ownership Cost
2.61C+
Technology
0.74F
Driving Experience
3.04B

The verdict

A mixed-report compact suv, strong on value and held back by performance.

The 2019 CX-5 is the compact SUV you buy because you actually like driving — quick 2.7-turn steering, a genuinely nice cabin at Touring money (about $29,060 as most people bought it), a 5-star NHTSA result and IIHS Top Safety Pick+. The catch is specific and serious: 88 of this model year's 265 NHTSA complaints describe the naturally aspirated 2.5's cylinder head cracking, with owner repair quotes running $5,262 to $10,655, and Mazda's warranty extension covers only the turbo engine — not the one in the Sport, Touring and Grand Touring trims most buyers own. Practicality is the other compromise: 30.9 cu ft behind the rear seats and 59.6 cu ft folded are near the bottom of the class, and there is no hybrid. As a used buy in 2026 this is a great-driving bargain only if you get service records showing the head has already been replaced, or you budget for it.

Jump to scores

Strengths

  • Drives like nothing else in the class
  • Cabin materials that punch above the price
  • Top-tier crash results and standard blind-spot monitoring

What holds it back

  • The cracked cylinder head — this year's defining problem
  • Cargo space near the bottom of the segment
  • Slow in the trim almost everyone bought

Top alternatives

Cars shoppers cross-shop with the Mazda CX-5

Production history

2013present · 14 years · 3 generations
SCORED WINDOW · last 10 yearsGen 1201320162013Gen 2201720252017Gen 32026now2026In production2026 — graded2025 — graded2024 — graded2023 — graded2022 — graded2021 — graded2020 — graded2019 — graded2018 — graded2017 — gradedProduction began 2013

How it's evolved

10 scored model years · 20172026

025507510020172018201920202021202220232024202520262017 · Overall: 552018 · Overall: 57 (+2 vs 2017)2019 · Overall: 60 (+3 vs 2018)2020 · Overall: 602021 · Overall: 62 (+2 vs 2020)2022 · Overall: 63 (+1 vs 2021)2023 · Overall: 64 (+1 vs 2022)2024 · Overall: 65 (+1 vs 2023)2025 · Overall: 62 (−3 vs 2024)2026 · Overall: 65 (+3 vs 2025)

Subject scores by year

Hover or tap a score to see what moved it versus the year before. A corner mark flags a big swing.

YearPerformanceEfficiencySafetySpaceCostReliabilityTechUse-caseDrivingValue
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Compare two years

vs
Performance29
31+2
Efficiency54
55+1
Safety57
77+20
Space47
55+8
Cost73
63-10
Reliability73
75+3
Tech34
77+43
Use-case56
63+7
Driving74
73-1
Value71
70-1

Best fit & conditions

FamilyC+67/100
CommuterC+67/100
Winter / inclementC60/100
AdventureC60/100
Work / TowF38/100

Higher scores mean a better fit for that use case. Learn more about use-case fit →

Trims & configurations

5 trims

Scores above reflect the volume trim. Per-trim specs and scores are rolling out — the full lineup:

S Select · baseS PreferredS Carbon EditionS PremiumS Premium Plus

Detailed scoring by subject

1Performance & PowertrainThe CX-5's lowest-graded category.0.35F
Horsepower
187 hp @ 6,000 rpm (Skyactiv-G 2.5 with cylinder deactivation — volume Sport/Touring/Grand Touring); 227 hp on 87 AKI / 250 hp on 93 AKI with the new-for-2019 2.5T, 168 hp with the mid-year Skyactiv-D 2.2 diesel
9/100
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

The three volume 2019 trims (Sport, Touring, Grand Touring) all run the naturally aspirated Skyactiv-G 2.5 at 187 hp; the newly added 2.5T is confined to the AWD-only Grand Touring Reserve and Signature trims. Modest output against a 150–550 hp SUV band.

Torque
186 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm (2.5 non-turbo); 310 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm with the 2.5T, 290 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm with the Skyactiv-D diesel
15/100
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

The non-turbo 2.5's 186 lb-ft peaks high at 4,000 rpm, so low-end pull is unremarkable and the engine must be revved to merge. Both 2019 alternatives transform this — the turbo's 310 lb-ft and the diesel's 290 lb-ft both arrive at 2,000 rpm — but neither is the volume configuration.

0–60 mph time
≈8.7 s (2.5 non-turbo, i-Activ AWD — volume config); ≈8.6 s FWD, ≈7.0 s with the 2.5T, ≈9.6 s with the diesel
13/100
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

Instrumented testing of the non-turbo CX-5 clusters at 8.6–8.8 seconds to 60 mph, slow-to-mid-pack for a 2019 compact SUV; the new turbo cuts that to roughly 7 seconds while the diesel is the slowest of the three. Mazda publishes no 0–60 figure for the CX-5, only top speed, so this necessarily comes from third-party tests.

Powertrain refinement70
#11 of 28 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.5 is linear and completely lag-free with clean, progressive throttle response — a genuine refinement edge over the small-displacement turbos most 2019 rivals fielded — but it is short on low-end torque and sounds strained when wrung out for a highway merge. Cylinder deactivation transitions are unobtrusive; 2019 brings no powertrain-NVH work (the road-noise reduction package arrives for 2020).

Transmission behavior77
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda's Skyactiv-Drive six-speed automatic stands out in a class that had largely moved to CVTs and 8-to-9-speed units: it holds gears decisively, downshifts promptly, and never hunts or drones, with a genuinely usable manual-shift and Sport mode. Only six ratios costs a little highway efficiency rather than driveability; it rates just under the 2020 car because paddle shifters were not yet offered on any 2019 trim.

Max towing capacity
3,500 lbs (Signature Skyactiv-D diesel, AWD — the maximum any 2019 CX-5 is rated for); 2,000 lbs for every gas trim
36/100
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 is the one CX-5 model year rated above 2,000 lbs: the mid-year Skyactiv-D Signature carries a 3,500-lb rating on the strength of its 290 lb-ft, and this item takes the maximum in any configuration. A buyer in a volume gas trim still gets only 2,000 lbs — enough for a small utility trailer or a pair of jet skis — so the headline figure overstates what most CX-5s can pull.

AWD/4WD availability65
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

i-Activ AWD spans the whole 2019 range — optional on Sport, Touring and Grand Touring, standard on the AWD-only Grand Touring Reserve, Signature and diesel Signature — and it is a sophisticated predictive system that pre-empts slip rather than reacting to it. It rates just below the 2020 car because FWD remains the default on the three volume trims and 2019 has no Off-road Traction Assist anywhere in the lineup.

Off-road capability25
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

Firmly pavement-oriented: 7.5 inches of unladen ground clearance, no low range, no locking differentials, no skid plates and no off-road trim. 2019 is a notch below even the 2020 car, which at least offered brake-based Off-road Traction Assist on its top two trims — for 2019 the CX-5's only traction provision beyond i-Activ AWD is standard stability and traction control.

Powertrain lineup breadth60
#2 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 is the broadest powertrain lineup the CX-5 ever offered in the US — three genuinely distinct engines: the 187-hp naturally aspirated 2.5, the new 227/250-hp 2.5T, and the mid-year 168-hp/290-lb-ft Skyactiv-D 2.2 diesel. It stays mid-band rather than higher because there is no electrified option at all in a segment where the RAV4 Hybrid was already established, and the diesel was a single $41,000 AWD Signature that sold in tiny numbers before being withdrawn.

2Efficiency & RangeMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.72C-
Combined fuel economy
26 MPG combined (2.5 non-turbo, i-Activ AWD — volume config); 28 MPG combined FWD, 24 MPG combined with the 2.5T AWD, 28 MPG combined with the Skyactiv-D diesel AWD
59/100
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

26 MPG combined for the volume non-turbo AWD build is competitive among gas-only compact SUVs — the 13.0:1 high-compression Skyactiv-G with cylinder deactivation earns real economy from a naturally aspirated engine — but it trails the hybrid RAV4 variants that already led this segment's efficiency ranking in 2019.

City fuel economy
24 MPG city (2.5 non-turbo AWD); 25 MPG city FWD, 22 MPG city with the 2.5T AWD, 27 MPG city with the diesel
63/100
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

24 MPG in town is solid for a non-hybrid AWD compact SUV, helped by cylinder deactivation and i-Stop auto start/stop, though stop-and-go commuting is exactly where the segment's hybrids pull decisively ahead.

Highway fuel economy
30 MPG highway (2.5 non-turbo AWD); 31 MPG highway FWD, 27 MPG highway with the 2.5T AWD, 30 MPG highway with the diesel
63/100
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

30 MPG highway is a respectable cruising figure for an AWD compact SUV; the Skyactiv-Drive six-speed's lack of a tall eighth or ninth ratio costs it a couple of MPG against rivals carrying more gears.

Driving range
≈398 mi (15.3-gal AWD tank × 26 MPG combined); ≈414 mi FWD on its 14.8-gal tank, ≈367 mi for the 2.5T AWD, ≈429 mi for the diesel
37/100
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 15.3-gallon tank caps range here rather than the engine — roughly 400 miles per fill falls short of the 450–500 miles the segment's hybrids and larger-tank rivals manage, so a long trip needs an extra stop. The diesel is the only 2019 CX-5 to clear 400 miles by a meaningful margin.

Estimated annual fuel cost
$2,350/yr (2.5 non-turbo AWD, 15,000 mi/yr on regular unleaded); $2,200/yr FWD, $2,550/yr for the 2.5T AWD, $2,750/yr for the diesel
52/100
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mid-pack running cost for a gas compact SUV, and it takes regular-grade fuel throughout — but the EPA figure runs several hundred dollars a year above a hybrid RAV4 over the same 15,000 miles. The diesel is the most expensive 2019 CX-5 to feed despite its better economy, because diesel fuel costs more per gallon than regular.

Fuel requirements90
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda specifies regular 87-octane unleaded for every gas 2019 CX-5, including the new turbo — the 2.5T simply detunes from 250 hp to 227 hp on regular rather than requiring premium, so there is no mandatory fuel-cost penalty on any volume trim. Shy of full marks because turbo buyers wanting the advertised output must pay for 93 octane, and the Signature diesel needs 44-cetane diesel, which is pricier and less widely stocked.

3SafetyOne of the CX-5's strongest categories.3.16B
NHTSA overall rating
5 stars overall (FWD and AWD)
100/100
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

Both 2019 CX-5 body configurations earned NHTSA's maximum five-star overall rating, with five stars in every frontal and side measure and four stars for rollover.

IIHS awards & crashworthiness90
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 CX-5 was an IIHS Top Safety Pick+ — its sixth straight top award — with Good results in all six crashworthiness tests including both driver- and passenger-side small overlap. Only the headlight qualifier (specific LED units) kept the award from applying to every trim.

Standard ADAS suite breadth78
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda made blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, a rear camera and low-speed Advanced Smart City Brake Support standard on every 2019 trim — unusually generous for the segment at the time — and the volume Touring adds the full i-Activsense set (full-speed Smart Brake Support, radar cruise with stop & go, lane departure warning, lane-keep assist, high beam control) as standard. The base Sport still needs the optional i-Activsense package for adaptive cruise and lane keeping, which holds it out of the top band.

Automatic emergency braking performance76
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

With the Smart Brake Support system fitted to the volume Touring and above, IIHS rated front crash prevention Superior for vehicle-to-vehicle, avoiding collisions outright in both the 12 mph and 25 mph runs. Pedestrian detection earned only Advanced in the daytime test, and nighttime pedestrian evaluation did not yet exist, so this is strong contemporary AEB rather than modern full-coverage protection.

Blind-spot & cross-traffic coverage76
#1 of 28 in classCompare all →

Blind Spot Monitoring with Rear Cross Traffic Alert is standard on every 2019 CX-5 including the base Sport, which puts coverage ahead of most compact-SUV rivals of the period. Both are alert-only — no steering or braking intervention and no safe-exit warning — so it stops short of the top band.

Lane keeping & centering55
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Lane Departure Warning and Lane-Keep Assist are standard from Touring upward but optional on Sport, and Mazda's implementation is a corrective steering nudge at the lane edge rather than true lane centering. It works as a departure backstop; it does not hold the car in the middle of the lane the way the class leaders of the era did.

Adaptive cruise & highway assist72
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda Radar Cruise Control with Stop & Go is standard on Touring and above and covers the full speed range down to a standstill, resuming with a tap of the accelerator after the vehicle ahead moves off — genuinely useful in traffic. There is no combined highway-assist mode pairing it with lane centering, so it remains adaptive cruise plus a separate lane-departure backstop rather than an integrated system.

Hands-free driving availability0
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

No hands-free highway driving system was offered on any 2019 CX-5 trim. i-Activsense is hands-on driver assistance and requires continuous steering input.

Headlight performance62
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

Only the Grand Touring, Grand Touring Reserve and Signature received the curve-adaptive LED units IIHS rated Good — the trims that actually earned the TSP+ headlight qualifier. The volume Touring and the base Sport were rated Acceptable, so most buyers got the second-tier setup.

Outward visibility78
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

Thin windshield pillars, a raised seating position and door-mounted mirrors give the CX-5 clear forward and quartering-forward sightlines. The rising beltline and comparatively small rear side glass pinch the over-shoulder view, and the 360-degree View Monitor that would compensate was restricted to Signature, leaving the volume trims on a rear camera alone.

Child-seat (LATCH) usability72
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

IIHS rates the CX-5's LATCH hardware Acceptable rather than Good — the anchors are usable but set back in the seat bight and need some digging. Rear doors open wide and second-row space is competitive for a compact SUV, though the roughly 55-inch rear width makes three car seats across a squeeze.

4Space & ComfortOne of the CX-5's weakest categories.1.22D
Seating capacity
5 seats (every 2019 trim — Sport, Touring, Grand Touring, Grand Touring Reserve, Signature)
25/100
#10 of 28 in classCompare all →

The KF-generation CX-5 is a strictly two-row compact SUV; Mazda lists five-passenger seating as standard across all five 2019 trims with no third-row or captain's-chair option anywhere in the range.

Front headroom
39.7 in without moonroof (volume Touring as configured); 39.3 in with the power moonroof, which is a package item on Touring and standard from Grand Touring up
54/100
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda publishes front headroom both ways and the volume Touring does not carry the moonroof as standard equipment, so 39.7 in is the representative figure for the trim being scored.

Front legroom
41.0 in (a single figure across all 2019 trims)
22/100
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

Front legroom is quoted as one figure for the whole 2019 range and sits near the bottom of the compact-SUV band on paper, even though the low seating position and 57.1 in of front shoulder room make the cabin feel more generous than the number suggests.

Rear headroom
39.0 in (identical with or without the moonroof)
75/100
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

Second-row headroom is a genuine strength and, unusually for the class, the power moonroof costs nothing in the back — Mazda quotes 39.0 in for both roof configurations.

Rear legroom
39.6 in second-row legroom (Mazda quotes rear knee clearance separately at just 2.7 in)
80/100
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 39.6 in figure looks competitive on paper, but Mazda's own 2.7 in rear knee-clearance number and reviewers' repeated complaints show the raw legroom measurement flatters the back seat.

Third-row usability15
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 CX-5 is a two-row-only design with no third row offered on any trim, so it scores in the low band by definition; Mazda pushed buyers needing seven seats to the larger CX-9.

Cargo/trunk volume
30.9 cu ft behind the second row (SAE, all seats upright)
11/100
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

Behind-seat cargo is the CX-5's clearest packaging weakness — 30.9 cu ft trails class benchmarks like the CR-V and RAV4 by a wide margin and reviewers single it out as a reason to shop elsewhere.

Max cargo volume
59.6 cu ft with the 40/20/40 rear seatbacks folded
10/100
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

Seats-folded capacity of 59.6 cu ft is well short of the 70–80 cu ft the compact-SUV volume leaders offer, placing the CX-5 near the bottom of the segment band on maximum cargo.

In-cabin storage & clever solutions50
#24 of 28 in classCompare all →

Everyday storage is complete but entirely conventional — a covered console bin with tray, a rear armrest with integrated cup holders, bottle holders in all four doors, front seatback pockets and three 12V sockets — with no standout innovation, no underfloor cargo storage and, notably for 2019, no wireless charging pad on any trim.

Seat comfort66
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume Touring's heated leatherette seats with Lux Suede inserts and a 6-way power driver's seat with manual lumbar are well shaped and repeatedly praised up front, but the driver gets no power lumbar until Grand Touring and the rear bench is flat-bottomed with only 2.7 in of knee clearance.

Ride quality71
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

Firm but well-damped, and the volume Touring's 17-inch wheels on 225/65 tires ride noticeably better than the 19s fitted from Grand Touring up; reviewers called it one of the most comfortable rides in the segment while still noting it is firmer than most compact crossovers.

Cabin quietness70
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

Reviewers rated the 2019 car among the quietest non-luxury compact SUVs, with intrusion appearing mainly at highway speed — but this is the model year before Mazda's dedicated NVH revision, which arrived for 2020 and measurably improved road and wind noise across the trim range.

Climate & comfort features64
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume Touring covers the essentials — dual-zone automatic climate with rear vents and three-level heated front seats standard — but the heated steering wheel, heated rear seats and ventilated front seats are all bundled into the Grand Touring Premium package or standard only from GTR up, and the 2019 car has no factory remote pre-conditioning because it predates Mazda Connected Services.

5Cost of OwnershipMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.61C+
Base MSRP
$25,395 (Sport FWD, $24,350 + $1,045 destination; range to $37,935 Signature AWD)
99/100
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 CX-5 (third year of the KF second generation) opened at $24,350 plus $1,045 destination for the Sport FWD, an entry price right at the compact-SUV norm for the year and well under the class-wide SUV band.

Volume-Trim Price
$29,060 (Touring AWD: $26,615 + $1,400 AWD + $1,045 destination; Touring FWD $27,660)
95/100
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

Touring AWD was the 2019 volume configuration — the trim that added Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, dual-zone climate, power driver's seat and 19-inch wheels while staying under $30k as delivered.

5-Year Maintenance & Repair Cost
~$4,400 projected 5-yr maintenance + repair (~$880/yr; scheduled service plus wear items and expected repairs)
78/100
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated Skyactiv-G 2.5 is a simple, well-proven port/direct-injected four with a conventional six-speed automatic and no turbo, timing belt or CVT, and RepairPal ranks the CX-5 first out of 26 for its class on repair cost — servicing runs at or below the compact-SUV average.

5-Year Resale Value Retention
~60% of MSRP retained at 5 years (sources span 58–62%)
67/100
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

The CX-5 is a consistently strong residual performer for a non-Toyota mainstream SUV, and 2019 cars benefited further from the 2021–22 used-vehicle spike when they hit the three-to-four-year mark.

Basic warranty
3 yr / 36,000 mi bumper-to-bumper (transferable)
0/100
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda's standard New Vehicle Limited Warranty — the segment floor, matching Toyota, Honda, Ford and Nissan but far behind Hyundai/Kia's 5-year/60,000-mile basic coverage.

Powertrain warranty
5 yr / 60,000 mi powertrain (transferable); 5 yr / unlimited-mile corrosion perforation
0/100
#9 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda's 5/60 powertrain coverage is the mainstream minimum — half the 10-year/100,000-mile term Hyundai and Kia offered on comparable 2019 compact SUVs.

Complimentary maintenance & perks48
#16 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda offered no complimentary scheduled-maintenance program on the 2019 CX-5 — owners pay from the first oil change, unlike ToyotaCare (2 yr/25k) or Hyundai's plan on class rivals. What is included is 3-year/36,000-mile 24-hour Emergency Roadside Assistance running with the basic warranty, and on Grand Touring and above a Mazda Connected Services trial; that puts it just below the middle of the class rather than at the floor.

Effective 5-Year Ownership Cost
$16,024 (≈$11,624 depreciation + $4,400 maintenance)
87/100
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

$29,060 volume-trim price minus its estimated resale value after 5 years (60% retained, or about $17,436) leaves about $11,624 in depreciation. Add the projected $4,400 in 5-year maintenance and repairs, and owning this vehicle for 5 years costs about $16,024 in total.

6Reliability & QualityMid-pack among this car's ten categories.2.28C
Predicted reliability66
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

Two signals point in opposite directions and the negative one is specific to this model year. In its favour, complaint volume is still far below the competitive set — 265 NHTSA filings against 1,081 for the CR-V, 873 for the RAV4, 831 for the Forester, 574 for the Escape, 372 for the Tucson, 332 for the Rogue and 297 for the Equinox — J.D. Power still scores the 2019 car 82/100 for quality and reliability, and RepairPal ranks the nameplate 1st of 26 midsize SUVs. Against that, the 2019 file is not diffuse the way a healthy one is: 88 of the 265 filings name a cracked cylinder head, and Consumer Reports has walked back the 5/5 predicted-reliability forecast it issued when the car was new, replacing it on actual owner-survey returns with 'about average reliability compared to other cars from the same model year' and flagging Engine Major (cylinder-head replacement) alongside in-car electronics. This lands below the 73 the 2020 car earns and well below the 78 the 2022 car earns, because both the recall count and the engine-defect concentration are worse here than in any other year of the KF generation.

Brand reliability track record75
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Judged in the era this car was sold, Mazda's brand standing was strong and rising: Consumer Reports' November 2019 Annual Auto Reliability Survey placed Mazda 2nd of all brands, behind only Lexus and ahead of Toyota, and CR credited Mazda's conservatism — conventional torque-converter automatics rather than CVTs or nine- and ten-speeds. The long-run record has held up, with Mazda 3rd overall and 2nd among mass-market brands in the 2025 J.D. Power VDS at 161 PP100 and 3rd at CR for used 5-to-10-year-old reliability, so this is a durable reputation rather than a one-survey artifact. Two counterweights keep it out of the top band. Initial quality for this exact model year was clearly below average — 108 PP100 against a 93 PP100 industry average in the 2019 J.D. Power IQS — and when J.D. Power surveyed 2019-model-year owners at three years in the 2022 VDS, against a 192 PP100 industry average, Mazda was not among the named leaders. Slightly below the 78 the 2020 car earns, where CR's survey put Mazda 1st outright.

Recall & TSB history50
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

This is the worst recall-and-bulletin year of the KF generation, and it is the item that pulls the category down. The recall count itself is low in absolute terms — two campaigns against three for the Forester, Rogue and Escape, four for the Equinox, seven for the RAV4 and eight for the CR-V — but one of them, 19V497, is a powertrain-control-module software error that can stall the engine, which is a safety-relevant defect rather than a paperwork one, and the other, 21V875, replaces a low-pressure fuel pump whose impeller can crack and cause a stall. What puts this at the boundary of the failing band is that three separate systemic remedy programs all reach the 2019 model year on top of those recalls. Service alert SA-031-21, superseding SA-058/20, establishes a new cylinder head assembly for 2018-2021 CX-5s with the naturally aspirated 2.5 and cylinder deactivation — the volume engine — and routes dealers through a hotline because heads, gasket sets and partial engines were on national backorder. CSP11 extends the powertrain warranty to 10 years/120,000 miles for coolant leaks at the cylinder head, but only on 2019-2020 CX-5s with the 2.5T. And the Duffy v. Mazda Connect settlement plus CSP13 both name the 2016-2020 CX-5 for infotainment reboot, freeze and ghost-touch failures. A defect remedied fleet-wide by warranty extension or settlement is systemic in substance whether or not it was ever called a recall; here there are three of them, and the largest one leaves the volume engine uncovered.

Powertrain durability reputation48
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

The configuration actually scored is the naturally aspirated PY-series Skyactiv-G 2.5 (187 hp / 186 lb-ft) with cylinder deactivation, driving a Skyactiv-Drive six-speed torque-converter automatic — standard on Sport, Touring and Grand Touring, with the newly introduced 2.5T (250 hp / 310 lb-ft on premium) reserved for the also-new Grand Touring Reserve and Signature. On architecture alone that should score well: the engine has been in continuous production since the 2012 CX-5 and the conventional six-speed avoids the CVTs fitted to the CR-V, RAV4, Rogue and Forester. It scores in the failing band anyway because the field record for this specific year is dominated by one failure mode on precisely this engine. Eighty-eight of the year's 265 NHTSA filings describe the cylinder head cracking above the exhaust manifold and dumping pressurized oil onto hot exhaust, with owners reporting it from roughly 26,000 to 78,000 miles and dealer quotes running $5,262 to $10,655. Mazda's own service documentation restricts the remedy to '2.5 SKYACTIV G with cylinder deactivation only,' which is this engine and not the turbo — and unlike the 2.5T, which received a 10-year/120,000-mile extension under CSP11, the naturally aspirated car got no warranty extension at all, so owners pay. Secondary powertrain traffic reinforces the pattern: timing-cover and pan-gasket oil leaks, delayed and slipping shifts, torque-converter complaints, and a fuel pump that prompted a separate recall. The 2.5T alternative carries its own coolant-leak defect and was brand-new to the CX-5 this year, so neither engine in the 2019 lineup is a clean choice. Confidence is MEDIUM because the bulletin's scope and the absence of NA coverage are documented facts while the true failure rate is not — most of these engines do not crack, and RepairPal still ranks the nameplate first in its class.

Interior material quality87
#2 of 28 in classCompare all →

The cabin is the CX-5's clearest advantage over everything else in the compact-SUV class, and none of this model year's engine or electronics trouble touches the materials themselves. Reviewers in 2019 read the interior as out of place at the price — Edmunds made the high-quality interior a core reason for naming it a top pick among small SUVs, and Autoblog credited satin-finish accents, a quality headliner with wrapped pillars and restrained piano black. 2019 is also the year Mazda pushed the ceiling upward, adding the Signature trim with Nappa leather and genuine wood plus the Grand Touring Reserve beneath it. Held a point below the 88 the 2020 car earns and three below the post-refresh 2021-2022 cars because the 2021 update pushed better trim content and the larger centre display further down the range, and because the Sport and Touring trims most buyers actually take are noticeably plainer than the Signature the glowing copy usually describes.

Fit & finish71
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

Structural assembly is not in question. Every US CX-5 is built at Mazda's Ujina plant in Hiroshima, 2019 is the third year of the KF generation so the line is settled, and the 265-filing NHTSA record contains no panel-gap or misalignment cluster — only three filings touch STRUCTURE at all. What holds this to the low seventies, below the 74/76/78 the 2020, 2021 and 2022 cars earn, is reported quality on the measure that covers this exact build plus two component-quality problems. Mazda posted 108 PP100 in the 2019 J.D. Power IQS against a 93 PP100 industry average — a 16% shortfall, the widest relative gap of the generation. On top of that, Consumer Reports' owner survey for the 2019 car flags squeaks and rattles in the dashboard and windshield area, a direct fit-and-finish complaint absent from the adjacent years, and 40 of the year's filings describe the Mazda Connect display freezing, phantom-touching or placing calls unprompted, a digitizer defect large enough to be settled in court. This is a reported-quality and component-quality deduction rather than a build-integrity one, which is why it stays above the segment median.

Dealer & service network53
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Coverage density is the CX-5's standing ownership weakness, and 2019 is the least favourable year of the generation for it. Mazda has deliberately contracted its US network from 635 stores in 2014 to roughly 548, against about 1,246 Toyota and 1,076 Honda dealers, so a buyer outside a metro area faces a materially longer drive for warranty work than a RAV4 or CR-V owner — a real cost in a model year whose signature defect requires dealer diagnosis and a cylinder-head replacement. The Retail Evolution programme genuinely improves facility quality and throughput, but it upgrades existing stores rather than adding new ones, and during the 2019 model year it had not yet reached its 100th opening, which came in March 2020 — so fewer than one store in five had been through it when this car was new. A point below the 2020-2022 cars because the year's defining repair is the one Mazda declined to cover on the volume engine, and owners describe being quoted five figures with no goodwill: the service experience on this model year is worse than the network alone would predict.

Parts availability & repair cost68
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

Routine running costs are low and well documented — RepairPal puts the CX-5's average annual repair-and-maintenance spend at $447 against $573 for midsize SUVs and $652 across all vehicles, with low repair severity, below-average frequency and 0.3 unscheduled shop visits a year versus 0.4 for the class — and as Mazda's US volume leader the CX-5 has the deepest independent parts catalogue in the brand's range. What holds this below the normal band's upper reaches, and below the 70 the 2020 car earns, is that this year's characteristic repair is both expensive and poorly supported. Mazda's own service alert put cylinder heads, gasket sets and partial engines on hotline-controlled release because of a supply shortage; the repair itself carries no warranty extension on the naturally aspirated engine, unlike the 2.5T's 10-year/120,000-mile CSP11 coverage; and 2019 owners report the widest quote range of any year in the generation, from roughly $5,300 to $10,655. On the electronics side, CSP13 covers CMU diagnosis and replacement but not ghost-touch screen repair, leaving owners quoted several hundred dollars and up. Mazda's US volume also remains an order of magnitude below Toyota's and Honda's, leaving a thinner aftermarket and salvage supply than a RAV4 or CR-V equivalent.

7Technology & InfotainmentOne of the CX-5's weakest categories.0.74F
Touchscreen size
7.0 in full-color touchscreen — the only size offered on any 2019 trim, from Sport through Signature
0/100
#18 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 is the last CX-5 model year with a single 7-inch display across the entire range; the 8-inch screen arrived for 2020 on the top two trims and the 10.25-inch unit not until the 2021 refresh, so the volume Touring sits at the floor of the segment band.

Infotainment UX & responsiveness58
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda Connect pairs a rotary Commander knob with a touchscreen that is locked out above low speed, which keeps the driver's eyes up but frustrates passengers, and by 2019 the 7-inch panel's graphics and menu depth were visibly dated — reviewers listed the controls as a con.

Wireless CarPlay / Android Auto52
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

Phone projection was new for 2019 and is standard on the volume Touring and above, but it is wired only — no wireless projection exists on any trim — and the base Sport does without it entirely.

Voice control & native navigation44
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

Voice control is a rigid command-word system rather than natural language, and although 2019 makes factory navigation standard from Grand Touring up — better coverage than 2020, which pushed it to Signature only — the volume Touring has no built-in nav at all, and Mazda deliberately deleted nav from the Touring Preferred Equipment package for this model year.

Audio system quality65
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume Touring's six-speaker system is merely adequate, but the Bose 10-speaker setup with Centerpoint 2 and AudioPilot 2 is a genuinely good premium option — available in the Touring Preferred Equipment package and standard from Grand Touring up.

Digital instrument cluster42
#15 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume Touring runs analog gauges with only a small four-function trip-computer display; the 7-inch LCD Multi-Information Display was new for 2019 but confined to Grand Touring and above, and even that is a partial-digital arrangement rather than a true configurable full-digital cluster.

OTA update capability15
#22 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 CX-5 has no over-the-air update capability of any kind — there is no embedded modem, and infotainment or map updates require a dealer visit or a purchased SD card.

Companion app & remote functions26
#27 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda Connected Services did not reach the CX-5 until the 2021 model year, so there is no factory app-based lock/unlock, vehicle status or locate; the only remote capability is Mazda Mobile Start, a port- or dealer-installed subscription smartphone remote-start accessory, with the MyMazda app otherwise limited to service scheduling and owner information.

Charging ports & device power42
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

Port count is reasonable for 2019 — four USB inputs (two front, two rear) on Touring and up plus three 12V sockets — but every port is legacy USB-A, the base Sport gets only two, and there is no wireless charging pad and no household AC outlet on any trim.

Keyless & remote access58
#23 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume Touring has Mazda Advanced Keyless Entry with push-button start, but the power liftgate is a package item on Touring, and there is no hands-free liftgate, no phone-as-key and no factory remote start anywhere in the 2019 range — remote start is an accessory only.

Camera & parking aids38
#26 of 28 in classCompare all →

A rearview camera is standard on every trim, but the 2019 CX-5 confines both the 360-degree view monitor and front/rear parking sensors to the single range-topping Signature — the volume Touring gets no parking sensors from the factory at all, and there is no parking automation anywhere in the range.

Head-up display availability55
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Active Driving Display is a proper full-color windshield-projected HUD with traffic sign recognition rather than a flip-up plate, but it is unavailable on the volume Touring — a Grand Touring Premium package item and standard only from Grand Touring Reserve up.

8Use-Case FitMid-pack among this car's ten categories.1.89C-
Kid & car-seat practicality62
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

Full LATCH provision, a genuinely useful 40/20/40 one-touch folding and reclining rear seatback, a wide 44.3-inch tailgate opening and a low 29.4-inch lift-over height help daily family logistics, but 30.9 cu ft behind the seats is tight for a stroller plus groceries and Mazda's own 2.7-inch rear knee clearance makes rear-facing seats a squeeze.

Family safety package78
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

The volume Touring carries the full i-ActivSense suite standard — radar cruise with stop-and-go, pedestrian-detecting AEB, lane-keep assist, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert — on top of a 5-star NHTSA result and IIHS Top Safety Pick+, but 2019 still charges the cheapest Sport trim a package for most of that suite (unlike 2020, which made it standard), the TSP+ award requires the uprated headlights fitted only from Grand Touring up, and there is no rear-occupant reminder.

Family road-trip comfort63
#14 of 28 in classCompare all →

Rear-seat amenities on the volume Touring are decent for the class — rear climate vents, two rear USB ports, a rear armrest with integrated cup holders and a reclining seatback — but there is no rear entertainment or rear window shade, the bench is flat-bottomed, and luggage space with four aboard is the car's weakest dimension.

Daily driving ease72
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

Radar cruise with stop-and-go is standard on the volume Touring, which is a real traffic-jam asset at this price, the conventional six-speed automatic is smooth and decisive rather than a droning CVT, and light steering effort plus a tight 36-foot turning circle keep low-speed work easy; the 187 hp naturally aspirated 2.5 is merely adequate rather than effortless.

Commuting cost efficiency58
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

26 MPG combined on regular unleaded with cheap conventional consumables is unremarkable but inoffensive for a compact AWD crossover; with no hybrid anywhere in the 2019 CX-5 range it is clearly beaten per mile by hybridized rivals such as the RAV4 Hybrid.

Parking & maneuverability68
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

A compact 179.1-inch footprint, 72.5-inch width and a tight 36.0-foot curb-to-curb circle with only 2.7 turns lock-to-lock make it easy to thread and park, but the volume Touring is helped only by a rearview camera — parking sensors and the 360-degree monitor are Signature-exclusive for 2019.

Work capability30
#21 of 28 in classCompare all →

A 2,000 lb tow rating on every gas trim, roughly 1,045 lb of payload and 59.6 cu ft of maximum enclosed cargo make this a light-duty personal vehicle rather than a work tool — there is no bed, no heavy-duty option and no factory towing package.

Durability for work duty56
#7 of 28 in classCompare all →

The Skyactiv-G 2.5 and conventional six-speed torque-converter automatic are a proven, low-drama combination that should survive hard commuting, but this is a car-based unibody crossover with carpeted floors and leatherette trim and effectively no commercial-fleet track record.

Jobsite & upfit practicality32
#12 of 28 in classCompare all →

Provisions are limited to a switched cargo lamp and three 12V sockets — there is no AC inverter or onboard power, no washable load floor, and roof rails, crossbars, a hitch and cargo trays are all dealer or port accessories rather than factory options.

Long-distance comfort & range65
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

One of the quieter cabins in the non-luxury compact class, a composed if firm ride and standard radar cruise with stop-and-go make it a pleasant tourer with roughly 400 miles between fills, held back by a flat-bottomed rear bench, no driver's power lumbar on the volume trim and lane-keep assist that nudges rather than centers.

Outdoor & adventure capability53
#19 of 28 in classCompare all →

Optional i-Activ AWD and fold-flat rear seats handle gravel roads, trailheads and bike racks without complaint, but 7.5 inches of ground clearance, a 2,000 lb tow limit, road-biased all-season tires and no low-range mean it is not a genuine adventure enabler — and 2019 predates even the Off-road Traction Assist that 2020 added to the turbo trims.

Gear & luggage flexibility58
#20 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 40/20/40 one-touch split is unusually flexible for the class — long items pass through the center section while two passengers stay seated — and the 44.3-inch tailgate opening over a low 29.4-inch threshold loads easily, with a broad roof-rack accessory catalog behind it, but 59.6 cu ft maximum is small for a compact SUV and rails and a hitch cost extra.

9Driving ExperienceOne of the CX-5's strongest categories.3.04B
Handling & agility78
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

The 2019 CX-5 was routinely called the sharpest-handling mainstream compact SUV, and this is the model year G-Vectoring Control Plus arrived as standard on every trim, adding a yaw moment through the brakes to steady corner exit on top of independent suspension with stabilizer bars at both ends.

Steering feel79
#2 of 28 in classCompare all →

Steering is the standout control in the car — a quick 15.5:1 ratio needing only 2.7 turns lock-to-lock, with reviewers describing genuine precision and feedback, a rarity among electrically assisted crossover racks.

Braking confidence74
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

An instrumented 182-foot stop from 70 mph for the AWD car is respectable for a compact SUV on all-season tires, and pedal feel from the ventilated-front/solid-rear disc setup is firm and progressive.

Powertrain smoothness & response73
#6 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda's decision to keep a conventional six-speed torque-converter automatic pays off in clean, decisive shifts and linear tip-in with none of the rubber-band drone of the CVTs most rivals used, and the 2.5's cylinder deactivation transitions imperceptibly; 2019 predates the paddle shifters added for 2020.

Drivetrain noise & vibration63
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

The naturally aspirated 2.5 in the volume Touring turns coarse and buzzy when worked hard, and 2019 predates both Mazda's across-the-range NVH revision and the Engine Harmonics Enhancer that sweetened the engine note — each of which arrived for 2020.

Turning circle
36.0 ft curb-to-curb (38.7 ft wall-to-wall); Mazda quotes the same figure for every 2019 trim
75/100
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

A 36.0-foot curb-to-curb circle is genuinely tight for a compact SUV and pairs with quick 2.7-turn steering to make the car easy in car parks and on narrow streets.

Driving position & ergonomics76
#8 of 28 in classCompare all →

Mazda's low-cowl, driver-centric layout with a tilt-and-telescopic column, a 6-way power driver's seat with manual lumbar on the volume Touring and the Commander knob falling naturally to hand is a segment strength; the lack of power lumbar below Grand Touring and the small 7-inch screen are the compromises.

Fun-to-drive factor74
#4 of 28 in classCompare all →

Reviewers consistently named the 2019 CX-5 the compact SUV to buy if you actually enjoy driving, on the strength of its steering and chassis; the 187 hp naturally aspirated engine in the volume trim — 8.8 seconds to 60 mph in AWD form — is the limiting factor, with the new 2.5T reserved for the two top trims.

10Value & Market PositionThe CX-5's best-graded category.3.27B+
Standard equipment generosity78
#3 of 28 in classCompare all →

The $24,350 Sport is unusually well equipped for a base compact SUV: LED headlights and taillights, Blind Spot Monitoring with Rear Cross Traffic Alert, Smart City Brake Support (low-speed AEB), push-button start, a 7-inch Mazda Connect touchscreen with commander knob and a leather-wrapped wheel are all standard — blind-spot monitoring in particular was still an extra-cost or higher-trim item on a 2019 CR-V LX and Rogue S. It falls short of a clean sweep because full i-Activsense (radar cruise, lane-keep, auto high beams) stayed a package on Sport, and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — new for 2019 — was standard only from Touring up, a dealer-installed retrofit below that.

Feature value per dollar78
#2 of 28 in classCompare all →

The CX-5's content-per-dollar case is qualitative rather than checklist-driven: for CR-V money it delivers a materials and refinement level reviewers repeatedly called near-premium, plus class-best steering and body control, and from 2019 the 250-hp/310-lb-ft 2.5T gives near-luxury thrust at $34,870 — genuinely underpriced against a similarly quick German compact SUV. It gives back some ground on raw utility, with less cargo volume and rear legroom than a CR-V or RAV4 at the same price, and no hybrid option in 2019.

Trim & configuration breadth78
#5 of 28 in classCompare all →

Five trims spanning $24,350 to $36,890 — Sport, Touring, Grand Touring, the new Grand Touring Reserve and the new range-topping Signature — with FWD or AWD ($1,400) on every one and, from 2019, a genuine second powertrain in the 2.5T. Mazda also added a Skyactiv-D 2.2 diesel Signature during the model year. The gap is at the bottom: no manual, no work-grade stripper, and the turbo is locked to the two priciest trims.

Sales popularity & market acceptance72
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 was the CX-5's best US sales year ever at 154,545 units, up 2.6% year over year and comfortably Mazda's number-one seller — a rising trajectory in a segment where several rivals were flat or falling. It is still a clear second tier in absolute volume, roughly a third of the RAV4's and CR-V's numbers, so it is a strong performer rather than the segment leader.

Brand desirability & image74
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

By 2019 Mazda had built a distinct, well-liked image as the enthusiast's mainstream brand and was actively pushing upmarket — the CX-5 Signature was the clearest expression of it. That reputation supports satisfaction and residuals above the mainstream norm, but Mazda's small US dealer network and modest scale keep it short of the unquestioned trust Toyota and Honda carry in this segment.

Deals & incentive availability66
#17 of 28 in classCompare all →

A normal pre-pandemic market: 2019 CX-5s transacted below sticker with routine dealer discounts and Mazda Financial Services subvented APR and lease programs, plus loyalty and military bonus cash — real buyer leverage, but nothing like the clear-out rebates on an end-of-cycle rival such as the 2019 Escape, because the CX-5 was selling at a record pace and Mazda was deliberately holding down incentive spend to protect its move upmarket.

Model freshness75
#13 of 28 in classCompare all →

2019 is year three of the second-generation KF CX-5 (launched for 2017) and is a substantive change year rather than a carry-over: the Skyactiv-G 2.5T engine, the Grand Touring Reserve and Signature trims, G-Vectoring Control Plus, a reworked upper interior and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto all arrive. Mid-cycle but freshly updated, with no redesign looming — the KF generation ran through 2025.

Critical reception & awards88
#2 of 28 in classCompare all →

Among the most decorated compact SUVs of its year: Car and Driver named it to the 2019 10Best Trucks and SUVs list ahead of the Forester and Wrangler, and it took a 2019 IIHS Top Safety Pick+ — its sixth consecutive IIHS top award. Reviewers routinely called it the best-driving and best-finished vehicle in the class; the reservations were cargo space, rear-seat room and an infotainment system without a touchscreen at speed, which is what keeps it from a clean sweep of comparison tests against the RAV4 and CR-V on pure practicality.